UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

 

 

 

Filed by the Registrant  ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

 Preliminary Proxy Statement.

 Confidential, for use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)).

 Definitive Proxy Statement.

 Definitive Additional Materials.

 Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12.

Avon Products, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

 No fee required.

 Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

  

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

     

(2)

  

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

     

(3)

  

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

     

(4)

  

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

     

(5)

  

Total fee paid:

 

 

 

 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

  

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

     

(2)

  

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

     

(3)

  

Filing Party:

 

 

     

(4)

  

Date Filed:

 

 

     

 

 

 


 

LOGOLOGO

A V O N

 

 

LOGO


LOGO

March 30, 2017

April 2, 2019

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

It is my pleasure to invite you to join me, the Board of Directors, senior leaders, and current and former employees at the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in White Plains,New York, New York. Details regarding admission to the meeting and the business to be conducted are more fully described in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement.

We hope that you will join us in person, but whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, your vote is important. I encourage you to vote by telephone, by internet or by signing, dating, and returning your proxy card by mail. Voting instructions are found on page 6 of the Proxy Statement.

On behalf of the Board of Directors and Avon management, thank you for your investment and interest in Avon.

 

          Sincerely yours,
 LOGOLOGO
          Sheri McCoyJan Zijderveld
          Chief Executive Officer


AVON PRODUCTS, INC.

Building 6, Chiswick Park

London W4 5HR

United Kingdom

NOTICEYOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT – YOU CAN VOTE IN ONE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

DATE & TIME:    

Tuesday, May 9, 2017

9:00 a.m.

PLACE:

The Ritz-Carlton

New York, Westchester

3 Renaissance Square,

White Plains, NY 10601

Salon III

RECORD DATE:

March 20, 2017

    Meeting Agenda

    1        

Elect as directors the eight nominees named in the Proxy Statement;

    2

Hold anon-binding,FOUR WAYS: advisory vote to approve compensation of our named executive officers;

    3

Hold anon-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of the executive compensation advisory vote;

    4

Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, United Kingdom, as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017; and

    5

Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

 

LOGO 

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT – YOU CAN VOTE IN ONE OF FOUR WAYS:

LOGO 

  LOGO

LOGO
 LOGO

 

VIA THE INTERNET

Visit the website listed on your

proxy card

 

 

LOGOBY TELEPHONE

Call the telephone

number on your proxy card

 

 

BY MAIL

Sign, date and return your proxy

card in the enclosed envelope

 

  LOGO

BY TELEPHONE

Call the telephone number on your proxy card

LOGO

 

IN PERSON

Attend the Annual Meeting

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other record holder, follow the voting instructions on the form that you receive from them. The availability of telephone and internet voting will depend on their voting process.

    Meeting Agenda

1   Elect as directors the eight nominees named in the Proxy Statement;

2   Hold anon-binding, advisory vote to approve compensation of our named executive officers;

3   Approve the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan;

4   Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, United Kingdom, as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019; and

5   Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

 

 

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Thursday, May 16, 2019

9:00 a.m.

Convene

810 Seventh Ave

22nd Floor

New York, NY 10019

How to Attend the Meeting

If you plan to attend the meeting in person, please see page 6 for admission requirements.

The record date for the meeting is March 27, 2019. This means that you are entitled to receive notice of meeting and vote your shares at the meeting if you were a shareholder of record as of the close of business on March 27, 2019.

By order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

LOGO

Ginny Edwards

Vice President & Corporate Secretary

March 30, 2017

April 2, 2019

 

Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the shareholder meeting to be held on May 9, 2017:16, 2019:

Our Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available atwww.edocumentview.com/avpavp.

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

30  

EXECUTIVE OFFICERSLetter from the Committee Chair

  23 

31  

OWNERSHIP OF SHARESCompensation Discussion and Analysis

  25 

33  

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONSCompensation and Risk Management

  27 

55  

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

29        

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

30        

Letter from the Committee Chair31        
Compensation Discussion and Analysis32        
Compensation and Risk Management51        
Compensation and Management Development Committee Report  52 
56  Executive Compensation Tables53 

Executive Compensation Tables

57  
PROPOSAL 2 – ANNUAL ADVISORY VOTE TO
APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
71  
PROPOSAL 3 – APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN73  
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

  6683   

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT84  
PROPOSAL 4 – RATIFICATION OF THE
APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
86  
SOLICITING MATERIAL88  
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES88  

PROPOSAL 2—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR

2020 ANNUAL ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONMEETING

  6788   

INFORMATION REQUESTS88  

PROPOSAL 3—ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ADVISORY VOTEAppendix A

  69 

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

A-1  
 70        

PROPOSAL 4—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

72        

SOLICITING MATERIAL

74        

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

74        

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2018 ANNUAL MEETING

74        

INFORMATION REQUESTS

74        

LOGO


PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in the Proxy Statement and in Avon Products, Inc.’s (“Avon,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. This summary is not a complete description and you should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting. Proxy materials were first sent to shareholders on or about March 30, 2017.April 2, 2019.

Meeting Agenda

 

  Matter

 

Board Vote

Recommendation

 

Page Reference  

(for more detail)  

PROPOSAL 1

 

Election of the eight Director Nominees named in this  Proxy Statement

FOR EACH NOMINEE

  9

PROPOSAL 2

 

 

FOR EACH NOMINEE

10

  PROPOSAL 2

AnnualNon-Binding, Advisory Vote to Approve Compensation of our Named Executive Officers

FOR

67

PROPOSAL 3

 

 

Non-Binding, Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Executive Compensation Advisory Vote

ONE YEAR

69

PROPOSAL 4FOR

 

 

71

  PROPOSAL 3

Approval of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan

FOR

73

  PROPOSAL 4

Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, United Kingdom, as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2017

2019

 

FOR

 72

86

Board and Governance Highlights

The Company has adopted many leading governance practices that establish strong independent leadership in our boardroom and provide our shareholders with meaningful rights. Highlights include:

 

The Company has adopted many leading governance practices that establish strong independent leadership in our boardroom and provide our shareholders with meaningful rights. Highlights include:

    Since 2016, over 60% Board member refreshment including new Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) in 2018

Annual election of directors

Non-executive Chairman of the Board and Lead Independent Director

 

    All directors are independent other than CEO

Proxy Access

Majority vote standard with resignation policy for election of directors in uncontested elections

All directors are independent other than CEO

Directors may serve on limited number of other public boards

    Regular Executive Sessions of independent directors

    Annual board and committee evaluations

No supermajority voting with respect to common stock, except as provided under New York Business Corporation law

Since 2012, 90% Board member refreshment including 5 new directors in 2016

 

Several    Compensation: Many compensation best practices, including double-triggerchange-in-control benefits, no excise tax reimbursements forchange-in-control payments, prohibition against hedging and pledging common stock, claw-back policy, stock ownership guidelines and certain holding period requirements

 

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

TENURE AVERAGE: 4 Years

AVERAGE AGE:         61

 

 

LOGO  LOGOLOGO

Board Independence Board Tenure Board Gender Median Age: 59 Average Age: 59

LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  1


Board Nominees and Designees

The following table provides summary information about each director nominated for election toby our Board of Directors (the “Board”) to the Board at the 20172019 Annual Meeting (the(collectively, the “Director Nominees”) and each director elected to the Board by holders of our Series C Preferred Stock (the(collectively, the “Series C Designees”). Director Nominees are elected annually by a majority of the votes cast by our shareholders, voting together as a single class. The Series C Designees have been elected by the holders of our Series C Preferred Stock, voting separately as a class.

 

Nominees and Designees

Nominees and Designees

 

Committee Membership

 

Nominees and Designees

 

Committee Membership

 

Names 

Director  

Since  

 Independent1   

Other  

Public  

Boards  

 

Audit  

Committee  

 

Compensation  
and  

Management  

Development  

Committee  

 

 

Finance  

Committee  

 

Nominating  

and  

Corporate  

Governance  
Committee  

 

 

Director

Since

 Independent1 

Other

Public

Boards

 

Audit

Committee

 

Compensation

and

Management

Development

Committee

 

 

Finance

Committee

 

Nominating  

and  

Corporate  

Governance  

Committee  

 

Jose Armario

 2016 I 1  LOGO   

 

2016

 

 

 

I

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

LOGO

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

W. Don Cornwell2

 2002 I 2 LOGO  LOGO  LOGO LOGO 

 

2002

 

 

 

I

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

LOGO  LOGO

 

  

 

LOGO

 

 

 

LOGO   

 

Chan W. Galbato3,4

 2016 I 1 LOGO   LOGO 

 

2016

 

 

 

I

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

LOGO

 

   

 

LOGO   

 

Nancy Killefer

 2013 I 3  LOGO  LOGO 

 

2013

 

 

 

I

 

 

 

2

 

  

 

LOGO

 

  

 

LOGO   

 

Susan J. Kropf

 2015 I 3   LOGO  

 

2015

 

 

 

I

 

 

 

3

 

   LOGO

 

 

Steven F. Mayer4

 2016 I 2  LOGO  

Helen McCluskey

 2014 I 2  LOGO   

 

2014

 

 

 

I

 

 

 

3

 

  

 

LOGO

 

  

Sheri McCoy5

 2012  0    

Charles H. Noski

 2012 I 2 LOGO  LOGO   LOGO

Cathy D. Ross

 2016 I 1 LOGO  LOGO   

Andrew G. McMaster, Jr.

 

 

2018

 

 

 

I

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

LOGO  LOGO

 

   

James A. Mitarotonda

 

 

2018

 

 

 

I

 

 

 

2

 

   

 

LOGO

 

 

Michael F. Sanford4

 2016 I 0     LOGO   

 

2016

 

 

 

I

 

 

 

0

 

  

 

LOGO

 

 

 

LOGO

 

 

Lenard B. Tessler4

 

 

2018

 

 

 

I

 

 

 

1

 

    

Jan Zijderveld5

 

 

2018

   

 

0

        

1  Independent in accordance with NYSE listing standards, SEC regulations, and our Corporate Governance Guidelines

2  Lead Independent Director

3  Non-executive Chairman of the Board

4  Series C Designee

5  CEO

 

2  Lead Independent Director

3  Non-executive Chairman of the Board

4  Series C Designee

5  CEO

   LOGO  - Committee Chair

   LOGO   - Member

  LOGO  - Financial Expert

 

 LOGO   - Committee Chair

 LOGO   - Member

 LOGO   - Financial Expert

LOGO -Non-Voting Observer

Attendance

Each Director Nominee and each Series C Designee is a current director and each Director Nominee and Series C Designee that served on the Board in 20162018 attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of 20162018 meetings of the Board and each Board Committee on which he or she served. Each of the Series C Designees was initially elected to the Board on March 1, 2016. Cathy D. Ross and Jose Armario were initially elected to the Board on March 24, 2016 and September 6, 2016, respectively.

 

2  AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


Business and Strategy Highlights

2016 wasFew companies have the brand recognition, extensive global reach or market-leading positions in beauty and direct selling that Avon has. In a world where trust in companies is becoming a scarcer commodity, a Representative’s strong relationship with her consumers continues to be highly relevant.

Avon is an important year for Avon as it marked the 130thanniversary of our iconic beauty company. It was alsoorganization with a year of significant change as Avon embarked on its first year of a thoroughclear and comprehensive three-year transformation plan (the “Transformation Plan”) that our CEO and Management Team shared with our investment community on January 21, 2016. The Transformation Plan contains three strategic pillars—Investing in Growth, Driving out Costand Improving Financial Resilience—as well as long-term financial goals ofmid-single digit constant dollar revenue growth, 1 to 2% Active Representative growthand low double-digitcompelling purpose, operating margin.

Following a strategic review of the business in 2015 undertaken to identify alternatives for improving shareholder value, we finalized a strategic partnership with Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. (collectively with its affiliates, “Cerberus”) in March 2016 and successfully separated Avon’s North America business on March 1, 2016 into a privately held company, operating as New Avon LLC, under the management of Cerberus. Avon Products, Inc. remains listed on the New York Stock Exchange and retains an approximate 20% interest in New Avon LLC. As part of the transaction, Cerberus made a $435 million investment in exchange for an approximate 16.6% interest in Avon Products, Inc. at the time of the investment.

The Transformation Plan was a key enabler of our 2016 financial performance. For the full year, total revenue for reportable segments was $5.7 billion, which declined 7% as a result of the impact of foreign currency, but grew 3% in constant dollars despite significant macroeconomic and sociopolitical and geopolitical challenges. For reportable segments, Active Representatives declined 1%, primarily due to Asia Pacific, while Ending Representatives were relatively unchanged compared to 2015. We were pleased with our full year operating margin that improved 5.6%, up 290 basis points, and our full year adjusted operating margin that improved 80 basis points to 6.5%, despite the negative impact from foreign exchange of approximately 310 basis points. We delivered solid overall year on year improvement in 2016, notwithstanding a deceleration in performance in the fourth quarter. In 2016 we focused on our Top 10 markets, representing approximately 70% of our revenue,beauty and produced better overall performance in these top markets.

As part of our Transformation Plan, we delivered approximately $120 million in cost savings, exceeding our targets and improving our profit margin. We also significantly strengthened our balance sheet and improved our financial resilience by achieving an approximate $260 million reduction in debt. Our transformation is on track andpersonal care categories across the steps we have taken in 2016 have laid the foundation for further progress in improving and growing the business. We have a strong set of building blocks including an iconic brand, leadership positions in many markets, a strong innovation pipeline and an incredible Representative base of approximately six million women who are Avon brand ambassadors.

We are pleased with the progress made during the first year of our Transformation Plan as well as our improvement in profitability and expanded operating margin. We achieved these results despite challenging and ever-changing macroeconomic and geopolitical trends. Our progress in 2016 was enabled by the key strategic decision made by our Board and CEO to enter into the partnership with Cerberus.

As we move into 2017, we are in a position to place more emphasis onInvesting in Growth.In January 2016, we outlined an investment of $350 million over three years which includes an estimated $150 million in media and social selling and $200 million in service model evolution and information technology to improve the Representative experience. We will also work to drive sustainable and more consistent revenue growth across our Top 15 markets, which represent approximately 80% of Avon’s revenue. We will continue to invest in Avon’s brand and strong innovationglobe with a focus on developing and growing markets. Through our millions of direct selling Representatives, we empower micro-entrepreneurs across the globe. Avon’s core purpose to provide part-time earnings to families and offer amazing products at great prices is as relevant today, if not more, than it was 130 years ago at the Company’s founding. Avon’s ongoing progress to unlocke-commerce, make Avon available to anyone, anywhere and enable our Representatives to be more competitive is powerful, and is at the heart of Avon’s value proposition. In 2018, Avon introduced digital mobile brochures in 60 countries,on-line stores for Representatives in 20 markets and relaunched oure-commerce positioning in China thereby driving significant early growth in thee-commerce channel.

Overall 2018 operating results were disappointing, total revenue from reportable segments was down 2% compared to the prior year, driven by declines in Brazil, Russia and the United Kingdom. The 2018 full year results reinforced the urgent need to execute Avon’s new strategic direction and we have made good progress.

In 2018 we made critical progress in addressing the key concerns of leadership and strategic direction. Throughout the year we continued to strengthen Avon’s leadership team, further recruiting seasoned and skilled senior executives. The process of putting in place a leadership team to accelerate change and to increase sustainable profit continued with the recruitment by the Board of a new CEO, Jan Zijderveld, who joined Avon in February 2018. Before joining Avon, Mr. Zijderveld was a senior executive and30-year veteran of Unilever N.V./PLC with a track record as a proven global leader driving profitable growth in large, multi-channel, complex consumer businesses across emerging, developing and developed markets. We also made other critical appointments in key markets resulting in Avon now having new leadership in markets that account for more than 50% of total revenue. We are confident that Avon has an energized, highly motivated leadership team in place with the skillset required to deliver our Value, Massnew Open Up Strategy and Upper Mass brandsthe experience needed to appealrestore Avon to growth in key emerging and developing markets.

Avon is operating in a broader spectrumdramatically changing and competitive environment, where business as usual is not an option for Avon. A year ago, the Board gave Mr. Zijderveld a clear mandate to lead a deep and comprehensive strategic and operating review of women,all facets of the business and evaluate ways to significantly accelerate Avon’s path to profitable growth. This review led to the development and launch of Avon’s new Open Up Strategy, which was communicated to shareholders in September 2018. Our Open Up Strategy is simple and clear, and we made important progress during Q3 and Q4 of 2018, including in the following areas: Reboot Direct Selling; Open Up Mindset; Deliver Fuel for Growth; Refresh and Strengthen the Brand. (See page 34 for a more detailed discussion.)

In 2018, we faced the reality of our situation and acted with focus and intent to launch a comprehensive corporate turn-around strategy, addressing all key areas of our business and achieved good early-stage progress. We laid the groundwork, strengthened the executive leadership team and put the right plan in place. We’ve started to fix the core and we’re moving in the right direction, but we need to do more. In 2019 we need to execute our Open Up Strategy with pace and drive, build momentum to see our financial results grow quarter over quarter and start delivering key strategic milestones necessary to achieve our business plan and implementing our strategy.

Shareholder Engagement & 2018 Compensation Highlights

At our 2018 annual meeting, shareholders representing approximately 85% of votes cast approved our“say-on-pay” proposal in support of our executive compensation program. While the vast majority of our shareholders are in favor of our executive compensation programs, we remain committed to shareholder engagement and value insights provided from our longer term goal of 1 to 2% Active Representative growth. Finally, we will continue to focus on increased cost savings as we strive to deliver the $350 million in cost reduction over three years. We are confident in our Transformation Plan, and we expect to deliver the long-term financial objectives ofmid-single digit constant revenue growth, 1% to 2% Active Representative growth and low double-digit operating margin.

Shareholder Engagement & 2016 Compensation Highlightsfellow shareholders.

During 2016,2018, we engagedcontinued our practice of engaging with our shareholders representing nearly 60% ofand soliciting feedback. Having received strong support for our shares outstanding as of December 31, 2016.2018say-on-pay proposal, in 2018 our shareholder engagement focused particularly on gaining feedback and input from shareholders who did not support oursay-on-pay proposal in 2018. As in previousrecent years, the Chair of the Compensation and Management Development Committee Chair(the “Committee”) conducted significant shareholder outreach to ensure shareholder perspectives and concerns were heard and well understood. We had discussions with our shareholders about our compensationShareholder outreach meetings were conducted as the 2019 incentive programs design was developing, which enabled the Committee to directly incorporate feedback and suggestions into the 2019 program and the changes made for 2016. In these conversations, we reviewed program changes, and discussed the Company’s transformation status and financial and strategic priorities.

design. The feedback received from our shareholders continues to be tremendously valuablevaluable. While shareholders raised different challenges and wasconcerns, they consistently agreed that the performance metrics for both the short and long-term programs should be directly tied to Avon’s strategy. This feedback has been incorporated into the Compensation and Management Development Committee’s (the “Committee’s”) determination ofour program design.

The 2018 executive compensation program changeswas highly performance-based and provided incentive opportunities that align with our shareholders’ interests and our strategic and financial goals. Performance goals were selected to fully align with our commitment to our shareholders. The Committee took the following specific actions with respect to the compensation of the NEOs for 2016 and beyond.2018:

Base Salary: No increase to base salaries

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement3


Annual Cash Incentive: Even though our Open Up Strategy resulted in important progress during Q3 and Q4 of 2018, we were unable to achieve annual incentive plan threshold performance given the challenging macro environment and the robust nature of our goal setting process. Consistent with the formulaic nature of the program and the avoidance of positive discretion, there were no annual cash incentive award payouts to the NEOs with respect to 2018 performance (other than to Mr. Zijderveld, who was guaranteed a minimum annual incentive payout of 50% of target in his employment contract, solely for 2018; the rationale for this was to balance the following considerations: (1) recruiting a high-quality CEO, (2) recognition that some new CEOs receive a first-year minimum of 100% of target and (3) given his date of hire, his impact on the 2018 budget process was limited).

Long-Term Incentive Awards:

Our CEO’s 2018 long-term incentive award has a target value of $3.25 million and is 100% performance-based with the following mix:

40% premium-priced stock options (“Premium Options”) with exercise price equal to 125% of the closing price of a share of Avon stock as of the grant date, and

60% performance-based restricted stock units (“Performance RSUs”) with a three-year performance period.

Additionally, our CEO receivedone-timesign-on inducement awards in 2018, 50% of which were performance-based and in the form of Performance RSUs and the other 50% were service-based restricted stock units (“Service-based RSUs”). These performance-based inducement awards have three separate tranches, all of which are eligible to vest only after completion of the 2020 performance year. The Committee will establish at the beginning of each year (i.e., 2018, 2019 and 2020) the performance objectives required to earn the award – ensuring that the Committee can tailor the measures and their rigor to the business circumstances. Thenon-performance based restricted stock units were granted as a replacement of a portion of his prior employer forfeited equity awards, and to promote shareholder alignment and retention over the three-year vesting period. These inducement awards cliff vest after three years.

For other NEOs, 2018 long-term incentive awards consisted of Performance RSUs, Service-based RSUs, and Premium Options, each representing one-third of the overall target award.

Our Say on Pay Proposal is found on page 6771 and our Board recommends that our shareholders vote “For” this proposal. The following factors support this recommendation:

 

 · 

Our programs are designed to support anddrive shortshort- and long-term, externally communicated business transformation objectives.objectives. Further, an analysis of our programs demonstrates astrong and direct link between realizable pay and performance (see page 39).

 

 LOGO3


·Ourprogram design incorporates shareholder feedback received during recent outreach campaigns.

 

 · 

Our long-term incentive plan design isaligned with shareholder value, requiring significant stock price appreciation before target awards are realized. As a result, we have delivered long-term incentive compensation targets for our NEOs well below those delivered in the prior year.target.

 

 · 

We have also maintained a focus onlimiting shareholder dilutiondilution..

 

 · 

We benchmark our executives’ pay against apeer group that better reflects Avon’s business following the separation of our North America business.business.

Key features of our 2016 compensation programs include the following:

·Annual incentive plan:  We directly link pay with performance by choosing metrics aligned with financial goals and our Transformation Plan. All metrics, including our strategic objectives, have threshold, target and maximum attainment levels and are quantitatively derived. For 2016, bonus payouts for all named executive officers are tied only to these quantitative results.

·Long-term incentive plan:  Changes to our long-term incentive plan for 2016 were thoughtfully made in order to better align compensation with shareholders’ interests, minimize dilution and reflect the investment made by Cerberus. As a result, significant stock price improvement is required in order for senior officers to realize target long-term compensation. For 2016, the following are the key features of our long-term incentive plan:

·Use of stock price divisor of $5.00, a price consistent with the Cerberus investment, rather than the actual, lower stock price on the grant date ($4.22), to determine the number of shares granted to senior officers. This methodology resulted in a reduction in the delivered grant date fair value and also reduced shareholder dilution.

·Incorporated premium-priced stock options with a significantly higher exercise price than the actual stock price at grant, to be exercisable and vest ratably over three years. Shares were converted to premium-priced stock options using a 2.5 to 1 ratio rather than the accounting fair value ratio in order to further reduce shareholder dilution.

·Included performance-based restricted stock units (“Performance RSUs”) tied to relative Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”), with above median performance required before target payouts are achieved.

·Restored the performance period for Performance RSUs to three years based on relative TSR goals.

·Pay for Performance:  We believe that our programs deliver compensation to our executives reflecting performance over time. The 2016 annual incentive plan paid out at approximately 53% of target, and the realized value of the 2014-2016 Performance RSUs was approximately 31% of the targeted award value. The actions above resulted in a 31% reduction in our CEO’s delivered long-term incentive compensation for 2016 compared to the prior year.

20172019 Compensation Highlights

For 2017,We are committed to ensuring that Avon’s pay framework, particularly our incentive programs, are aligned with and reflect the Committee has maintained its commitment to the strong alignmentmost important task of our executive team – returning our business to profitable growth. Following the introduction of the Open Up Strategy the Committee undertook a detailed, thorough and holistic review of Avon’s incentive arrangements (fixed, short and long-term) to determine if our pay programsarrangements are aligned with our shareholders’ interests, while ensuring we can attractAvon’s new strategic direction, key priorities and retain key talent in the organization. As such,timelines.

Following this thorough review, the Committee believes that many elements of the 2016 design remainscurrent incentive program remain appropriate, as it has strong performance elements that support our three-year Transformation Planexternally communicated business goals and requires significant stock price appreciation for executives to realize target compensation. AsHowever, for 2019 the Committee made a result,number of adjustments to the detailsincentive arrangements, to further strengthen their alignment with Avon’s strategic direction and focus on delivering the turnaround strategy with urgency. For example, the 2019 long-term incentive program places a greater focus onone-year performance than our historical practice in order to explicitly reflect our shareholders’ feedback, which stressed the urgency of our compensation programs for 2017 are not significantly different from 2016,delivering the turnaround strategy as shown on page 36.

Key 2016-2017 Governance Highlights

On March 1, 2016,well as enabling the Board amended and restatedretention of critical staff needed to deliver the Company’sby-laws (the“By-Laws”) to, among other things, adopt a proxy access provision, as discussed on page 19 of this Proxy Statement. The Company believes the proxy accessBy-Law amendments adopted by the Board reflect shareholder feedback and are responsive to shareholders’ approval, during the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders, of anon-binding proposal requesting the Board provide for proxy access.

In 2016, as part of the strategic partnership with Cerberus, the Company reduced the size of its Board from twelve to eleven directors. The Board is now comprised of six of the Company’s incumbent directors, three directors designated by Cerberus, and two additional directors jointly selected by the Company and Cerberus, one of whom was approved by Barington, as further described below. In addition, so long as Cerberus maintains a certain ownership level in the Company (as described in more detail on page 29 of this Proxy Statement), Cerberus will continue to have the right to select the Chairman. A new Lead Independent Director role was also created on the Board in 2016. The Company believes this newly-reconstituted Board and the addition of a Lead Independent Director provides an effective governance framework in support of the Company’sgo-forward strategy and transformation.

turnaround.

 

4  AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


We have continued to engage our shareholders on these governance and related Company matters. For example, ournon-executive Chairman of the Board and Lead Independent Director have participated in meetings to address the strategic partnership with Cerberus and the Company’s Transformation Plan which we believe sets the Company on a solid path to profitability and growth by providing a solution for the North America business as well as capital, focus and resources to support the Company in the execution of its transformation. We will continue to engage investors on a regular basis to better understand and consider their views.

In addition, on March 27, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Barington Agreement”) with an investor group led by Barington Capital Group, L.P. (collectively, “Barington”) that, as of March 27, 2016, collectively owned over 3% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company. Under the terms of the Barington Agreement, the Company granted Barington the right to approve the appointment of a director to be jointly selected by the Company and Cerberus, which Barington exercised with its approval of Mr. Armario’s appointment.

Governance and Related Materials

The Company has established strong policies, practices and procedures which provide a framework for effective governance. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines describe our Board of Directors’Board’s governance policies and practices, including standards for director independence, qualifications for Board and Board Committee membership, Board and Board Committee responsibilities, and Board and CEO evaluations. Highlighted below are some of our key governance and related materials.materials:

 

      Corporate Governance Guidelines

      Charters of Each Board Committee

      Code of Conduct

      Corporate Responsibility Report

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Charters of Each Board Committee

Code of Conduct

Corporate Responsibility Report

The Corporate Governance Guidelines, charters of each Board Committee, and Corporate Responsibility Report are available on our investor website (www.avoninvestor.com)(investor.avonworldwide.com) and may be accessed by clicking on “Corporate Governance” or, in. Both the caseCode of ourConduct and Corporate Responsibility Report by clicking on “Corporate Responsibility.” The Code of Conduct isare available atwww.avoncompany.comwww.avonworldwide.com and may be accessed by clicking on “Ethics & Compliance” under the “About Avon” heading.

“Our Values” and “Responsible Business”, respectively.

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  5


VOTING AND MEETING INFORMATION

 

 

Purpose of Materials

 

  

 

We are providing these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Avon Products, Inc. (“Avon,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) of proxies to be voted at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will take place on Tuesday,Thursday, May 9, 2017.16, 2019.

  

This Proxy Statement describes the matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting and contains other required information.

 

Distribution of Proxy Materials

 

  

 

We are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet.internet. Accordingly, on or about March 30, 2017,April 2, 2019, we mailed our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“proxy notice”), which contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials over the internet and vote online. If you received a proxy notice, you will not receive a printed copy of our proxy materials by mail unless you request one by following the instructions provided on the proxy notice. We mailed the proxy materials to participants in our Avon Personal Savings Account Plan.

Plan (“the PSA Plan”).

 

Shareholders Entitled to Vote

 

  

 

Shareholders of our common stock and of our Series C Preferred Stock as of the close of business on March 20, 2017,27, 2019, the record date, are entitled to vote. There were approximately 439,300,464442,504,364 shares of our common stock outstanding on March 20, 201727, 2019 for an aggregate vote of approximately 439,300,464442,504,364 (or one vote per share) and 435,000 shares of our Series C Preferred Stock outstanding on March 20, 201727, 2019 for an aggregate vote of 87,051,524 (on anas-converted basis). Shareholders of our common stock and of our Series C Preferred Stock will vote together as a single class on all matters being presented in this Proxy Statement, for up to an aggregate 526,351,988529,555,888 votes. We refer to the holders of shares of our common stock and of shares of our Series C Preferred Stock (which are convertible into shares of our common stock) as “shareholders” throughout this Proxy Statement.

 

How to Vote

 

  

 

Shareholders can vote in one of several ways:

  

•    Via the Internet—Visit the website on the proxy notice or proxy card

  

•    By Telephone—Call the telephone number on the proxy card

  

•    By Mail—Sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope

  

•    In Person—Attend the Annual Meeting (follow instructions below)

  

 

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other record holder, follow the voting instructions on the form that you receive from them. The availability of telephone and internet voting will depend on their voting process. If you do not give instructions to the broker, bank or other record holder holding your shares, it will not be authorized to vote with respect to Proposals 1, 2 or 3. We therefore urge you to provide instructions so that your shares may be voted.

 

Attending the Annual Meeting

 

  

 

Shareholders who would like to attend the Annual Meeting in person are asked to follow the guidelines below. Anyone who arrives without an admission ticket orpre-registration will not be admitted to the Annual Meeting unless it can be verified that the individual was a shareholder as of March 20, 2017.27, 2019.

6AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


  

Shareholders of Record (shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A.)

  

Please bring the admission ticket that is attached to your proxy notice and/or proxy card and photo identification. If you vote in advance of the Annual Meeting, please keep a copy of your admission ticket and bring it with you.

6


  

If you do not have your admission ticket at the Annual Meeting, you must bring other proof of your Avon share ownership as of March 20, 201727, 2019 and photo identification.

Beneficial Owners (shares are held in a stock brokerage account, in the PSA Plan, or by a bank or other record holder)

  

We recommend that youpre-register to attend the meeting by sending a written request, along with proof of ownership (such as a current brokerage statement), to our Investor Relations Department, Avon Products, Inc., 601 Midland Avenue, Rye,1 Avon Place Suffern, New York 10580,10901, by mail, by email at avoninvestorrelations@icrinc.cominvestor.relations@avon.com or by fax203-724-1610. We must receive your request at least one week prior to the Annual Meeting to have time to process your request. In addition, please bring photo identification to the Annual Meeting.

  

•    You may attend withoutpre-registration; however, you must bring proof of your Avon share ownership as of March 20, 201727, 2019 and photo identification.

  

You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. Please note, however, that sharesShares held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other record holder may be voted in person at the Annual Meeting only if you obtain a legal proxy from such broker, bank or other record holder giving you the right to vote the shares.

Shares held through the PSA Plan must be voted through the PSA Plan Trustee as described below.

 

Voting Instructions

 

  
  

 

Your proxy, when properly signed and returned to us, or processed by telephone or via the internet, and not revoked, will be voted in accordance with your instructions. We are not aware of any other matter that may be properly presented at the meeting. If any other matter is properly presented, the persons named as proxies on the proxy card will have discretion to vote in their best judgment.

  

 

Unless you give other instructions on your proxy card, or unless you give other instructions when you cast your vote by telephone or via the internet, the persons named as proxies will vote in accordance with the recommendations of theAvon’s Board of Directors as follows:for the election of each Director Nominee,for the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers,for anannual advisory vote on executive compensation,the approval of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan andfor the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.

 

Revoking Your Proxy or

Changing Your Vote

 

  

 

If your sharesShareholders are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you mayentitled to revoke your proxytheir Proxies at any time before it is actuallytheir shares are voted by givingat the Annual Meeting. To revoke a Proxy, you must file a written notice of revocation to ourwith the Company’s Corporate Secretary at the address set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, by delivering1 Avon Place Suffern, NY 10901, deliver a proxyduly executed Proxy bearing a later date (includingthan the original submitted Proxy, submit voting instructions again by telephone or by internet)via the Internet, or by attending and voting in person atattend the Annual Meeting.Meeting and vote in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, causeby itself, revoke your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically make that request.Proxy.

  

 

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other record holder, you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank or other record holder or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other record holder giving you the right to vote your shares, by attending the meeting and voting in person.

 

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement7


 

Quorum Requirements

 

  
  

 

The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum, permitting the meeting to conduct its business.

Abstentions and “brokernon-votes” are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. A brokernon-vote occurs when a broker or other record holder holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because that holder does not have discretionary voting power and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. If you do not give instructions to the broker, bank or other record holder holding your shares, it will not be authorized to vote your shares with respect to Proposals 1, 2, or 3. We therefore urge you to provide instructions so that your shares held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other record holder may be voted.

 

LOGO7


 

Approval of a Proposal

 

  
  

 

Each of the Proposals requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. “Votes cast” means the votes actually cast “for” or “against” a particular proposal, whether in person or by proxy. Therefore, abstentions and brokernon-votes generally have no effect in determining whether a proposal is approved by shareholders.

 

 

Avon Associates—Personal

Savings Account Plan

 

  

 

The trustee of the Avon Personal Savings AccountPSA Plan, (the “Plan”), as record holder of the shares held in the PSA Plan, will vote the shares allocated to your account in accordance with your instructions. Unless your vote is received by 11:59 P.M. (New York time) on May 5, 201710, 2019 and unless you have specified your instructions, your shares cannot be voted by the trustee.

 

 

Voting Deadline

 

  
  

 

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., and if you vote by telephone or the internet, your vote must be received by 1:00 A.M. (New York time) on May 9, 2017.16, 2019. If you doprefer not prefer to vote by telephone or internet, you should complete and return the proxy card as soon as possible, so that it is received no later than the closing of the polls at the Annual Meeting.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other record holder, you should return your voting instructions in accordance with the instructions provided by the broker, bank or other record holder who holds the shares on your behalf.

  

If you hold shares in the Avon Products, Inc. Personal Savings AccountPSA Plan, your voting instructions must be received by 11:59 P.M. (New York time) on May 5, 2017.10, 2019.

 

 

Tabulation of Votes

 

  
  

 

Representatives of our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., will tabulate the votes and act as inspectors of election.

 

 

Vote Results

 

  
  

 

We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and to publish final results in a current reportCurrent Report on Form8-K within four business days of the Annual Meeting.

  

 

All proxies, ballots and voting materials that identify the votes of specific shareholders will generally be kept confidential, except as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements, to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote,votes, and to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation.

 

8AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


 

Householding

 

  
  

 

Beneficial owners who share a single address may receive only one copy of the proxy notice or the proxy materials, as the case may be, unless their broker, bank or other nominee has received contrary instructions from any beneficial owner at that address. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce printing and mailing costs. If any beneficial owner(s) sharing a single address wish to discontinue householding and/or receive a separate copy of the proxy notice or the proxy materials, as the case may be, or wish to enroll in householding, they should contact their broker, bank or other nominee directly. Alternatively, if any such beneficial owners wish to receive a separate copy of the proxy materials, we will deliver them promptly upon written or oral request to Investor Relations Department, Avon Products, Inc., 601 Midland Avenue, Rye,1 Avon Place Suffern, New York 10580,10901, by mail, email at avoninvestorrelations@icrinc.cominvestor.relations@avon.com or fax203-724-1610 (telephone number203-682-8200)212-282-5320). We currently do not “household” for our registered shareholders.

 

8  AVON 2019 Proxy Statement9


PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

On March 1, 2016, the Company entered into an Investor Rights Agreement (the “Investor Rights Agreement”) with Cleveland Apple Investor L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Cerberus Investor”), an affiliate of Cerberus Capital Management, L.P., pursuant to which the Company reduced the size of theThe Board of Directors has fixed the number of the Company (the “Board”) from twelve directors to eleven directors.

at 11. The Board has nominated Jose Armario, W. Don Cornwell, Nancy Killefer, Susan J. Kropf, Helen McCluskey, Sheri McCoy, Charles H. NoskiAndrew G. McMaster, Jr., James A. Mitarotonda, and Cathy D. RossJan Zijderveld (the “Director Nominees”) for election to the Board, and Cerberus Investor, as the holder of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock, has elected Chan W. Galbato, Steven F. Mayer and Michael F. Sanford and Lenard B. Tessler, (the “Series C Designees”) to serve as directors commencing immediately upon the conclusion of the 20172019 Annual Meeting. All Director Nominees and Series C Designeesnominees are current members of our Board. There are no family relationships among our directors or executive officers.

As set forth in further detail on page 20, on March 26, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with certain shareholders (the “Nomination Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to nominate Mr. Mitarotonda for election to the Board at the 2018 Annual Meeting. With Mr. Mitarotonda’sre-nomination for election to the Board at the 2019 Annual Meeting, certain terms of the Nomination Agreement remain in effect.

Each of the Series C Designees will hold office until the next succeeding Annual Meeting or until his or her successor is elected and qualified. Each of the Director Nominees, if elected as a director at the 20172019 Annual Meeting, will generally hold office until the next succeeding Annual Meeting or until his or her successor is elected and qualified. As set forth in further detail on page 29, Cerberus Investor is required to vote its shares in favor of each Director Nominee. Each Director Nominee has consented to being named as a nominee in our proxy materials and to serve as a director, if elected. We have no reason to believe that any of the Director Nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve as a director.

Each Director Nominee who receives a majority of the votes cast will be elected to the Board, in an uncontested election.Board. If a Director Nominee is an incumbent director and he or she receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election, he or she is required to tender his or her resignation in accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as described under “Information Concerning The Board Of Directors—Board Policy Regarding Voting for Directors” on page 18.19.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS

that you vote FOR the election of each of the Director Nominees listed below.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS

that you vote FOR the election of each of the Director Nominees listed below.

 

JOSE ARMARIO

 

 

Director Nominee

LOGO

Director since 2016    LOGO

 

Age: 57    

COMMITTEE

Compensation and Management Development Committee

 

Jose Armario is the Chief Executive Officer of Bojangles’ Restaurants, Inc. Prior to joining Bojangles’ Restaurants, Inc. in January 2019, he served as Corporate Executive Vice President of Worldwide Supply Chain, Development, and Franchising of McDonald’s Corporation from August 2011 until his retirement in October 2015. He served as Group President, McDonald’s Canada and Latin America of McDonald’s Corporation from February 2008 to August 2011. Prior to this, Mr. Armario was President, McDonald’s Latin America from 2004 to July 2008. Earlier in his career, Mr. Armario held operating roles of increasing responsibility at Lenscrafters, Inc. and Burger King Corporation. Mr. Armario is currently a director of USG Corporation. He also serves on the President’s Council of the University of Miami, Florida and the Governing Council of Advocate Good Samaritan Hospital, and isas a director of Golden State Foods and Receptions for Research: The Greg Olsen Foundation.

Director since:2016

 

KEY ATTRIBUTES, EXPERIENCE AND SKILLS: Mr. Armario brings to the Board significant expertise in global consumer products marketing, branding and supply chain. Mr. Armario’s knowledge in the areas of global markets, consumer experience, complex operations and strategy including significant focus on Latin American markets, a key geography for the Company, provides a valuable asset to the Board.Age:59

 

COMMITTEES

Audit Committee

Compensation and
Management
Development Committee

SKILLS & EXPERIENCE OF PARTICULAR RELEVANCE TO AVON:

Having served in a variety of key leadership positions in nearly two decades with McDonald’s Corporation, Mr. Armario brings to the Board substantial experience leading large complex operations in global marketing, branding, supply chain, franchising and strategic planning. His first-hand consumer experience and global responsibilities with McDonald’s Corporation, particularly in Latin America, provide him with valuable insights to guide Avon in its key geographies.

 

10  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  9


W. DON CORNWELL

 

 

Director Nominee

LOGO

Director since 2002    LOGO

 

Age: 69    

COMMITTEE

Audit Committee

Finance Committee (Chair)

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Lead Independent Director

 

Mr. Cornwell was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Granite Broadcasting Corporation from 1988 until his retirement in August 2009, and served as Vice Chairman until December 2009. Previously, Mr. Cornwell was Chief Operating Officer for the Corporate Finance Department at Goldman, Sachs & Co. from 1980 to 1988 and Vice President of the Investment Banking Division of Goldman Sachs from 1976 to 1988. He is a member of the joint diversity advisory council of Comcast and NBCUniversal, a trustee of Big Brothers Big Sisters of New York and a director of the Edna McConnell Clark Foundation.Blue Meridian Partners, a partnership of philanthropists. Mr. Cornwell is a director of Pfizer, Inc. and American International Group, Inc.

Director since:2002

 

KEY ATTRIBUTES, EXPERIENCE AND SKILLS:Age: Through Mr. Cornwell’s career as an entrepreneur driving the growth of a consumer focused media company, an executive in the investment banking industry71

COMMITTEES

Audit Committee

Finance Committee (Chair)

Nominating and as a director of several significant consumer product and health care companies, he has accumulated valuable business, leadership, and management experience and brings important perspectives on the issues facing the Company. Mr. Cornwell founded and built Granite Broadcasting Corporation, a consumer-focused media company, through acquisitions and operating growth enabling him to provide insight and guidance on strategic direction and growth. Mr. Cornwell’s strong financial background, including his work at Goldman Sachs prior toCorporate Governance Committee

co-foundingLead Independent Director Granite and his service on the audit and investment committees of other

SKILLS & EXPERIENCE OF PARTICULAR RELEVANCE TO AVON:

Through Mr. Cornwell’s career as an entrepreneur driving the growth of a consumer focused-media company, an executive in the investment banking industry and as a director of several significant consumer product and health care companies, he has accumulated valuable business, leadership, and management experience and brings important perspectives on the issues facing the Company. Mr. Cornwell founded and built Granite Broadcasting Corporation, a consumer-focused media company, through acquisitions and operating growth, enabling him to provide insight and guidance on the Company’s strategic direction and growth. Mr. Cornwell’s strong financial background, including his work at Goldman Sachs prior toco-founding Granite and his service on the audit and investment committees of other companies’ boards, also provides financial expertise to the Board, including an understanding of financial statements, corporate finance, accounting, and capital markets.

 

NANCY KILLEFER

 

 

Director Nominee

LOGO

Director since 2013    LOGO

 

Age: 63    

COMMITTEE

Compensation and Management Development Committee

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Chair)

 

Ms. Killefer served as a Senior Partner at McKinsey & Company, an international management consulting firm, until her retirement in August 2013. She joined McKinsey in 1979 and held a number of leadership roles, including as a member of the firm’s governing board. Ms. Killefer led the firm’s recruiting and chaired several of the firm’s personnel committees. From 2000 to 2007, she ran McKinsey’s Washington, D.C. office. From 1997 to 2000, Ms. Killefer served as Assistant Secretary for Management, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer at the U.S. Department of Treasury. In 2000, she returned to McKinsey to establish and lead the firm’s Public Sector Practice. She also served as a member of the IRS Oversight Board from 2000 to 2005 and as chair of that body from 2002 to 2004. Ms. Killefer is currently a director of Cardinal Health and Taubman Centers, Inc. She also served as a chairman and director of CSRA until 2018 and director of The Advisory Board Company and Cardinal Health and Chairman of the board of directors of CSRA. She also serves as a vice chair of the Defense Business Board, an advisory body to the Secretary of Defense, and the MyVA Advisory Board, a board advising the VA Secretary.until 2017.

Director since:2013

 

KEY ATTRIBUTES, EXPERIENCE AND SKILLS: Ms. Killefer has served in key leadership positions in both the privateAge:65

COMMITTEES

Compensation and public sectorsManagement Development Committee

Nominating and brings to the Board significant expertise in strategy development, execution, marketing, brand-building, and organizational efficiencies across all sectors. In particular, her experience with consumer-based and retail industries is valuable to the Company. In addition, Ms. Killefer’s strong financial background, including her experience as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the U.S. Department of Treasury, provides expertise to the Board on financial and accounting matters.Corporate Governance Committee (Chair)

SKILLS & EXPERIENCE OF PARTICULAR RELEVANCE TO AVON:

Having served in key leadership positions in both the public and private sectors and having provided strategic counsel to consumer-based companies during her 30 years with McKinsey & Company, Ms. Killefer brings to the Board substantial experience in the areas of strategic planning, including sales, marketing and brand building. Her experience as a partner of a global management consulting firm and as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of a government agency provides valuable expertise in the areas of executive leadership and finance. Ms. Killefer’s corporate governance experience as a director of other public companies, including as the former chairman of the board of directors of CSRA, is also highly valuable to the Board.

 

10  AVON 2019 Proxy Statement11


SUSAN J. KROPF

 

 

Director Nominee

LOGO

Director since 2015    LOGO

 

Age: 68    

COMMITTEE

Finance Committee

 

Ms. Kropf served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Avon Products, Inc. from January 2001 until her retirement in 2006. She also served as Avon’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, North America and Global Business Operations from 1999 to 2001 and Executive Vice President and President, North America from 1998 to 1999. Ms. Kropf was a member of Avon’s Board of Directors from 1998 to 2006. Ms. Kropf is currently a director of Tapestry (formerly Coach, Inc.), The Kroger Co., New Avon LLC and The Sherwin-Williams Company. Ms. Kropf also served as a director of Mead Westvaco Inc. until 2015.

Director since:2015

 

KEY ATTRIBUTES, EXPERIENCE AND SKILLS:Ms. Kropf has extensive operational skills and a deep understanding of direct selling, having held various senior management positions during the course of her36-yearAge: career at Avon, including in the areas of marketing, research and development, product development, customer service, and manufacturing. Ms. Kropf has significant boardroom experience through her service on the boards of various public companies, including experience serving on compensation, audit, and corporate governance board committees.70

COMMITTEES

Finance Committee

SKILLS & EXPERIENCE OF PARTICULAR RELEVANCE TO AVON:

Having held various senior management positions during the course of her37-year career at Avon, including fullprofit-and-loss responsibility for all of Avon’s worldwide operations as its President and Chief Operating Officer, Ms. Kropf has extensive operational skills, a deep understanding of direct selling, and significant experience in marketing, research and development, product development, customer service, supply chain operations and manufacturing. Ms. Kropf has a strong financial background gained through her career at Avon and from her service on the boards of various public companies, including their compensation, audit, and corporate governance committees.

 

HELEN MCCLUSKEY

 

 

Director Nominee

LOGO

Director since 2014    LOGO

 

Age: 61    

COMMITTEE

Compensation and Management Development Committee (Chair)

 

Ms. McCluskey was President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of The Warnaco Group, Inc. from February 2012 to February 2013, when it was acquired by PVH Corp., and she then served on the board of directors of PVH Corp. until June 2014. Ms. McCluskey also served in other leadership roles at Warnaco, including Chief Operating Officer from September 2010 to February 2012 and Group President from July 2004 to September 2010. Prior to joining Warnaco, Ms. McCluskey held positions of increasing responsibility at Liz Claiborne, Inc. from August 2001 to June 2004. Previously,Prior to that, she spent 18 years in Sara Lee Corporation’s intimate apparel units, where she held executive positions in marketing, operations and general management, including President of Playtex Apparel from 1999 to 2001. Ms. McCluskey is currently a director of Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Dean Foods Company and Signet Jewelers Limited.

Director since:2014

 

KEY ATTRIBUTES, EXPERIENCE AND SKILLS:Ms. McCluskey has a broad background in strategy, business planningAge:64

COMMITTEES

Compensation and operations derived from her career in consumer businesses. Having built women’s brands globally, she contributesManagement Development Committee (Chair)

SKILLS & EXPERIENCE OF PARTICULAR RELEVANCE TO AVON:

Ms. McCluskey has a broad background in strategy, business planning and operations derived from a career spanning over 30 years with leading consumer goods companies. Having built women’s brands globally for sale through all channels of distribution worldwide, she brings a valuable blend of branding, merchandising, marketing and international expertise to the Board. Ms. McCluskey’s experience as a Chief Executive Officer of a global public company provides her with significant expertise in global business matters, corporate leadership and management which enables her to make important contributions to the oversight of the Company’s strategic direction and growth, and management development.

12AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


ANDREW G. MCMASTER, JR.

Director Nominee

LOGO

Mr. McMaster served as Deputy Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman at Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) from 2002 until his retirement in May 2015. He joined Deloitte in 1976 and held a number of leadership roles, including National Managing Partner of Deloitte’s Office of the CEO client programs and of Deloitte’s U.S. and Global Forensic and Dispute Consulting practice. Mr. McMaster is currently a director of Black & Veatch Holding Company and UBS Americas Holding LLC, a subsidiary of UBS AG. Mr. McMaster also currently serves as Chairman of the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council (FASAC), an advisory body to the Company. Her experienceFinancial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), and as Vice Chair of the Hobart and William Smith Colleges Board of Trustees.

Director since:2018

Age: 66

COMMITTEES

Audit Committee (Chair)

SKILLS & EXPERIENCE OF PARTICULAR RELEVANCE TO AVON:

Mr. McMaster has substantial experience in the areas of finance, audit and accounting, having served as a senior executive during a39-year career with Deloitte, as the current Chair of the audit committees of Black & Veatch Holding Company and UBS Americas Holding LLC, and as the current Chairman of the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council. He also gained experience in a variety of operational, client service and firm leadership roles at Deloitte, serving many of the firm’s largest, most complex global clients as both a Lead Engagement partner and an Advisory Partner across diverse industries.

JAMES A. MITAROTONDA

Director Nominee

LOGO

Mr. Mitarotonda has served as the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of a global public company provides her with significant expertise in global business matters, corporate leadership and management which enables her to bring important contributions toBarington Capital Group, L.P. (“Barington Capital”), an investment firm that heco-founded, since 1991. He has also served as the oversightChairman of the Company’s strategic directionBoard, President and growth.Chief Executive Officer of Barington Companies Investors, LLC, the general partner of a value-added activist investment fund, since 1999. Mr. Mitarotonda is currently a director of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. and The Eastern Company, where he is the Chairman of its Board of Directors. He also serves as a member of the Board of Trustees for Queens College. Mr. Mitarotonda previously served as a director of A. Schulman until 2018, The Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack until 2016, Ebix, Inc. until 2015, and The Jones Group Inc. until 2014. He also served as a director of Barington/Hilco Acquisition Corp. until January 2018, as its Chief Executive Officer until 2015, and as its Chairman until 2017.

Director since:2018

Age: 64

COMMITTEES

Finance Committee

SKILLS & EXPERIENCE OF PARTICULAR RELEVANCE TO AVON:

Through his over 25 years as Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of Barington Capital, Mr. Mitarotonda brings to the Board extensive financial, investment banking and executive leadership experience. He also has significant board of director and corporate governance experience through his service on numerous public company boards across diverse industries, including consumer-focused companies such as The Jones Group and The Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack.

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  1113


  SHERI MCCOY  JAN ZIJDERVELD

 

 

Director Nominee

LOGO

Director since 2012    LOGO

 

Age: 58    

CEO

 

Ms. McCoyMr. Zijderveld joined Avon as Chief Executive Officer in April 2012 and was electedappointed to the Board of Directors in May 2012. SheFebruary 2018. He joined Avon after 30 years with Johnson & Johnson,Unilever N.V./PLC (“Unilever”), where shehe rose to Vice Chairmanserve as a member of the Executive Committee and President of Unilever’s European business in January 2011. Most recently at Johnson & Johnson, Ms. McCoyIn this position, Mr. Zijderveld oversaw Pharmaceutical, Consumer, Corporate Office of Science & Technology,25,000 employees and Information Technology divisions.operations in 34 countries. Prior to that, shehe served in a number of leadership roles, including Worldwide Chairman, Pharmaceuticals Group from 2009 to 2011; Worldwide Chairman, Surgical Care GroupExecutive Vice President of Unilever, South East Asia & Australasia from 2008 to 2009; and Company Group Chairman and Worldwide Franchise2011, while also acting asNon-Executive Chairman of Ethicon, Inc., a subsidiaryUnilever’s listed Indonesian business, and CEO of Johnson & Johnson,Unilever, Middle East and North Africa (MENA) from 2005 to 2008. Earlier in herhis career, Ms. McCoy was Global President of the Babyhe served in numerous leadership positions across Europe, Australia and Wound Care franchise; Vice President, Marketing for a variety of global brands;New Zealand in general management, marketing, sales and Vice President, Research & Development for the Personal Products Worldwide Division. She servesdistribution. Mr. Zijderveld currently sits on the boardsBoard of New Avon LLC, Catalyst, Stonehill College, and thenon-profit science and technology organization FIRST.

KEY ATTRIBUTES, EXPERIENCE AND SKILLS:Ms. McCoy has a unique combinationDirectors of strategic and finely honed operational skills and a significant turnaround track record. Throughout her career, she has consistently achieved results and driven change across highly diverse operating units with widely varying product lines, customers, distribution channels, and business models. Ms. McCoy has deep global experience and is highly skilled at managing complex, matrixed organizational structures.

  CHARLES H. NOSKI  

Director Nominee

LOGO

Director since 2012    

Age: 64    

COMMITTEE

Audit Committee (Chair)

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

HEMA.
 

Mr. Noski served as Vice Chairman of Bank of America Corporation from June 2011 until his retirement in September 2012, having served previously as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from May 2010 to June 2011. Prior to that, Mr. Noski was Corporate Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Northrop Grumman Corporation from 2003 to 2005 and served on its board of directors from 2002 to 2005. He was AT&T Corporation’s Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1999 to 2002 and Vice Chairman of the board of directors during 2002. Earlier in his career, Mr. Noski was President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Hughes Electronics Corporation and a Partner with Deloitte & Touche LLP. Mr. Noski is currently a director of Microsoft Corporation, The Priceline Group Inc., and the National Association of Corporate Directors. He is also the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Financial Accounting Foundation. Mr. Noski also served as a director of Avery Dennison Corporation until 2014.Director since:2018

 

KEY ATTRIBUTES, EXPERIENCE AND SKILLS:Mr. Noski is a seasoned business leader with significant finance, accounting, auditing and business operations expertise. In particular, his role as chief financial officer at major global corporations and his public company board experience enhance his contributions to the Company’s transformation and strategy. His key insights into finance and accounting matters, including capital management, restructuring, and capital markets, are highly valuable to the Board.Age:54

CEO

SKILLS & EXPERIENCE OF PARTICULAR RELEVANCE TO AVON:

Having spent 30 years with Unilever, a transnational consumer goods company, during which time he lived and worked in seven countries across three continents, Mr. Zijderveld possesses deep operating experience in multi-channel, complex consumer businesses across emerging, developing and developed markets. His particular experience in Europe, the Middle East and Asia enable him to provide insights and understanding into these areas and help guide the Company’s strategic decisions in these markets. His leadership positions at Unilever provide him with vast experience in marketing, sales and distribution, and make him uniquely qualified in making necessary decisions for the Company’s long-term growth, business goals and managing challenging market conditions.

 

12


  CATHY D. ROSS  CHAN W. GALBATO

 

 Director Nominee

Series C Designee

LOGO

Director since 2016    LOGO

 

Age: 59    

COMMITTEE

Audit Committee

Ms. Ross served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for FedEx Express from 2010 until her retirement in July 2014 and prior to that, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2004 to 2010, and Vice President, Express Financial Planning from 1998 to 2004. Ms. Ross joined FedEx in 1984 as a senior financial analyst and held numerous other leadership roles. Prior to joining FedEx, she worked for Kimberly-Clark Corporation as a cost analyst and cost analysis supervisor from 1982 to 1984. Ms. Ross serves on the board of directors of the National Civil Rights Museum in Memphis, Tennessee and The Memphis Child Advocacy Center. Ms. Ross is also a director of Steelcase, Inc.

KEY ATTRIBUTES, EXPERIENCE AND SKILLS: Ms. Ross’ financial and global operating experience honed throughout her career, makes her a valuable member of the Board. In addition, her leadership and extensive knowledge in the area of cost transformation is a tremendous asset to the Company in light of our strategic direction and growth. Ms. Ross’ financial and accounting background, including her service on an audit committee of another public company, provides financial expertise to the Board.

  CHAN W. GALBATO  

Series C Designee

LOGO

Director since 2016    

Age: 54    

COMMITTEE

Audit Committee(non-voting Observer)

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Non-executive Chairman of
the Board

 

Mr. Galbato was appointednon-executive Chairman of Avon’s Board of Directors in March 2016. Mr. Galbato is Chief Executive Officer of Cerberus Operations and Advisory Company, LLC. Prior to joining Cerberus in 2009, he owned and managed CWG Hillside Investments LLC, a consulting business, from 2007 to 2009. From 2005 to 2007, he served as President and CEO of the Controls Group of businesses for Invensys plc and President of Services for The Home Depot.plc. Mr. Galbato previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Armstrong Floor Products, President of Services for The Home Depot and Chief Executive Officer of Choice Parts. He spent 14 years with General Electric Company, holding several operating and finance leadership positions within theirits various industrial divisions as well as holding the role of President and CEO of Coregis Insurance Company, a G.E. Capital company. Mr. Galbato currently serves as Chairman of YP Holdings LLC. He also serves on the Board of Directors of AutoWeb, Inc., Blue Bird Corporation, DynCorp International, Electrical Components International, FirstKey Homes LLC, Staples Solutions B.V. and Steward Health Care, LLC, and on the Board of Managers of New Avon LLC. Mr. Galbato has alsohad previously served as lead director of the Brady Corporation, and as a director of Tower International.International until 2014 and Chairman of YP Holdings, LLC until 2017.

 

Mr. Galbato was electedre-elected to the Board of Directors commencing immediately upon the conclusion of the 20172019 Annual Meeting by the holders of our Series C Preferred Stock, voting separately as a single class, and is not up for election by our shareholders at the 20172019 Annual Meeting.

Director since:2016

 

KEY ATTRIBUTES, EXPERIENCE AND SKILLS: Mr. Galbato has broad operationalAge:56

COMMITTEES

Audit Committee (non-voting Observer)

Nominating and business strategy expertise and has developed significant corporate leadership skills from his experience at public and private companies. Mr. Galbato is recognized for his experience in corporate turnarounds, which enables him to provide guidance in helping to driveCorporate Governance Committee

Non-executive Chairman of the Board

SKILLS & EXPERIENCE OF PARTICULAR RELEVANCE TO AVON:

Through his 30 years of experience as an executive at public and private companies across a range of industries, including consumer products, Mr. Galbato has broad operational and business strategy expertise and significant skills in corporate leadership including as a Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Galbato is recognized for his experience in corporate turnarounds, which enables him to help guide the Company’s strategic direction and growth.

 

14  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  13


  STEVENMICHAEL F. MAYER  SANFORD

 

 

Series C Designee

LOGO

Director since 2016    LOGO

 

Age: 57    

COMMITTEE

Compensation and Management Development Committee

 

Mr. MayerSanford is a Senior Managing Director,Co-Head of Global Private Equity and Chairman of the Investment Committee at private investment firm Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. Prior to joining Cerberus in 2002, Mayer served as executive managing director at Gores Technology Group, a private equity investment firm. Before joining Gores Technology Group, he was a managing director at Libra Capital Partners, L.P. (“Libra”), a private equity investment firm, and was also a managing director andco-head of the Corporate Finance division of U.S. Bancorp Libra, an affiliated firm. Prior to joining Libra, Mr. Mayer was a managing director of Aries Capital Group, LLC, a private equity investment firm that heco-founded, and was a principal with Apollo Advisors, L.P. and Lion Advisors, L.P., affiliated private equity investment firms. Prior to that time, Mr. Mayer was an attorney with Sullivan & Cromwell. He currently serves on the Boards of Directors of BlueLinx Holdings Inc., Grifols S.A., Staples Solutions N.V., Starrus Holdings Limited, and YP Holdings LLC, and on the Board of Managers of New Avon LLC.

Mr. Mayer was elected to the Board of Directors commencing immediately upon the conclusion of the 2017 Annual Meeting by the holders of our Series C Preferred Stock, voting separately as a single class, and is not up for election by our shareholders at the 2017 Annual Meeting.

KEY ATTRIBUTES, EXPERIENCE AND SKILLS: Mr. Mayer has an extensive background in strategy, operations and corporate finance derived from his career in private equity. Mr. Mayer’s knowledge in the areas of finance, international business and strategic investments provide a valuable perspective to the Board.

  MICHAEL F. SANFORD  

Series C Designee

LOGO

Director since 2016    

Age: 36    

COMMITTEE

Finance Committee

Mr. Sanford is a Managing Director,Co-Head of North American Private Equity, and a member of the Global Private Equity Investment Committee at private investment firm Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. Prior to joining Cerberus in 2006, Mr. Sanford was at The Blackstone Group (“Blackstone”) in its Restructuring and Reorganization Advisory Group from 2004 to 2006, where he advised companies and creditors on a variety of restructuring transactions. Prior to joining Blackstone, from 2003 to 2004, Mr. Sanford worked at BancBank of America Securities in its Consumer and Retail Investment Banking Group, where he executed various financing, M&A and leveraged recapitalization transactions. He serves on the Board of Directors of YP Holdings LLC, Print Media LLC, DynCorp International Inc., Electrical Components International, Subcom, Navistar Defense and Tier 1 Group LLC and on the Board of Managers of New Avon LLC.

 

Mr. Sanford was electedre-elected to the Board of Directors commencing immediately upon the conclusion of the 20172019 Annual Meeting by the holders of our Series C Preferred Stock, voting separately as a single class, and is not up for election by our shareholders at the 20172019 Annual Meeting.

Director since:2016

 

KEY ATTRIBUTES, EXPERIENCE AND SKILLS:Age:38

COMMITTEES

Compensation and Management Development Committee

Finance Committee

SKILLS & EXPERIENCE OF PARTICULAR RELEVANCE TO AVON:

Through his career in various roles with finance and private equity firms, Mr. Sanford has extensive experience in financing matters and private equity investments. Mr. Sanford’s insights into capital management, restructuring, and capital markets are highly valuable to the Board.

 

14

LENARD B. TESSLER

 

Series C Designee

LOGO

Mr. Tessler is currently Vice Chairman and Senior Managing Director of private investment firm Cerberus Capital Management, L.P., where he is a member of the Cerberus Capital Management Investment Committee. Prior to joining Cerberus in 2001, Mr. Tessler served as Managing Partner of TGV Partners from 1990 to 2001, a private equity firm which he founded. Earlier in his career, he was a founding partner of Levine, Tessler, Leichtman & Co., and a founder, Director and Executive Vice President of Walker Energy Partners. Mr. Tessler is currently Lead Director of Albertsons Companies, and a director of Keane Group, Inc. He is also a Trustee of the New York-Presbyterian Hospital where he is a member of the Investment Committee and the Budget and Finance Committee.

Mr. Tessler wasre-elected to the Board of Directors commencing immediately upon the conclusion of the 2019 Annual Meeting by the holders of our Series C Preferred Stock, voting separately as a single class, and is not up for election by our shareholders at the 2019 Annual Meeting.

Director since:2018

Age:66

SKILLS & EXPERIENCE OF PARTICULAR RELEVANCE TO AVON:

Through his senior executive positions held during the course of over 30 years at private investment firms and his service on boards of directors of operating companies, Mr. Tessler has an extensive background in financing and private equity investments, which provides critical skills to the Board in its oversight of strategic planning and operations.

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement15


INFORMATION CONCERNING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

20162018 Board Meetings

Our Board of Directors held elevenseven meetings in 2016.2018. Directors are expected to attend all meetings of the Board and the Board Committees on which they serve and to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In 2016,2018, all directors then serving on the Board attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of 20162018 meetings of the Board and of each Board Committee on which he or she served. Nine out of ten of theAll directors then serving on the Board attended the 20162018 Annual Meeting. In addition to participation at Board and Committee meetings and the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our directors discharge their duties throughout the year through communications with senior management.

Non-employee directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions, as needed, without the CEO or other members of management.

Board Leadership Structure

The Board currently separates the positions of Chairman, Lead Independent Director and CEO. Mr. Galbato serves as ournon-executive Chairman of the Board, Mr. Cornwell serves as our Lead Independent Director and Ms. McCoyMr. Zijderveld serves as our CEO.

The Board evaluates its leadership structure periodically and believes that separating the Chairman, Lead Independent Director and CEO roles is important as the Company focuses on its transformation and growth efforts. FollowingPer the amendment of theCompany’sBy-Laws, on March 1, 2016, the Chairman presides at all meetings of the Board, including executive sessions, at which the Chairman is present, and the Lead Independent Director presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present. Additional rights, duties and responsibilities of the Chairman and the Lead Independent Director are set forth in theBy-Laws and the Corporate Governance Guidelines. Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, so long as Cerberus Investor maintains a certain ownership level in the Company (as described in more detail on page 29 of this Proxy Statement), Cerberus Investor has the right to select the director to be appointed as our Chairman.

Risk Oversight

The Board administers its risk oversight function primarily through the Audit Committee, which oversees the Company’s risk management practices. The Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things, discussing with management on a regular basis the Company’s guidelines and policies that govern the process for risk assessment and risk management. Management is responsible for assessing and managing the Company’s various risk exposures onaday-to-day basis. basis. In connection with this, the Audit Committee has oversight of the Company’s enterprise risk management (“ERM”) program, which includes a risk management committee composed of certain key executives. The cross-functional group of key executives who comprise the risk management committee identify, on a periodic basis, the top current and future risks facing the Company, including, but not limited to, strategic, operational, financial and compliance risks, and the associated risk owners are responsible for managing and mitigating these risks. The Board may assign certain ERM risks to a specific Board Committee to examine in detail if such Board Committee is in the best position to review and assess the risk. In line with this, the Company provides regular ERM updates to the Audit Committee on several risks, including cybersecurity and data privacy, and to other Board Committees, as appropriate, which may have certain ERM risks assigned to them by the Board.appropriate. The Audit Committee also periodically reports to the full Board on the Company’s risk managementERM program.

While the Board has overall responsibility for overseeing risk management, Board Committees oversee risk within their areas of responsibility, as appropriate. For example, as set forth in further detail on page 51,55, our Compensation and Management Development Committee, with support and advice from its independent consultant, reviews the risk and reward structure of executive compensation plans, policies and practices at least annually to confirm that there are no compensation-related risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. As set forth in its charter, the Finance Committee is responsible for, among other things, reviewing periodically the Company’s strategy for and use of derivatives for hedging risks such as interest rate and foreign exchange risks.

For certain risks, oversight is conducted by the full Board, such as during the Board’s annual review of the Company’s strategic goals and initiatives and other significant issues that are expected to affect the Company in the future. We believe that the Chairman, Lead Independent Director, CEO, and roles of the Board and the Board Committees provide the appropriate leadership to help ensure effective risk oversight.

Communications with Directors

A shareholder or other interested person who wishes to contact the Chairman, the Lead Independent Director or thenon-employee or independent directors as a group may do so by addressing his or her correspondence to the Chairman, the Lead Independent Director or such directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, Avon Products, Inc., 601 Midland Avenue, Rye, NY 10580. All correspondence addressed to a director or group of directors will be forwarded to that director or group of directors.

 

16  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  15


Board Committees

The Board has the following regular standing committees: Audit Committee, Compensation and Management Development Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Finance Committee. The charters of each Committee and our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the Corporate Governance tab of our investor website (www.avoninvestor.com)(investor.avonworldwide.com). Our Code of Conduct (which applies to the Company’s directors, officers and employees) is available aton the “Our Values” tab ofwww.avoncompany.com.www.avonworldwide.com.

 

 

Audit Committee

 

 

 

Primary Responsibilities

  

 

20162018 Meetings: 1112    

 

Charles H. NoskiAndrew G. McMaster, Jr. (Chair)

Jose Armario

W. Don Cornwell

Cathy D. Ross

Chan W. Galbato*

*non-voting Observer

 

 

Assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee the integrity of our financial statements, controls and disclosures, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm, and the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm. The Committee has the authority to conduct any investigation appropriate to fulfilling its purpose and responsibilities.

 

The Board has determined that Mr. Noski, Mr.Messrs. McMaster and Cornwell and Ms. Ross are “audit committee financial experts,”experts” under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and that all of the Committee members are independent and financially literate under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.Exchange (the “NYSE”).

 

A further description of the role of the Audit Committee is set forth on pages 7084 through 7387 under “Audit Committee Report” and “Proposal 4—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

 

 

Compensation and

Management Development

Committee

 

 

 

Primary Responsibilities

  

 

20162018 Meetings: 129    

 

Helen McCluskey (Chair)

Jose Armario

Nancy Killefer

StevenMichael F. MayerSanford

 

 

Discharges the responsibilities of the Board relating to executive compensation, including reviewing and establishing our overall executive compensation and benefits philosophy, including review of the risk and reward structure of executive compensation plans, policies and practices, as appropriate. In addition, the Committee, in consultation with the independent members of the Board, reviews and approves the goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO and determines the compensation of the CEO. It also determines the compensation of all senior officers and oversees incentive compensation plans, including establishing performance measures and evaluating and approving any incentive payouts thereunder.

 

Reviews and evaluates the Company’s talent management and succession planning approach, philosophy, and key processes, and is responsible for development and succession plans for members of the Company’s Executive Management Committee, and provides oversight of development plans for their potential successors.

 

The Committee may delegate responsibilities to a subcommittee composed of one or more members of the Committee, provided that any action taken shall be reported to the full Committee as soon as practicable, but in no event later than at the Committee’s next meeting. In addition, the Committee may delegate certain other responsibilities, as described in the Committee charter. For example, the Committee has delegated to Ms. McCoyMr. Zijderveld, in herhis capacity as a director, the authority to approve annual andoff-cycle equity awards to employees who are not senior officers.

 

A description of the role of the compensation consultant engaged by the Committee, scope of authority of the Committee and the role of executive officers in determining executive compensation is set forth on page 4051 under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Roles in Executive Compensation.”

 

16  AVON 2019 Proxy Statement17


 

Nominating and Corporate

Governance Committee

 

 

 

Primary Responsibilities

  

 

20162018 Meetings: 56    

 

 

Nancy Killefer (Chair)

W. Don Cornwell

Chan W. Galbato

    Charles H. Noski

 

Identifies individuals qualified to become Board members, consistent with criteria approved by the Board, and recommends to the Board the candidates for directorships to be filled by the Board. A description of the Committee’s process for identifying and evaluating nominees for directorships is set forth on page 1819 under “Director Nomination Process & Shareholder Nominations.”

 
 

Develops and recommends to the Board corporate governance principles, monitors developments in corporate governance, and makes recommendations to the Board regarding changes in governance policies and practices.

 
 

Oversees the evaluation of the Board, including conducting an annual evaluation of the performance of the Board and Board committees.

 
 

Reviews and recommends to the Board policies regarding the compensation ofnon-employee directors.

 
 

A description of the compensation ofnon-employee directors and the Committee’s scope of authority with respect to such matters is set forth on page 22 under “Director Compensation —RoleCompensation—Role of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.”

 

 

Finance Committee

 

 

 

Primary Responsibilities

 

  

 

20162018 Meetings: 5    

 

 

 

W. Don Cornwell (Chair)

Susan J. Kropf

James A. Mitarotonda

Michael F. Sanford

 

Assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities to oversee our financial management, including oversight of our capital structure and financial strategies, investment strategies, banking relationships, and funding of the employee benefit plans.

 

Responsible for the oversight of the deployment and management of our capital, including the oversight of certain key business initiatives.

Director Independence

The Board has concluded that eachnon-employee director, Director Nominee and Series C Designee is independent.

The Board of Directors assesses the independence of itsnon-employee members at least annually in accordance with the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange,NYSE, the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,SEC, and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. As part of its assessment, the Board determines whether or not any such director has a material relationship with the Company, either directly or indirectly as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company. The Board broadly considers all relevant facts and circumstances and considers this issue not merely from the standpoint of the director, but also from that of persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation. This consideration includes:

 

the nature of the relationship;

 

the significance of the relationship to Avon, the other organization and the individual director;

 

whether or not the relationship is solely a business relationship in the ordinary course of Avon’s and the other organization’s businesses and does not afford the director any special benefits; and

 

  

any commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable, familial and other relationships;provided, that ownership of a significant amount of our stock is not, by itself, a bar to independence.

In assessing the independence of directors and the materiality of any relationship with Avon and the other organization, the Board has determined that a relationship in the ordinary course of business involving the sale, purchase or leasing of property or services will not be deemed material if the amounts involved, on an annual basis, do not exceed the greater of (i) $1,000,000 or (ii) one percent (1%) of Avon’s revenues or one percent (1%) of the revenues of the other organization involved.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company has business relationships with certain companies on which Avon directors also serve on the board of directors, including for example, advertising arrangements, software services, and insurance coverage. The Company also has ongoing business relationships with affiliates of Cerberus Investor, of which the Series C Designees serve as directors, officers or employees, as described in “Transactions with Related Persons” on page 27. Based on the standards described above, the Board has determined that none of these transactions or relationships, nor the associated amounts paid to the parties, was material such that it would impede the exercise of independent judgment.

 

18  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  17


Board Policy Regarding Voting for Directors

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that any Director Nomineeincumbent director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” than votes “for” his or her election in an uncontested election of directors will promptly tender his or her resignation. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Committee”“Nominating Committee”) will recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider any factors or other information that it considers appropriate or relevant. The Board, taking into account the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation, will act on the tendered resignation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale within 90 days from the date of the certification of the election results.

Board and Committee Self-Evaluations

Pursuant to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and each committee’s charter, the Board and each of its committees annually conducts a self-assessment. The Nominating Committee oversees the process. In recent years, the Board has used the Corporate Secretary or a third-party facilitator to interview each Director to obtain his or her feedback regarding the Board’s and each committee’s effectiveness, as well as feedback on each individual Director and the Chairman, Lead Independent Director and each committee chair in their respective roles. Self-evaluation topics generally include, among other matters, Board and committee composition and structure; effectiveness of the Board and committees; meeting topics and process; and Board interaction with management. The Board discusses the results of each annual self-evaluation and, based on the results, implements enhancements and other modifications as appropriate. Similarly, the results of each committee evaluation are generally discussed at subsequent committee meetings for the relevant committee. Individual feedback is provided to Directors by the Chairman and the Lead Independent Director.

Director Nomination Process & Shareholder Nominations

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying individuals qualified to become Board members, consistent with criteria approved by the Board, and for making recommendations to the Board regarding: (i) nominees for Board membership to fill vacancies and newly created positions, and (ii) the persons to be nominated by the Board for election at the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders. The Nominating Committee actively considers potential director candidates on an ongoing basis as part of its director succession planning efforts.

The Nominating Committee’s process for considering all candidates for election as directors, including shareholder-recommended candidates, is designed to ensure that the Nominating Committee fulfills its responsibility to recommend candidates that are properly qualified and are not serving any special interest groups, but rather the best interest of all of the shareholders.

In making its recommendations, the Nominating Committee evaluates each candidate based on the independence standards described above and other qualification standards described below. For example, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee require that our directors possess the highest standards of personal and professional ethics, character and integrity and meet the standards set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. In identifying candidates for membership on the Board, the Nominating Committee takes into account all factors it considers appropriate, consistent with criteria approved by the Board, which may include professional experience, knowledge, independence, diversity of backgrounds, and the extent to which the candidate would fill a present or evolving need on the Board. There is not a formal diversity policy; however, the Board values diversity of backgrounds, as one factor that the Committee may consider, is broadly construed to includein its broadest sense, including differences of viewpoint, personal and professional experience, skill, gender, race, ethnicity, geography, and other individual characteristics.

Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreementcharacteristics, and the Nominating Committee endeavors to include women, minority, and geographically diverse candidates in the qualified pool from which Board candidates are chosen.

The Board takes an active and thoughtful approach to refreshment and strives to maintain a balance of longer-tenured directors and newer directors with fresh ideas and viewpoints to achieve an appropriate balance of continuity and refreshment. The Board does not believe in limiting the number of terms that a director may serve, as term limits could deprive the Company and its shareholders of valuable director experience and familiarity with the Company and its operations; however, there-nomination of incumbent directors is not automatic. In accordance with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, all directors serveone-yearterms and conditionsanynon-employee director who will be age 72 or older at the time of the election may not stand for reelection unless requested by the Board. The composition of our Series C Preferred Stock, Cerberus Investor,Board, as contemplated by our current slate of nominees, includes six new independent directors since 2016. In addition, in 2018, Jan Zijderveld joined the Board in connection with his appointment as the holderCompany’s Chief Executive Officer. As a result of the Series C Preferred Stock, is currently entitled to elect three directors to the Board. In connection with this, Cerberus Investor has elected each of Messrs. Galbato, Mayer and Sanford to servethese Board changes, tenure on the Board commencing immediately upon the conclusioncurrently ranges from less than one year to 17 years, with an average Board tenure of the 2017 Annual Meeting. So long as Cerberus Investor maintains a certain ownership level in the Company (as described in more detail on page 29 of this Proxy Statement), Cerberus Investor also has the right to select the director to be appointed as our Chairman and has selected Mr. Galbato to serve in this capacity. In addition, pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, the Company and Cerberus Investor jointly selected Ms. Ross and Mr. Armario for election to the Board in accordance with the process described below.4 years.

The Nominating Committee has retained a third-party search firmsfirm to locate candidates who may meet the needs of the Board.Board at that time. The firmsfirm typically provideprovides information on a number of candidates for review and discussion by the Nominating Committee. As appropriate, the Nominating Committee chair and other members of the Nominating Committee and the Board interview potential candidates. If the Nominating Committee determines that a potential candidate meets the needs of the Board, possesses the relevant qualifications, and meets the standards set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating Committee will vote to recommend to the Board the election of the candidate as a director. Following the completion of this process with respect to Ms. Ross and Mr. Armario, members of the Committee determined that Ms. Ross and Mr. Armario met these standards and, therefore, recommended to the Board their election as directors. Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, each of

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement19


On March 26, 2018, the Company and Cerberus Investorcertain of its shareholders entered into the Nomination Agreement, pursuant to which the Company agreed to the election of Ms. Ross andnominate Mr. Armario to the Board based upon the recommendation of the Committee members. As described on page 4, pursuant to its agreement with the Company, Barington exercised its right to approve the appointment of Mr. Armario. Ms. Ross and Mr. Armario were elected to the Board on March 24 and September 9, 2016, respectively, by the directors then serving on the Board and Ms. Ross was again elected by our shareholders for aone-year term at our 2016 Annual Meeting. Both have been nominatedMitarotonda for election to the Board at the 20172018 Annual Meeting.

The shareholders party to the Nomination Agreement consist of Shah Capital Management, Inc., NuOrion Advisors, LLC, and Barington Capital and certain of their respective affiliates (collectively, the “Barington Group”). In connection with the Nomination Agreement, the Barington Group withdrew its notice of nomination for the 2018 Annual Meeting. The Nomination Agreement requires each member of the Barington Group to abide by certain customary voting and standstill provisions, subject to certain exceptions, through Mr. Mitarotonda’s service on the Board, including that at the 2019 Annual Meeting it will vote all of its shares of the Company’s common stock that it or its affiliates have the right to vote in favor of the election of directors nominated by the Board and refrain from soliciting proxies or participating in any “withhold” or similar campaign. The foregoing is not a complete description of the terms of the Nomination Agreement and the associated Confidentiality Agreement. For copies of, and more information concerning, the Nomination Agreement and the Confidentiality Agreement, please see the Company’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC on March 26, 2018 and Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 thereto.

18


The Nominating Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders if properly submitted to the Nominating Committee in accordance with ourBy-Laws and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Shareholders wishing to recommend persons for consideration by the Nominating Committee as nominees for election to the Board of Directors can do so by writing to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, Avon Products, Inc., 601 Midland Avenue, Rye,1 Avon Place, Suffern, NY 10580.10901. Recommendations must include the proposed nominee’s name, detailed biographical data, work history, qualifications and corporate and charitable affiliations. A written statement from the proposed nominee consenting to be named as a nominee and, if nominated and elected, to serve as a director is also required. The Nominating Committee will then consider the candidate and the candidate’s qualifications using the criteria as set forth above. The Nominating Committee may discuss with the shareholder making the nomination the reasons for making the nomination and the qualifications of the candidate. The Nominating Committee may then interview the candidate and may also use the services of a search firm to provide additional information about the candidate prior to making a recommendation to the Board.

Shareholders of record may also nominate candidates for election to the Board by following the procedures set forth in ourBy-Laws. On March 1, 2016, the Board amended and restated theThe Company’sBy-laws to, among other things, adoptinclude proxy access provisions whereby a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, who owns 3% or more of the Company’s common stock continuously for at least three years, may nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials candidates for election as directors of the Company. Such shareholder(s) or group(s) of shareholders may nominate up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board, provided that the shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in theBy-Laws and comply with the other procedural requirements of our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Please also see Section 14(a) of Article 3 of ourBy-Laws for details regarding the nomination of a Director candidate through the Advance Notice Process which is separate from a proxy access nomination. Information regarding these procedures for nominations by shareholders will be provided upon request to our Corporate Secretary.

In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that anyCommunications with Directors

A shareholder or other interested person who wishes to contact the Chairman, the Lead Independent Director or thenon-employee or independent directors as a group may do so by addressing his or her correspondence to the Chairman, the Lead Independent Director or such directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, Avon Products, Inc., 1 Avon Place, Suffern, NY 10901. All correspondence addressed to a director whoor group of directors will be age 72forwarded to that director or older at the timegroup of the election may not stand for reelection unless requested by the Board.directors.

Certain Legal Proceedings

In July and August 2010, derivative actions were filed in state court against certain presentThere are no material legal proceedings to which any of our directors, executive officers, or former officers and/or directorsbeneficial owners of more than 5% of the Company (Carol J. Parker, derivatively on behalfoutstanding shares of Avon Products, Inc. v. W. Don Cornwell, et al. and Avon Products, Inc. as nominal defendant (filed in the New York Supreme Court, Nassau County, Index No. 600570/2010); Lynne Schwartz, derivatively on behalf of Avon Products, Inc. v. Andrea Jung, et al. and Avon Products, Inc. as nominal defendant (filed in the New York Supreme Court, New York County, Index No. 651304/2010)). On November 22, 2013, a derivative action was filed in federal court against certain presentcommon stock, or former officers and/or directors of the Company and following the federal court’s dismissal, an additional action was subsequently filed in New York state court on May 1, 2015 (Sylvia Pritika, derivatively on behalf of Avon Products, Inc. v. Andrea Jung, et al. and Avon Products, Inc. as nominal defendant (filed in the New York Supreme Court, New York County, Index No. 651479/2015)). The claims asserted in one or more of these actions include alleged breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment, relating to the Company’s compliance with the FCPA, including the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls. The relief sought against the individual defendants in one or more of these derivative actions include certain declaratory and equitable relief, restitution, damages, exemplary damages and interest. The Companyany affiliate thereof, is a nominal defendant, and no relief is sought against the Company itself. On April 28, 2015, an action was filedparty adverse to seek enforcement of demands for the inspection of certain of the Company’s books and records (Belle Cohen v. Avon Products, Inc. (filed in the New York Supreme Court, New York County, Index No. 651418/2015)). The parties reached agreementsus or has a material interest adverse to settle the derivative and books and records actions. The terms of settlement include certain corporate governance measures as well as releases of claims and payment of plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees in the amount of $4 million. On March 30, 2016, the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement, and on August 1, 2016, the court entered an order and judgment granting final approval of the settlement. The $4 million was paid by the Company’s insurers. The order and judgment approving the settlement has become final. In light of the settlement, stipulations voluntarily dismissing or discontinuing the actions with prejudice have been filed in the Pritika and Parker actions.

Consistent with the Company’sBy-Laws and the New York Business Corporation Law, expenses in connection with all of the foregoing actions and certain other matters described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K are being paid by the Company on behalf of certain present or former officers and/or directors.us.

Compensation and Management Development Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of our Board’s Compensation and Management Development Committee has served as one of our officers or employees at any time. None of our executive officers served during 20162018 as a member of the board of directors or as a member of a compensation committee of any other company that has an executive officer serving as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation and Management Development Committee.

 

20  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  19


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table discloses compensation received by ournon-employee directors during 2016.2018.

 

Director

 

 

  Fees Earned or  

Paid in Cash

($)1

 

 

Stock

        Awards        
($)
2

 

 

Nonqualified
Deferred
  Compensation  
Earnings

($)3

 

 

All Other

  Compensation  

($)4

 

 

          Total           

($)

 

Mr. Armario7 27,798 —    25 27,823
Mr. Conant6 25,000 —    13 25,013
Mr. Cornwell8 203,000 115,000  31,075 349,075
Mr. Galbato5,8 219,500 125,411  62 344,973
Ms. Hailey6 25,000 —    13 25,013
Ms. Killefer 93,000 115,000  75 208,075
Ms. Kropf 81,000 115,000  75 196,075
Ms. Lagomasino6 25,000 —    13 25,013
Ms. Mathew6 25,000 —    13 25,013
Mr. Mayer5 69,500 125,411  62 194,973
Ms. McCluskey 90,000 115,000  75 205,075
Mr. Noski 101,000 115,000  75 216,075
Mr. Rodkin6 25,000 —    13 25,013
Ms. Ross 68,946 125,411  54 194,411
Mr. Sanford5 69,500 125,411  62 194,973

Dr. Stern6

 

 

25,000

 

 

—  

 

 

214

 

 

10,862

 

 

36,076

 

Director

 

  

 

Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash

($)1

 

  

 

Stock

Awards

($)2

 

  

 

All Other

Compensation

($)3

 

  

Total        

($)        

 

 

Jose Armario

 

  

 

91,000

 

  

 

115,000

 

  

 

61

 

  

 

206,061

 

 

W. Don Cornwell6

 

  

 

203,000

 

  

 

115,000

 

  

 

15,561

 

  

 

333,561

 

 

Chan W. Galbato4,6

 

  

 

231,000

 

  

 

115,000

 

  

 

61

 

  

 

346,061

 

 

Nancy Killefer

 

  

 

93,000

 

  

 

115,000

 

  

 

61

 

  

 

208,061

 

 

Susan J. Kropf

 

  

 

81,000

 

  

 

115,000

 

  

 

61

 

  

 

196,061

 

 

Steven F. Mayer4,5

 

  

 

18,750

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

15

 

  

 

18,765

 

 

Helen McCluskey

 

  

 

90,000

 

  

 

115,000

 

  

 

61

 

  

 

205,061

 

 

Andrew G. McMaster, Jr.

 

  

 

90,000

 

  

 

115,000

 

  

 

41

 

  

 

205,041

 

 

James A. Mitarotonda

 

  

 

56,000

 

  

 

115,000

 

  

 

41

 

  

 

171,041

 

 

Charles H. Noski5

 

  

 

25,000

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

15,526

 

  

 

40,526

 

 

Cathy D. Ross5

 

  

 

25,000

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

26

 

  

 

25,026

 

 

Michael F. Sanford4

 

  

 

87,000

 

  

 

115,000

 

  

 

61

 

  

 

202,061

 

 

Lenard Tessler4

 

  

 

56,250

 

  

 

125,178

 

  

 

51

 

  

 

181,479

 

 

1

This column represents the amount of cash compensation earned in 20162018 (including any deferred amounts) for Board and Board Committee service. For 2016,2018, only Mr. NoskiArmario and Ms. Ross elected to defer any such amounts. See “Annual Retainer Fees” below for details.

 

2

Fornon-employee directors (other than the Cerberus-appointed directors) who were elected to the Board of Directors at the 20162018 Annual Meeting to serve until the next Annual Meeting, stock awards consist of 29,94861,170 service-based restricted stock units (“Service-based RSUs” or “RSUs”), which were granted on May 26, 201616, 2018 as part of the annual retainer fornon-employee directors. Ms. Ross, who joined the Board in March 2016, received an additionalpro-rata award of 2,711 RSUs for her service on the Board prior to our 2016 Annual Meeting. The aggregate grant date fair value of the RSUs is shown in the column and was determined based on the grant date fair value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See also Note 1013 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Form10-K for 20162018 for a description of our share-based awards. In lieu of the annual RSU awards that othernon-employee directors received on May 26, 2016,16, 2018, each of the Cerberus-appointed Directorsdirectors was granted 29,94861,170 phantom stock units (i.e., a contractual right to cash of the value of such units as of the date of vesting) as part of their annual retainers. They eachMr. Tessler also received an additionalpro-rata award of 2,7115,414 phantom stock units on May 16, 2018 for commencing service during the prior term (i.e., March and April 2016)2018). Directors whose service ended prior to the 20162018 Annual Meeting were not awarded any stock awards in 2016 (i.e., Mr. Conant, Ms. Hailey, Ms. Lagomasino, Ms. Mathew, Mr. Rodkin and Dr. Stern).2018.

 

3This column includes earnings on deferred compensation balances invested in the cash account under the Board of Directors of Avon Products, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan during 2016 that earned interest at the prime rate and which exceeded 120% of the applicable federal long-term interest rate published by the Treasury Department at the time the interest rate was set.

4This column includes payments of life and business travel accident insurance premiums and matching contributions made pursuant to the Avon Foundation Matching Gift Program.Non-employee directors arewere eligible to participate in the Avon Foundation’s U.S. Associate Matching Gift Program on the same terms as Avon Products, Inc. employees. Under this program, the Avon Foundation will matchmatched anon-employee director’s contribution to a charitable organization up to $15,500 attributable to each calendar year. This program ceased in May 2018. This column includes the following amounts for matches to charitable organizations: W. DonMr. Cornwell $31,000 (reflects matches made in calendar year 2016 attributable to contributions made in calendar years 2015$15,500 and 2016) and Dr. Stern, $10,850.Mr. Noski $15,500.

 

4
20


5Annual

All annual retainer fees payable to Mr.Messrs. Galbato, Mr. Mayer, Sanford, and Mr. Sanford by Avon Products, Inc.Tessler were paid by the Company directly to Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. at the direction of these directors.

5

Mr. Mayer resigned from the Board in March 2018. Mr. Noski and Ms. Ross chose not to stand forre-election at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and therefore their service as board members ended in May 2018.

 

6Mr. Conant, Ms. Hailey, Ms. Lagomasino, Ms. Mathew, Mr. Rodkin and Dr. Stern resigned from the Board in March 2016.

7Mr. Armario, who joined the Board in September 2016, did not receive a grant of RSUs during 2016.

8A fee of $150,000 was payable to Mr. Galbato for his service asnon-executive Chairman of the Board was paid in accordance with note 54 above. Mr. Cornwell received a fee of $100,000 for his service as Lead Independent Director.

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement21


Annual Retainer Fees

Directors who are employees of Avon Products, Inc., or any of our subsidiaries, receive no additional remuneration for services as a director. As in prior years, in 2016,2018 eachnon-employee director was entitled to an annual retainer of $190,000, consisting of $75,000 in cash plus an annual grant of RSUs having a market value as of the date of grant of approximately $115,000 based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. Pursuant to the Avon Products, Inc. Compensation Plan forNon-Employee Directors (the “Plan”“Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan”), annual RSU awards are granted on the same date as the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and vest on the date of the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders, provided that suchnon-employee director has served as a member of the Board of Directors for the entirety of his or her annual term. Vested RSUs are settled upon a director’s departure fromterm, and provided further that the Board. Anon-employeeNon-Employee director is entitled to regular dividend equivalent payments (to the extent any dividends on common stock are declared and paid) on RSUs but does not have the right to vote RSUs until settlement.

In 2016, we amended theDirector Compensation Plan to provideprovides that the Board canmay accelerate vesting of the annual RSU grant in the event anon-employee director’s Board service ceases involuntarily and without cause or in the event of a similar cessation of Board service. Vested RSUs are settled upon a director’s departure from the Board. Anon-employee director is entitled to receive dividend equivalent payments (to the extent any dividends on common stock are declared and paid) on RSUs but does not have the right to vote RSUs until settlement.

Additionally, directors elected by Cerberus Investor pursuant to the terms of the Series C Preferred Stock and the Investor Rights Agreement are entitled to be compensated for their services in the same amounts described above. EachHowever, each of these directors’ compensation that would otherwise be in the form of an annual RSU award willis instead be in the form of phantom stock units (i.e., a contractual right to receive an amount in cash ofequal to the value of such units as of the date of vesting) in an amount equal to the value of the othernon-employee directors’ RSU awards as of the date of vesting, to beand is paid upon vesting.

In addition to the annual Board retainer, during 2016,2018 thenon-executive Chairman and Lead Independent Director received additional fees of $150,000 and $100,000, respectively. Furthermore, the Company paid aan additional $10,000 retainer for service on the Audit Committee and aan additional $6,000 retainer for service on each of the other Board committees. In 2016,2018, the chair of the Audit Committee received an additional fee of $10,000,$30,000, the chair of the Compensation and Management Development Committee received an additional fee of $9,000, and the chair of each other Committee received an additional fee of $6,000. At certain times, we provide directors with complimentary Avon products, such as samples of new product launches.

Pursuant to the Board of Directors of Avon Products, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan,non-employee directors may elect to defer all or a portion of their cash retainer fees into a stock account or cash account. The amounts deferred into the stock account increase or decrease in value proportionately with the price of Avon’s common stock. In line with this, the amounts deferred into the cash account, inclusive of accumulated interest, earn interest equal to the prime rate.

Stock Ownership Guideline

The Board of Directors has adopted a stock ownership guideline which requiresnon-employee directors to own shares of our common stock having a value equal to or greater than $350,000 within five years from the date of their election to the Board. The Board may waive this stock ownership guideline for any director if the receipt of equity awards or the ownership of Company common stock by such director would violate any policies or procedures to which such director is subject in connection with his or her employment. In line with this, the stock ownership guideline has been waived for Messrs. Galbato, MayerSanford, and Sanford.Tessler. All other current directors were in compliance with this guideline for 2016 or are on track to satisfy it withinworking toward attaining the period allowed to satisfy the guideline.required ownership level.

LOGO21


Role of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for periodically reviewing and making recommendations to the full Board regarding the compensation ofnon-employee directors. In making its recommendations, the Nominating Committee typically considers:

 

The

the form and amount of compensation necessary to attract and retain individuals who are qualified to serve on the Board and to align the interests of the directors with those of shareholders.shareholders;

 

The

thenon-employee director compensation practices of other companies to assist it in the development of the compensation program and practices for ournon-employee directors.directors;

 

The

the impact on the perceived independence of the directors of compensation in excess of customary amounts and of indirect compensation.compensation; and

 

The

the advice of independent consultants retained from time to time by the Nominating Committee (whom the Nominating Committee did not retain in 2018).

During 2017, Pay Governance LLC (“Pay Governance”) provided independent compensation consulting services to the Nominating Committee on various director compensation matters including, but not limited to, retainers, chair fees, equity-based compensation,non-employee chairperson and Corporatelead director compensation, and stock ownership guidelines. Pay Governance conducted analysis and delivered presentations to the Nominating Committee regarding current and prospective director compensation matters. Pay Governance is engaged by and reports directly to the Nominating Committee for the services regarding director compensation and consults directly with the Chair of the Nominating Committee.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Committee”) directly engaged an independent outside consulting firm, Pearl Meyer and Partners LLC (“Pearl Meyer”), to provide input on director compensation in 2016. Pearl Meyer reported to the Committee, which hadhas the sole authority to continue orretain and terminate Pay Governance for these services and to review and approve Pay Governance’s fees for these services and other terms of the relationship. In 2016, Pearl Meyer provided only limited services to theengagement. See page 51 for information regarding Pay Governance’s independence. The Nominating Committee on director compensation matters and provided no other services to the Company. The Committee reviewed the relationship with Pearl Meyer to identify conflicts of interest pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission and New York Stock Exchange rules and did not identify any such conflicts for 2016.

retain Pay Governance’s services in 2018.

 

22  AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The executive officers of the Company as of the date hereof are listed below. Executive officers are generally designated by the Board of Directors at its first meeting following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders or in connection with the appointment to his or her role. Each executive officer holds office until the first meeting of the Board of Directors following the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until his or her successor is elected, except in the event of death, resignation, removal or the earlier termination of his or her term of office.

 

Name

 

    

Title

 

 

    Age  

 

 

Year Designated

  Executive Officer  

 

Sheri McCoy   Chief Executive Officer 58 2012
James Wilson   Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer 57 2017
James S. Scully   Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer 52 2015
Fernando Acosta   Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing and Social Selling Officer 49 2011
John P. Higson   Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer 59 2006
Jeff Benjamin   Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer 71 2012
Susan Ormiston   Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Chief Human Resources Officer 46 2013

Robert Loughran

 

    

Group Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer

 

 52

 

 2012

 

Name

 

  

Title

 

  

Age

 

  

 

Year Designated     

Executive Officer     

 

 

Jan Zijderveld

 

  

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

  

 

54

 

  

 

2018

 

 

Gustavo Arnal*

 

  

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

 

  

 

49

 

  

 

2019

 

 

Miguel Fernandez

 

  

 

Executive Vice President, Global President

 

  

 

47

 

  

 

2017

 

 

Jonathan Myers

 

  

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer

 

  

 

49

 

  

 

2017

 

 

James E. Thompson**

 

  

 

Senior Vice President, General Counsel

 

  

 

58

 

  

 

2017

 

 

Vikram Agarwal

 

  

 

Senior Vice President & Chief Supply Chain Officer

 

  

 

54

 

  

 

2019

 

 

Kay Yukako Nemoto

 

  

 

Senior Vice President, Chief Strategy and HR Officer

 

  

 

47

 

  

 

2019

 

 

Laura Barbrook

 

  

 

Vice President, Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

 

  

 

45

 

  

 

2018

 

* On December 13, 2018 the Company announced that Gustavo Arnal was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), effective during Spring 2019. Mr. Arnal is expected to begin his employment and service as CFO on May 1, 2019.

**James E. Thompson’s last day of employment is expected to be effective no later than April 2019.

Sheri McCoyJan Zijderveld joined Avon as Chief Executive Officer in April 2012 and was electedappointed to the Board of Directors in May 2012. SheFebruary 2018. He joined Avon after 30 years with Johnson & Johnson,Unilever N.V./PLC, where shehe rose to Vice Chairmanserve as a member of the Executive Committee and President of Unilever’s European business in January 2011. Most recently at Johnson & Johnson, Ms. McCoyIn this position, Mr. Zijderveld oversaw Pharmaceutical, Consumer, Corporate Office of Science & Technology,25,000 employees and Information Technology divisions.operations in 34 countries. Prior to that, shehe served in a number of leadership roles, including Worldwide Chairman, Pharmaceuticals Group from 2009 to 2011; Worldwide Chairman, Surgical Care GroupExecutive Vice President of Unilever, South East Asia & Australasia from 2008 to 2009; and Company Group Chairman and Worldwide Franchise2011 while also acting asNon-Executive Chairman of Ethicon, Inc., a subsidiaryUnilever’s listed Indonesian business, and CEO of Johnson & Johnson,Unilever, Middle East and North Africa (MENA) from 2005 to 2008. Earlier in herhis career, she was Global President of the Babyhe served in numerous leadership positions across Europe, Australia and Wound Care franchise; Vice President, Marketing for a variety of global brands;New Zealand in general management, marketing, sales and Vice President, Research & Development for the Personal Products Worldwide Division. She serves on the boards of New Avon LLC, Catalyst, Stonehill College,distribution.

Gustavo Arnalis expected to begin his employment and thenon-profit science and technology organization FIRST.

James (Jamie) Wilsonhas beenservice as Avon’s Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since January 2017.on May 1, 2019. Prior to joining Avon, he served as Senior Vice President, CFO of SABMiller, an international brewingInternational Divisions and beverage company headquartered in London from 2011 to 2015. He joined SABMiller in 2005 as Director of Strategic Projects and held numerous roles over his ten years at the company, including managing director in Russia as well as managing director of Central Europe.Global Functions for Walgreens Boots Alliance (WBA) since July 2017. Prior to joining SABMiller in 2005,WBA, Mr. Wilson served in keyArnal worked for over twenty years at Procter & Gamble (P&G), holding multiple executive roles as Strategyincluding Vice President and Projects Director at Scottish & NewcastleCFO of the India, Middle East and various positions including Group Finance Director at Highland Distillers. Mr. Wilson began his career at Deloitte Haskins & Sells.Africa region from 2014 to 2017.

James S. ScullyMiguel Fernandezhas been Avon’s Executive ViceGlobal President Chief Operating Officer since January 2016. He also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from March 2015 to December 2016.August 2017. Prior to joining Avon, Mr. Scully served as the Chief Operating Officer of the J. Crew Group, Inc., a specialty apparel and accessories retailer. Mr. Scully served as J. Crew’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from September 2005 to May 2012 and Chief Administrative Officer from April 2008 to April 2013. Prior to joining J. Crew in 2005, Mr. Scully served in key roles at Saks Incorporated from 1997 to 2005, including at various times as Executive Vice President of Human Resources and Strategic Planning, Senior Vice President of Strategic and Financial Planning and Senior Vice President, Treasurer. Mr. Scully held the position of Senior Vice President of Corporate Finance at Bank of America (formerly NationsBank) from 1994 to 1997. Mr. Scully began his career in the banking industry at Connecticut National Bank, which was subsequently acquired by Shawmut Bank.

Fernando Acosta has been Avon’s Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing and Social Selling Officer since January 2016. Prior to this, he was Senior Vice President and President, North Latin America and Andean Cluster and Head of Global Brand Marketing from November 2014 to December 2015 and Senior Vice President and President Latin America from December 2011 to November 2014. Prior to joining Avon, Mr. AcostaFernandez spent 19nearly 10 years at Unilever,Herbalife, Ltd., where he advanced through a series of senior operating positions with increasing responsibility. He served as Unilever’sExecutive Vice President for the Americas and Worldwide Member Operations from December 2013 to June 2017. From July 2009 to November 2013, he was Senior Vice President Middle Americas beginningand Managing Director Mexico and prior to that he was Vice President Finance and Distributor Operations. Prior to joining Herbalife, Mr. Fernandez was Chief Financial Officer at OCC Mundial and also served as Business Controller and Business Development for Microsoft in November 2010.Mexico. His earlier career included roles in investment banking at JPMorgan Chase and financial management at Procter & Gamble (P&G).

Jonathan Myershas been Avon’s Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer since September 2017. Prior to joining Avon, Mr. Myers served as Vice President, Western European Markets and Managing Director, UK and Ireland for Kellogg Company from January 2012 to July 2016. Prior to joining Kellogg, Mr. Myers spent twenty years at Procter & Gamble (P&G) serving in various leadership roles for businesses spanning Europe, Asia and Latin America, including General Manager, Oral Care and Feminine Care, Greater China.

James E. Thompson has been Avon’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel since August 2017 and also served as Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer until February 2019. Prior to joining Avon, Mr. Thompson spent nine years at Chiquita Brands International, Inc. as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from 2006 to 2015. Prior to that, he was Group Vice President and General Counsel to McLeodUSA from 2003 to 2006 and prior to that he served as Unilever’s Senior Vice President, Skin CareDirector, International Legal to Alticor Inc., the parent company of Amway Corporation from 1995 to 2002. Mr. Thompson began his career as an attorney at Jones Day where he gained significant experience working on U.S. and Cleansing from August 2008 to October 2010. Prior to that, he served as Senior Vice President, Dove Personal Care from July 2006 to July 2008. Prior to 2006, Mr. Acosta held various management positions within Unilever’s Deodorantsinternational antitrust and Hair Care businesses.

corporate law matters.

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  23


John P. HigsonVikram Agarwalhas been Avon’s Senior Vice President & Chief Supply Chain Officer since February 2019. Prior to joining Avon, Mr. Agarwal spent thirty years at Unilever, where he advanced through a series of senior positions in operations and supply chain in various roles around the world. His last role was as Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer since fall 2016. PriorSupply Chain Unilever from August 2016 to this,January 2019, and prior to that from August 2013 to August 2016 he was Avon’s Executive Vice President Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA) and Latin America since January 2016, Senior Vice President and President, EMEA and Head of Global Field Operations from November 2014 to December 2015 and Senior Vice President and President, EMEA from March 2012 to November 2014. Mr. Higson served as Seniorthe Group Vice President, Global Commercial Operations from March 2011 to March 2012 and Senior Vice President, Global Direct Selling and Business Model Innovation from June 2009 to March 2011. Prior to that, Mr. Higson was Senior Vice President, Central and Eastern Europe from 2005 to 2009, Area Vice President, Central and Eastern Europe from 2002 to 2005 and, additionally during that period, was General Manager, Avon Poland from 2003 to 2005 and head of Global Sales Development from 1999 to 2002. Before that, he held various positions since joining Avon in 1985.Home Care Supply Chain.

Jeff BenjaminKay Yukako Nemoto has been Avon’s Senior Vice President, General CounselChief Strategy and Chief Ethics & ComplianceHR Officer since September 2012. Prior to joining Avon, he was employed by Novartis Corporation (formerly known as Ciba-Geigy Corporation) from April 1974 through December 2011. There he served in a variety of general counseling positions from 1986 until his retirement in December 2011. In addition, he was Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer at Novartis Corporation from 1997 through 2010 and Chair of the Ethics & Compliance Committee from 2010 through 2011.

Susan Ormiston has been Avon’s Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Chief Human Resources Officer since July 2013.February 2019. Prior to that, Ms. OrmistonNemoto served on secondment with Avon from Cerberus Operations & Advisory Company (COAC) as Group Vice President, Global Functions & HR Operational Excellence from November 2012 topart of strategic partnership since July 2013 and prior to that she held the position of Vice President, Human Resources, Global Brand Marketing since joining Avon in August 2010.2017. Prior to joining Avon, Ms. Ormiston was SeniorNemoto served as Operating Executive, for COAC since February 2015. Earlier in her career, Ms. Nemoto spent over 23 years in banking, consultancy and advisory roles at companies including Ernst & Young and Alix Partners, including as Director, Operational Transaction Services with Ernst & Young from July 2011 to June 2014.

Laura Barbrook has been Avon’s Vice President, Human Resources,Corporate Controller since September 2017 and was elected the Company’s Principal Accounting Officer in January 2018. Prior to joining Avon, Dr. Barbrook was Group Financial Controller at global life insurer New York Life International from June 2007 to July 2010.Travelex beginning in 2013. Earlier in her career, she spent 15 years at IBM, progressing through human resources management roles of increasing responsibilityworked for Rio Tinto and Ernst & Young in the U.S.finance and U.K.

Robert Loughran has been Avon’s Group Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer since March 2016 and prior to that Group Vice President, Corporate Controller since May 2015. He also served as Acting Chief Financial Officer from October 2014 to March 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Loughran served as Vice President and Corporate Controller from May 2012 to May 2015 and as Vice President and Assistant Controller from September 2009 to May 2012. Prior to that, he held the position of Executive Director, Assistant Controller since joining Avon in 2004.

control roles.

 

24  AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


OWNERSHIP OF SHARES

The following table shows information for beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Avon common stock, as set forth in recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).SEC. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with SEC rules. In computing a person’s percentage ownership of common stock, shares of common stock into which shares of Avon’s Series C Preferred Stock are convertible are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned only with respect to the person exercising voting and dispositive power over such shares of Series C Preferred Stock, as described in more detail in footnote 1 to the following table.

 

Name and Address

 

  

 

Amount and Nature of    

Beneficial Ownership    

Of Common Stock    

 

  

        Percent of          

        Class         

 

Stephen Feinberg, Cerberus Investor and Avatar GP, LLC1

875 Third Avenue, 11th Floor

New York, New York 10022

 

  87,051,524  16.5%

Capital Research Global Investors2

333 South Hope Street

Los Angeles, CA 90071

 

  53,358,441  12.1%

BlackRock, Inc.3

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

 

  45,037,423  10.3%

The Vanguard Group4

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

 

  38,614,629  8.8%
Name and Address  

Amount and Nature of

Beneficial Ownership

Of Common Stock

  

Percent of

Class

  

Stephen Feinberg, Cerberus Investor and Avatar GP, LLC1

875 Third Avenue, 11th Floor

New York, New York 10022

 

  87,051,524  16.44% 

BlackRock, Inc. 2

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

 

  44,642,763  10.09% 

Miller Value Partners, LLC, William H. Miller III Living Trusts3

One South Street, Suite 2550

Baltimore, MD 21202

  35,578,463  8.04% 

 

1

In its Schedule 13D filed on March 11, 2016 with the SEC, each of Stephen Feinberg, Cerberus Investor and Avatar GP, LLC reported that each may be deemed to beneficially own 435,000 shares of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock, which represents 100% of the outstanding Series C Preferred Stock and was convertible into 87,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as of March 1, 2016. Such shares are held by Cerberus Investor. Mr. Feinberg exercises sole voting and sole dispositive power over all securities held by Cerberus Investor. The percentage of class noted in the table is on anas-converted basis. Stephen Feinberg is the president, sole director and sole shareholder of Craig Court, Inc., the managing member of Craig Court GP, LLC, which is the general partner of Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. As set forth in further detail on page 29, Cerberus Investor is required to vote its shares of Series C Preferred Stock and common stock in favor of (i) each director nominated to the Board, (ii) the Company’s“say-on-pay” proposal and any other approved equity compensation proposals and (iii) the ratification of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. In its Form 4 filed on March 4, 2016 with the SEC, each of Mr. Feinberg, Cerberus Investor and Avatar GP, LLC reported that each may be deemed to own an additional 51,524 shares of the Company’s common stock as of March 31, 2016 as a result of accrued and unpaid dividends on such date.

 

2

In its Schedule 13G/A filed on February 13, 2017 with the SEC, Capital Research Global Investors, a division of Capital Research and Management Company reported the beneficial ownership of 53,358,441 shares. Capital Research Global Investors reported that it had sole voting power with respect to 53,358,441 shares, shared voting power with respect to no shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 53,358,441 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to no shares.

3In its Schedule 13G filed January 9, 2017March 8, 2019 with the SEC, BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) reported the beneficial ownership of 45,037,42344,642,763 shares on behalf of itself and the following subsidiaries: BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V.; BlackRock Advisors, LLC; BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited; BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited; BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG; BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.; BlackRock Fund Advisors; BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.; BlackRock International Limited;National Association; BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited; BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd;Limited; BlackRock Investment Management, LLC; BlackRock Japan Co Ltd.; and BlackRock Life Limited. BlackRock reported that it had sole voting power with respect to 43,822,70544,357,033 shares, shared voting power with respect to no shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 45,037,42344,642,763 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to no shares.

 

43

In its Schedule 13G/A13G filed on February 10, 201711, 2019 with the SEC, The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”)William H. Miller III Living Trust reported the beneficial ownership of 38,614,62935,578,463 shares, on behalf of itself and the following subsidiaries, which are investment managers and beneficially own shares: Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. Vanguard reported that it had sole voting power with respect to 597,2507,166,850 shares, shared voting power with respect to 46,63628,411,613 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 37,992,4437,166,850 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 622,18628,411,613 shares. Miller Value Partners, LLC, reported the beneficial ownership of 28,411,613 shares, sole voting power with respect to no shares, shared voting power with respect to 28,411,613 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to no shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 28,411,613 shares.

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  25


The following table sets forth certain information as of March 1, 20172019 regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each director, each named executive officer (“NEO”—those officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table), and all of our directors and executive officers as a group. The totalTotal shares individuallybeneficially owned by directors, NEOs and on an aggregate basis,executive officers individually represent less than 1% of Avon’s outstanding shares of common stock. Total shares beneficially owned by directors, NEOs and executive officers as a group represent 1.95% of Avon’s shares of common stock.

 

Name

 

 

    Shares of    

    Common    

    Stock1    

 

 

    Stock Options    

    Currently Exercisable    

    or Exercisable    

    within 60 Days    

 

 

    Total Number    

    of Shares    

    Beneficially    

    Owned    

 

 

    Restricted    

    Stock Units2    

 

    

    Total        

 

 

Fernando Acosta

 

   139,331   127,034 266,365 318,981  585,346

 

Jose Armario

 

   18,215   0       18,215 0  18,215

 

Jeff Benjamin

 

   118,156   76,045 194,201 191,104  385,305

 

W. Don Cornwell

 

   14,4833,4   0       14,483 80,191  94,674

 

Chan W. Galbato

 

   0        0       0 0  0

 

Nancy Killefer

 

   0        0       0 60,614  60,614

 

Susan J. Kropf

 

   169,861   0       169,861 46,214  216,075

 

John P. Higson

 

   64,341   305,949 370,290 214,989  585,279

 

Steven F. Mayer

 

   0        0       0 0  0

 

Helen McCluskey

 

   0        0       0 59,769  59,769

 

Sheri McCoy

 

   384,750   462,000 846,750 40,000  886,750

 

Charles H. Noski

 

   1,0004   0       1,000 63,162  64,162

 

Cathy D. Ross

 

   0        0       0 32,659  32,659

 

Michael F. Sanford

 

   0        0       0 0  0

 

James S. Scully

 

   292,241   133,334 425,575 603,470  1,029,045

 

17 directors, NEOs and executive officers as a group

 

   2,523,6645   1,202,412 3,726,076 1,918,407   5,644,483
Name  

Shares of

Common

Stock1

 

Stock Options

Currently Exercisable

or Exercisable

within 60 Days

  

Total Number

of Shares

Beneficially

Owned

  

Restricted

Stock Units2

  Total

Jose Armario

  18,215 0  18,215  113,621  131,836

W. Don Cornwell

  14,4834 0  14,483  173,847  188,330

Miguel Fernandez

  100,000 202,612  302,612  243,134  545,746

Chan W. Galbato7

  0 0  0  0  0

Nancy Killefer

  0 0  0  154,270  154,270

Susan J. Kropf

  169,861 0  169,861  139,870  309,731

Helen McCluskey

  0 0  0  153,425  153,425

Sheri McCoy3

  658,687 2,310,000  2,968,687  0  2,968,687

Andrew G. McMaster, Jr.

  0 0  0  61,170  61,170

James A. Mitarotonda

  4,167,2595 0  4,167,259  61,170  4,228,429

Jonathan Myers

  0 141,189  141,189  169,427  310,616

Michael F. Sanford7

  0 0  0  0  0

Lenard B. Tessler7

  0 0  0  0  0

James E. Thompson

  0 129,684  129,684  155,620  285,304

James Wilson

  0 266,017  266,017  216,113  482,130

Jan Zijderveld

  250,000 227,800  477,800  600,000  1,077,800

19 directors, NEOs and

executive officers as a group

  5,378,5056 3,292,563  8,671,068  2,346,416  11,017,484

 

1

Shares reflect sole voting and investment power except as otherwise noted.

 

2

The numbers in this column include unvested Service-based RSUs and Service-based RSUs that have become vested but are not yet settled, and which therefore do not afford the holder voting or investment power. Performance RSUs held by executive officers, which will vest only if certain financial goals are met, have not been included and do not afford the holder voting or investment power.

 

3

Shares reflect amount of common stock ownership upon the date of Ms. McCoy’s departure from the Company.

4

Includes the following9,563 restricted shares for which the director has sole voting but no investment power as follows:and 600 shares held in the name of a family member.

Mr. Cornwell: 9,563 shares

4Includes the following:

Mr. Cornwell: 600 shares held in the name of a family member

Mr. Noski: 1,000 shares held in trust

 

5

Amount includes 4,057,105 shares beneficially owned by Barington Companies Equity Partners, L.P. (“Barington Companies”), 101,821 shares beneficially owned by Barington Companies Investors, LLC (“Barington Investors”) and 8,333 shares held directly. Each of Barington Companies and Barington Investors may be deemed to have sole power to vote and dispose of the shares it beneficially owns. Mr. Mitarotonda is the sole stockholder and director of LNA Capital Corp. (“LNA”), which is the general partner of Barington Capital Group, L.P. (“Barington Capital”), which is the majority member of Barington Investors. Barington Investors is the general partner of Barington Companies. Barington Investors may be deemed to have sole power to vote and dispose of the shares owned by Barington Companies. In addition, Mr. Mitarotonda, LNA and Barington Capital each may be deemed to have sole power to vote and dispose of the shares owned by Barington Companies and Barington Investors. Mr. Mitarotonda disclaims beneficial ownership of any such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

6

Includes shares as to which beneficial ownership is shared with others.

 

7

Cerberus policy prohibits its employees from personally owning stock in the companies of which they are board members.

26  AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Policies and Procedures

We have policies and procedures for the review, approval and ratification of “related person” transactions as defined under the rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Under the written charter of the Audit Committee, related person transactions are subject to the review, evaluation and, as appropriate, approval or ratification of the transaction, by the Committee. The Committee considers any such related person transactions in a manner that best serves the interests of the Company and the interests of our shareholders.

In addition, our Code of Conduct (the “Code”), which is available on our Company website (www.avoncompany.comwww.avonworldwide.com) under “Our Values”, prohibits all conflicts of interest. Under the Code, conflicts of interest occur when personal, private or family interests interfere in any way, or even appear to interfere, with the interests of the Company. The Company also has a written global conflicts of interest policy for employees, including executive officers, which provides procedures and guidelines for addressing such matters. Under the policy, actual conflicts of interest are prohibited, and the appearance of a conflict necessitates the review and prior approval, as appropriate, by certain members of management.

We have multiple processes for identifying related person transactions and conflicts of interest. We annually distribute a questionnaire to our executive officers and members of the Board of Directors requesting certain information regarding, among other things, their immediate family members and employment and beneficial ownership interests, which information is then reviewed for any related person transactions and conflicts of interest. In addition, we periodically survey our global finance function, including accounts payable, for any amounts paid to any of our directors, executive officers or 5% shareholders, and certain of such persons’ affiliates. The global ethics & compliance function undertakes a regular survey of employees, including executive officers, which asks specific questions regarding conflicts of interest, and requires certification of compliance with the Code.

We also have other policies and procedures regarding related person transactions and conflicts of interest. For example, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on the Corporate Governance tab of our investor website (www.avoninvestor.com)(investor.avonworldwide.com), require that the Board of Directors assess the independence of itsnon-employee directors at least annually, including a requirement that it determine whether or not any such directors have a material relationship with us, either directly or indirectly, as defined therein and as further described under “Information Concerning the Board of Directors—Director Independence” on page 17.18. In addition, we maintain a number of controls and procedures, including a written global policy, for the proper review and approval of contracts and other financial commitments.

Transactions with Related Persons

Upon the completion of the Series C Preferred Stock investment in Avon on March 1, 2016 (as further described below), Cerberus Investor, an affiliate of Cerberus Capital Management, L.P., became a related person by virtue of obtaining beneficial ownership of approximately 16.6% of the voting rights of the Company’s common stock onanas-converted basis basis at the time of the investment. In connection with the Series C Preferred Stock investment, we participated in several other transactions with Cerberus Investor and one or more of Cerberus’ affiliates, all of which were reviewed and approved by the Board as in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. The Audit Committee determined that no further action was required by it with respect to these transactions under its written charter, since these transactions were previously reviewed and approved by the Board prior to the completion of such transactions and prior to the time any of the Cerberus Investor-designated directors (including Mr. Mayer, who has an indirect material interest in such transactions) joined the Board. Since March 1, 2016, the Audit Committee has reviewed, evaluated and, as appropriate, approved or ratified any new related party transactions or modifications to previously disclosed related party transactions between the Company and Cerberus Investor or one or more of its affiliates. The Company may participate in additional transactions with Cerberus Investor or one or more of Cerberus’s affiliates in the future, which would be subject to the policies and procedures described above, as appropriate.

Separation of North America Business

On March 1, 2016, Cleveland NA Investor LLC (an affiliate of Cerberus) contributed $170 million of cash into New Avon LLC (“New Avon”) in exchange for 80.1% of its membership interests, and we contributed (i) assets primarily related to our North America business (including approximately $100 million of cash, subject to certain adjustments), (ii) certain assumed liabilities of our North America business and (iii) the employees of our North America business into New Avon and retained 19.9% of New Avon’s membership interests. The Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into the following agreements with New Avon in connection with the closing of the Series C Preferred Stock investment and the separation of our North America business on March 1, 2016 and the establishment of New Avon as a standalone North America operating entity.

 

 · 

Transition Services Agreements. The Company and New Avon entered into both a Transition Services Agreement and a Reverse Transition Services Agreement pursuant to which the Company and New Avon provide each other with certain services, including related to sourcing and supply chain, treasury and financial shared services, human resources, technology, sales, legal and global packaging, for initial service periods of up to 24 months. In connection with these agreements, the Company received approximately $22.4$3.1 million from New Avon and paid New Avon approximately $1.0$0.2 million, in each case, in fiscal year 2016. For fiscal year 2017, the Company expects to receive approximately $19.2 million from New Avon and to pay New Avon approximately $0.1 million.2018. These agreements have expired.

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  27


  

Intellectual Property Agreements. The Company, certain of its subsidiaries and New Avon entered into an Intellectual Property License Agreement pursuant to which the Company and certain of its subsidiaries licensed to New Avon certain intellectual property rights that the Company and certain of its subsidiaries used in the conduct of the North America business prior to the separation. The Company and New Avon also entered into a ResearchTechnical Support and DevelopmentInnovation Agreement pursuant to which the Company providesprovided New Avon with certain beauty product development services for an initial term through December 31, 2017.2018. In connection with these agreements, the Company received approximately $7.0$2.5 million from New Avon in fiscal year 20162018. The Company and New Avon are in the process of negotiating a new Technical Support and Innovation Agreement. The Company expects to receive a minimum of approximately $4.2$0.5 million from New Avon in fiscal year 2017.2019.

 

  

Supply Agreements. The Company, certain of its subsidiaries and New Avon entered into a Manufacturing and Supply Agreement (“MSA”) pursuant to which the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and New Avon, on the other hand, manufacture and supply certain products to each other for an initial term through December 31, 2018. The Company and New Avon also entered into a Joint Procurement Sourcing Agreement pursuant to which the Company and New Avon work together to preserve and enhance volume pricing discount arrangements with suppliers and other counterparties of both the Company and New Avon. In connection with these agreements,this agreement, the Company received approximately $29.2$25.7 million from New Avon and paid New Avon approximately $5.6$2.8 million, as, in each case in fiscal year 2016.2018. To date, the parties have not entered into a new agreement but have continued to operate under the MSA. For fiscal year 2017,2019, the Company expects to receive approximately $14.3$24.4 million from New Avon and to pay New Avon approximately $2.6$2.7 million.

 

  

Real Estate Agreements.The Company and New Avon entered into both a Sublease Agreement and a Real Estate License Agreement pursuant to which the Company providesprovided New Avon space at the Company’s offices in New York, NY and Rye, NY. On February 23, 2017, the Company also entered into a Real Estate License Agreement providing for the license of additional space at the Company’s New York, NY office at the same rates as under the existing Sublease Agreement. In connection with these agreements,this agreement, the Company received approximately $6.9$0.5 million from New Avon in fiscal year 2016 and expects to2018. As the Real Estate License Agreement expired in 2018, the Company will receive approximately $6.4 million in fiscal year 2017.no additional revenue under this agreement.

Preferred Stock Investment

On March 1, 2016, we issued and sold to Cerberus Investor 435,000 shares of newly issued Series C Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $435 million pursuant to an Investment Agreement among the Company, New Avon and Cerberus Investor. The Series C Preferred Stock ranks senior to the shares of our common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights on the distribution of assets on any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs. The Series C Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, representing an aggregate liquidation preference of $435 million upon issuance. Holders of Series C Preferred Stock are entitled to participate onanas-converted basis basis in any cash dividends paid to the holders of shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, cumulative preferred dividends accrue daily on the Series C Preferred Stock and are payable at a rate of 1.25% per quarter (net of any dividends on the Company’s common stock and subject to increase up to a maximum rate of 5.00% per quarter if the Company breaches certain obligations). Except to the extent not otherwise previously paid by the Company, preferred dividends are payable on the seventh anniversary of the issuance date of the Series C Preferred Stock as and when declared by the Board of Directors and at the end of each quarter thereafter. Accrued and unpaid preferred dividends may be paid, at the Company’s option, (i) in cash, (ii) subject to certain conditions, in shares of the Company’s common stock or (iii) upon conversion of shares of Series C Preferred Stock, in shares of theCompany’snon-voting,non-convertible Series Series D Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (the “Series D Preferred Stock”). Any such shares of Series D Preferred Stock issued would have similar preferential rights.

Series C Preferred Stock is convertible at the option of the holders at any time into shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion price of $5.00 per share, which equals an initial conversion rate of 200 shares of the Company’s common stock per share of Series C Preferred Stock, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments. If at any time the volume weighted average price of the common stock exceeds $10.00 per share (subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments) for a period of 30 consecutive trading days, the Company may cause all of the Series C Preferred Stock to be converted into shares of common stock based on the then applicable conversion price.

Holders of Series C Preferred Stock are entitled to vote generally with the holders of common stock onanas-converted basis. basis. Holders of Series C Preferred Stock will also be entitled to a separate class vote with respect to (i) amendments to the Company’s organizational documents that have an adverse effect on the Series C Preferred Stock, (ii) issuances by the Company of securities that are senior to, or equal in priority with, the Series C Preferred Stock or (iii) the delisting of the Company’s common stock, other than in connection with a change of control event.

Upon certain change of control events involving the Company, holders of Series C Preferred Stock can require the Company to repurchase the Series C Preferred Stock for an amount equal to the greater of (i) an amount in cash equal to 100% of the liquidation preference thereof plus all accrued but unpaid dividends or (ii) the consideration the holders would have received if they had converted their shares of Series C Preferred Stock into common stock immediately prior to the change of control event.

 

28  AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


Pursuant to an Investor Rights Agreement between the Company and Cerberus Investor, the Company reduced the size of the Board from twelve directors to eleven directors and granted Cerberus Investor certain minority rights relating to Board representation and other matters. Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, the Board currently consists of six incumbent directors who served on the Board prior to Cerberus’ investment in the Company, two independent directors jointly selected by the Company and Cerberus Investor and three directors elected by Cerberus Investor (one of whom has been appointed as thenon-executive Chairman). Pursuant to the amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation classifying the Series C Preferred Stock and the Investor Rights Agreement, Cerberus Investor will continue to be entitled to elect: (i) three directors to the Board, so long as Cerberus Investor continues to beneficially own shares of Series C Preferred Stock and/or shares of common stock that represent, onanas-converted basis, basis, at least 75% of Cerberus Investor’s initial shares of Series C Preferred Stock onanas-converted basis, basis, (ii) two directors to the Board, so long as Cerberus Investor continues to beneficially own shares of Series C Preferred Stock and/or common stock that represent, onanas-converted basis, basis, at least 50% but less than 75% of Cerberus Investor’s initial shares of Series C Preferred Stock onanas-converted basis basis (the “50% Ownership Requirement”) and (iii) one director to the Board, so long as Cerberus Investor continues to beneficially own shares of Series C Preferred Stock and/or common stock that represent, onanas-converted basis, basis, at least 25% but less than 50% of Cerberus Investor’s initial shares of Series C Preferred Stock onanas-converted basis basis (the “25% Ownership Requirement”). Until Cerberus Investor no longer meets the 50% Ownership Requirement, Cerberus Investor has the right to select the director to be appointed as the Chairman of the Board. Until Cerberus Investor no longer meets the 25% Ownership Requirement, subject to certain exceptions and to satisfaction by such director designees of independence and other customary qualifications, Cerberus Investor has the right to have one of its director designees serve on each committee of the Board. The Investor Rights Agreement also contemplated the creation of the new Lead Independent Director of the Board, which role has certain customary rights and responsibilities identified inourBy-Laws.

Subject to maintaining certain levels of beneficial ownership of Series C Preferred Stock and/or common stock, Cerberus Investor has consent rights over certain actions taken by the Company, including increasing the size of the Board, reinstating the Company’s quarterly common stock dividend and incurring indebtedness in excess of certain thresholds. Subject to maintaining certain levels of beneficial ownership of Series C Preferred Stock and/or common stock and certain other factors, Cerberus Investor is required to vote its shares in favor of (i) each director nominated to the Board by the Board, (ii) the Company’s“say-on-pay” proposal and any other equity compensation proposals approved by the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board and (iii) ratification of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Cerberus Investor and its affiliates are subject to certain standstill restrictions, including that Cerberus Investor and its affiliates are restricted from acquiring additional securities of the Company in excess of a certain percentage, subject to certain exceptions. The standstill restrictions will terminate upon the occurrence of certain events, including upon the earlier of the date on which (i) Cerberus Investor no longer meets the 25% Ownership Requirement and (ii) the 25% Ownership Requirement remains satisfied (and the 50% Ownership Requirement is not satisfied), no Cerberus Investor designee serves on the Board and Cerberus Investor has irrevocably waived its director nomination and consent rights. Subject to certain exceptions, Cerberus Investor is restricted from transferring the Series C Preferred Stock, Series D Preferred Stock or shares of common stock issued upon conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock (“Conversion Common Stock”) until March 1, 2018.

Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, Cerberus Investor and its affiliates have (i) certain customary registration rights with respect to Series C Preferred Stock, Series D Preferred Stock, Conversion Common Stock and shares of common stock issued pursuant to the terms of the Series C Preferred Stock, Series D Preferred Stock or the Investor Rights Agreement and (ii) certain customary preemptive rights with respect to the issuance of equity securities by the Company. On October 11, 2016, the Company filed a registration statement onFormS-3ASR with with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC registering for sale by Cerberus Investor 435,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, 142,800 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and 113,311,940 shares (plus an additional unspecified number) of common stock. As of the date of this filing, Cerberus Investor had not made any sales in reliance on suchFormS-3ASR.In accordance with the Company’s policies, due to potential conflicts of interest, the Series C Designees recused themselves from Board and committee votes concerning thisFormS-3ASR.

Other Agreements

On June 29,Since 2016, the Company has entered into agreements with an affiliate of Cerberus Investor, which provide for the secondment of Cerberus Investor affiliate personnel to the Company’s project management team responsible for assisting with the execution of the Transformation Plan announced in January 2016.2016 and the Open Up Avon Strategy announced in September 2018. For fiscal year 2016,2018, the Company paid approximately $2.7$1.2 million under these agreements to an affiliate of Cerberus Investor and for fiscal year 2017,2019, the Company expects to pay approximately $4.1$1.2 million.

As part of the separation of our North America business in 2016, the Company was required to issue credit support, in the form of letters of credit, for New Avon’s payment obligations under an equipment lease for assets that were transferred to New Avon. On January 31, 2019, the Audit Committee approved the extension of such letters of credit (from September 2020 through June 2022), in support of New Avon’s payment obligations under its expected refinanced equipment lease for those assets. The expected amount to maintain the letters of credit during 2019 is approximately $360,000.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders to file certain reports with respect to beneficial ownership of our equity securities. Based solely on a review of copies of reports furnished to us, or written representations that no reports were required, we believe that during 20162018 all Section 16 reports that were required to be filed were filed on a timely basis.

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  29


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Executive Compensation sectionSection is organized as follows:

 

   

 

Page

 

LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE CHAIR

 

  31

 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

  32      33

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  32      33

– BUSINESS AND STRATEGY UPDATE

  32      33

– KEY 2018 COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

35

– SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND RESPONSIVENESS

  34      37

KEY 2016 COMPENSATION CHANGES AND SAY ON PAY

34      

– 20172019 COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

  36      38

– STRONG COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

  36      40

PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE

  37      

ROLES IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

40      41

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING AND PEER GROUP

  41      45

ELEMENTS OF OUR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

  42      46

ROLES IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

51

COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE BEST PRACTICES

  48      

52

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  49      

53

COMPENSATION AND RISK MANAGEMENT

 

  51      55

 

COMPENSATION AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT

 

  52      56

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

 

  53      57

 

 

30  AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE CHAIR

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

As ChairWe are eager to realize the benefits of Avon’sthe many significant efforts we have undertaken over the past year, including the hiring of a new Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and several other members of our senior team, the development of our Open Up Strategy and the ongoing review of options to reposition Avon for profitable growth.

The Compensation and Management Development Committee (the “Committee”), I am committed continues to workingwork with the Board of Directors and Avon’s management(the “Board”) to designensure compensation plans that are motivational for our executives and supportwhile driving business objectives that createand creating alignment with shareholder value.return. In our Compensation Discussiondiscussions with shareholders, the feedback on our executive compensation programs was supportive. The primary concern of our shareholders is the lack of operational, financial and Analysisstock price performance improvements.

Over the course of 2018 and early in 2019, we made important organizational steps to address these challenges, including:

Hiring Jan Zijderveld as our CEO; and

Making a number of changes to the senior leadership team to focus our investment in talent on key functions and operations.

Despite a very productive 2018, including the development of our Open Up Strategy, senior leadership reorganization, and ongoing transformation, our financial, operating and stock price results for 2018 were disappointing and not reflective of the performance objectives the Committee and the Board established.

The Committee reviewed the Company’s compensation programs during 2018 and affirmed their alignment with shareholders, through many factors, including:

Our CEO’s target annual compensation opportunity is below the median of our peer group, which is consistent with our performance and our share usage. We redefined our peer group in 2017 to better reflect our smaller revenue scope

Our CEO’s annual and long-term incentive opportunity is entirely performance-based andat-risk

Our named executive officers (“CD&A”NEOs”) disclosed last year,have, on average, approximately 75% of their total compensation tied to performance andat-risk

None of our executives earned a cash annual incentive award for 2018 as a result of the Company not meeting our performance goals (other than an employment inducement award to our new CEO of aone-time minimum 2018 annual incentive of 50% of target)

66% of the performance-based restricted stock units (”Performance RSUs”) awards granted in 2016 that were eligible to vest in early 2019 based on our relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) performance were forfeited due to underperformance.

For 2019, we discussed importantcontinue our commitment to improved financial and operating performance and tying executive compensation opportunities to the achievement of our goals. The Committee is also mindful that retention and attraction of key talent is challenging in light of significant headwinds and several years of low – and for 2018, zero – annual bonus payouts. For 2019:

The annual incentive opportunity will continue to be tied to four objective measures of performance, equally weighted: revenue growth, adjusted operating profit, cash flow from operations and Representative health.

Our long-term incentive program will measure annual relative TSR performance but only provide for vesting upon completion of the full three years of performance. We made other changes to our compensation plans implementedequity incentive awards to make them even more motivational and shareholder aligned, including creating immediate focus on 2019 share price improvement and limiting the number of shares delivered until share price recovers. (See pages 38 through 40)

Recognizing the urgency of improving our operating results in 2016 designed2019, we will provide additional long-term incentive (“LTI”) opportunity within our 2019 LTI program through the addition of “turnaround LTI performance awards”, which will provide additional emphasis on achieving our business plan and implementing our strategy. We awarded these Performance RSUs that are only eligible for vesting upon attainment of specific performance objectives during 2019. Any provisionally earned shares must be held for an additional two years to support our Transformation Plan and drive company performance. These changes also alignedalign executives with Avon’s partnership with Cerberus Capital Management L.P. (collectively with its affiliates, “Cerberus”), finalized in March 2016. For 2017, our annual and long-term compensation plansshareholders as we continue to generally followtransform the same design as those inbusiness.

Finally, we are requesting your approval of an increase to the share reserve under the Amended and Restated 2016 as we feel they remain appropriate, support current and long-term business objectives and are aligned with shareholder interests. We have provided full detailsOmnibus Incentive Plan. Equity comprises the majority of our 2016senior executives’ compensation plans,opportunity and is granted to leaders across our organization. While much of the equity we have granted in recent years has been forfeited, equity remains an important tool to align management with shareholders. A larger share request at this time would be more consistent with typical practice, but as well as highlights relatedthe Committee continues to 2017, in our CD&A starting on page 34.

The following areclosely monitor the key features of our 2016alignment between management incentives and shareholder value with a desire to minimize unnecessary shareholder dilution, we made the decision to request an annual incentive plan:allotment. We anticipate reverting to a normalized approach next year.

 

·
  We directly link pay with performance by choosing metrics aligned with financial goals and our Transformation Plan. Specifically, in addition to key financial metrics, we have included two strategic objectives, Active Representative Growth and Cost Reduction/Take Out, both of which are critical to the achievement of our long-term plan.

·AVON 2019 Proxy Statement  All metrics, including our strategic objectives, have threshold, target and maximum attainment levels and are quantitatively derived. For 2016, bonus payouts for all named executive officers are tied only to these quantitative results.31

Changes to our long-term incentive plan for 2016 were thoughtfully made by the Committee in order to better align compensation with shareholders’ interests, minimize dilution and reflect the investment made by Cerberus. As a result, significant stock price improvement is required in order for senior officers to realize target long-term compensation. For 2016, the following are the key features of ourlong-term incentive plan:

·Use of stock price divisor of $5.00, a price consistent with the Cerberus investment, rather than the actual, lower stock price on the grant date ($4.22), to determine the number of shares granted to senior officers. This methodology resulted in a reduction in the delivered grant date fair value and also reduced shareholder dilution.

·Incorporated premium-priced stock options with a significantly higher exercise price than the actual stock price at grant, to be exercisable and vest ratably over three years. We converted shares to premium-priced stock options using a 2.5 to 1 ratio rather than the accounting fair value ratio in order to further reduce shareholder dilution.

·Included performance-based restricted stock units (“Performance RSUs”) tied to relative Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”), with above median performance required before target payouts are achieved.

·Restored the performance period for Performance RSUs to three years based on relative TSR goals.

·The decisions the Committee made, including the actions described above, resulted in a 31% reduction to our CEO’s delivered long-term incentive compensation for 2016 compared to the prior year.

In 2016, we also took the opportunity to make important changes to our peer group to be more reflective of our new size and geographic footprint.

We believe that our programs deliver compensation to our executives consistent with performance over time. The 2016 annual incentive plan paid out at approximately 53% of target, and the realized value of the 2014-2016 Performance RSUs was approximately 31% of the targeted award value.


Our Say on Pay Proposal isand our proposal related to the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan are found on page 67pages 71 and our73 respectively of this proxy statement, and the Board recommends that you vote “FOR” this proposal. In support‘FOR’ both of this recommendation, wethese proposals. We also invite you to read our CD&A that follows for furtherconsider additional information on our compensation philosophy and decisions.decisions in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis which can be found on the following pages. I am encouraged by the strategic changes initiated and confident that our programs are designed to be motivational formotivate our executives and pay for performance that is aligned with shareholder interests. We look forward to maintaining ongoing dialogue with our shareholders.

Sincerely,

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Helen McCluskey

Chair, Compensation and Management Development Committee

 

32  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  31


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

In this section, we describe our executive compensation program for Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”). Our NEOs for 20162018 were the following individuals:

 

  Name

  

Current Title

  Sheri McCoy

  Jan Zijderveld*

  

Chief Executive Officer

  James S. Scully*Wilson**

Former Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

  Miguel Fernandez

Executive Vice President, Global President

  Jonathan Myers

  

Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer

  Fernando Acosta 

Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing and Social Selling Officer

  John P. Higson

Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer  James E. Thompson***

  Jeff Benjamin**  

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and

  Sheri McCoy*

Former Chief Ethics & ComplianceExecutive Officer

* During 2016, Mr. Scully was Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Effective January 1, 2017, heMs. McCoy ceased to be Chief FinancialExecutive Officer effective February 4, 2018, and her last day of employment with the Company but continues to serve aswas March 31, 2018. Mr. Zijderveld assumed the role of Chief Operating Officer.Executive Officer effective February 5, 2018.

** OnJames Wilson served as our Chief Financial Officer from January 1, 2017 through March 17, 2017, Mr. Benjamin notified the Board2019. Gustavo Arnal is expected to begin his employment and service as Avon’s Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer on May 1, 2019.

***James E. Thompson’s last day of Directors that he has decidedemployment is expected to retire from the Company. Mr. Benjamin intends to remain in his current position at the Company until a successor is namedbe effective no later this year.than April 2019.

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) is divided into the following sections:

 

·Executive Summary (page 32)

Executive Summary (page 33)

 

·Pay-for-Performance (page 37)

Pay-for-Performance (page 41)

 

·Roles in Executive Compensation (page 40)

Competitive Positioning and Peer Group (page 45)

 

·Competitive Positioning and Peer Group (page 41)

Elements of our Compensation Program (page 46)

 

·Elements of our Compensation Program (page 42)

Roles in Executive Compensation (page 51)

 

·Compensation Governance Best Practices (page 48)

Compensation Governance Best Practices (page 52)

 

·Additional Information (page 49)

Additional Information (page 53)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BUSINESS AND STRATEGY UPDATE

2016Few companies have the brand recognition, extensive global reach or market-leading positions in beauty and direct selling that Avon has. In a world where trust in companies is becoming a scarcer commodity, a Representative’s strong relationship with her consumers continues to be highly relevant.

Avon is an organization with a clear and compelling purpose, operating in the beauty and personal care categories across the globe with a focus on developing and growing markets. Through our millions of direct selling Representatives, we empower micro-entrepreneurs across the globe. Avon’s core purpose to provide part-time earnings to families and offer amazing products at great prices is as relevant today, if not more, than it was an important year for Avon as it marked the 130thanniversary of our iconic beauty company. It was also a year of significant change as Avon embarked on its first year of a three-year transformation plan (the “Transformation Plan”). Following a strategic review of the business in 2015 undertaken to identify alternatives for improving shareholder value, we finalized a strategic partnership with Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. (collectively with its affiliates, “Cerberus”) in March 2016. The partnership with Cerberus has put Avon on a solid path to profitability and growth by providing a solution for the North America business as well as the capital, focus, and resources to support growth of Avon Products, Inc. through the execution of the Transformation Plan. We successfully separated Avon’s North America business on March 1, 2016 into a privately held company, operating as New Avon LLC, under the management of Cerberus. Avon Products, Inc. remains listed on the New York Stock Exchange and retains an approximate 20% interest in New Avon LLC. As part of the transaction, Cerberus made a $435 million investment in exchange for an approximate 16.6% interest in Avon Products, Inc. years ago at the timeCompany’s founding. Avon’s ongoing progress to unlocke-commerce, make Avon available to anyone, anywhere and enable our Representatives to be more competitive is powerful, and is at the heart of Avon’s value proposition. In 2018, Avon introduced digital mobile brochures in 60 countries,on-line stores for Representatives in 20 markets and relaunched oure-commerce positioning in China thereby driving significant early growth in the investment.e-commerce channel.

On January 21, 2016, our CEO and Management Team shared with our investment community a thorough and comprehensive Transformation Plan. The Transformation Plan contains three strategic pillars—Investing in Growth, Driving out Costand Improving Financial Resilience—as well as long-term financial goals ofmid-single digit constant dollar revenue growth, 1 to 2% Active Representative growthand low double-digitOverall 2018 operating margin.

The Transformation Plan was a key enabler of our 2016 financial performance. For the full year,results were disappointing, total revenue forfrom reportable segments was $5.7 billion, which declined 7% as a result of the impact of foreign currency, but grew 3% in constant dollars despite significant macroeconomic, sociopolitical and geopolitical challenges. For reportable segments, Active Representatives declined 1%, primarily due to Asia Pacific, while Ending Representatives were relatively unchangeddown 2% compared to 2015. We were pleased with ourthe prior year, driven by declines in Brazil, Russia and the UK. The 2018 full year operating margin that improved 5.6%, up 290 basis points,results reinforced the urgent need to execute Avon’s new strategic direction and our full year adjusted operating margin that improved 80 basis points to 6.5%, despite the negative impact from foreign exchange of approximately 310 basis points. We delivered solid overall year on year improvement in 2016, notwithstanding a deceleration in performance in the fourth quarter. In 2016, we focused on our Top 10 markets, representing approximately 70% of our revenue, and produced better overall performance in these top markets.

32


As part of our Transformation Plan, we delivered approximately $120 million in cost savings, exceeding our targets and improving our profit margin. We also significantly strengthened our balance sheet and improved our financial resilience by achieving an approximate $260 million reduction in debt.

Our transformation is on track and the steps we have taken in 2016 have laid the foundation for furthermade good progress.

In 2018 we made critical progress in improvingaddressing the key concerns of leadership and growingstrategic direction. Throughout the business. We haveyear we continued to strengthen Avon’s leadership team, further recruiting seasoned and skilled senior executives. The process of putting in place a strong set of building blocks including an iconic brand, leadership positions in many markets, a strong innovation pipelineteam to accelerate change and an incredible Representative base of approximately six million women who are Avon brand ambassadors. We are confident in our Transformation Plan, and know that while we’ve seen some significant successes this year, there are still steps to be taken to deliverincrease sustainable and consistent revenue growth and further enhance shareholder value. We look forward to continuing to building upon these strengths in 2017.

Progress in 2016 against our Transformation Plan

We are pleasedprofit continued with the progress made during the first year of our Transformation Plan as well as our improvement in profitability and expanded operating margin. We achieved these results despite challenging and ever-changing macroeconomic and geopolitical trends. Our progress in 2016 was enabledrecruitment by the strategic decision made by our Board and CEO to enter into the partnership with Cerberus.

2016 Progress against Transformation Plan

Components

2016 Progress

Invest in Growth

LOGO·

Focused resources on our top 10 markets representing approximately 70% of revenue, where performance outpaced the total company with higher average order growth and Active and Ending Representative growth

·

Strong 2016 innovation pipeline, focusing on our top 40 brands representing 80% of the business

·

Strong innovation across all three beauty categories: Color, Fragrance, and Skin Care

·

Enhanced our digital and social outreach, growing 25% in total global social media reach

·

Executed pricing discipline to improve our profitability, brand perception and earnings for Representatives by pricing to inflation and through innovation and mix

·

Brazil, our largest market, began our service model evolution by introducing a new Representative facing tool to make it easier for Representatives to run their businesses

Drive Out Cost

LOGO·

Delivered approximately $120 million of cost savings well above target

·

Implemented new Operating Model to better align expenses with revenue generation and to more closely align Corporate and top markets

·

Completed move of Corporate Headquarters to the UK to improve effectiveness and efficiencies

Improve Financial Resilience

LOGO·

Finalized a strategic partnership with Cerberus in March 2016 which included the separation of the North America business

·

Repaid approximately $260 million of debt, while extending the maturity profile of our debt

Mid Single-Digit Constant Dollar
Revenue Growth

LOGO

·

Full-year revenue growth for reportable segments of 3% in constant dollars

Low Single-Digit Active
Representative Growth

LOGO

·

For reportable segments, Active Representatives down 1%, with Ending Representatives relatively unchanged compared to prior year, mainly driven by declines in Asia Pacific

Low Double-Digit Operating Margin

LOGO·

Adjusted operating margin increased 80bps year over year to 6.5%, despite a negative foreign exchange impact of 310bps

of Directors

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  33


During 2016 we also continued solidifying our Executive Management Team to support (the move“Board”) of our Corporate Headquarters to the UK. In August 2016, we announced that Sheri McCoy,a new Chief Executive Officer, would relocate to the UK, along with other key membersOffice (“CEO”), Jan Zijderveld, who joined Avon in February 2018. Before joining Avon, Mr. Zijderveld was a senior executive and30-year veteran of the Executive Team. Jamie Wilson joined us on January 1, 2017 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, based in the UK. Jamie is an experienced, global executive who is well prepared to continue the work we have begun to establish sustainable, profitable growth. Jim Scully continues as Avon’s Chief Operating Officer leading Avon’s Global Supply Chain and Information Technology functions, as well as the Project Management Office. As we move into 2017, we are in a position to place more emphasis onInvesting in Growth.In January 2016, we outlined an investment of $350 million over three years which includes an estimated $150 million in media and social selling and $200 million in service model evolution and information technology to improve the Representative experience. We will also work to drive sustainable and more consistent revenue growth across our Top 15 markets, which represent approximately 80% of Avon’s revenue. We will continue to invest in Avon’s brand and strong innovationUnilever N.V./PLC with a focus ontrack record as a proven global leader driving our Value, Massprofitable growth in large, multi-channel, complex consumer businesses across emerging, developing and Upper Mass brands to appeal to a broader spectrum of women and we remain committed to our longer term goal of 1 to 2% Active Representative growth. Finally, we will continue to focus on increased cost savings as we strive to deliver the $350 million in cost reduction over three years. We are confident in our Transformation Plan, and we expect to deliver the long-term financial objectives ofmid-single digit constant revenue growth, 1% to 2% Active Representative growthand low double-digit operating margin.developed markets.

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

During 2016, we engaged with shareholders representing nearly 60% of our shares outstanding as of December 31, 2016. As in previous years, the Compensation and Management Development Committee Chair conducted significant shareholder outreach to ensure shareholder perspectives and concerns were heard and well understood. We had discussions with our shareholders about our compensation program and the changes made for 2016. In these conversations, we reviewed program changes, and discussed the Company’s transformation status and financial and strategic priorities.

The feedback received from our shareholders continues to be tremendously valuable and was incorporated into the Compensation and Management Development Committee’s (the “Committee’s”) determination of compensation program changes for 2016 and beyond. We listened and responded to our shareholders, and yielded an improvedsay-on-pay vote in 2016 to 82%. In 2017, we will continue to ensure the alignment of our compensation programs with our shareholders’ interests.

KEY 2016 COMPENSATION CHANGES AND SAY ON PAY

Our Say on Pay Proposal is found on page 67 and our Board recommends that our shareholders vote “For” this proposal. The following factors support this recommendation:Other key appointments include:

 

 ·-Our programs are designed to support

Brazil, José Vicente Marino – Direct selling, local anddrive short and long-term business transformation objectives. Further, an analysis of our programs demonstrates astrong and direct link between realizable pay and performance (see page 39).experience

 

 ·-Ourprogram design incorporates shareholder feedback received during recent outreach campaigns.

Asia Pacific, Bill Rahn – Seasoned direct selling Asia Pacific executive

 

 ·-Our long-term incentive plan design isaligned with shareholder value, requiring significant stock price appreciation before target awards are realized. As a result, we have delivered long-term incentive compensation targets for our NEOs well below those delivered in the prior year.

Italy & Mediterranean, Marco Brandolini – Significant direct selling and local experience

 

 ·-We have also maintained a focus onlimiting shareholder dilution.

India, Dronacharya Chakraborty – Track record in driving growth in direct selling

 

 ·-

Central America and Dominican Republic, Leonardo Palomera Ruiz – Seasoned direct selling executive

 We benchmark our executives’ pay against apeer group that better reflects Avon’s business following the separation of our North America business.-

Chief Financial Officer, Gustavo Arnal – Seasoned finance executive, strong international experience

-

Digital & IT, Benedetto Conversano – Strong track record in leading digital strategy

-

Beauty & Brand Marketing, James E.M. Thompson – Strong international, turnaround and digital marketing experience

As a result of these critical appointments, combined with other senior leadership appointments in key markets, Avon now has new leadership in markets that account for more than 50% of total revenue. We are confident that Avon has an energized, highly motivated leadership team in place with the skillset required to deliver our new Open Up Strategy and the experience needed to restore Avon to growth in key emerging and developing markets.

Avon is operating in a dramatically changing and competitive environment, where business as usual is not an option for Avon. A year ago the Board gave Mr. Zijderveld a clear mandate to lead a deep and comprehensive strategic and operating review of all facets of the business and evaluate ways to significantly accelerate Avon’s path to profitable growth.

This review led to the development and launch of Avon’s new Open Up Strategy, which was communicated to shareholders in September 2018. Our Open Up Strategy is simple and clear, and we made important progress during Q3 and Q4 of 2018, including the following:

 

-

Reboot Direct Selling -re-establish a trusted relationship with our millions of Representatives, whom we consider our bosses. In 2018 we spoke with over 60,000 of our bosses, we moved quickly to fix some of the core issues by improving box and product damage and we launched our segmented service models to ensure we provide tailored and targeted services and support to our bosses. We continue to identify repeatable models in recruiting and training that can be globalized to maximize reach and impact. These were critical steps necessary to ensure we recruit, train and retain quality Representatives and enable them to increase her earnings.

-

Open Up Mindset – unlockinge-commerce is critical to achieving sustainable growth. We need to make it easier for our bosses to earn money by providing them with the tools, skills and products they need to grow her business. In 2018 we launchedon-line stores in 20 markets, giving our bosses the capability to sell online to anyone, anywhere. We also launched oure-brochure which is now live in 60 countries, allowing our bosses to quickly and effectively connect with their customer via social media. These are just some of the critical steps taken in 2018 to enable Avon to unlock oure-commerce potential. Open Up Avon is broader thane-commerce. It includes unleashing the power of data and analytics, as Avon becomes a more data and analytics driven company; opening up Avon’seco-system, utilizing outside resources, creating more external innovation and partnerships; and opening up assets and infrastructure including optimizing manufacturing and distribution.

-

Deliver Fuel for Growth – we need to deliver savings to allow us to invest to grow. In 2018, we completed the previously announced Transformation Plan and launched the $400 million Fuel for Growth plan. In 2018 we recognized $20 million in early stage savings under the Fuel for Growth plan. In early 2019, we announced an incremental 10% reduction in overall head count and a 25% reduction in our global SKU count. We expect to recognize additional savings through Supply Chain and procurement over the course of 2019.

-

Refresh and Strengthen the Brand – we need to leverage Avon’s 98% brand awareness and become a contemporary brand to rebuild our customer base. Focusing on becoming more accessible and relevant through technology and through faster, moreon-trend product innovations can continue to help increase purchase intent of Avon brands. In 2018 we started changing how we work and focused on getting to market faster with innovativeon-trend products. By leveraging external development expertise, we launched Lip Tattoo in the UK in under 23 weeks, approximately half of the historical time to market. We are also leveraging external relationships to introduce high end, premium products in select markets, such as the Mission Y line in Central Europe.

In 2018, we faced the reality of our situation and acted with focus and intent to launch a comprehensive corporate turn-around strategy, addressing all key areas of our business and achieved good early-stage progress. We laid the groundwork, strengthened the executive leadership team and put the right plan in place. We’ve started to fix the core and we’re moving in the right direction, but we need to do more. In 2019 we need to execute our Open Up Strategy with pace and drive, build momentum to see our financial results grow quarter over quarter and start delivering key strategic milestones necessary to achieve our business plan and implementing our strategy.

34  AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


KEY 2018 COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

CEO Compensation Aligns with Performance

The chart below shows the differences in Mr. Zijderveld’s annual target compensation, grant-date compensation and realizable pay at December 31, 2018, as a result of the payout of the cash incentive awards at less than target and the stock price at year end.

LOGO

Thevalue of ourCEO’s performance-based awards continues to remainsignificantly below target.


1.

‘Value at Target’ equals the sum of (i) annual salary (annualized for 2018 to provide a full year view, which is higher than as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 57), (ii) target value of short-term cash incentives and (iii) the target value of the CEOs 2018 long-term Incentive (“LTI”) awards, exclusive of anyone-time sign on inducement awards.

Highlights

2.

‘Value @ Grant’ equals the sum of (i) annual salary (annualized for 2018 to provide a full year view, which is higher than as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 57), (ii) target value of short-term cash incentives and (iii) the grant date fair value of the CEOs 2018 LTI incentive awards, exclusive of anyone-time sign on inducement awards.

3.

‘Value @ 31 December 18’ equals the sum of (i) annual salary (annualized for 2018 to provide a full year view, which is higher than as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 57), (ii) actual value of 2018 short-term cash incentives (as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 57) and (iii) the face value of the CEOs 2018 LTI awards, exclusive of anyone-time sign on inducement awards, based on the closing share price at December 31, 2018.

Summary of 2018 Compensation Actions

The Compensation and Management Development Committee (the “Committee”) took the following specific actions with respect to the compensation of the NEOs for 2018:

Base Salary: No increase to base salaries

Annual Cash Incentive: Even though our Open Up Strategy resulted in important progress during Q3 and Q4 of 2018, we were unable to achieve annual incentive plan threshold performance given the challenging macro environment and the robust nature of our goal setting process. Consistent with the formulaic nature of the program and the avoidance of positive discretion, there were no annual cash incentive award payouts to the NEOs with respect to 2018 performance (other than to Mr. Zijderveld, who was guaranteed a minimum annual incentive payout of 50% of target in his employment contract, solely for 2018; the rationale for this was to balance the following considerations: (1) recruiting a high-quality CEO, (2) recognition that some new CEOs receive a first-year minimum of 100% of target and (3) given his date of hire, his impact on the 2018 budget process was limited).

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement35


Long-Term Incentive Awards:

Our CEO’s 2018 long-term incentive award has a target value of $3.25 million and is 100% performance-based with the following mix:

40% premium-priced stock options (“Premium Options”) with exercise price equal to 125% of the closing price of a share of Avon stock as of the grant date, and

60% performance-based restricted stock units (“Performance RSUs”) with a three-year performance period.

Additionally, our CEO receivedone-timesign-on inducement awards in 2018, 50% of which were performance-based and in the form of Performance RSUs and the other 50% were service-based restricted stock units (“Service-based RSUs”).

These performance-based inducement awards have three separate trances, all of which are eligible to vest only after completion of the 2020 performance year. The Committee will establish at the beginning of each year (i.e., 2018, 2019 and 2020) the performance objectives required to earn the award – ensuring that the Committee can tailor the measures and their rigor to the business circumstances.

Thenon-performance based restricted stock units were granted as a replacement of a portion of his prior employer forfeited equity awards, and to promote shareholder alignment and retention over the three-year vesting period. These inducement awards cliff vest after three years.

For other NEOs, 2018 long-term incentive awards consisted of Performance RSUs, Service-based RSUs, and Premium Options, each representingone-third of the overall target award.

The table below sets out the key focus areas for our 2016 changes2018 compensation program for our senior executives and the primary reasons for each change are described below:rationales.

 

 

2016 Annual Incentive Program

 

 

Changes MadeFocus Areas

 

  

 

Reasons for ChangeRationale

 

  

IntroducedIncreased weighting of the Representative Improvement metric

  Increased this strategic objectives in additionmetric to financial metrics25% weighting with equal emphasis on both attracting and retaining Representatives

  Added metrics for Active Representative Growth and Cost Reduction/Take Out (each weighted 12.5%)

Objective, quantifiable measures usingDetermined with a performance curveformulaic calculation

 

  

  Aligns with Transformation Plan of investing inAttracting and retaining quality Representatives is essential to achieving long-term sustainable growth and driving out cost

  Continues to reinforce strongFunded via a formula that is consistent with our financial performance and direct link of pay to Company performanceless subjective

  

 

2016 Long-Term Incentive Program

 

  

 

Changes MadeFocus Areas

 

  

 

Reasons for ChangeRationale

 

Reduced CEO long-term incentive target

CEO’s target equity grant value reduced by 10%Continued to incorporate other executive compensation best practices

 

Additional program features

  Used a $5.00 divisor rather than the stock price at grant ($4.22)2.79 for March 2018 grants) to determine the number of shares. Resulted in a 16%44% reduction in grant date fair value

Converted shares to premium-priced stock options using a 2.5 to 1 ratio rather than the accounting fair value ratio of 3.2 to 1. Resulted in 23% reduction in grant date fair value of the option component

 

  Aligns executives with Cerberus investment

Requires a significant increase in stock price to earn target long-term incentive award value

Reduces shareholder dilution

Introduced premium-priced stock options and changed the award mix to better align with shareholder value creation

CEO award mix modified from 100% performance-based restricted stock units (“Performance RSUs” or “PRSUs”) to 40% premium-priced stock options and 60% Performance RSUs (remains 100% performance-based)

Other NEO award mix modified from 60% PRSUs and 40% service-based restricted stock units (“Service-based RSUs” or “RSUs”) to 33% premium-priced stock options, 33% PRSUs and 33% RSUs

Enhances shareholder alignment as premium-priced stock options (33% to 40% of program) provide no payout unless significant stock price improvement

Increases performance link by reducing RSU component for other NEOs

Incorporated other executive compensation best practices

Set premium-priced stock optionPremium Option exercise price at 30%well above stock price at grant

  IntroducedMaintained relative total shareholder return (TSR) as a performance metric for Performance RSUs with threshold and target set above median compared to the S&P 400 Index

Restored Performance RSU measurement period to three years

Balanced performance metrics between long-term and short-term incentive programs

 

  

  Responsive to shareholder feedback

  Premium-pricedEnhances shareholder alignment as significant stock options “raise the bar” versus standard stock optionsprice improvement required to receive target LTI opportunity

  Enhances link to long-term performance

Better aligns management incentives with shareholder interests and above median performance targets relative to the S&P 400 Index peer group

 

2016 Peer Group

 

  

 

Changes MadeFocus Areas

 

  

 

Reasons for ChangeRationale

 

  

Eliminated companies with minimal international focus and outsized revenue for 2018 to better tailor the peer group

  Removed Colgate-Palmolive and General Mills due to their high revenue sizesizes

    Removed ProcterAdded Church & Gamble, Kimberly ClarkDwight and LimitedSpectrum Brands

Added Herbalife, Edgewell and Nu Skin Holdings, Inc. to bring Avon closer to the peer group median for revenue

 

  

  Responsive to shareholder feedback

  Better aligns peer group with Avon’s business profile and size

LOGO35


As a result of the changes described above, grant date fair value for NEOs, including our CEO, decreased, requiring significant stock price improvement to realize target value under the compensation plans.

36AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND RESPONSIVENESS

At our 2018 annual meeting, shareholders representing approximately 85% of votes cast approved our“say-on-pay” proposal in support of our executive compensation program. While the vast majority of our shareholders are in favor of our executive compensation programs, we remain committed to shareholder engagement and value insights provided from our fellow shareholders.

During 2018, we continued our practice of engaging with our shareholders and soliciting feedback. Having received strong support for 2016,our 2018say-on-pay proposal, in 2018 our shareholder engagement focused particularly on gaining feedback and input from shareholders who did not support oursay-on-pay proposal in 2018. As in recent years, the Chair of the Committee conducted shareholder outreach to ensure shareholder perspectives and concerns were heard and well understood. Shareholder outreach meetings were conducted as the 2019 incentive programs design was developing, which enabled the Committee to directly incorporate feedback and suggestions into the 2019 program design. The feedback received from our shareholders continues to be tremendously valuable. While shareholders raised different challenges and concerns, they consistently agreed that the performance metrics for both the short and long-term programs should be directly tied to Avon’s strategy. As you will see on the following pages, this feedback has been incorporated into our program design.

Highlights of the feedback we received from shareholders are as follows:

What We Heard

What We Did

Ensure incentive metrics drive the turnaround

  In 2018 and continuing in 2019, increased weighting on the Representative Improvement metric in the annual incentive plan to 25% with equal emphasis on both attracting and retaining Representatives

  In 2019, aligned performance measurement period of Performance RSUs with our strategic and financial goals

  In 2019, introduced a supplementary LTI Award (the “2019 LTI Turnaround Performance Awards” or “Turnaround LTI Performance Awards”), directly aligned with Open Up strategy and short-term financial milestones

Drive urgency and focus on delivering 2019 performance and building momentum

  In 2019, reassessed the incentive metrics and confirmed that the metrics (Revenue, Operating Profit, Cash Flow from Operations and Representative Improvement) continue to be the best short-term indicator of our turnaround success

  Retained relative TSR for 2019 LTI Awards, but performance will be measured over threeone-year periods to create stronger alignment with our key goals and focus management on delivering year on year growth.One-year measures of rTSR will focus our team on constant year-over-year improvement in share price, which is imperative to our turnaround.

Continue to provide strongpay-for-performance alignment and significant proportion of payat-risk

  For 2018, over 83% of CEO compensation is variable, performance-based compensation

  In 2018 and continuing in 2019, used Premium Option exercise price 25% above stock price at grant

  In 2018 and continuing in 2019, maintained relative TSR as a performance metric for Performance RSUs with target set above median compared to the S&P 400 Index

Enable the retention of critical staff needed to deliver the turnaround

  In 2019, reintroduced equity (rather than cash) below senior officer levels to better align all management level incentives with shareholder interests, with above median performance targets relative to the S&P 400 Index peer group

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement37


  in 2019, grantedone-time Turnaround LTI Performance Awards to select members of the management team to create enhanced focus on the critical 2019 financial goals. The performance goals for these awards are set to be more challenging than the business plan and are capped at target.

Positive feedback about our rigorous management of shareholder dilution

  In 2018 we continued to use a $5.00 divisor, rather than stock price at grant, to determine number of shares to grant. Share awards for 2019 were granted in the same number of shares as in 2018 to recognize remaining need for share price appreciation.

In 2019, we will continue to ensure the alignment of our compensation programs with our shareholders’ interests with a strong pay for performance alignment and payouts of incentive plans based on business performance and stock price appreciation.

2019 COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

We are committed to ensuring that Avon’s pay framework, particularly our incentive programs, are aligned with and reflect the most important task of our executive team – returning our business to profitable growth. Following the introduction of the Open Up Strategy the Committee undertook a detailed, thorough and holistic review of Avon’s incentive arrangements (fixed, short and long-term) to determine if our pay arrangements are aligned with Avon’s new strategic direction, key priorities and timelines.

Our shareholder outreach reinforced our belief that our 2019 incentive programs should:

Incorporate metrics that drive the turnaround

Drive urgency and focus on delivering 2019 targets and building momentum

Continue to provide strongpay-for-performance alignment and significant proportion of payat-risk; and

Enable the retention of critical staff needed to deliver the turnaround.

Following this thorough review, the Committee believes that many elements of the current incentive program remain appropriate, as it has strong performance elements that support our externally communicated business goals and requires significant stock price appreciation for executives to realize target compensation. However, for 2019 the Committee made a number of adjustments to the incentive arrangements, to further strengthen their alignment with Avon’s strategic direction and focus on delivering the turnaround strategy with urgency. For example, the 2019 Long-Term Incentive Program places a greater focus onone-year performance than our historical practice in order to explicitly reflect our shareholders’ feedback, which stressed the urgency of delivering the turnaround strategy as well as enabling the retention of critical staff needed to deliver the turnaround. Details of our compensation programs for 2019 are as follows:

2019 Annual Incentive Program

For our annual incentive plan, the same key financial metrics and strategic goals used in 2018 that link to our externally communicated business goals remain appropriate and are fully formulaic.

2019 Long-Term Incentive Program (“LTIP”)

For our 2019 LTI, the number of shares granted to executives were fixed to align with those granted in recent years, rather than the stock price at grant ($2.75). The fixed 2019 LTI grant resulted in a 43% reduction in grant date fair value. When combined with the Turnaround LTI Performance Awards, the combined value of NEO’s 2019 LTI award was, on average, 76% of target. 2019 Performance RSUs will be measured based on relative TSR goals compared with the S&P 400 peer group, where performance above median will be required to achieve target pay out.

Performance for the 2019 Performance RSUs will be measured over threeone-year performance periods, to increase focus and emphasis on delivering immediate results and achievingyear-on-year improvements in line with our turnaround plan.One-year measures of rTSR will focus our team on constant year-over-year improvement in share price, which is imperative to our turnaround.

Equity awards were reintroduced into LTI award mix in lieu of certain LTI cash awards for business leaders below the NEO level, to enhance alignment with shareholder interests while continuing to focus on minimizing shareholder dilution.

2019 Long-Term Incentive Turnaround Awards

The Committee approved theone-time grant of Turnaround LTI Performance Awards for 2019 to select members of the management team. The purpose of this award is (i) to increase focus on delivering key 2019 operational results and building momentum to deliver the turnaround and (ii) to bridge some, but not all, of the significant gap in value between actual LTI awards and target LTI awards.

38AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


2019 LTI Turnaround Performance Awards will be delivered in the form of Performance RSUs. Performance for these awards will be measured against operational metrics over aone-year performance period (2019) with atwo-year holding period.

Theseone-time Turnaround LTI Performance Awards are not additive as the combined value of participants’ regular 2019 LTIP and the Turnaround LTI Performance Awards will not exceed 80% of their target 2019 LTI opportunity. The shortfall reflects the performance-based nature of the LTIP and requires a significant stock price improvement to realize target value under the compensation plans. The table below comparesperformance goals for these Turnaround LTI Performance Awards are set to be more challenging than the business plan and are capped at target.

Highlights of our CEO’s 2016 target grant date value delivered with2019 compensation programs and the prior year:rationale are described below:

 

  Component

 

    

2015 Target Delivered

 

    

2016 Target Delivered

 

    

% Change

 

  Base Salary      $1,200,000      $1,200,000        0%
  Annual Incentive      $1,800,000      $1,800,000        0%
  Long-Term Incentive      $7,700,000*    $5,322,517**    -31%
  Total Target Compensation     $10,700,000       $8,322,517        -22%

 

*The amount reflects Performance RSUs granted under our 2015-2017 long-term incentive program.
**The amount reflects target value which differs slightly from the accounting grant date fair value which is reported in the summary compensation table on page 53.

2017 COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

For 2017, the Committee has maintained its commitment to the strong alignment of our executive pay programs with our shareholders’ interests, while ensuring we can attract and retain key talent in the organization. As such, the Committee believes the 2016 design remains appropriate as it has strong performance elements that support our three-year Transformation Plan and requires significant stock price appreciation for executives to realize target compensation. As a result, the details of our compensation programs for 2017, not significantly different from 2016, are as follows:

2017 Annual Incentive Program

 

· For

Focus Areas

Rationale

No Change

  The Committee determined that the current program, including the performance metrics (Revenue, Operating Profit, Cash Flow from Operations and Representative Improvement) continues to be the best short-term indicator of our annual incentive plan,turnaround success and should be retained for 2019

  Current program is directly aligned with Open Up Strategy and provides appropriatepay-for-performance alignment, as illustrated by the same financial metricslack of payout for 2018

Long-Term Incentive Program

Focus Areas

Rationale

Strengthened shareholder alignment by reintroducing equity below the senior officer level

  CEO and strategic goals thatNEO award mix remains unchanged (CEO 40% Premium Options and 60% Performance RSUs. NEO 33% Performance RSUs, 33% Premium Options and 33% Service-based RSUs)

  Introduced more stock-based awards (in lieu of cash) for below senior officer level so award mix now more closely mirrors NEO.

  Responsive to shareholder feedback

  25% premium price on Premium Options “raises the bar” versus standard stock options or 10% premium priced options

  Better aligns all management level incentives with shareholder interests and above median performance targets relative to the S&P 400 Index peer group

  Enhances link to our three-year Transformation Plan remain and are fully formulaiclong-term performance

2017 Long-Term Incentive Program

· For

Aligned performance measurement period of Performance RSUs with our long-term incentivestrategic and financial goals

  Relative TSR retained for LTI Awards, but performance measured over three1-year periods.

Introduced fixed share awards for Performance RSUs, to simplify plan shares granted at $5.00 in line with

  Used fixed share awards (same fixed number of awards as 2018, accomplished by continuing to apply the Cerberus investment,$5 stock price divisor) rather than the stock price at grant, ($4.43) to determine the number of shares granted to senior officersgrant in 2019.

  The value of fixed shares, including theone-time Turnaround LTI Performance Awards, awarded to NEOs in 2019 was equal to, on average, 76% of their target LTI award opportunity.

  Creates stronger alignment with our key goals and focuses management on delivering year on year growth

  Addresses uncertainty, particularly regarding target setting during turnaround

  Requires a significant increase in stock price to earn target long-term incentive award value

  Reduces shareholder dilution

  Fixed share awards simplify the LTIP, particularly during extended period of share price volatility

(continued on next page)

 

·
  A three year performance period forAVON 2019 Proxy Statement39


Introduced Turnaround LTI Performance Awards, directly aligned with Open Up strategy and medium-term financial milestones

  For 2019, NEOs and other executives, were granted Turnaround LTI Performance Awards in the form of Performance RSUs with above median relative TSR goals comparedaone-year performance period andtwo-year holding period

  Performance measured against operational metrics directly aligned with the S&P 400 peer groupturnaround strategy and reflect performance goals that are more challenging than the business plan and are capped at target.

  Turnaround LTI Performance Awards granted to NEOs and other senior executives, as the value of this population’s fixed LTI awards for 2019 (excluding Turnaround LTI Performance Awards) was 45% less than their target opportunity

  For the CEO, the value of his Turnaround LTI Performance Awards reduced the gap between the actual value of his fixed 2019 LTI awards and target LTI opportunity to 28%. For other NEOs and other senior executives, the value of Turnaround LTI Performance Awards is, on average, 40% of the 55% gap between the actual value of the fixed 2019 LTI awards and the target LTI opportunity

  Reflects shareholder feedback to create strong alignment with our key turnaround goals and milestones, focusing on urgency in delivering the turnaround

  Creates alignment between long-term incentives and delivering shareholder value

  Facilitates retention of critical staff needed to deliver the turnaround, while maintaining strong alignment between executive pay and shareholder interests and retaining the requirement for significant increase in stock price in order for target LTI to achievebe achieved

    As the combined value of participants’ regular 2019 LTIP and Turnaround LTI Performance Awards will not exceed 80% of their target pay out

·Premium-priced stock options with2019 LTI opportunity, the awards are not additive but rather still below the target 2019 LTIP opportunity. The shortfall reflects the performance-based nature of the LTIP and requires a higher exercise price than the actualsignificant stock price onimprovement to realize target value under the grant datecompensation plans.

STRONG COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

We maintain several best practices in compensation governance. A more detailed discussion of these practices is on page 48.52.

 

What We Do

    

 

What We Don’t Do

LOGO

Comprehensive Clawback Policy

 

 

LOGOLOGO  Comprehensive Clawback Policy

 

LOGO

No Excise TaxGross-Ups on Change

in Control

No Hedging Transactions or Short Sales

LOGO

LOGODouble-Trigger Vesting forChange-in-Control Benefits

 

LOGO

LOGOMultiple Performance Metrics for Various Incentive Plans

 

LOGO

No Repricing of Stock Options

LOGO

LOGOMulti-Year Vesting Equity Awards

 

LOGO

No Dividend Equivalents Paid on

Unvested Performance RSUs

LOGO

LOGOStock Ownership Guidelines and Holding Requirements for Senior Executives

 

LOGOLOGO  Limited Perquisites

 

Limited Perquisites

LOGO

LOGOActive Shareholder Engagement

 

LOGO

LOGOIndependent Compensation Consultant

 

LOGO

LOGOCompensation Risk Review

 

LOGO

LOGORegular review of compensation, especially incentive design, to ensure continued alignment with evolving company strategy and shareholder interests

  

LOGO    No Excise TaxGross-Ups on Change in Control

LOGO    No Hedging Transactions, Short Sales or Pledging

LOGO    No Repricing of Stock Options

LOGO    No Dividend Equivalents Paid on Unvested Performance RSUs

40  AVON 2019 Proxy Statement  

36


PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE

Our strategic and financial goals influenced the design and development of our 20162018 compensation programs. The Committee believes that aligning payouts with our performance outcomes is critical for shareholders, as is securing the right talent to lead our business. Accordingly, the targets under our annual and long-term incentive programs represent rigorous performance expectations and are aligned with our immediate and long-term financial and strategic goals.

We seek to promote the following in our incentive compensation program design:

 

·

Align with Avon’s externally communicated business goals

Maintain focus on financial and strategic results and year-over-year improvement

·Strengthen leadership behaviors including ownership, accountability and execution

·Attract, motivate and retain talent

·Balance and align business and shareholder interests

·Aligned with Avon’s Transformation Plan

Performance-based structure. Target total compensation for our CEO in 2016 was 86% “at risk”, meaning that it is contingent upon and based on Company performance and stock price performance, and target total compensation for our other NEOs was on average 74% “at risk”.

Significant Majority of Target Total Compensation Tied to Avon Performance*

LOGO

86% of CEO target pay is “at risk” and an average of74% of target pay for all other NEOs is “at risk”.

*Incentive compensation for these purposes is based on “at target” compensation, which reflects approximate compensation that would be realized if we achieve the financial and strategic goals set within our incentive plans.

Our Committee continues to believe that despite external challenges to achieving our goals, a high percentage of our executives’ compensation should remain “at risk”results and based on Company performance and stock price performance.year-over-year improvement

Demonstrated rigor of incentive plans.Despite our management team’s focus on key strategic and financial goals, our financial results have fallen short of the performance targets set by the Committee over the past several years and our executives’ incentive pay has been reflective of these results.

LOGO37


The tables below illustrate the strong link between our financial performance and incentive opportunity value realized by our management team. The funding score continues to be strongly aligned with our performance.

LOGO

* Measured in constant dollars. For details on how constant dollars and other adjusted metrics are calculated, please see the Annual Incentive    Compensation Section below and the“Non-GAAP Financial Measures” paragraph of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section of    our Annual Report filed on Form10-K.

** See page 44 for actual 2016 annual incentive plan payouts for NEOs.

LOGO

* The realized value shown is a percentage of target and reflects the December 31, 2016 closing stock price.

Annual Incentive Plan Plan Year Financial Performance Measures* Funding Achieved Not Achieved Plan Funding Score** (% of Target) 2016 Cash Flow from Operations Adjusted Operating Profit Revenue Growth Active Representative Growth Transformation Savings 2015 Cash Flow from Operations Adjusted Operating profit Revenue Growth 2014 Cash Flow from Operations Adjusted Operating Profit Revenue Growth 2013 Cash Flow from Operations Adjusted Operating Profit Revenue Growth 2012 Cash Flow from Operations Adjusted Operating Profit Revenue Growth
Performance-Based Long-Term Incentive Plan Performance Period Financial Perf. Measures Actual Financial Score 2016 Average NEO Realized Value* 2014-2016 Revenue Growth Operating Margin in 2016 Stock Price: 34% of Grant Date Price 2013-2015 Revenue Growth Operating Margin in 2015
Stock Price: 20% of Grant Date Price 2012-2014 Revenue Growth Operating Profit Growth Funding Achieved Not Achieved

38


CEO compensation aligns with performance

As illustrated in the table below, the realizable and realized compensation for Ms. McCoy over the last three years (2014-2016) is significantly less than the amounts disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table and demonstrates the pay and performance alignment of our program. Given our performance over the last three years, Ms. McCoy has earned her base salary and annual incentives of 50%, 76% and 53% of target in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. In addition, Ms. McCoy has earned only a fraction of her Performance RSUs to date and at lower prices than grant.

·The Performance RSUs granted for the 2013-2015 performance period achieved an 80% payout; however, the value realized upon vesting was only 16% of the original value awarded.
·The 2014-2016 Performance RSUs achieved a 91% payout, however, the value realized upon vesting was only 31% of the original value awarded.
·The 2015-2017 Performance RSUs have one year remaining in the performance cycle and, as of December 31, 2016, have a 39% decline in value from grant date.

The differences in Ms. McCoy’s grant-date compensation, potentially realizable pay and actual realized pay reflect the unearned Performance RSUs, payout of cash incentive awards at less than target, and the current stock price.

3-Year Aggregate CEO Pay ($MM)

(2014 – 2016)

LOGO

The payout value of our CEO’s performance-based equity awards continues to remain

significantly below target.

1In the chart above, “Granted Pay Opportunity” equals the sum of, for all of the three prior fiscal years (i.e., 2014-2016): (i) Salary (as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 53), (ii) target value of short-term cash incentives, and (iii) the grant date fair-value of long-term incentive awards (i.e., Performance RSUs, stock options, previously disclosedone-time 2015 retention Performance RSUs and performance-based cash).

LOGO39


2In the chart above, “Realizable Pay” equals the sum of, for all of the three prior fiscal years: (i) Salary, (ii) short-term cash incentives earned, and (iii) the value of all earned long-term incentive awards for completed performance periods (of which there are two) and unvested long-term incentive awards for ongoing performance periods. All unvested long-term incentive awards are valued based on our stock price as of December 31, 2016. The 2014-2016 Performance RSUs have been reduced to reflect the payout of 91% of target. The 2015-2017 Performance RSUs and the 2016-2018 Performance RSUs are included at target value. The previously disclosedone-time 2015 performance-based retention awards reflect the payout at 100% of target for the Performance RSU portion and no projected payout for the performance-based cash portion.

3In the chart above, “Realized Pay” equals the sum of, for all of the three prior fiscal years: (i) Salary, (ii) short-term cash incentives earned, and (iii) the value of all earned long-term incentive awards (of which there are two) based on our stock price as of December 31, 2016. The 2014-2016 Performance RSUs have been reduced to reflect the payout of 91% of target. The previously disclosedone-time 2015 performance-based retention awards reflect the payout at 100% of target for the Performance RSU and no projected payout for the performance-based cash portion.

ROLES IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following parties are responsible for the development and oversight of our executive compensation program for our NEOs:

Compensation and Management Development Committee

Oversees our executive compensation program; responsibilities include review of strategic objectives, design, and risk and reward structure

 

Determines

Strengthen leadership behaviors including ownership, accountability and approves the compensation of our NEOs, other officers at or above the level of senior vice president, and any officers covered by Section 16 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amendedexecution

 

Consults with the independent members of the Board in establishing

Attract, motivate and evaluating performance objectives for the CEO each year, in part to determine the CEO’s incentive compensation payoutretain talent

 

Sets annual

Balance and long-term performance measuresalign business and goals that align with ourpay-for-performance philosophyshareholder interests

Reviews and evaluates our talent management and succession planning approach, philosophy, and key processes; responsible for development and succession plans for members of the Executive Committee and their potential successors

Has sole authority to engage, continue to engage or terminate its relationship with outside advisors, including its independent compensation consultant

Requires that the compensation consultant be independent, and reviews such independence at least annually

Under the Committee’s charter, a compensation consultant is not considered independent if it provides significant services to the business apart from work performed for the Committee (services in excess of $50,000 or, if less, 1% of the consulting firm’s gross revenues for the most recent fiscal year). In 2016, Semler Brossy Consulting Group (“Semler Brossy”) and Pay Governance LLC (“Pay Governance”) provided no services to us apart from work performed for the Committee and other Board committees and members, and the Committee has determined that Semler Brossy and Pay Governance are independent. The Committee also reviews the relationship with the compensation consultants to identify conflicts of interest pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission and New York Stock Exchange rules and, in 2016, did not identify any such conflicts

See “Information Concerning the Board of Directors—Compensation and Management Development Committee” on page 16 for additional Committee responsibilities.

Independent Consultant to the Committee

(Semler Brossy Until August 2016 and Pay Governance Beginning September 2016)

Advises the Committee on various executive compensation matters, including proposed changes to our annual and long-term incentive programs, share utilization, compensation levels, peer group constituents and pay mix

Attends Committee meetings

Provides periodic reports, analyses and presentations to the Committee, and reviews all Committee meeting materials regarding current and prospective compensation plans and programs

Conducts analyses related to the employment arrangements for new senior officers

Provides assistance with the Committee’s review of the risk and reward structure of executive compensation plans, policies and practices

In September 2016, the Committee engaged a new compensation consultant, Pay Governance, to replace Semler Brossy who had served as the independent consultant to the Committee since 2009.

Pay Governance is engaged by and reports directly to the Committee and consults directly with its Chair; the Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate Pay Governance and to review and approve Pay Governance’s fees and other terms of the engagement. Similarly, Semler Brossy had been engaged and reported directly to the Committee and consulted directly with its Chair; the Committee had the sole authority to retain and terminate Semler Brossy and review and approve Semler Brossy’s fees and other terms of the engagement

40


Chief Executive Officer

Makes individual compensation recommendations for senior officers (other than herself), including the other NEOs, to the Committee for its review and approval, after considering market data and relative individual achievements

Provides input on the design of the executive compensation program, with a focus on alignment with strategic priorities and the desired Company culture

Management

Supports the Committee by making recommendations and providing analyses with respect to competitive practices and pay ranges, compensation and benefit plans, policies and procedures related to equity awards, perquisites, and general compensation and benefits philosophy

Senior human resources and legal executives attend Committee meetings to provide perspective and expertise relevant to the meeting agenda

Does not recommend, determine or participate in Committee discussions relating to their individual compensation arrangements

COMPETITIVE POSITIONING AND PEER GROUP

We seek to deliver competitive compensation packages and programs, and use our peer group for compensation benchmarking and relative pay and performance comparisons. We periodically assess pay ranges, pay levels, and our program design against our peer group. Elements.The Committee, with input from its independent compensation consultant, continued to review the peer group during 2016 to better align the size of the companies we use as a comparison as we move forward with the Transformation Plan. Similarly, the peer group needed to be reviewed in the context of the Cerberus transaction, as Avon is smaller in revenue and an internationally-focused company. Avon’s current market capitalization presents a challenge for identifying potential peers, as there are only a handful of companies with similar market capitalizations that are sufficiently large in terms of revenue and complex in terms of scale and international presence.

As a result, we made changes to the peer group for 2016 that result in an overall reduction in the median revenue and market capitalization of the peer group, while retaining a composition of relevant consumer products companies that are internationally and operationally complex. The peer group for 2016 was made up of the following companies:

2016 Peer Group

      Campbell Soup

      Estee Lauder

      Kellogg

      Clorox

      General Mills

      Nu Skin Enterprises

      Colgate-Palmolive

      Herbalife

      Revlon

      Coty

      Hershey Foods

      Tupperware Brands

      Edgewell Personal Care

The Committee made five changes to the peer group in 2016, as follows:

Removed Procter & Gamble and Kimberly Clark due to their high revenue sizes

Removed Limited Brands since its international sales accounted for less than 15% of sales

Added Herbalife, a competitor in direct selling, which is similar in market capitalization size and has nearly half its sales from international markets

Added Edgewell since it is focused on retailconsumer-end products with nearly half of its sales from international markets and is within a competitive range for market capitalization

Added Nu Skin because it is a direct competitor in the beauty market, has a similar market capitalization, and has a majority of sales from international markets.

The 2016 changes result in a decrease in the median peer’s revenues from $11.1 billion to $5.7 billion. Furthermore, the new peer group is comprised of companies with a strong international focus—at median, peers earn half of sales from international markets and operate in 100 countries. In 2016, actual cash payouts and value of long-term incentive awards as compared to the market median of target compensation for our peers, on average, for our NEOs is above market on base salary, below market on total cash compensation (base salary plus actual bonus payout), above market on long-term incentives (2016 long-term incentive awards) and at market for total direct compensation (total actual cash compensation and long-term incentive opportunity).

LOGO41


We generally target the market median for total direct compensation and each of base salary, total cash compensation, and long-term incentives for senior officers, including NEOs, although we allow flexibility to pay above or below the median depending on other factors, including adjusting for specific individual circumstances and personal achievement (e.g., length of time in a given role, sustained performance, and potential to take on expanded roles within Avon), the evolving business environment, and executive recruitment efforts. We determine “market” for these purposes based on analysis provided to the Committee by its independent compensation consultant with respect to the peer group of companies described above.

ELEMENTS OF OUR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

Key elements of compensation include base salary, annual incentive compensation, long-term incentive compensation, retirement benefits, and other benefits, including health and limited perquisites.

COMPENSATION STRUCTURE

The 20162018 executive compensation program was highly performance-based and provided incentive opportunities that align with our shareholders’ interests and our strategic and financial goals. Performance goals were selected to fully align with our commitment to our shareholders. The following table provides a summary of the three primary components of the executive compensation program:

 

LOGO

LOGO

Component Form Performance Link CEO and NEO Pay Mix Base Salary Cash Fixed compensation to attract and retain NEOs For CEO and NEOs Annual Incentives Cash 100% Based on Avon Performance Revenue Growth Operating Profit Operating Cash Flow-Active Representative Growth-Transformation Savings For CEO and NEOs Long-Term Incentives Performance-Based RSUs Premium Stock Options Service-Based RSUs Relative Total Shareholder Return Target set above median compared to peer group (S&P 400 Index) TSR Regulator (applied if absolute TSR is negative) Value also tied to stock price performance Stock price performance; Premium-priced stock options exercise price set at 25% Above stock price at grant Stock price performance 60% for CEO 33% for NEOs 40% for CEO 33% for NEOs 0% for CEO 33% for NEOs

Performance-based orientation. Target total compensation for our CEO in 2018 was 83% “at risk”, meaning that it is contingent upon and based on Company performance and stock price performance, and target total compensation for our other NEOs was on average 75% “at risk”.

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement41


Significant Majority of 2018 Target Total Compensation Tied to Avon Performance*

LOGO

83% At Risk 17% Base Salary 33% Annual Incentive 50% Long-Term Incentive 60% Performance-based RSUs 40% Premium-priced Stock Options CEO Pay Elements 75% At Risk 25% Base Salary 20% Annual Incentive 55% Long-Term Incentive 1/3 Performance-based RSUs 1/3 Premium-priced Stock Options 1/3 Service-based RSUs Other NEOs Pay Elements (Average)

83% of CEO target pay is “at risk” and an averageof 75% of target pay for all other NEOs is “at risk”.

*Incentive compensation for these purposes is based on “at target” compensation, which reflects approximate compensation that would be realized if we achieve the financial and strategic goals set within our incentive plans.

Our Committee continues to believe that despite external challenges to achieving our goals, a high percentage of our executives’ compensation should remain “at risk” and based on Company and stock price performance.

Demonstrated rigor of incentive plans.Despite our management team’s focus on key strategic and financial goals, our financial results have fallen short of the performance targets set by the Committee over the past several years and our executives’ incentive pay has been reflective of these results.

The tables below illustrate the strong link between our financial performance and incentive value realized by our executives. The funding score continues to be strongly aligned with our financial and stock price performance.

Annual Incentive Plan

Plan Year

Financial Performance Measures*

LOGO= Funding AchievedLOGO = Not Achieved

Plan Funding Score**

(% of Target)

2018

LOGO  Cash flow from operations

LOGO  Adjusted Operating Profit

LOGO  Revenue Growth

LOGO  Representative Improvement

LOGO

2017

LOGO  Cash flow from operations

LOGO  Adjusted Operating Profit

LOGO  Revenue Growth

LOGO  Active Representative Growth

LOGO  Transformation Savings

LOGO

2016

LOGO  Cash flow from operations

LOGO  Adjusted Operating Profit

LOGO  Revenue Growth

LOGO  Active Representative Growth

LOGO  Transformation Savings

LOGO

* Measured in constant dollars. For details on how constant dollars and other adjusted metrics are calculated, please see the Annual Incentive Compensation Section below and the“Non-GAAP Financial Measures” paragraph of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section of our Annual Report filed on Form10-K.

** See page 48 for actual 2018 annual incentive plan payouts for NEOs.

42AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


Performance-Based Long-Term Incentive Plan

Performance Period

Financial Perf. Measures

LOGO= Funding        LOGO= Not

Achieved  Achieved

Actual Financial Score

Average Realized Value*

    2016-2019**

LOGO  rTSR 2016-2019 (50%)

LOGO  rTSR 2016–2017 (16.6%)

LOGO  rTSR 2017–2018 (16.6%)

LOGO  rTSR 2018–2019 (16.6%)

LOGO

LOGO

•  Stock Price: 59% of Grant Date Price

    2015-2017

LOGO  Revenue growth

LOGO  Operating margin in 2016

LOGO

LOGO

•  Stock Price: 26% of Grant Date Price

    2014-2016

LOGO  Revenue growth

LOGO  Operating margin in 2016

LOGO

LOGO

•  Stock Price: 34% of Grant Date Price

* The realized value shown is a percentage of target and reflects the closing stock price on the last trading day of the performance period for each respective LTI award.

** rTSR Performance for the 2016 LTIP is measured over the three-year period (i.e. March 10, 2016 to March 10, 2019).

New CEO’s Key Compensation Elements

Ournew CEO’s annual target directcompensation isaligned with the median of ournew peer group (see page 45) and is intended to be: (i) predominantlyvariable,at-risk compensation that istied to Company performance, (ii)100% performance-based with respect to the annual LTI awards, and (iii) 40%lower than the former CEO’s target direct compensation consistent with our reduced scale.

Mr. Zijderveld’s compensation terms reflect the Board’s focus on performance and his annual total direct compensation opportunity is summarized below.

Compensation Element for New CEO

Shareholder Alignment

  Annual Base Salary: £850,000

 Serves as fixed compensation

  Annual Cash Incentive: 200% of base salary

 Formulaic financial metrics and strategic goals linked to our externally communicated business goals

  Long-Term Incentive (LTI): 300% of base salary

 2018 LTI is 100% performance-based with the following mix:

–  40% Premium Options with exercise price equal to 125% of the closing price of a share of Avon stock as of the grant date; annual vesting over three years

–  60% Performance RSUs; cliff vesting at completion of three-year performance period in line with the 2018 LTI program described on page 48

 Our methodology to determine the number of LTI shares granted conserves shares and limits dilution for our shareholders, and resulted in accounting grant date fair value for our new CEO’s 2018 LTI awards of $1,942,410 – See discussion above under “Key 2018 Compensation Highlights” of the methodology used to determine number of LTI shares granted

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement43


Compensation Element for New CEO

Shareholder Alignment

  Target Total Compensation: Approx. £4,000,000 (approx. $5,400,000). This is based on the grant date accounting value of the LTI following the application of the methodology used to determine the number of shares granted.

            This value is 22% less than the target total compensation based on the grant date accounting value of the LTI following the application of the methodology used to determine the number of shares granted for our former CEO

  Employment Inducement Provisions

            Solely for 2018 (the initial year of employment), minimum annual incentive of 50% of target. The rationale for this was to balance the following considerations: (1) recruiting a high-quality CEO, (2) recognition that some new CEOs receive a first-year minimum of 100% of target and (3) given his date of hire, his impact on the 2018 budget process was limited

             Sign-on equity awards consisting of:

–600,000 Service-based RSUs (with a grant date fair value of $1,350,000), which will cliff-vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued employment. These Service-based RSUs were granted as a replacement for a portion of his prior employer forfeited equity awards, and to promote shareholder alignment and retention over the three-year vesting period.

–            600,000 Performance RSUs, which will vest based on service and performance conditions over a three-year period (with the first third of the award having a grant date fair value of $558,000). These awards have three separate trances, all of which are eligible to vest only after completion of the 2020 performance year. The Committee will establish at the beginning of each year (i.e., 2018, 2019 and 2020) the performance objectives required to earn the award – ensuring that the Committee can tailor the measures and their rigor to the business circumstances.

–            No cash-based retention awards were granted.

44AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


COMPETITIVE POSITIONING AND PEER GROUP

We seek to deliver competitive compensation packages and programs and use our peer group for compensation benchmarking and relative pay and performance comparisons. We periodically assess pay ranges, pay levels, and our program design against our peer group. The peer group for 2018 was made up of the following companies:

2018 Peer Group

    Campbell Soup

      Estee Lauder

      Nu Skin Enterprises

    Church & Dwight

      Herbalife

      Revlon

    Clorox

      Hershey Foods

      Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

    Coty

      Kellogg

      Tupperware Brands

    Edgewell Personal Care

The Committee, with input from its independent compensation consultant, continued to review the peer group during 2017 to ensure the size and international scope of the companies we use as a comparison accurately reflect Avon’s current revenue and international focus. The Committee made a number of changes to the peer group for 2018 that resulted in a reduction in the median revenue of the peer group to $5.1 billion, while retaining a composition of relevant consumer products companies that are internationally and operationally complex; at median, peers earn half of sales from international markets and operate in 100 countries. Following a thoroughre-assessment of the peer group, the Committee believes the current peer group, with its reduced median revenue and market capitalization, appropriately reflects Avon’s current size and the international complexity of our business. As such, the Committee determined not to make any changes to the peer group for 2019.

We generally target the market median for target total direct compensation and each of base salary, target total cash compensation, and long-term incentives for senior officers, including NEOs, although we allow flexibility to pay above or below the median depending on other factors, including adjusting for specific individual circumstances and personal achievement (e.g. sustained performance over a length of time in a given role, and potential to take on expanded roles within Avon), the evolving business environment, and executive recruitment efforts. We determine “market” for these purposes based on analysis provided to the Committee by its independent compensation consultant with respect to the peer group of companies described above.

In 2018, actual cash payouts and value of long-term incentive awards as compared to the market median of target compensation for our peers, on average, for our NEOs is aligned with market on base salary, below market on total cash compensation (i.e. base salary plus actual bonus payout), below market on long-term incentives (i.e. 2018 long-term incentive awards) and below market for 2018 total direct compensation (i.e., base salary, actual bonus payout and long-term incentive opportunity).

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement45


ELEMENTS OF OUR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

Key elements of compensation include base salary, annual incentive compensation, long-term incentive compensation, retirement benefits, and other benefits, including health and limited perquisites.

BASE SALARY

 

 

Purpose: CompensatesTo attract and retain key executive talent and compensates for achievements based on job responsibilities and individual performance and attracts and retains key executive talent

 

Annual salary increases are based on our overall salary increase budget, individual performance, and internal and external market comparisons. Ms. McCoy has notIn keeping pay aligned with performance, no NEOs received a salary increase since joining the Company. In 2016, Mr. Scully received a 5% salary increaseincreases in consideration of his expanded role and appointment to Chief Operating Officer, in addition to his then role as Chief Financial Officer. Messrs. Acosta and Higson received a 5% and 18% salary increase, respectively, in connection with their promotions to Executive Vice President and expanded scope and responsibilities. Mr. Benjamin received a 2% salary increase in consideration of his performance and value to Avon.2018.

Component Form Performance Link CEO and NEO Pay Mix Base Salary Cash Fixed compensation to attract and retain NEOs For CEO and NEOs Annual Incentives Cash 100% Based on Avon Performance Revenue Growth Operating Profit Growth Operating Cash Active Representative Growth Transformation Savings Flow Growth For CEO and NEOs Long-Term Incentives Performance Based RSUs Relative Total Shareholders Return Target set above median compared to peer group (S&P 400 Index) TSR Regulator (applied if absolute TSR is negative) 60% for CEO 33% for NEOs Premium Stock Option Value also tied to stock price performance Stock price performance; Premium-priced stocked option exercise price set at 30% above stock price at grant 40% for CEO 33% for NEOs Service Based RSUs Stock price performance 0% for CEO 33% for NEOs

42


ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

 

 

Purpose: Encourages and rewards achievement of annual/short-term Company financial goals and strategic initiatives and personal contributions towards such goals;initiatives; attracts, motivates, and retains key executive talent

 

As in previous years, the aggregate amount available for payment under the annual incentive program for all senior officers for 20162018 was based solely on our global financial and strategic results, which supports our objectivesculture of collaboration and objective to focus on a “One Team“Winning as One Avon” culture of collaboration.Team”. The Committee then may use negative discretion to reduce the targetactual payout for senior officers. For 2016,2018, the Committee selected three global financial performance measures of equal weight: revenue growth, adjusted operating profit, and operating cash flow; and twoone global strategic objectives: Activeobjective: Representative Growth and Transformation Savings (cost savings in connection with the company’s Transformation Plan).Improvement. These metrics were chosen to focus execution ontop-line growth, profit, and cash flow generation. Individual payouts to senior officers wereare fully funded based onpre-set global financial and strategic performance measures.

Calculation of award payments for each senior executive was based fully on Company performance and fully formulaic. Individual performance was not a component for our senior executives:

 

Funding 100%Entirely Based on AvonAvon’s Financial Performance

 

LOGO

LOGO

FundingFinancial Score 0% - 150% Revenue Growth Operating Profit Growth Operating Cash Flow Growth Active Representative Growth Transformation SavingsImprovement Each equally weighted 25% Each equally Weighted 12.5% Target Award Funding Score Annual Incentive Award

LOGO43


The calculation of the funding results is purely formulaic, and no discretion is usedhas been applied in determining the score. The table below summarizes the results of each metric.metric.In recognition of (1) the challenging operating environment that we expected to face during 2018 (2) the below target results in 2017, which were reflected in the payout of 37.5% of target, and (3) the importance of retaining and motivating executives with realistic, but challenging, goals that have some probability of being achieved, threshold for each of the 2018 financial goals was set at a lower performance level than actual 2017 results.

 

46AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


There was notable progress achieved on the Representative Improvement metric in 2018 (we spoke to over 60,000 Representatives, launchedon-line stores in 20 markets, launched the new Representative segmentation,e-brochure launched and now live in 60 countries). However, to ensure the total bonus results are calculated based on a quantitative assessment, funding for the Representative Improvement metric is determined based on the average score of the financial metrics, which resulted in 0% payout for Representative Improvement metric.

The table below summarizes the results of each metric

 

LOGO

  

 

Preset Performance Goals

 

 

  

Achievement

 

  

Weighted Funding

Result

 

  

 

Threshold

(25% of Target)

 

  

 

Target

(100% of Target)

 

  

 

Maximum

(150% of Target)

 

  
          

 

Revenue

Growth

(Constant $)1

 

  

-1.50%

 

  

1.20%

 

  

2.00%

 

  

-3.30%

 

  

0%

 

          

 

Operating Profit

Growth

(Constant $)2

 

  

320M

 

  

400M

 

  

450M

 

  

269M

 

  

0%

 

          

 

Operating Cash

Flow Growth

(Constant $)3

 

  

160M

 

  

243M

 

  

274M

 

  

120M

 

  

0%

 

          

 

Representative

Improvement4

 

  

Funding calculated based on average of three financial metrics

 

  

N/A

 

  

0%

 

           
          
        

 

Total

 

   

 

0%

 

 

 1.

Revenue growth (in constant dollars) was up 3.25% on a year-over-year basis and abovebelow the minimum performance threshold, of 2%. This resulted in a payout percentage of 67% for this metric, which applied to 25% ofand therefore contributed zero toward the overall funding score. Revenue growth (in constant dollars) excluded certain losses fromgeo-political impacts in Turkey and is adjusted for the deconsolidation of Venezuela. When assessing performance for annual incentive plan purposes, certain transaction and operating costs related to the separation of the North America business are excluded.

 

 2.

Adjusted operating profit (in constant dollars) was up 44.7% on a year-over-year basis and abovebelow the minimum performance threshold, of 36.7%. This resulted in a payout score of 68% for this metric, which applied to 25% ofand therefore contributed zero toward the overall funding score. Adjusted operating profit (in constant dollars) excludes certain losses fromgeo-political impacts in Turkey and costs related to the relocation of our corporate headquarters, and is adjusted for the deconsolidation of Venezuela. When assessing performance for annual incentive plan purposes, certain transaction and operating costs related to the separation of the North America business are excluded.

 

 3.

Operating cash flow (in constant dollars) was below the minimum performance threshold, and therefore contributed zero toward the overall funding score. Adjustments were made for the same items that impacted the operating profit listed above as well as adjustments for costs related to restructuring implementation impact ofand the Industrial Production Tax (IPI) in Brazil, debt refinancing, certain litigation items and pension plan expenses.Brazilian IPI tax deposit refund collected following successful legal challenge, which reduced the cash flow funding result from above threshold to below threshold.

 

 4.Active

Representative growthImprovement is calculated based on the average score from the financial metrics. The Committee can then vary the weighted funding for this metric up or down by up to 25%. Given the average of financial metrics score was belowzero, the minimum performance threshold, and therefore contributed zero toward the overall funding score. Active Representative growth excluded the impact of certain losses fromgeo-political impacts in Turkey.Committee determined not to make any adjustments.

 

 5.Transformation Savings (cost savings in connection with

Constant dollars measures have been adjusted to exclude the company’s Transformation Plan, measured inimpact of changes due to the translation of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars. For further details on how constant dollars) was abovedollars and other adjusted metrics are calculated, please see the maximum performance threshold of $80M. This resulted in a payout score of 150% for this metric, which applied to 12.5%“Non-GAAP Financial Measures” paragraph of the overall funding score.Management’s Discussion and Analysis section of our Annual Report filed on Form10-K.

In light of these results, the overall funding score for 20162018 was 52.6%0%. Based on these results, the Committee approved paymentsno payouts to our NEOs for the 2018 annual incentive plan year, other than for Mr. Zijderveld whose payout is based on his previously agreed to employment contract as an inducement to join the Company, which provides for payout of the 2018 annual bonus at 52.6%50% of theirtarget. The rationale for this guarantee was to balance the following considerations: (1) recruiting a high-quality CEO, (2) recognition that some new CEOs receive a first-year minimum of 100% of target amounts.and (3) given his date of hire, his impact on the 2018 budget process was limited.

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement47


Target award and actual payout under the 20162018 annual incentive program for each NEO are summarized below:

 

    NEO  2016 Target Annual Incentive Program Amount       2016 Actual Payout Amount   
    Ms. McCoy  $1,800,000    $946,800
    Mr. Scully  $840,000    $441,840
    Mr. Acosta  $640,248    $336,770
    Mr. Higson  $435,053    $228,838
    Mr. Benjamin  $525,000    $276,150
   
    NEO     2018 Target Annual Incentive Program Amount         2018 Actual Payout Amount    
 

    Mr. Zijderveld

 

$2,169,236

 

$1,084,618

    Ms. McCoy*

 

$0

 

$0

    Mr. Wilson

 

$596,540

 

$0

    Mr. Fernandez

 

$541,033

 

$0

    Mr. Myers

 

$479,784

 

$0

    Mr. Thompson

 

$437,675

 

$0

* In line with Ms McCoy’s separation agreement with the Company, she was not entitled to receive an annual incentive award for 2018.

44

Preset Performance Goals Threshold (50%In addition, in connection with his commencement of Target) Target (100%employment in 2017, Mr. Fernandez received in March 2018 payment of Target) Revenue Growth (Constant $)1 2.00% 5.60% 9.20% Maximum (150%a deferred cash award in the amount of Target) Achievement Weighted Funding Result 3.25% 16.8% Operating Profit Growth (Constant $)2 341M 396M 452M 361M 17.0% Operating Cash Flow Growth (Constant $)3 94M 134M 174M -5M 0% Active Representative Growth 4 0.30% 0.80% 1.30% -0.4% 0% Transformation Savings (Constant $)5 60M 70M 80M 122M 18.8% Total 52.6%$1,373,951 in recognition of his forfeiture of a significant amount of value in unvested equity and other benefits from his prior employer.


LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

 

 

Purpose: Encourages long-term focus and promotes decision making consistent with our long-term strategic and financial goals and the interests of our shareholders; attracts, motivates and retains key executive talent

 

For 2016,2018, the Committee constructed a long-term incentive program that encourages and rewards key executives for meeting objectives associated with total shareholder return relative to a defined peer group. As in prior years, our long-term incentive award program consisted of overlapping cycles, with a new equity award each year. In general, each participant received a grant at the beginning of each three-year cycle. In 2016:2018:

 

·100% of Ms. McCoy’s long-term compensation was granted in performance-based equity (she was awarded no Service-based RSUs); 60% was delivered in the form of Performance RSUs, and 40% was delivered in the form of premium-priced stock options with a strike price set 30% above the closing stock price on the grant date

100% of Mr. Zijderveld’s 2018 long-term compensation was granted in the form of performance-based equity; 60% was delivered in the form of Performance RSUs, and 40% was delivered in the form of Premium Options with a strike price set 25% above the closing stock price on the grant date.

 

·For other senior officers, including the NEOs, 2016 long-term incentive awards consisted of Performance RSUs, Service-based RSUs, and premium-priced stock options, each representingone-third of the overall target award.

For other senior officers, including the NEOs other than the CEO, 2018 long-term incentive awards consisted of Performance RSUs, Service-based RSUs, and Premium Options, each representingone-third of the overall target award.

Service-based RSUs were included as part of the long-term incentive award program for NEOs, other than the CEO, to provide stability, encourage share ownership by our senior officers and to attract and retain key talent. Service-based RSUs were also used to connect the realized pay of our senior officers to Avon’s stock, thereby aligning their pay to shareholder interests. These awards will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to continued employment, in order to encourage share ownership of our senior officers and to attract and retain key talent.employment. Dividend equivalents are generally paid on Service-based RSUs. However, because the Company suspended its dividend to shareholders effective in the first quarter of 2016, dividend equivalents have been similarly suspended for Service-based RSUs effective in the first quarter of 2016.

Premium-priced stock optionsPremium Options were also included as part of the long-term incentive award program for NEOs in 2016.2018. The exercise price on the optionsPremium Options was set 30%25% above the actual stock price on the date of grant, requiring significant stock price appreciation for executives to realize target award value. The Committee determined to set the premium at 25% in order to incentivize performance and achieve alignment with shareholder interests, while noting that the 25% premium is significantly higher than the 10% premium generally supported by investors and the leading proxy advisory firms. These awards will vest ratably over three years following the grant date, subject to continued employment, in order to encourage share ownership of our senior officers and to attract and retain key talent.

20162018 Performance RSUs

Long-term Performance RSU awards granted in 20162018 were formulaic and tied solely to relative TSR which strongly aligns with previous 20162018 commitments to shareholders. The target relative TSR for the 20162018 program was set at the 55th percentile compared to the S&P 400 Index over a three yearthree-year period.

While relative TSR is the primary metric that drives payout for 20162018 Performance RSU awards, the Committee maintained another governance feature to ensure that even if the relative TSR metric performance results in funding which is above target, payouts cannot exceed target unless absolute TSR is positive at the end of the three-year vesting period. Awards vest at the end of the three-year vesting period and payouts can range from 0% to 150% of target. There is no discretion in determining the payout. If performance measures are met, the Performance RSUs will generally be settled in shares of Avon common stock. However, Performance RSUs may be settled in cash rather than shares as necessary to comply with applicable limits under our stock incentive plan. Dividend equivalents are not paid on Performance RSUs.

48AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


Grants to the NEOs under the 20162018 long-term incentive program were as follows:

 

    NEO 

Grant Date Value of   

Performance

RSUs

   Grant Date Value of Service-Based  
RSUs
 

  Grant Date Value of Premium-  

Priced Stock Options

 Total Grant Date Value
  

Ms. McCoy

 $3,675,672 $0 $1,880,340 $5,556,012
  

Mr. Scully

 $707,200 $675,200 $542,667 $1,925,067
  

Mr. Acosta

 $673,785 $643,297 $517,026 $1,834,107
  

Mr. Higson

 $434,499 $414,839 $333,412 $1,182,750
  

Mr. Benjamin

 $403,338 $385,088 $309,500 $1,097,926

  NEO

 

 

Grant Date Value of

Performance

RSUs

 

 

Grant Date Value of Service-
Based

RSUs

 

 

Grant Date Value of Premium
Options

 

 

Total Grant Date Value***

 

  Mr. Zijderveld*

  

 

$1,759,417

  

 

$1,350,000

  

 

$738,072

  

 

$3,847,489

  Ms. McCoy**

  

 

-

  

 

-

  

 

-

  

 

-

  Mr. Wilson

  

 

$331,111

  

 

$315,290

  

 

$305,119

  

 

$951,519

  Mr. Fernandez

  

 

$360,686

  

 

$343,452

  

 

$332,373

  

 

$1,036,511

  Mr. Myers

  

 

$282,947

  

 

$269,428

  

 

$260,737

  

 

$813,112

  Mr. Thompson

  

 

$230,861

  

 

$219,830

  

 

$212,738

  

 

$663,429

*Mr Zijderveld’s award includes annual LTI award plus 600,000sign-on Performance RSUs, and 600,000sign-on RSUs, as agreed under his contract, however, because as of December 31, 2018 the metrics fortwo-thirds of thesesign-on Performance RSUs were not yet determined, onlyone-third (i.e., 200,000) of thesign-on Performance RSUs is included (the remainingtwo-thirds will be tied to the achievement of goals for the 2019 and 2020 performance periods respectively).

**Given her separation from service in March 2018, Ms. McCoy was not granted any long-term incentive awards in 2018.

LOGO45


2014-2016***For all NEOs, the Total Grant Date Value shown is based on our LTI methodology to determine the number of shares and the option conversion ratio of 2.5:1.

2016-2019 Performance RSU Awards

In order for there to be any payout with respect to the 2014-20162016-2019 Performance RSUs granted in 2014,2016, minimum thresholds had to be achieved. The table below summarizes the results of each financial metric, which resulted in a 91%34% funding score, howeverscore. However, the value realized upon vesting, which reflects the December 31, 2016March 8, 2019 (last trading day of the performance period) closing stock price, was only 31%21% of the original value awarded. Ms. McCoy is the only current NEO who participated in the 2016-2019 LTI plan,

The 2016 Performance RSU awards are the first tranche of LTI awards where performance was based 100% on TSR rather than long-term operating metrics. The Board determined it was appropriate to introduce relative TSR for the LTI Performance RSU awards to create greater alignment between shareholder values and the value of executive LTI awards. As the table below demonstrates, the outcomes of the 2016 PRSU awards are consistent with and reflective of shareholder experiences over the three-year period.

 

LOGO

  

 

Preset Performance Goals

 

 

  

Achievement

 

  

Weighted Funding

Result

 

  

 

Threshold

(30th Percentile)

 

  

 

Target

(55th Percentile)

 

  

 

Maximum

(75th Percentile)

 

  
          

 

2016-2019

3 year relative TSR

(50% Weighting)

 

  

50%

 

  

100%

 

  

150%

 

  

0%

 

  

0.0%

 

          

 

2016-2017

1 year relative TSR

(16% Weighting)

 

  

50%

 

  

100%

 

  

150%

 

  

89%

 

  

14.5%

 

          

 

2017-2018

1 year relative TSR

(16% Weighting)

 

  

50%

 

  

100%

 

  

150%

 

  

0%

 

  

0%

 

          

 

2018-2019

1 year relative TSR

(16% Weighting)

 

  

50%

 

  

100%

 

  

150%

 

  

117%

 

  

19.5%

 

           
          
        

 

Total Vesting

 

   

 

34%

 

 

1.Revenue growth (in constant dollars) was up 2.7% on a three-year basis and above the target of 1.2%. This resulted in a payout percentage of 182% for this metric, which applied to 50% of the overall funding score. Revenue growth (in constant dollars) was adjusted for the Liz Earle and North America divestitures, the deconsolidation of Venezuela, and exiting the France and Bolivia businesses.

  2.AVON 2019 Proxy StatementOperating margin (in fluctuating dollars) was below the minimum performance threshold, adjusted for the same items that impacted the revenue growth listed above, and therefore contributed zero toward the overall funding score.

  3.The realized value is shown as a percentage of target and reflects the December 31, 2016 closing stock price.49

Target award value and actual realized payouts to the NEOs under the 2014-2016 long-term incentive program were as follows:

NEO    Target Value of
Performance-Based  Awards
    Realized Value  of
Performance-Based Awards*
    Ms. McCoy    $7,700,004    $2,397,508
    Mr. Scully**    N/A    N/A
    Mr. Acosta    $1,287,004    $400,728
    Mr. Higson    $927,312    $288,732
    Mr. Benjamin    $774,003    $240,997

*Realized value is based on the 91% funding score, and the December 31, 2016 closing stock price.

**Mr. Scully was not employed by the Company at the time these awards were granted and therefore was not eligible for a grant or payout.


OTHER COMPENSATION

Retirement Benefits

 

 

Purpose: Offers market-based retirement opportunities and promotes retention

 

Avon offers retirement benefits to the NEOs which areconsistent with the retirement programs generally available to all employees of the applicable employing entity meeting the qualifications required by each benefit plan. Because the amount of an employee’s compensation and the number of years of service are key components in determining retirement benefits, an employee’s performance and service over time will influence the level of his or her retirement benefits. For each NEO, the Committee reviews accrued and projected retirement benefits and deferred compensation account balances, as applicable, as part of its annual total compensation review. Our U.S. plans, which are further described in the applicable executive compensation tables, include a cash balance pension plan (that is closed to new hires after December 31, 2014), a 401(k) plan (that includes an employer match contribution and, solely for individuals hired on or after January 1, 2015 who are not eligible to participate in the pension plan, an additional nonelective employer contribution), a benefit restoration plan to restore benefits that may not be provided under the cash balance plan due to IRSInternal Revenue Service (“IRS”) limitations, and a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, which provides alternativetax-deferred savings opportunities and restores benefits that may not be provided under the 401(k) plan. Other benefitsFor ourU.K-based NEOs, given that the U.K. defined benefit program is closed to new hires, they are providedeligible to Mr. Higson,participate only in anon-U.S.-basedU.K.-tax NEO, as further describedqualified defined contribution arrangement to which they may contribute, which includes an employer match contribution that is capped in accordance with applicable law. The U.K. defined contribution scheme includes a lifetime allowance, and therefore if a participant is going to exceed this amount they will cease contributing to the applicable executive compensation tables.

46

Preset Performance Goals Threshold (25%scheme (or opt to never commence participation) and in lieu of Target) Target (100% of Target) Maximum (200% of Target) Achievement Weighted Funding Result 2014-2016 Revenue Growth (Constant $)1 -0.40% 1.20% 3.10% 2.7% 91% 2016 Operating Margin (Fluctuating $)2 10.2% 11.1% 12.0% 6.5% 0% Funding Total 91% Realized Value3 31%continued contributions to the plan, the Company makes additional cash payments to them via regular payroll.


Other Benefits and Perquisites

 

 

Purpose: Offers health and financial protection programs to support well-being and healthy lifestyles

 

The Committee has established and periodically reviews the perquisites and benefits available to our NEOs in light of our compensation philosophy and competitive market practices.

 

  

Broad-Based Benefits: Our NEOs are eligible to participate in the benefit plans generally available to all employees.employees of their employing entity. These generally include medical, dental and vision coverage, life insurance and disability benefits.benefits, and for U.K.-based NEOs, a flexible benefits scheme. International allowances are also provided when our employees, including our NEOs, work abroad in accordance with our international assignment policies and procedures.

 

  

Limited Perquisites: As part of our overall compensation program, we provide some limited perquisites to our NEOs that are not available to employees generally. These additional benefits are generally limited to financial planning and tax preparation services allowances, transportation allowance,allowances. For our U.K.-based NEOs, they are also eligible for a company car at the benchmark level for their grade or an annual cash equivalent of approximately $19,462.

50AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


ROLES IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following parties are responsible for the development and oversight of our executive compensation program for our NEOs:

Compensation and executive health exams.Management Development Committee

Oversees our executive compensation program; responsibilities include review of strategic objectives, design, and risk and reward structure

Determines and approves the compensation of our NEOs, other officers at or above the level of senior vice president, and any officers covered by Section 16 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

Consults with the independent members of the Board in establishing and evaluating performance objectives for the CEO each year, in part to determine the CEO’s incentive compensation payout

Sets annual and long-term incentive performance measures and goals that align with ourpay-for-performance philosophy

Reviews and evaluates our talent management and succession planning approach, philosophy, and key processes; responsible for development and succession plans for members of the Executive Committee and oversight of development plans for their potential successors

Has sole authority to engage, continue to engage or terminate its relationship with outside advisors, including its independent compensation consultant

Requires that the compensation consultant be independent, and reviews such independence at least annually

Under the Committee’s charter, a compensation consultant is not considered independent if it provides significant services to the business apart from work performed for the Committee (services in excess of $50,000 or, if less, 1% of the consulting firm’s gross revenues for the most recent fiscal year). In 2018, Pay Governance LLC (“Pay Governance”) provided no services to us apart from work performed for the Committee, and the Committee has determined that Pay Governance is independent. The transportation allowance was closedCommittee also reviews the relationship with the compensation consultant to U.S.-based executives who were newly hired or promoted after 2012.identify conflicts of interest pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission and New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) rules and, in 2018, did not identify any such conflicts

See “Information Concerning the Board of Directors—Compensation and Management Development Committee” on page 17 for additional Committee responsibilities.

Independent Compensation Consultant to the Committee

(Pay Governance Since September 2016)

Advises the Committee on various executive compensation matters, including proposed changes to our annual and long-term incentive programs, share utilization, compensation levels, peer group constituents and pay mix

Attends Committee meetings

Provides periodic reports, analyses and presentations to the Committee, and reviews all Committee meeting materials regarding current and prospective compensation plans and programs

Conducts analyses related to the employment arrangements for new senior officers

Provides assistance with the Committee’s review of the risk and reward structure of executive compensation plans, policies and practices

Pay Governance is engaged by and reports directly to the Committee and consults directly with its Chair; the Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate Pay Governance and to review and approve Pay Governance’s fees and other terms of the engagement

Chief Executive Officer

Makes individual compensation recommendations for senior officers (other than herself or himself), including the other NEOs, to the Committee for its review and approval, after considering market data and relative individual achievements

Provides input on the design of the executive compensation program, with a focus on alignment with strategic priorities and the desired Company culture

Management

Supports the Committee by making recommendations and providing analyses with respect to competitive practices and pay ranges, compensation and benefit plans, policies and procedures related to equity awards, perquisites, and general compensation and benefits philosophy

Senior human resources and legal executives attend Committee meetings to provide perspective and expertise relevant to the meeting agenda

Does not recommend, determine or participate in Committee discussions relating to their individual compensation arrangements

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  4751


COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE BEST PRACTICES

 

 

What We Do

 

 

  

Comprehensive Clawback Policy. We have a robust clawback policy that applies to annual and long-term incentive payments. This policy applies to certain executives, including all of our NEOs, in the event of a financial restatement, a material miscalculation of performance achievement, misconduct, serious violations of our Code of Conduct or violations of law within the scope of company employment.

 

  

Double-Trigger Vesting. Change in control benefits under our Change in Control Policy, long-term incentive cash programs, and equity awards granted to our senior executives since 2011 are subject to double-trigger vesting following a change in control event.

 

  

Multiple Performance Metrics. We mitigate compensation-related risk in a number of ways, including by using multiple performance measures across our various incentive plans.

 

  

Multi-Year Vesting Equity Awards. Theon-cycle equityRSU awards granted to our NEOs in 20162018 vest at the end of a three-year period subject to continued employment and, in the case of Performance RSUs, only in the event that underlying performance goals are met. Premium-priced stock optionsPremium Options vest ratablyone-third each year over three years.

 

  

Stock Ownership Guidelines and Holding Requirements. We have clear stock ownership guidelines and we monitor compliance with those guidelines regularly. At this time, all of our applicable NEOs are on track to satisfy these guidelines. Our CEO’s ownership guideline requiresprovides for ownership of stock equal to 6 times base salary and, like for all other NEOs, a stock holding retention ratio is in place until the ownership guideline is satisfied. In 2015, we added a stock holding retention ratio for all other senior executives that applies until the stock ownership guideline is satisfied.

 

  

Limited Perquisites. We eliminated transportation allowancesoffer only limited perquisites for U.S.-based executives hired or promoted after December 31, 2012, further reducing our already limited perquisites.NEOs, in line with competitive market practice, and continually review the perquisites available.

 

  

Active Shareholder Engagement. We communicate proactively with our largest shareholders regarding executive compensation, governance, and business matters.

 

  

Independent Compensation Consultant. The Committee has retained Pay Governance to advise on our executive compensation programs. Aside from services to the Committee and(and other Board members,committees when applicable), Pay Governance performs no other services for us.

 

  

Risk Review.The Committee, with support and advice from its independent compensation consultant, reviews the risk and reward structure of executive compensation plans, policies and practices to confirm thatdetermine whether there are no compensation-related risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the business.

 

  

Regular Review of Compensation to Ensure Alignment. The Committee, with support and advice from its independent compensation consultant, regularly reviews its compensation programs for executives, especially the incentive design, to ensure continued alignment with evolving company strategy.

 

 

What We Don’t Do

 

 

  

No Excise TaxGross-Ups on Change in Control. We do not have any excise taxgross-ups with respect to any change in control payments.

 

  

No Hedging Transactions, or Short Sales or Pledging. We do not permit our directors and employees to engage in any transaction in publicly traded options on Company common stock or any other transaction to hedge a position in, or engage in short sales of, Company common stock. In addition, pledging Company common stock as collateral for a loan is prohibited.

 

  

No Repricing of Stock Options.Our equity plans prohibit repricing or the buyout of underwater stock options without shareholder approval.

 

  

No Dividend Equivalents on Unvested Performance RSUs. To the extent we declare any dividends on our common stock, we pay dividend equivalents only on certain Service-based RSUs. (Because the Company suspended its dividend to shareholders effective in the first quarter of 2016, dividend equivalents have been similarly suspended for Service-based RSUs effective in the first quarter of 2016.). As proposed to be amended and restated effective as of our 2019 annual meeting (and as summarized in greater detail beginning on page 73, under the heading, “Proposal 3: Approval of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan”), the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan now provides that no dividends or dividend equivalents may be paid out currently on any unearned awards thereunder, whether time- or performance-vested.

 

4852AVON 2019 Proxy Statement  


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

EQUITY AWARD GRANTING PROCESS

The Committee generally approves annual equity grants to senior officers, including NEOs, at its regularly scheduled meeting in March of each year and approvesoff-cycle equity grants that may be made to senior officers, including NEOs, from time to time (for example, to new hires or for promotions). For employees who are not senior officers, grants are made onpre-established dates determined by the Committee. The Committee establishes the aggregate number of shares that may be subject to annual andoff-cycle equity grants and the terms and conditions of such awards, but has delegated to Ms. McCoy,the CEO, as a director, the authority to determine the grantees of such awards and the number of shares subject to each award for grantees other than senior officers. We do not time the release ofnon-public information for the purpose of affecting the value of equity awards.

CLAWBACK POLICIES

In 2010, the Board of Directors adopted a “clawback” policy that applies to any annual and long-term incentive payments (cash and equity) awarded to certain executives, including our NEOs, and which we believe supports ourpay-for-performance philosophy. Under the policy, in the event of a financial restatement, material incorrect calculations of performance metrics, or misconduct, the Committee is authorized to recover compensation based on its analysis of the relevant facts and circumstances. In January 2013, the policy was updated to provide an expanded definition of misconduct to include serious violations of the Code of Conduct and violations of law within the scope of Avon employment. In addition, the three-year discovery limit for misconduct was eliminated. The scope of coverage was also expanded to include additional key finance executives below the executive officer level.

In addition to the policy described above, our shareholder-approved 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the Amended and Restated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, and 2013-2017 Executive Incentive Planas well as other compensation arrangements, include the misconduct provisions described above for all participants (including individuals who are not senior officers) and also provide for forfeiture of awards if a participant breaches certainnon-compete,non-solicitation ornon-disclosure obligations. Our 2005 and 2010 Stock Incentive Plans also provide for forfeiture of awards if a participant (including individuals who are not senior officers) breaches certainnon-compete,non-solicitation ornon-disclosure obligations. Further, as part of our annual Code of Conduct certification, where permitted by local law, certifying employees acknowledge our right of recoupment of incentive compensation in the event of serious violations of the Code of Conduct and violations of law within the scope of company employment.

EXECUTIVE STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

To further support our goal of achieving a strong link between shareholder and executive interests, we maintain stock ownership guidelines to requireexpect executive share ownership as follows:

 

Chief Executive Officer: 6 times base salary

 

Executive Vice President (EVP): 3 times base salary

 

Senior Vice President (SVP): 2 times base salary

Ms. McCoyOur CEO is expected to hold 75% of the net shares acquired upon the vesting of the equity awards until she has satisfied hersatisfying the ownership target. EVPs and SVPs are expected to hold 50% of the net shares acquired upon vesting of equity awards until their ownership target has been satisfied. All applicable NEOs are on track to satisfy the guidelines.

Stock ownership for U.S. executives includes unvested RSUs, deferred RSUs, Company stock units in the 401(k) plan, Company stock fund units in the deferred compensation plan and Company stock held in the executive’s spouse’s name. Stock ownership fornon-U.S. executives includes only unvested RSUs and Company stock held in the executive’s spouse’s name. Stock ownership does not include stock options or unvested Performance RSUs.

TRADING POLICIES

Under our Trading in Avon Securities policy, no employee or director may engage in any transaction in publicly traded options on Avon common stock or any other transaction to hedge a position in, or engage in short sales of, Avon common stock.

EXCISE TAX GROSS UPSGROSS-UPS

No NEO or senior officer is entitled to an excise taxgross-up, which we believe reflects current best practices.

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  4953


POST-TERMINATION PAYMENTS

We have a change in control policy for senior officers at or above the senior vice president level who serve on our Executive Management Committee. We have designed this policy based on competitive practice, and shareholder input and considerations to attract senior level executives and to motivate and retain them in the event of a potential change in control. Generally, we believe that having change in control provisions will help ensure that, in the event of a potential change in control, members of senior management can act in the best interests of shareholders without the uncertainty and distraction that could result from the effects a change in control could have on their personal situations.

Our policy provides for payments to be made to covered executives upon a “double trigger,” i.e., in the event of an involuntary termination without cause or termination of a covered executive for good reason within two years of a change in control. A covered executive is generally entitled to receive two times the sum of base salary and target annual incentive bonus, and continued participation in our medical and welfare benefit plans for two years, plus two additional years of service and age credits under our nonqualified defined benefit plan. Ms. McCoy would be entitled to receive three times the sum of base salary and target annual incentive bonus, and continued participation in our medical and welfare benefit plans for three years, plus three additional years of service and age credits under our Benefit Restoration Pension Plan.plan, as applicable.

In addition, our employees, including NEOs, are generally eligible for post-termination benefits in the event of death, disability or an involuntary termination. We periodically review the level of post-termination benefits that we offer to ensure that it is competitive and necessary for the attraction, motivation, and retention of superior executive talent. Please refer to the narrative discussion under “Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment, Including After a Change in Control” beginning on page 6266 for a further description.

TAX CONSIDERATIONS

The Committee recognizes tax factors that may impact executive compensation, including:

 

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

PlacesCode places a limit of $1 million on the amount of compensation that we may deduct in any one year with respect to certain of our executive officers unless such compensation satisfies certain criteria.

Certain performance-based compensation approved by shareholders is not intended to be subject to the deduction limit (e.g., annual and long-term incentive awards and Performance RSUs).

For our annual incentive awards, baseline revenue of $5 billion in constant dollars was set and achieved for 2016 for 162(m) purposes. No payouts would have been made if this revenue goal had not been attained. This goal reflected the revenue size of the Company and the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency from the prior-year constant-dollar exchange rates used by the Company. Note that this amount is meant only to create a funding threshold to have any payouts of annual awards to senior executives. The Committee then uses negative discretion to reduce the target payout based on the operative plan described on pages 43 to 44.

officers. The Committee considers tax implications in determining executive pay, and generally endeavors to provide compensation that is tax deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code; however, we reserve the right to forgo any or all of the tax deduction if we believe it to be in the best long-term interests of Avon and its shareholders. For example, we believeIn addition, the Committee will consider the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2018 (the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”), and the change to Section 162(m) thereunder.

Our compensation program was designed to allow the Committee to grant certain incentive awards that granting Service-based RSUswere intended to be fully deductible for federal income tax purposes pursuant to the performance-based compensation exemption to the limit on deductibility under Section 162(m). However, the Section 162(m) exemption from the deduction limit for performance-based compensation has been repealed by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, such that compensation paid to our covered executive officers in excess of $1 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain instances isarrangements in our best interest despite being subjectplace as of November 2, 2017. Because of ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m) and the regulations issued thereunder, including the uncertain scope of the transition relief under the legislation repealing Section 162(m)’s exception to the deduction limit underfor performance-based compensation, no assurance can be given that compensation intended to satisfy the requirements for exception from the Section 162(m) ofdeduction limit will in fact satisfy the Internal Revenue Code. It is possible that performance-basedexception. Further, the Committee reserves the right to modify compensation that iswas initially intended to be exempt (including compensation granted during 2018) from Section 162(m) if it determines that such modifications are consistent with the deduction limit may not meet the requirements to qualify for such exemption.

Company’s business needs.

 

Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

SetsCode sets forth limitations on the deferral and payment of certain benefits.

The Committee considers the impact of and designs its programs to comply with or be exempt from, Section 409A and considers generally the evolving tax and regulatory landscape in which its compensation decisions are made.

ACCOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS

The Committee recognizes accounting implications that may impact executive compensation. For example, we record salaries and performance-based compensation in the amount paid or expected to be paid to our NEOs in our financial statements. Also, generally accepted accounting principles require us to record an expense in our financial statements for equity awards, even though equity awards are not paid as cash to employees and may not vest or be earned by such employees.

 

5054AVON 2019 Proxy Statement  


COMPENSATION AND RISK MANAGEMENT

A multi-disciplinary management team comprised of senior executives in human resources, legal, internal audit, enterprise risk, sales, and finance discusses our compensation programs and risk management at least annually and considers many factors, including governance and oversight of compensation planplans and program designdesigns and global and local compensation policies and programs, together with potential business risks relating thereto.

The Compensation and Management Development Committee, with support and advice from its independent compensation consultant, reviews the risk and reward structure of executive compensation plans, policies and practices at least annually to confirm that there are no compensation-related risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. We consider in this review program attributes to help mitigate risk, including:

 

The use of multiple performance measures, balanced between short- and long-term objectives

 

Overlapping long-term incentive programs

 

Individual payout caps under plans and programs

 

The ability to clawback compensation, including pursuant to our stock incentive plans and the compensation recoupment policy

 

Our stock ownership guidelines for senior executives to further align executive interests with those of shareholders

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  5155


 

COMPENSATION AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT

 

The Compensation and Management Development Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. Based upon such review and discussion, the Compensation and Management Development Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and be incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.

COMPENSATION AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

Helen McCluskey, Chair

Jose Armario

Nancy Killefer

Steven F. MayerMichael Sanford

 

 

5256AVON 2019 Proxy Statement  


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table provides information regarding the compensation of (i) each person who served as our CEO in 2018, (ii) our CFO in 2018, and (iii) the three other most highly compensated officers who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2016 (the2018 (collectively, the “named executive officers” or “NEOs”).

Name Year 

Salary

($)

 

Bonus

($)1

 Stock
Awards ($)
2
 Option
Awards ($)
3
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
4
 

 

Change in Pension
Value andNon-
Qualified Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
5

 

  All Other
Compensation
($)
6
  

Total

($)

          

Jan Zijderveld*

 2018    977,642 1,084,618 3,109,417 738,072 —     —      182,309  6,092,058   
          

Chief Executive Officer

 

                    

 

Sheri McCoy**

 

 

2018   

 

 

295,890

 

 

—    

 

 

—    

 

 

—    

 

 

—    

 

 

—    

  

 

1,035,209

  

 

1,331,099   

          

Former Chief Executive Officer

 2017    1,200,000 —     3,758,832 2,222,220 900,000 238,302  1,568,240  9,887,594   
 

 

2016   

 

 

 

1,200,000

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

3,675,672

 

 

 

1,880,340

 

 

 

946,800

 

 

 

259,928

 

  

 

103,097

 

  

 

8,065,837   

 

 

Jamie Wilson***

 

 

2018   

 

 

701,811

 

 

—    

 

 

646,400

 

 

305,119

 

 

—    

 

 

—    

  

 

51,589

  

 

1,704,919   

          

Former Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer

 

 2017    742,660 —     922,799 413,283 236,723 —      47,982  2,363,447   
          

 

Miguel Fernandez

 

 

2018   

 

 

676,291

 

 

1,373,951

 

 

704,138

 

 

332,373

 

 

—    

 

 

—    

  

 

375,111

  

 

3,461,865   

          

Executive Vice President,

Global President

 

 2017    259,523 —     565,355 293,081 77,857 —      115,511  1,311,327   

 

 

Jonathan Myers

 

 

2018   

 

 

599,730

 

 

—    

 

 

552,375

 

 

260,737

 

 

—    

 

 

—    

  

 

166,810

  

 

1,579,651   

          

Executive Vice President, Chief

Operating Officer

 

                    

 

 

James Thompson****

 

 

2018   

 

 

625,250

 

 

—    

 

 

450,690

 

 

212,738

 

 

—    

 

 

—    

  

 

183,412

  

 

1,472,091   

          

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel

 

 2017    276,290 —     520,125 250,971 72,526 —      96,350  1,216,262   

* Mr. Zijderveld began serving as our Chief Executive Officer on February 5, 2018.

** Ms. McCoy served as our Chief Executive Officer until February 4, 2018 and terminated employment with the Company on March 31, 2018.

*** Mr. Wilson served as our Chief Financial Officer from January 1, 2017 through March 2019.

**** Mr. Thompson’s last day of employment is expected to be effective no later than April 2019.

 

 NameYear 1

Salary

($)

Bonus

($)

Stock

Awards

($)1

Option

Awards

($)2

Non-Equity 

Incentive Plan 

Compensation 

($)3

ChangeIn connection with his commencement of employment in

Pension 

Value2017, Mr. Fernandez received a deferred cash award in the amount of $1,373,951, in recognition of a significant amount of value in unvested equity and

Nonqualified 

Deferred 

Compensation 

Earnings 

($)4

All Other 

Compensation 

($)5

Total

($)

 Sheri McCoy
Chief Executive Officer

2016

2015

2014

1,200,000

1,200,000

1,200,000

0

0

0

3,675,672

9,777,646

7,700,004

1,880,340

0

0

946,800

1,693,959

900,000

259,928

167,403

292,292

103,097

36,608

90,186

8,065,837

12,875,616

10,182,482

 James S. Scully
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer*

2016

2015

840,000

650,959

0

1,000,000

1,382,400

8,606,365

542,667

0

441,840

800,000

0

0

37,317

47,797

3,244,223

11,105,121

 Fernando Acosta
Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing and Social Selling Officer

2016

2015

2014

800,310

756,848

733,904

0

0

0

1,317,082

3,363,303

2,144,997

517,026

0

0

336,770

464,637

293,562

88,479

41,423

109,627

59,354

60,457

82,272

3,119,021

4,686,668

3,364,362

 John P. Higson6

Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer

2016

2015

2014

543,817

473,882

589,744

0

0

0

849,338

1,531,703

1,545,516

333,412

0

0

228,838

299,626

222,011

231,279

0

297,027

21,796

313,536

176,192

2,208,479

2,618,747

2,830,490

 Jeff Benjamin
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer

2016

2015

698,199

679,578

0

0

788,426

2,013,204

309,500

0

276,150

391,135

97,572

80,854

38,363

37,481

2,208,211

3,202,252other benefits from his prior employer that he forfeited. This amount was paid to Mr. Fernandez in March 2018. For Mr. Zijderveld, the amount reported in this column represents payout of his minimum guaranteed annual incentive amount for 2018 (£850,000), pursuant to the terms of his employment contract.

 

*2During 2016, Mr. Scully was Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Effective January 1, 2017, he ceased to be Chief Financial Officer of the Company but continues to serve as Chief Operating Officer.

1For each of the named executive officers 2016(other than Ms. McCoy), the amounts reported in the stock awards column for 2018 consist of performance-based restricted stock units (“Performance RSUs”) and/orand service-based restricted stock units (“Service-based RSUs”) as follows:

 

    Name    

Performance RSUs         

Grant Date Fair Value($)         

    

Service-based RSUs          

Grant Date Fair Value($)         

    Ms. McCoy    3,675,672             N/A         
    Mr. Scully    707,200             675,200         
    Mr. Acosta    673,785             643,297         
    Mr. Higson    434,499             414,839         
    Mr. Benjamin    403,338             385,088         
       Name

 

Performance RSUs
Grant Date Fair Value($)

 

Service-based RSUs
Grant Date Fair Value($)

 

    Mr. Zijderveld

 

1,759,417

 

1,350,000

    Ms. McCoy

-

-

    Mr. Wilson

331,111

315,290

    Mr. Fernandez

360,686

343,452

    Mr. Myers

282,947

269,428

    Mr. Thompson

230,861

219,830

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement57


The aggregate grant date fair value of the awards was determined based on the grant date fair value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. ThisFor NEOs other than Mr. Zijderveld, this column (Stock Awards) reflects the Performance RSUs and the Service-based RSUs granted under our 2016-20182018-2021 long-term incentive program. For Mr. Zijderveld, this column (Stock Awards) reflects the Performance RSUs granted under our 2018-2021 long-term incentive program as well assign-on Performance RSUs granted in connection with his employment commencement; 600,000sign-on Performance RSUs were granted at that time, however as of December 31, 2018 the performance metrics fortwo-thirds of the award were not yet determined and as a result the value of onlyone-third of such award is included (the remainingtwo-thirds will be tied to the achievement of goals for the 2019 and 2020 performance periods respectively). Amounts reported for Performance RSUs are based on the probable outcome of relevant performance conditions as of the grant date. See Note 1113 to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Form10-K for 20162018 for a description of the assumptions used in valuing the Performance RSUs awards. The value of the Performance RSU awards at the grant date assuming the highest level of performance conditions achieved would be $5,513,508 for Ms. McCoy, $1,060,800$2,639,126 for Mr. Scully, $1,010,677Zijderveld, $496,666 for Mr. Acosta, $651,749Wilson, $541,029 for Mr. Higson, and $605,007Fernandez, $424,421 for Mr. Benjamin.Myers and $346,291 for Mr. Thompson. Performance RSUs will be settled in cash rather than shares as necessary to comply with applicable limits under our stock incentive plan(s). Please refer to the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for additional information.

 

23

The grant date fair value of the stock option awards was determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 1113 to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Form10-K for 20162018 for a description of the assumptions used in valuing stock option awards.

 

4
LOGO53


3This column reflects amounts earned under our annual incentive program. No named executive officer received a payout under the annual incentive program for 2018 (Mr. Zijderveld received solely his minimum guaranteed payout, as reported in the “Bonus” column and described in footnote 1 above).

 

45

This column for 20162018 includes the change in pension value reported, which is the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of the applicable named executive officers’ accumulated benefits under our Personal Retirement Account Plan (“PRA”), and Benefit Restoration Pension Plan (“BRP”), Avon Cosmetics Pension Plan (UK) (“UK Plan”), Avon Cosmetics Pension Plan (Germany) (“German Plan”). Only Ms. McCoy was eligible to participate in qualified and International Retirement Plan (“IRP”). See “Pension Benefits” beginning on page 57. For Mr. Higson, a change of $0 is reflected in the row for 2015, since the actuarial present value decreased by $258,593 during 2015. No amounts are reported for deferred compensation earnings as the interest rate for the fixed rate fund of our Deferred Compensation Plan was 3.50%, which is 120% of the applicable federal long-term interest rate published by the Treasury Department at the time it was set for the 2016 plan year.non-qualified defined benefit pension plans.

 

56

“All Other Compensation” generally includes perquisites, 401(k) employer contributions, excess 401(k) employer contributions, New Money Purchase Section of the Avon Cosmetics Pension Plan (UK) (“UK Defined Contribution Plan”) employer contributions (including opt out payments), relocation/assignment-related tax benefits, and taxgross-ups,for Ms. McCoy, severance, which are set forth in the table below for 2016:2018:

 

    Name  Perquisites ($)a          

401(k) Employer        

Contributions ($)        

  

Excess 401(k) Employer        

Contributions ($)        

  

Tax Gross-ups        

($)        

Ms. McCoyb

  57,604          9,823          0          35,670        

Mr. Scully

  6,200          22,525          8,592          0        

Mr. Acostac

  23,500          11,857          23,997          0        

Mr. Higsond

  0          N/A          N/A          21,796        

Mr. Benjamine

  31,275          7,088          0          0        
       

Name

 

Perquisites
($)
a

 

401(k) Employer
        Contributions ($)        

 

Excess 401(k)
Employer
Contributions ($)

 

UK Defined Contributions
Plan (Employer
Contributions) 
h

 

Severance

 

Relocation/Assignment
Related Tax Benefits
i

 

 

Mr. Zijderveldb

 

105,219

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

26,939

 

N/A

 

50,151

 

Ms. McCoyc

120,599

10,500

N/A

904,110

Mr. Wilsond

19,462

N/A

N/A

32,127

N/A

Mr. Fernandeze

 

170,734

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

37,406

 

N/A

 

166,971

 

Mr. Myersf

80,711

N/A

N/A

32,127

N/A

53,972

Mr. Thompsong

106,480

N/A

N/A

37,062

N/A

39,871

 

 a

The amounts disclosed are the actual costs incurred by us. The actual and incremental cost for any complimentary Avon products is nominal.

 

 b

For Mr. Zijderveld, perquisites includes annual transportation allowance, car service, medical insurance, and international relocation allowances in the amount of $78,135 associated with his relocation to the United Kingdom.

c

For Ms. McCoy, perquisites include financial planning and tax preparation services, car service allowance, executive health exam, and home security and international assignment allowances in the amount of $41,588.

cFor Mr. Acosta, perquisites$116,099 associated with her assignment in the United Kingdom and repatriation to the United States. The amounts reported in this table for Ms. McCoy also include financial planning and tax preparation services and transportation allowance.an entitlement to $904,110 in severance paid in 2018 in connection with her termination of employment with the Company on March 31, 2018.

 

 d

For Mr. Wilson, perquisites include annual transportation allowance.

e

For Mr. Fernandez, perquisites include transportation allowance, and international relocation allowances in the amount of $151,272 associated with his relocation to the United Kingdom.

f

For Mr. Myers, perquisites include transportation allowance, and relocation allowances in the amount of $61,249 associated with his relocation within the United Kingdom.

g

For Mr. Thompson, perquisites include transportation allowance, and international relocation allowances in the amount of $61,249 associated with his relocation to the United Kingdom.

58AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


h

As anon-U.S. based employee, Mr. Higson isU.K.-based employees, Messrs. Zijderveld, Wilson, Fernandez, Myers and Thompson are not eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan (or excess 401(k) plan), but instead are eligible to participate in the UK Defined Contribution Plan, which is atax-qualified defined contribution plan similar to our 401(k) plan. The amount listed under the UK Defined Contribution Plan is the cash payment made to Messrs. Zijderveld, Wilson and is not eligible forMyers in lieu of contributions to any other defined contribution plans established, maintained or sponsored by us.the UK Defined Contribution Plan. For a description of the UK Defined Contribution Plan, see page 50.

 

 eiFor Mr. Benjamin, perquisites

In accordance with our international relocation and assignment policies and the terms of the individual relocation/assignment agreements, the amounts shown for Messrs. Zijderveld, Fernandez, Myers and Thompson include financial planning and tax preparation services, transportation allowance and executive health exam.benefits provided in connection with expenses associated with relocation to London, United Kingdom.

 

67

Compensation for Mr. HigsonMessrs. Zijderveld, Wilson, Fernandez, Myers and Thompson is generally delivered in Euros.GBP. In calculating the dollar equivalent for such amounts reported for Mr. Higson,Messrs. Zijderveld, Fernandez, Myers and Thompson, amounts have been converted to U.S. Dollarsdollars based on the respective currency exchange ratesrate on December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.2018.

 

54  AVON 2019 Proxy Statement59


GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table presents information regarding grants of equity andnon-equity plan-based awards to our named executive officers during 2016.2018.

 

      

Estimated Future 

Payouts Under Non- 

Equity Incentive Plan 

 

Awards1 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under 

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards2 

 

All Other 

Stock 

Awards: 

Number 

of Shares 

 

All other 

Option 

Awards: 

Number of 

securities  

 

Exercise 

or Base 

Price of  

 

Grant Date 

Fair 

Value of 

Stock and 

  Name 

Grant 

Date 

 

Target 

($) 

 

Maximum 

($) 

 

Threshold 

(#) 

 

Target 

(#) 

 

Maximum 

(#) 

 

of Stock 

or Units 

(#)3 

 

underlying 

Options 

(#)4 

 

Option 

Awards 

($/Sh)5 

 

Option 

Awards 

 

($)6 

  Ms. McCoy

 

   1,800,000

 

 2,700,000

 

              
  3/10/2016

 

     415,800

 

 831,600

 

 1,247,400

 

       3,675,672

 

  3/10/2016

 

             1,386,000

 

 5.49

 

 1,880,340

 

  Mr. Scully

 

   840,000

 

 1,260,000

 

              
  3/10/2016

 

     80,000

 

 160,000

 

 240,000

 

       707,200

 

  3/10/2016

 

           160,000

 

     675,200

 

  3/10/2016

 

             400,000

 

 5.49

 

 542,667

 

  Mr. Acosta

 

   640,248

 

 960,372

 

              
  3/10/2016

 

     76,220

 

 152,440

 

 228,660

 

       673,785

 

  3/10/2016

 

           152,440

 

     643,297

 

  3/10/2016

 

             381,100

 

 5.49

 

 517,026

 

  Mr. Higson

 

   435,053

 

 652,580

 

              
  3/10/2016

 

     49,152

 

 98,303

 

 147,455

 

       434,499

 

  3/10/2016

 

           98,303

 

     414,839

 

  3/10/2016

 

             245,758

 

 5.49

 

 333,412

 

  Mr. Benjamin

 

   525,000

 

 787,500

 

              
  3/10/2016

 

     45,627

 

 91,253

 

 136,880

 

       403,338

 

  3/10/2016

 

           91,253

 

     385,088

 

  3/10/2016

 

             228,133

 

 5.49

 

 309,500

 

  Name

 

 

 

Grant  
Date  

 

 

 

Approval   

    Date   

 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under   
Non-Equity Incentive Plan   
Awards
1   

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity   
             Incentive Plan Awards
2   

 

 

 

All   

Other   

Stock   

Awards   

# of   

shares   

of stock   

or units   

(#)3   

 

 

 

 

All other   

option   

awards # of   

securities   

underlying   

options   

(#)4   

 

 

 

 

Exercise   

or Base   

Price of   

Option   

Awards   

($/Sh)5   

 

 

 

 

Grant   

Date   

FMV of   

Stock &   

Option   

Awards   

($)6   

 

 

 

Target

($)

 

 

 

Maximum

($)

 

 

 

Threshold
(#)

 

 

 

Target
(#)

 

 

 

Maximum
(#)

 

 

Mr. Zijderveld7

     

 

1,767,791

 

 

2,651,686

              
 

 

3/14/2018   

 

 

3/14/2018   

     

 

205,020

 

 

410,040

 

 

615,060

       

 

1,201,417   

 

 

3/27/2018   

 

 

3/27/2018   

     

 

300,000

 

 

600,000

 

 

850,000

       

 

558,000   

 

 

2/5/2018   

 

 

2/5/2018   

           

 

600,000

     

 

1,350,000   

 

 

3/14/2018   

 

 

3/14/2018   

             

 

683,400

 

 

$3.49

 

 

738,072   

 

Ms. McCoy

 

 

—   

 

 

—   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—   

 

Mr. Wilson

     

 

596,540

 

 

894,810

              
 

 

3/14/2018   

 

 

3/14/2018   

     

 

56,504

 

 

113,007

 

 

169,511

       

 

331,111   

 

 

3/14/2018   

 

 

3/14/2018   

           

 

113,007

     

 

315,290   

 

 

3/14/2018   

 

 

3/14/2018   

             

 

282,518

 

 

$3.49

 

 

305,119   

            

 

Mr. Fernandez

     

 

541,033

 

 

811,549

              
 

 

3/14/2018   

 

 

3/14/2018   

     

 

61,551

 

 

123,101

 

 

184,652

       

 

360,686   

 

 

3/14/2018   

 

 

3/14/2018   

           

 

123,101

     

 

343,452   

 

 

3/14/2018   

 

 

3/14/2018   

             

 

307,753

 

 

$3.49

 

 

332,373   

 

Mr. Myers

     

 

479,784

 

 

719,676

              
 

 

3/14/2018   

 

 

3/14/2018   

     

 

48,285

 

 

96,569

 

 

144,854

       

 

282,947   

 

 

3/14/2018   

 

 

3/14/2018   

           

 

96,569

     

 

269,428   

 

 

3/14/2018   

 

 

3/14/2018   

             

 

241,423

 

 

$3.49

 

 

260,737   

 

Mr. Thompson

     

 

479,784

 

 

719,676

              
 

 

3/14/2018   

 

 

3/14/2018   

     

 

39,396

 

 

78,792

 

 

118,188

       

 

230,861   

 

 

3/14/2018   

 

 

3/14/2018   

           

 

78,792

     

 

219,830   

 

 

3/14/2018   

 

 

3/14/2018   

             

 

196,980

 

 

$3.49

 

 

212,738   

 

1

Amounts represent possible cash payouts under the 20162018 annual incentive program, for which there is no threshold payout. Amounts shown for Mr. HigsonMessrs. Zijderveld, Wilson, Fernandez, Myers and Thompson have been converted from EurosGBP to U.S. dollars based on the December 31, 20162018 currency exchange rate.

 

2

This column reflects the Performance RSUs granted under our 2016-20182018-2021 long-term incentive program.program (including, for Mr. Zijderveld, an additionalsign-on Performance RSU award). Performance RSUs will be settled in cash rather than shares as necessary to comply with applicable limits under our stock incentive plan(s). Please refer to the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for additional information. Mr. Zijderveld was granted 600,000sign-on Performance RSUs under the terms of his employment contract, however as of December 31, 2018 the performance metrics fortwo-thirds of the award were not yet determined, and as a result the value of onlyone-third of such award is included. The remaining two thirds will be tied to the achievement of goals for the 2019 and 2020 performance periods respectively.

 

3

These Service-based RSUs vest 100% after three years of service on the third anniversary of the grant date. Dividend equivalents are paid in cash on these Service-based RSUs annually to the extent the Company pays any dividends on its common stock.

 

60AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


4

This column shows the number of stock option awards granted under our 2016-2018 long-term incentive program.2018-2021 LTIP. All of the stock options listed above vestone-third per year over a three-year period.

 

5

This column shows the exercise price of stock option awards granted under our 2016-2018 long-term incentive program,2018-2021 LTIP, which is equal to 130%125% of $4.22, the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE on the date of grant.

 

6

Please refer to Footnotes 12 and 23 under the Summary Compensation Table for additional information.

7

All of Mr. Zijderveld’s 2018 equity grants were made outside of our 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan using the NYSE inducement grant exception.

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement61


The material factors necessary for an understanding of the compensation for our named executive officers are described under the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment, Including After a Change in Control” sections and the corresponding footnotes to the tables. In addition, most of our U.S.-based named executive officers have an employment agreement that identifies, where applicable, his or her position and generally provides, among other things, for(i) at-will employment, (ii) an annual base salary, (iii)(ii) eligibility to receive annual cash bonuses and long-term incentive awards,(iv)(iii) sign-on compensation, and (v)(iv) eligibility to receive perquisites and to participate in benefit plans generally available to oursimilarly situated senior executives. When she joined the company in 2012, Ms. McCoy received cashsign-on compensation of (i) a deferred cash award of $850,000, vesting and becoming payable on the fifth anniversary of her start date in April 2017 with interest compounded annually at 3.25% provided she remains in our employ on the payment date, and (ii) a bonus of $1,910,000 subject to repayment if she does not remain in our employ for five years, which repayment obligation decreases at a rate of 20% for each year of employment provided that, in the event of certain qualifying terminations of employment as described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment, Including after a Change in Control,” thesesign-on compensation awards would become nonforfeitable. During 2016,2018, Ms. McCoy was entitled to international assignment benefits, such aspre-departure and relocation repatriation support, together with related tax equalization benefits, under our relocation policies and the terms of her international assignment agreement.and retirement agreements. Messrs. Zijderveld, Fernandez, Myers and Thompson were entitled to relocation support under our relocation policies and the terms of their employment contracts. Ms. McCoy became entitled to severance pay and benefits under the terms of our applicable severance programs and her severance agreement in connection with her termination of employment on March 31, 2018, as described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment, Including after Change in Control” and as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table.

LOGO55


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCALYEAR-END

The following table presents information regarding outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 20162018 for the named executive officers. All dollar values are based on $5.04,$1.52, the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE on December 31, 2016.2018.

 

   

Option Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

 

  Name

 

 

Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options

(#)
exercisable

 

 

Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options

(#)
unexercisable

 

 

Option
exercise
price ($)

 

 

Option
expiration
date

 

 

Number of
Shares or

 Units of Stock 

That Have
Not Vested (#)

 

 

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of

 Stock That 

Have Not
Vested ($)

 

 

Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned

 Shares, Units or 

Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested (#)

 

 

Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards: Market
or Payout Value
of Unearned

 Shares, Units or 

Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested ($)

 

  Ms. McCoy

 0 1,386,0001 5.49 3/10/2026 40,0002 201,600 234,7563 1,183,172
        415,8004

 

 2,095,632

 

  Mr. Scully

 0 400,0001 5.49 3/10/2026 326,3975 1,645,041 43,9033 221,269
      117,0736 590,048 80,0004 403,200
      160,0007

 

 806,400

 

   

  Mr. Acosta

 0 381,1001 5.49 3/10/2026 58,2488 293,570 40,6103 204,673
      108,2936 545,797 76,2204 384,149
      152,4407

 

 768,298

 

   

  Mr. Higson

 28,261  36.77 3/7/2017 41,9698 211,524 28,0193 141,216
  41,237  38.80 3/5/2018 74,7176 376,574 49,1524 247,724
  101,713  15.50 3/5/2019 98,3037 495,447   
  52,818  31.61 3/11/2020     
   245,7581

 

 5.49

 

 3/10/2026

 

     

  Mr. Benjamin

 0 228,1331 5.49 3/10/2026 35,0318 176,556 24,3073 122,509
      64,8206 326,693 45,6274 229,958
          91,2537

 

 459,915

 

    

 

  Name

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

 

Stock Awards

 

 

 

Number of   

securities   

underlying   

unexercised   

options (#)   

exercisable   

 

 

 

 

Number of   

securities   

underlying   

unexercised   

options   

(#) unexercisable   

 

 

 

 

Option   

exercise   

price ($)   

 

 

Option   

Expiration   

date   

 

 

Number of   

Shares or   

Units of   

Stock That   

Have   

Not Vested (#)   

 

 

 

Market Value of   

Shares or Units   

of Stock That   

Have Not   

Vested ($)   

 

 

Equity Incentive Plan   

Awards: Number of   

Unearned Shares, Units   

or Other Rights That   

Have Not Vested (#)   

 

 

Equity Incentive Plan   

Awards: Market or Payout   

Value of Unearned   

Shares, Units or Other   

Rights That Have Not   

Vested ($)   

 

Mr. Zijderveld

 

-          

 

683,4001   

 

3.49   

 

3/14/2028   

 

    


600,0007   

 

 912,000   

 

 -   

 

 -       

 

             205,02013    

 

 623,261   

 

             300,00014    

 

 456,000   

 

Ms. McCoy

 

924,000   

 

 

462,0002   

 

 

5.49   

 

 

3/10/2026   

 

     

277,20015   

 

 

842,688   

 

 462,000   

 

 924,0003    

 

 5.54   

 

 3/17/2027   

 

     138,60016    

 

 421,344   

 

Mr. Wilson

 

85,922   

 

 

171,8433   

 

 

5.54   

 

 

3/17/2027   

 

 

103,1068   

 

 

156,721   

 

 

51,55316   

 

 

156,721   

 

 -       

 

 282,5181    

 

 3.49   

 

 3/14/2028   

 

 113,0079    

 

 171,771   

 

 56,50413    

 

 171,771   

 

Mr. Fernandez

 

100,028   

 

 

200,0554   

 

 

3.30   

 

 

8/21/2027   

 

 

120,03310   

 

 

182,450   

 

 

60,01716   

 

 

182,450   

 

 -       

 

 307,7531    

 

 3.49   

 

 3/14/2028   

 

 123,1019    

 

 187,114   

 

 61,55113    

 

 187,114   

 

Mr. Myers

 

60,715   

 

 

121,4305   

 

 

3.09   

 

 

9/1/2027   

 

 

72,85811   

 

 

110,744   

 

 

36,42916   

 

 

110,744   

 

 -       

 

 241,4231    

 

 3.49   

 

 3/14/2028   

 

 96,5699    

 

 146,785   

 

 48,28513    

 

 146,785   

 

Mr. Thompson

 

64,024   

 

 

128,0466   

 

 

4.44   

 

 

8/1/2027   

 

 

76,82812   

 

 

116,779   

 

 

38,41416   

 

 

116,779   

 

 -       

 

 196,9801    

 

 3.49   

 

 3/14/2028   

 

 78,7929    

 

 119,764   

 

 39,39613    

 

 119,764   

 

 

1

These stock options vest in equal installments on March 10, 2017,14, 2019, March 10, 201814, 2020 and March 14, 2021. Dividend equivalents are not paid on stock options.

2

These stock options vest on March 10, 2019. Dividend equivalents are not paid on stock options.

 

23

These stock options vest in equal installments on March 17, 2019 and March 17, 2020. Dividend equivalents are not paid on stock options.

4

These stock options vest in equal installments on August 21, 2019 and August 21, 2020. Dividend equivalents are not paid on stock options.

5

These stock options vest in equal installments on September 1, 2019 and September 1, 2020. Dividend equivalents are not paid on stock options.

6

These stock options vest in equal installments on August 1, 2019 and August 1, 2020. Dividend equivalents are not paid on stock options.

7

These Service-based RSUs were granted in respect of Mr. Zijderveld’s sign on award and vest 100% on April 23, 2017.February 5, 2021. Dividend equivalents are paid in cash on these Service-based RSUs annually to the extent the Company pays any dividends on its common stock.

 

3
62AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


8

These Service-based RSUs vest 100% on March 17, 2020. Dividend equivalents are paid in cash on these Service-based RSUs annually to the extent the Company pays any dividends on its common stock.

9

These Service-based RSUs vest 100% on March 14, 2021. Dividend equivalents are paid in cash on these Service-based RSUs annually to the extent the Company pays any dividends on its common stock.

10

These Service-based RSUs vest 100% on August 21, 2020. Dividend equivalents are paid in cash on these Service-based RSUs annually to the extent the Company pays any dividends on its common stock.

11

These Service-based RSUs vest 100% on September 1, 2020. Dividend equivalents are paid in cash on these Service-based RSUs annually to the extent the Company pays any dividends on its common stock.

12

These Service-based RSUs vest 100% on August 1, 2020. Dividend equivalents are paid in cash on these Service-based RSUs annually to the extent the Company pays any dividends on its common stock.

13

These Performance RSUs are tied to the achievement of goals for the 2015-20172018-2021 performance period. Amounts reflect the threshold number of shares that could be earned as of the end of the performance period. Assuming the performance conditions are satisfied, Performance RSUs vest and settle on March 12, 2018.14, 2021. Dividend equivalents are not paid on Performance RSUs.

 

414

These Performance RSUs were granted in respect of Mr. Zijderveld’ssign-on award and are tied to the achievement of goals for the 2018 performance period. Amounts reflect the threshold number of shares that could be earned with respect to the performance period. Assuming the performance conditions are satisfied, Performance RSUs vest and settle on March 27, 2021. Mr. Zijderveld was granted 600,000sign-on Performance RSUs under the terms of his employment contract, however as of December 31, 2018 the performance metrics fortwo-thirds of the award were not yet determined, and as a result the value of onlyone-third of such award is included. The remaining two thirds will be tied to the achievement of goals for the 2019 and 2020 performance periods respectively.

15

These Performance RSUs are tied to the achievement of goals for the 2016-20182016-2019 performance period. Amounts reflect the threshold number of shares that could be earned as of the end of the performance period. Assuming the performance conditions are satisfied, Performance RSUs vest and settle on March 10, 2019. Dividend equivalents are not paid on Performance RSUs.

 

516

These Service-basedPerformance RSUs are tied to the achievement of goals for the 2017-2020 performance period. Amounts reflect the threshold number of shares that could be earned as of the end of the performance period. Assuming the performance conditions are satisfied, Performance RSUs vest in equal installmentsand settle on March 9, 201717, 2020. For Messrs. Fernandez, Myers and March 9, 2018.Thompson, as their employment commenced after the beginning of the performance period, under the terms of the plan they must continue to hold any vested shares until three years from the date of their respective grants, this is August 21, 2020, September 1, 2020 and August 1, 2020 respectively for Messrs. Fernandez, Myers and Thompson. Dividend equivalents are not paid in cash on these Service-based RSUs annually to the extent the Company pays any dividends on its common stock.Performance RSUs.

6These Service-based RSUs vest 100% on March 12, 2018. Dividend equivalents are paid in cash on these Service-based RSUs annually to the extent the Company pays any dividends on its common stock.

7These Service-based RSUs vest 100% on March 10, 2019. Dividend equivalents are paid in cash on these Service-based RSUs annually to the extent the Company pays any dividends on its common stock.

8These Service-based RSUs vest 100% on March 13, 2017. Dividend equivalents are paid in cash on these Service-based RSUs annually to the extent the Company pays any dividends on its common stock.

56


OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

The following table presents information regarding stock option exercises and the vesting of restricted stock unit awards during 20162018 for our named executive officers.NEOs.

 

    Option Awards  Stock Awards
  Name  Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
  

Value Realized
on Exercise

($)

  Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
  

Value Realized
on Vesting

($)

  Ms. McCoy      665,497  3,067,269
  Mr. Scully      293,705  1,308,586
  Mr. Acosta      275,166  1,302,934
  Mr. Higson      44,748  179,887
  Mr. Benjamin      166,374  786,612
   

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

 

 

Stock Awards

 

 Name

 

 

 

Number of Shares     

Acquired on Exercise     

(#)     

 

 

Value Realized on     

Exercise ($)     

 

 

 

Number of Shares     

Acquired on Vesting     

(#)     

 

 

Value Realized on     

Vesting ($)     

 

Mr. Zijderveld

 

 

—     

 

 

—     

 

 

—     

 

 

—     

 

Ms. McCoy

 

 

—     

 

 

—     

 

 

229,745         

 

 

654,773         

 

Mr. Wilson

 

 

—     

 

 

—     

 

 

—     

 

 

—     

 

Mr. Fernandez   

 

 

—     

 

 

—     

 

 

—     

 

 

—     

 

Mr. Myers

 

 

—     

 

 

—     

 

 

—     

 

 

—     

 

Mr. Thompson

 

 

—     

 

 

—     

 

 

—     

 

 

—     

 

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement63


PENSION BENEFITS

The following table presents information on our defined benefit pension plans and supplemental benefit restoration plan as of December 31, 20162018 for our named executive officers.

 

  Name Plan Name  

Number of Years

Credited Service

(#)

  

Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit

 

($)1

  Payments During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
  Ms. McCoy Avon Products, Inc.
Personal Retirement
Account Plan (“PRA”)2
  4.750  89,132  0
  Benefit Restoration
Pension Plan (“BRP”)2
  4.750  891,277  0
  Mr. Scully N/A3  N/A  N/A  N/A
  Mr. Acosta PRA2  5.083  86,781  0
  BRP2  5.083  286,309  0
  Mr. Higson Avon Cosmetics
Pension Plan (UK)
(“UK Plan”)2,4
  17.917  1,759,384  0
  The Avon Cosmetics
Pension Plan (Germany)
(“German Plan”)2,5
  4.500  303,018  0
  Avon Products, Inc.
International Retirement
Plan (“IRP”)2,6
  9.000  1,096,317  0
  Mr. Benjamin PRA2  4.333  90,138  0
  BRP2  4.333  236,939  0

Name

 

 

Plan Name

 

 

Number of Years            

Credited Service            

(#)            

 

  

Present Value of            

Accumulated Benefit            

($)1             

 

  

Payments During Last            

Fiscal Year            

($)            

 

 

Mr. Zijderveld

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A            

  

 

N/A            

  

 

N/A            

 

Ms. McCoy

 

 

Avon Products, Inc.

Personal Retirement

Account Plan (“PRA”)2

 6.000              129,252              0            
 

 

Benefit Restoration

Pension Plan (“BRP”)2

 6.000            

 

  203,483            

 

  0            

 

 

Mr. Wilson3

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A            

  

 

N/A            

  

 

N/A            

 

Mr. Fernandez3

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A            

  

 

N/A            

  

 

N/A            

 

Mr. Myers3

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A            

  

 

N/A            

  

 

N/A            

 

Mr. Thompson3

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A            

  

 

N/A            

  

 

N/A            

 

1

The amounts in this column represent the present values of the accumulated benefits based on an assumed retirement age equal to the earliest date the named executive officer may retire without any benefit reductions. The named executive officers listed as members ofparticipants in the PRA and BRP IRP and German Plan participate inare subject to the cash balance benefit formula, which have no actuarial reductions for early retirement. Therefore, the assumed retirement age is 65 for these participants. The UK Plan has a normal retirement age of 60.

 

2

For allMs. McCoy, the only participating named executive officers,NEO, the present value of the accrued cash balance benefits areis equal to the cash balance benefits as of December 31, 2016,2018, projected to the normal retirement age of 65, based on an interest crediting rate of 5.00% per annum for the PRA and BRP for the portion of the balance attributable to pay credits earned before December 31, 2014, and on an interest crediting rate of 2.40%3.36% per annum for the PRA and an interest crediting rate of 2.60%3.36% per annum for the BRP, in each case for the portion of the balance attributable to pay credits earned after December 31, 2014. Amounts are then discounted back to December 31, 20162018 at a rate of 3.65%4.27% per annum for the PRA and IRP and 3.85%3.96% per annum for the BRP. Due to the difference between the assumed interest crediting rates and the relevant accounting discount rates, the December 31, 20162018 actual cash balance accounts are less than the amounts disclosed in the table above, except for Mr. Benjamin who is past age 65, as a result of which his present value of benefits is equal to his cash balance. The present value as of December 31, 2016 for the UK Plan was determinedabove.

On December 31, 2018, the actual cash balance account balances were as follows:

 

LOGO57


based on the December 31, 2016 FAS 87 assumptions including a discount rate of 2.70%. The present value as of December 31, 2016 for the German Plan was determined based on the December 31, 2016 FAS 87 assumptions including a discount rate of 1.60%. On December 31, 2016, the actual cash balance account balances were as follows:

    PRA  BRP  German Plan  IRP
  Ms. McCoy  86,403  885,754  N/A  N/A
  Mr. Scully  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A
  Mr. Acosta  79,343  274,293  N/A  N/A
  Mr. Higson  N/A  N/A  69,170  1,012,230
  Mr. Benjamin  90,138  238,300  N/A  N/A
   
   

            PRA             

 

 

            BRP             

 

 

Mr. Zijderveld

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

Ms. McCoy

 

 

 

129,707

 

 

 

0

 

 

Mr. Wilson

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

Mr. Fernandez

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

Mr. Myers

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

Mr. Thompson

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

N/A

 

As of December 31, 2015, Ms. McCoy is vested in the PRA and the BRP. Pursuant to her employment agreement, Ms. McCoy’s BRP balance includes an additional 2% accrual above and below the Social Security Taxable Wage Base over the current basic credits table set forth below under the “Avon Products, Inc. Personal Retirement Account Plan” section. BRP benefits are generally paid 80% lump sum and 20% in 60 consecutive monthly installments. Mr. Acosta and Mr. Benjamin are vested in the PRA and the BRP. PRA benefits may be paid in various formsforms. Ms. McCoy had a trigger event at March 31, 2018 and no officer has yet electedwas therefore required to commence her BRP benefit in 2018. She received a lump sum payment of $998,261.46 in 2018 and began receiving monthly payments of $4,321.20 to be paid through March 31, 2023. The present value reported for the form of payment. Mr. Scully is not eligible to participateBRP in the PRA or BRP. Mr. Higson is not eligible to participate intable above reflects the PRA or BRP, and our UK Plan does not have a cash balance formula.present value of the remaining monthly payments at December 31, 2018.

 

3Mr. Scully does

Messrs. Zijderveld, Wilson, Fernandez, Myers and Thompson do not participate in the PRA, BRP or any other defined benefit retirement plans that are sponsored, maintained or established by us or to which we contribute.

 

4Mr. Higson ceased accruing benefits in the UK Plan as of June 30, 2003. Under the UK Plan, normal retirement age is age 60 with no unreduced early retirement. The benefit was determined using a 3.35% discount rate. Amounts reported reflect conversion to U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2016.
64AVON 2019 Proxy Statement

5Mr. Higson ceased accruing benefits in the German Plan as of December 31, 2007. Mr. Higson’s benefit under the German Plan is comprised of both a grandfathered defined benefit portion and a cash balance portion. The cash balance portion will be converted to a pension upon Mr. Higson’s retirement using guarantee conversion terms. The present value of the accumulated benefits is based on an assumed retirement date of age 65 (which is the normal retirement age given that the German Plan does not offer unreduced benefits). Amounts reported reflect conversion to U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2016.

6Mr. Higson became a participant in the IRP effective January 1, 2008. This plan has a cash balance formula, therefore the assumed retirement date for the IRP is normal retirement age of 65 and the assumptions used were those that apply for the PRA.

Avon Products, Inc. Personal Retirement Account Plan

The Avon Products, Inc. Personal Retirement Account Plan (“PRA”) is a U.S.tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan that is generally available to our eligible employees who have completed one year of service. NamedEligible named executive officers participate in the cash balance benefit accrual formula of the PRA, which generally provides a retirement benefit equal to the value of the participant’s hypothetical account balance. The hypothetical account balance is credited with an interest credit and a basic credit as of the last day of each month. For balances as of December 31, 2014, the interest credit is 1/12 of the annual rate of interest on Treasury securities for the month of November of the prior year (but not less than 5%). For balances as a result of pay credits earned on or after January 1, 2015 the interest credit is 1/12 of the annual rate of interest on Treasury securities for the month of November of the prior year (but not less than 1.6%). The basic credit is an employer contribution based upon a percentage of eligible compensation earned. The percentage of eligible compensation differs depending upon the number of points a participant has earned. Points are determined by adding the participant’s vesting service and attained age as of the last day of the prior plan year. Basic credits are determined as follows:

 

Participant Points  

Percentage of Compensation Up to 

Social Security Wage Base* 

  

Percentage of

Compensation Over

Social Security Wage Base*

  

Percentage of Compensation Up to                 

Social Security Wage Base*                

 

 

Percentage of        

Compensation Over        

Social Security Wage Base*              

 

<30  3.0%  4.50%  

3.0%                

 

4.50%        

30-39  3.5%  5.25%  

3.5%                

 

5.25%        

40-49  4.0%  6.00%  

4.0%                

 

6.00%        

50-59  4.5%  6.75%  

4.5%                

 

6.75%        

60-69  5.0%  7.50%  

5.0%                

 

7.50%        

70-79  5.5%  8.25%  

5.5%                

 

8.25%        

80-89  6.0%  9.00%  

6.0%                

 

9.00%        

90 or more  6.5%  9.75%  

6.5%                

 

9.75%        

* $118,500 in 2016  

* $128,400 in 2018

58


Compensation is generally defined as salary and annual bonus (not in excess of the target bonus amount), subject to the maximum permitted under Internal Revenue Code regulations. Long-term equity compensation is not included.

A participant must complete three years of service in order to be vested in the PRA. Participants may receive PRA benefits upon request as soon as practicable after termination of employment or at the end of the salary continuation period for those employees receiving severance benefits. Benefits may be paid, at the request of a participant, as a lump sum or annuity or various forms of joint and survivor annuities. None of our named executive officers have selected the form of payment of their PRA benefits.

The PRA is not available to employees hired on or after January 1, 2015.

Benefit Restoration Pension Plan of Avon Products, Inc.

The Benefit Restoration Pension Plan of Avon Products, Inc. (“BRP”) is a nonqualified defined benefit pension plan available to a select group of U.S.-based management or highly compensated employees whose benefits under the PRA are limited by the Internal Revenue Code maximum benefit limit. The BRP was established to provide participants in the PRA with the retirement benefits to which they were entitled under the PRA but may not be paid as a result of Internal Revenue Code limits.

Generally, the same definitions under the PRA for compensation, average final compensation and service apply to the BRP, except that the compensation and benefit limits under the Internal Revenue Code for qualified plans are disregarded. The same benefit accrual formulas also apply, (except for Ms. McCoy). Pursuanthowever, pursuant to Ms. McCoy’s employment agreement, the basic credits under the BRP cash balance benefit formula for Ms. McCoy are increased by 2% both above and below the Social Security Taxable Wage Base. Generally, a participant must complete three years of service to become 100% vested under the BRP.

If a participant receives salary continuation, the salary continuation period is credited to the participant at the time of the termination to match the service crediting rules of the PRA. In addition, if a participant under the Company’s Change in Control Policy is terminated after a change in control, such participant would be credited with an additional two years of service and age at the time of the termination of employment, except for Ms. McCoy who would be credited with three years of service and age, pursuant to her employment agreement.employment. In order to determine the BRP benefit, the hypothetical amount payable under the PRA is subtracted from the amount calculated under the BRP and the BRP pays out the excess. Benefits are paid from our general assets. The BRP benefit generally will be paid 80% in a lump sum cash payment and 20% in 60 monthly installments. Certain key employees may be subject to a six month delay in payments under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

The BRP is not available to employees hired on or after January 1, 2015.

Avon Products, Inc. International Retirement Plan

The Avon Products, Inc. International Retirement Plan (“IRP”) is a nonqualified defined benefit pension plan available to a select group of employees who are generally either career mobile associates or associates working in a country where they are unable to participate in a competitive retirement plan. Participating associates accrue credits under a cash balance formula which generally provides a retirement benefit equal to the value of the participant’s hypothetical account balance. The hypothetical account balance may be credited with an initial credit at the time a participant begins to participate in the IRP. Once participation begins, the hypothetical account balance is credited with an interest credit and a basic credit as of the last day of each plan year. The interest credit is the average daily yield of interest on30-year Treasury bonds for the month of November of the prior year (but not less than 5%). The basic credit is a credit that is equal to no less than 5% and no more than 15% (or a straight 12.5% for grandfathered participants) of eligible compensation earned. Mr. Higson is a grandfathered participant in the IRP. Eligible compensation for purposes of the IRP is generally defined as salary and annual cash incentive bonus (not in excess of the target bonus amount). Eligible compensation does not include other bonuses, long-term equity compensation, foreign service premiums or tax equalization payments, international assignment allowances, or salary continuation. Employee contributions are not permitted under the IRP.

Grandfathered participants become 100% vested upon completion of five years of service with the Company. New participants become 33% vested upon completion of one year of service, 67% vested upon completion of two years of service, and 100% vested upon completion of three years of service. Initial credits may be subject to different vesting schedules to the extent that they are intended to compensate the participant for benefits forfeited as a result of a transfer from one country to another, in which case the vesting schedule will generally track the vesting schedule of the forfeited benefits. Service for purposes of vesting may include service before participation in the IRP began. Service while a participant is receiving salary continuation does not count as service with the company.

Participants will receive distributions under the IRP in a lump sum within 90 days following their separation from service. Certain key employees may be subject to asix-month delay following separation from service before receiving their distributions (in order to comply with Section 409A of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code). Account distributions delayed as a result of Section 409A will be credited with an additional interest credit for the period of the delay.

The IRP is administered at all times using denominations of U.S. dollars. For purposes of determining each year’s credits, amounts are converted to U.S. dollars using an average of the exchange rates for each month of such year, as published by the Company from time to time.

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  5965


The Avon Cosmetics Pension Plan (UK)

The Avon Cosmetics Pension Plan (UK) (“UK Plan”) is a defined benefit plan for employees whose home country was within the United Kingdom for all or a portion of their career. Within this plan, the final pay section was open to new members prior to April 1, 2003 and to future accrual of benefits prior to October 1, 2006. The final pay section provides for post-retirement payments based on the employee’s final pensionable pay and years and months of service at the time of retirement.

The annual benefit is calculated in accordance with the following formula for applicable employees who are eligible fortop-hat/ executive benefits:

Benefit = Employee’s pensionable pay x service as a top hat participant x 0.025

For applicable employees who are not eligible for top hat/executive status, the annual benefit is calculated in accordance with the following formula:

Benefit = Employee’s pensionable pay x service as anon-top hat participant x 0.017

Mr. Higson’s benefits are derived from both formulas.

Benefits are paid from a retirement age of 60 and are not payable unreduced prior to this age. The pensionable pay underlying the pension calculation is reduced to account for government-sponsored pension benefits received by the employee. Benefits are generally paid in the form of an annuity, as lump sums are limited under the UK Plan. Benefits to a surviving spouse are generally equal to 67% of the participant’s pension at death. Increases in pension payments may apply depending on the period for which benefits were accrued and applicable inflation index.

The Avon Cosmetics Pension Plan (Germany)

The Avon Cosmetics Pension Plan (Germany) (“German Plan”) is a pension plan for Germany-based employees meeting the eligibility criteria. The German Plan is comprised of a grandfathered defined benefit portion for service prior to January 1, 2006 and a cash balance portion for service after December 31, 2005. The benefits attributable to the defined benefit formula are determined based on final average pay and service prior to 2006. The cash balance accrual provides for post-retirement payments based on guaranteed conversion terms that are applied to the employee’s cash balance account. Mr. Higson is eligible for benefits attributable to both the grandfathered defined benefit formula and the cash balance portion. The benefits are paid from a retirement age of 65 and are not payable unreduced prior to this age.

60


NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The following table provides information relating to compensation for our named executive officers under our nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP”).

  Name  Executive
Contributions in
Last FY
($)
1
  Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY
($)
2
  Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)
3
  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
Last FYE
($)
  Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)
4
  Ms. McCoy  0  0  0  0  0
  Mr. Scully  0  8,592  465  0  16,311
  Mr. Acosta  31,996  23,997  540  106,928  56,533
  Mr. Higson5  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A
  Mr. Benjamin  0  0  0  0  0

1Amounts deferred under this column are included in the “Salary” column in the Summary Compensation Table.

2Reflects employer contributions to the excess 401(k) plan, which are included in the “All Other Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table.

3There are no amounts in this column that are reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

4The following amounts included in this column have been reported in our Summary Compensation Table: $8,592 for Mr. Scully and $55,993 for Mr. Acosta for 2016, and $7,197 for Mr. Scully for 2015.

5Mr. Higson is not eligible to participate in the DCP.

Avon Products, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP”)

The following sourcesWe maintain a nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP”), pursuant to which to a select group of compensation may be deferred into the DCP:

Base Salary—upU.S.-based management or highly compensated employees are eligible to 50% of annual salary

Annual Bonus—all or part of the annual bonus payable under our annual incentive plans

Excess 401(k) Plan Deferrals—up to 25% of thedefer a portion of base salary and all or a portion of any annual bonus, and excess 401(k) plan deferrals may also be made. None of our current NEOs participated in excess of the maximum compensation limit under our 401(k) Plan ($265,000 for 2016).DCP during 2018. In addition, we contribute an amount equalMessrs. Zijderveld, Wilson, Fernandez and Thompson are not eligible to participate in the employer contributions we would have made to the 401(k) Plan if IRS limits did not apply

In general, participants must make their deferral elections prior to the year in which they perform services for which the compensation is being deferred.

Investment of Deferred Compensation

Deferred compensation amounts are hypothetically invested in one or more of three investment choices as selected by the participant:

Fixed Rate Fund—credited each month with imputed interest at an annual rate that we establish. We determine the rate annually, and for 2016, the rate was set at 3.08%,DCP, which is 120% of the long-term federal rate as of November 2015.

Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index Fund.

Avon Stock Unit Fund—hypothetically invested in Avon stock with dividends credited (to the extent Avon pays any dividends on its common stock).

Plan Accounts and Distributions

Payments under the DCP are made from our general assets. Participants may allocate deferred compensation to (i) a Retirement/ Termination Account, which providesonly for distributions after termination of employment, or (ii) up to twoIn-Service Accounts, which provide for distributions during continued employment. Participants are fully vested in their DCP accounts. Retirement/Termination Accounts are distributed upon retirement or other termination of employment in a lump sum or up to 15 annual installments, as elected at the time of the initial deferral election. Changing the distribution elections for Retirement/Termination Accounts will delay distributions for at least five years from the original distribution date. AllIn-Service Accounts are payable in a lump sum or in up to five annual installments, as irrevocably elected at the time of initial deferral election. In the event of death prior to full distribution of the accounts, the undistributed amounts will be paid to the participant’s beneficiary. Accounts are also distributable upon a change in control event pursuant to Section 409A.U.S.-based eligible employees.

LOGO61


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT, INCLUDING

AFTER A CHANGE IN CONTROL

We have entered into individual agreements and maintain certain plans and arrangements that provide for payments to our named executive officers upon termination of employment, including after a change in control as set forth below.

Involuntary Termination of Employment (Other Than For Cause or Disability); Constructive Termination

CEOChief Executive Officer (“CEO”)

In the event that we terminate Ms. McCoy’sMr. Zijderveld’s employment other than for cause (as defined in his employment agreement), unsatisfactory work performance, failure to return to work after an approved leave of absence, death or disability, sheor if he terminates his employment for good reason (as defined in his employment agreement), he would generally be entitled to receive substantially the same severance payments and benefits afforded to other U.S.-basedU.K.-based senior officers described under“Non-CEO” below, except that Ms. McCoyMr. Zijderveld would also be entitled to immediatepro-rata vesting of herhis unvestedsign-on Service-based RSUs and payment of her deferred cashsign-on award plus interest at 3.25% compounded annually. Ms. McCoy also participates in the BRP and, pursuant to her employment agreement, her cash balance benefit includes an additional 2% accrual above and below the Social Security Taxable Wage Base over the current basic credits table Ms. McCoy would also be entitled to the same payments and benefits if she terminated her employment for good reason (as defined in her agreement).Performance RSUs.

U.K.-basedNon-CEO Named Executive Officers

In the event that we terminate the employment of any of our currently employed U.S.-basedU.K.-based named executive officers that are covered by our severance plan other than for cause or disability, under the terms of each of their employment contracts we would continue togenerally pay his or her basethe equivalent of 24 months’ salary, at the ratewhich is typically paid as a lump sum payment and includes pay in effect on the termination date forlieu of notice. If not paid as a period of time determined in accordance with the severance plan for employees at their level (which islump sum and instead paid as salary continuation, each currently 24 months for the current U.S.-based coveredemployed U.K.-based named executive officers), except thatenrolled in the first payment (equivalent to seven months at such rate) generally would not occur until the seventh month following the date of termination, unless certain exceptions permitted by Internal Revenue Code Section 409A apply. Each currently employed U.S.-based named executive officer covered by our severanceapplicable health plan would also be entitled to continuing coverage under our applicable group health plan(s)private medical plan and applicable group life insurance and accidentincome protection plan(s) during the salary continuation period. In addition, we would generally continue to provide any of them with certain of the perquisites he or she currently receives as described in the Summary Compensation Table for the following periods, as applicable: threetwenty-four months of a transportation or car allowance home securityand pension contributions until the end of his or her annual contract in effect, and an executive health exam for up to three months after termination.effect. In addition, we would generally provide career transition and developmentoutplacement services to any of them for twelve months following termination of employment.

In the event of involuntary termination without cause, a pro ratapro-rata portion of Service-based RSUs would vest and be settled in accordance with the terms of the individual award agreements. Mr. Scully would be entitled to immediate vesting of his unvestedsign-on Service-based RSUs. If termination occurs during the year of the grant, all Performance RSUs would be forfeited. If termination is on or after January 1 of the year following the grant, a pro ratapro-rata portion of theirthe Performance RSUs would vest and settle in accordance with the terms of the individual award agreements, provided that the applicable performance goals have been satisfied.

In addition, in the event of involuntary termination other than for cause, death, disability or retirement, a named executive officer’s stock options that were exercisable as of the date of separateseparation from service will continue to remain exercisable until 90 days after such date of separation from service.

A named executive officerNEO who is involuntarily terminated without cause on or after August 1 would be entitled to apro-rated award under the annual incentive program would be entitled to a prorated award provided that the applicable performance goals have been satisfied.

The U.S.-based named executive officers’ accrued benefits under the PRA accrue interest credits for additional years of service during his or her salary continuation period and they are credited with additional years of service credit under the BRP at termination for the salary continuation period.

Terminated employees arewould generally be required to sign a release of all claims in order to receive severance benefits. The severance benefits are also subjectand agree tonon-competition, andnon-solicitation covenants for the salary continuation period andnon-disparagement,non-solicitationnon-disparagement, cooperation, and confidentiality provisions that, if violated, would cause forfeitureas a condition of receiving severance benefits.

U.S.-basedNon-CEO NEOs

No U.S.-based named executive officer was employed on the last day of the remaining benefits.fiscal year.See “Departure of Former CEO” for a description of the letter agreement entered into with Ms. McCoy in connection with her 2018 separation.

Mr. Higson would be eligible to receive 7 months of base salary as statutory severance under German law. Mr. Higson is covered under a national health program and no contributions would be required by us after termination of employment.

66AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


Disability

In the event of qualifying disability, a U.S.-based named executive officerU.K.-based NEO would be entitled to receive benefits under our disability plans,sickness absence policy, which provide for the following income replacement benefits: underbenefit. Under the short term disability program, 100%sickness absence policy, the U.K. based named executive officer would be entitled to the following:

Service with AvonEntitlement

0-1 year

4 weeks at full pay

1-2 year

8 weeks at full pay

2-5 years

16 weeks at full pay

5+ years

26 weeks at full pay

Following the cessation of eligiblethe above, a U.K.-based named executive could apply for income protection where 67% of their base paysalary would be paid for a period of up to 8 weeks, then 70% of eligible pay for the remaining 17 weeks; and 50% of eligible base pay (up to the IRS limits) thereafter under the long-term disability program for the duration of his or her qualifying disability until age 65 (or if the disability occurred after age 60, for up to five years, but in no event less than 1 year).three years. In addition, each U.S.-basedU.K. based named executive officer would generally continue to be covered by our applicable group healthlife plan(s) and applicable group life and accident plan(s) andpension contributions would continue to be eligible for perquisites during the disability period. Mr. Higson would be entitled to receive payments (after 43 days of not being able to work) under the Deutsche Krankenversicherung (DKV) (a German health insurance scheme to which the company contributes) for each day (after day 43) that he is unable to work with payments based on a daily rate.

62


the fixed rate of pensionable pay applicable immediately before acceptance on to the income protection scheme. All other perquisites would discontinue. In the event of separation from service due to disability, all Service-based RSUs would vest and be settled, in accordance with the terms of the individual award agreements. All Performance RSUs would be proratedpro-rated and paid on the original settlement date, provided that the performance goals have been satisfied. All stock options awarded under the 2016 stock incentive plan willOmnibus Incentive Plan would immediately vest and be exercisable until the first anniversary of the date of separation from service due to disability. The stock options awarded

Retirement

Other than with respect to Mr. Higson under the Company’s prior stock incentive plans have already vested and would be exercisable until the option expiration dates set forth in the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End” table. Ms. McCoy’s deferred cashsign-on award would immediately vest and be payable and would include 29 months2018 separation as described below under “Departure of interest at 3.25% compounded annually on April 23rd of each year. Ms. McCoy would retain her cashsign-on awards.

All of our named executive officers who are currently participants in the PRA, BRP and IRP would continue to participate in those plans for up to 29 months while disabled.

Retirement

Mr. Higson and Mr. Benjamin are currently the only named executive officers who are retirement-eligible for purposes of our incentive compensation plans. All otherFormer CEO,” no current named executive officers are not presently retirement-eligible and, therefore, all would forfeit any unvested cash or equity incentive compensation upon retirement. For a named executive officer who is retirement-eligible,retirement-eligible: (i) if retirement is prior to January 1 of the year following the grant, a pro ratapro-rata portion of his or her Service-based RSUs would vest and be settled, in accordance with the terms of the individual award agreements, while all Performance RSUs would be forfeited; or (ii) if retirement is after January 1 of the year following the grant, all of his or her Service-based RSUs would vest and be settled, in accordance with the terms of the individual award agreements and a pro ratapro-rata portion of Performance RSUs would vest provided that the performance goals have been satisfied. If the retirement is after the first anniversary of the grant date, stock options awarded under the 2016-2018 long-term incentive program2018-2021 LTIP will continue to vest pursuant to the terms of the individual award agreements and be exercisable until the third anniversary of the date of separation from service due to retirement. The stock options awarded to Mr. Higson under the Company’s prior stock incentive plans have already vested and would be exercisable until the option expiration dates set forth in the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End” table.

A retirement-eligible named executive officerNEO would be entitled to a proratedpro-rated annual cash incentive award, provided that the applicable performance goals have been satisfied. Cashsign-on awards that have not vested would be forfeited and repaid to the Company.

Death

In the event of a named executive officer’s death, his or her beneficiary generally would be entitled to death and life insurance benefits. All U.S.-based named executive officersNEOs generally will receive benefits pursuant to our applicable group life and accident plan(s). For Mr. Higson, death benefits are paid under a life insurance program for our German employees.similarly situated employees of their employing entity.

All of a named executive officer’sNEO’s Service-based RSUs would vest and be settled, in accordance with the terms of the individual award agreements. Performance RSUs would be prorated,pro-rated, provided that the performance goals have been satisfied. Under our annual incentive program, a participating named executive officerNEO who dies during the performance period is entitled to a proratedpro-rated award provided that the performance goals have been satisfied. In addition, Ms. McCoy’s deferred cashsign-on award and deferredsign-on Service-based RSUs would immediately vest and be payable and Ms. McCoy would retain her cashsign-on awards. All of a named executive officer’sNEO’s stock options awarded under the 2016 stock incentive plan willOmnibus Incentive Plan would immediately vest and be exercisable until the first anniversary of the date of separation from service due to death. The stock options awarded to Mr. Higson under the Company’s prior stock incentive plans have already vested and would be exercisable until the earlier of the option expiration dates set forth in the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End” table and the second anniversary of the date of separation from service due to death.

Change in Control—Involuntary Termination of Employment (Other Than For Cause or Disability) or Constructive Termination

Our Amended and Restated Change in Control Policy has been designed based on competitive practice, with the objective of attracting senior-level executives and motivating and retaining them in the event of a potential change in control. Generally, we believe that having change in control provisions will help ensure that, in the event of a potential change in control, members of senior management can act in the best interests of all the shareholders without concern for the uncertainty and distraction that would result from the effects a change in control could have on their personal situations. All of our currentcurrently active named executive officers are covered under our policy.

The policy provides for payments to be made to covered executives upon a “double trigger,” (i.e., in the event of an involuntary termination without cause or termination by a covered executive for good reason within two years after a change in control), which reflects shareholder input and considerations. A covered executive is generally entitled to receive two times the sum of base salary and target annual incentive bonus, and continued participation in our medical/welfare benefit plans for two years, plus two additional years of service and age credits under our BRP. Ms. McCoy would be entitled to receive three times the sum of base salary and target annual incentive bonus, and continued participation in our medical/welfare benefit plans for three years, plus three additional years of service and age credits under our BRP.

years.

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  6367


“Change in control” is defined generally in the policy as an event that would be considered a change in control under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations issued thereunder and which includes:

 

the acquisition by a person or group of persons of beneficial ownership of more than 50% of the outstanding stock of the Company, measured by vote or value;

 

the acquisition by a person or group of persons that acquires, within a12-month period, 30% or more of the total voting power of the outstanding stock of the Company;

a majority of our Board of Directors is replaced during any12-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board prior to the date of the appointment or election; or

 

a sale of a substantial portion of the Company’s assets (40% or more of the total gross fair market value) within a12-month period unless the recipient of the assets is (i) a subsidiary, 50% or more of the total value or voting power of which is owned by the Company, (ii) Company shareholder(s) owning 50% or more of the total value or voting power of the Company, or (iii) an entity of which at least 50% of the total value or voting power is owned by such Company shareholder(s) described in (ii); provided that the assets are not distributed to a Company shareholder in exchange for common stock.

In the event of a change in control, the 2016 2013 and 2010 stock incentive plans provideOmnibus Incentive Plan provides for unvested awards that are assumed or otherwise replaced in the change in control to become fully vested and payable upon a “double trigger”. If the awards are no longer payable in our stock, and are not assumed or replaced in the change in control transaction, the awards become fully vested and payable upon the change in control. Awards subject to the achievement of performance goals will be fully vested and valued as if the performance goals had been achieved at target.

None of our named executive officersNEOs are entitled to reimbursement orgross-up of any parachute payment excise tax that might be incurred under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code as a result of payments made in connection with a change in control.

Departure of Former CEO

In August 2017, we entered into a letter agreement with Ms. McCoy, which provided that Ms. McCoy would retire as CEO on March 31, 2018, provided that if the Company determined that Ms. McCoy’s successor would be appointed prior to March 31, 2018, Ms. McCoy would continue to be employed as an advisor until March 31, 2018 on the same terms and conditions of employment (except she would not be eligible to receive annual or long-term incentive awards with respect to 2018). In February 2018, we announced Ms. McCoy’s successor, and that Ms. McCoy would retire as CEO effective as of February 4, 2018, but remain employed as an advisor to the Board and the new CEO during a transition period through March 31, 2018.

Ms. McCoy’s termination constituted an involuntary separation other than for cause for purposes of the Company’s compensation and benefit plans and arrangements, and as such she began receiving continued base salary at the rate in effect on the termination date for a period of 24 months. She is also entitled to continuing coverage under our applicable group health plan(s) and applicable group life and accident plan(s) during the salary continuation period. In addition, Ms. McCoy was entitled to receive her annual executive health exam for 2018, to the extent not received prior to termination, as well as outplacement services for twelve months following her termination of employment (which she did not use).

Ms. McCoy’s termination constituted a retirement for purposes of vesting and for stock option exercise under the terms of our incentive plans and outstanding awards, as described in more detail above in the “Retirement” section. Ms. McCoy’s international assignment benefits ceased, and she is entitled to repatriation benefits consistent with her assignment agreement and our international assignment policies, which included tax assistance and tax equalization benefits for as long as she is subject to United Kingdom taxes on her Company-compensation, and included lease termination fees and other similar fees and penalties that she incurred as a result of the end of her international assignment (provided that she was required to use reasonable efforts to mitigate the amount of any such fees and penalties).

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control Table

The following tableinformation sets forth the estimated incremental payments and benefits that would be payable upon termination of employment or a change in control, assuming that the triggering event occurred on December 31, 20162018 for each of our named executive officers.NEOs, unless otherwise provided in the accompanying narrative footnotes. These amounts exclude earned amounts, such as accrued amounts under compensation and benefits plans described previously in this proxy statement (for example, defined benefit pension benefits and supplemental benefits),Proxy Statement, which are not contingent upon a termination or a change in control. The valuation of equity awards is based upon a stock price of $5.04,$1.52, the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE on December 31, 2016.2018 (last trading day of our last fiscal year). Although the Performance RSUs granted under our long-term incentive program in 20152016, 2017 and 20162018 would have vestedpro-rata upon the events described in columns footnoted as 1 through 4 in the table below, they are not included in these amounts as payment is subject to attainment of performance goals. In addition, each named executive officerNEO, as applicable, has stock options as set forth in the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End” table, which would have vested in full upon the events described in columns footnoted as 2, 4 and 6. However, such stock options have no intrinsic value as the exercise prices were higher than the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE on December 31, 2016.2018.

 

  Name

 

  

Involuntary or 

Constructive 

Termination 

($)1 

 

  

Disability 

($)2 

 

  

Retirement 

($)3 

 

  

Death 

($)4 

 

 

Change in 

Control 

($)5 

 

  

Involuntary or 

Constructive 

Termination

Following a

Change of

Control

($)6

 

 

  Ms. McCoy

  3,537,152  5,637,025  0  1,151,600 0  14,586,845

 

  Mr. Scully

  4,750,397  8,831,137  0  3,964,012 0  8,299,803

 

  Mr. Acosta

  2,195,256  7,081,470  0  1,414,094 0  5,017,986

 

  Mr. Higson7

  569,551  1,384,514  822,140  2,071,700 0  3,273,523

 

  Mr. Benjamin

  305,550  1,182,865  786,608  886,608 0  3,718,525
68AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


    Name

 

  

Involuntary or        

Constructive        

Termination        

($)1         

 

  

Disability        

($)2         

 

  

Retirement        

($)3         

 

  

Death        

($)4         

 

  

Change in        

Control        

($)5         

 

  

Involuntary or        

Constructive        

Termination        

Following a        

Change of        

Control        

($)6         

 

Mr. Zijderveld

  2,456,457          3,103,005          0          3,220,284          0          8,988,855        
  

Ms. McCoy8

  N/A                    N/A          N/A          N/A          N/A          N/A        
  

Mr. Wilson

  1,541,820          1,801,588          0          2,636,776          0          3,257,520        
  

Mr. Fernandez

  1,566,857          1,789,092          0          2,677,848          0          3,234,842        
  

Mr. Myers

  1,304,872          1,510,798          0          2,560,253          0          2,670,323        
  

Mr. Thompson

  1,417,771          1,548,936          0          2,544,826          0          2,668,145        
  

 

1

We would pay a cash severance amount over atwo-year period of $2,400,000 for Ms. McCoy, $1,680,000$2,169,236 for Mr. Scully, and $1,600,620Zijderveld, $1,403,623 for Mr. Acosta. Pursuant to the German statutory termination period of seven months,Wilson, $1,352,582 for Mr. Higson would be paid cash severance of $255,118. Ms. McCoy’s deferred cash award of $850,000 would also be paid (interest on such cash award compounded annually at 3.25% not reflected).Fernandez, $1,199,460 for Mr. Myers and $1,250,500 for Mr. Thompson. The value of continued coverage for atwo-year period under our applicable group health plan(s) is $36,583 for Ms. McCoy, $38,070$30,054 for Mr. Scully,Zijderveld, $3,524 for Messrs. Fernandez and $37,461Myers and $51,538 for Mr. AcostaThompson, based on current costs and assuming an annual 20172019 health care trend rate of 7.50%7.00%, an annual dental trend rate of 5.00% and a discount rate of 4.30%3.71%. Mr. Higson is covered under national health programs and no contributions would be required by us after termination of employment.

64


The value of continued coverage under our applicable group life and accident plan(s) for atwo-year period is $219$3,834 for Ms. McCoy, Mr. Scully,Messrs. Zijderveld, Wilson, Fernandez, Myers and Mr. Acosta,Thompson, in each case assuming a discount rate of 4.30%3.71%. The estimated value of the perquisites that we would continue to provide is $30,000 for Ms. McCoy, and $27,750 for Mr. Acosta. For Ms. McCoy, Mr. Scully, and Mr. Acosta, we currently estimaterepatriation costs we would pay approximately $18,750 for outplacement services for the12-month period following termination of employment. Mr. Higson is not eligible for outplacement services because he is not based in the U.S. Pursuant to his employment agreement with the Company.Fernandez and Mr. Benjamin is not currently covered by our severance plan, so heThompson would not be entitled to a cash severance amount, continued coverage under our applicable group health plan(s) or our applicable group life$53,709 and accident plan(s), continued perquisites or outplacement services upon involuntary termination.$13,837, respectively. The value of Service-based RSUs that would immediately vest is $201,600 for Ms. McCoy, $3,013,358$253,333 for Mr. Scully, $510,456Zijderveld, $134,363 for Mr. Acosta, $314,433Wilson, $153,208 for Mr. Higson and $305,550Fernandez, $98,054 for Mr. Benjamin.Myers and $98,062 for Mr. Thompson.

 

2

Assuming continuation of disability payments until age 65 for all named executive officers,four weeks at full pay and for three years at 67% of base salary for U.K.-based NEOs, the present value of disability payments is $4,072,311 for Ms. McCoy, $4,967,125$2,191,005 for Mr. Scully, $5,573,919Zijderveld, $1,473,096 for Mr. Acosta, $353,874Wilson, $1,419,528 for Mr. Higson and $347,220Fernandez, $1,258,829 for Mr. BenjaminMyers and $1,312,394 for Mr. Thompson based on a discount rate of 2.40%. Assuming each of the following named executive officers commences his or her benefit immediately, the present value of the additional pension benefits earned under the PRA, BRP and IRP while on disability for up to 29 months is $513,114 for Ms. McCoy, $193,457 for Mr. Acosta, $208,500 for Mr. Higson and $49,037 for Mr. Benjamin, assuming a discount rate and a lump sum rate of 3.65% for the PRA and IRP and 3.85% for the BRP. Under the UK Plan and the German Plan, Mr. Higson is no longer accruing benefits and so there is no additional benefits that would accrue. Ms. McCoy will also be paid her deferred cash award of $850,000 (interest on such cash award compounded annually at 3.25% not reflected)2.76%. The value of Service-based RSUs that would immediately vest is $201,600 for Ms. McCoy, $3,864,012$912,000 for Mr. Scully, $1,314,094Zijderveld, $328,492 for Mr. Acosta, $822,140Wilson, $369,564 for Mr. Higson, and $786,608Fernandez, $251,969 for Mr. Benjamin.Myers and $236,542 for Mr. Thompson.

 

3

For purposes of our equity incentive compensation plans, Mr. Higson and Mr. Benjamin are the only named executive officers whono actively employed NEOs were retirement eligible as of December 31, 2016.2018. Therefore, Ms. McCoy, Mr. Scully, and Mr. Acostaall listed named executive officers would have forfeited their outstanding equity awards if they had retired as of December 31, 2016. The amount shown in the table above for Mr. Higson and Mr. Benjamin is the value of Service-based RSUs that would immediately vest had they retired on December 31, 2016.2018.

 

4

Upon the death of any U.S.-based named executive officer, death benefits in the amount of $100,000 would be paid pursuant to our applicable group life and accident plan(s). Upon Mr. Higson’sMessrs. Zijderveld’s, Wilson’s, Fernandez’s, Myers’s or Thompson’s death, death benefits in the amount of $1,249,560$2,308,284 would be paid. Ms. McCoy’s deferred cash award of $850,000 would be paid upon her death (interest on such cash award compounded annually at 3.25% not reflected). The value of Service-based RSUs that would immediately vest is $201,600 for Ms. McCoy, $3,864,012$912,000 for Mr. Scully, $1,314,094Zijderveld, $328,492 for Mr. Acosta, $822,140Wilson, $369,564 for Mr. Higson and $786,608Fernandez, $251,969 for Mr. Benjamin.Myers and $236,542 for Mr. Thompson.

 

5

Our change in control policy provides for payments to be made to covered executives upon a “double trigger” as described above. Therefore, we have assumed for the purposes of this column that unvested awards under our stock incentive plans have been assumed or otherwise replaced by the acquirer or surviving entity upon a change in control and that no second trigger has occurred.

 

6

Our named executive officersNEOs would receive benefits pursuant to our double trigger change in control policy. Ms. McCoy would receive $9,000,000, which consists of 300% of the sum of the target annual cash bonus and base salary. Ms. McCoy’s deferred cash award of $850,000 would be paid (interest on such cash award compounded annually at 3.25% not reflected). Mr. Scully,Zijderveld, Mr. Acosta,Wilson, Mr. HigsonFernandez, Mr. Myers and Mr. BenjaminThompson would receive payments of $3,360,000, $2,881,116, $1,957,740$6,507,707, $2,596,703, $2,434,648, $2,159,027 and $2,450,000,$2,125,851, respectively, which consist of 200% of the sum of the target annual cash bonus and base salary. These payments would be made in a lump sum. For Mr. Scully and Mr. Acosta, seeSee footnote 1 above for the estimated values of continued coverage under our applicable group health plan(s) and life insurance plans for thetwo-year period following an involuntary termination. Mr. Benjamin is entitled to continued coverage under our applicable group health plan(s)termination and applicable group life and accident plan(s), in each case for thetwo-year period following a double trigger change in control, the value of which is $11,743 and $219, respectively.repatriation benefits.

For purposes of awards under our stock incentive plan, we have assumed for the purposes of this column that unvested awards have been assumed or otherwise replaced by the acquirer or surviving entity upon a change in control so that they would vest and be payable upon involuntary or constructive termination of employment that occurs within two years following a change in control. The value of Service-based RSUs that would immediately vest is $912,000 for Mr. Zijderveld, $328,492 for Mr. Wilson, $369,564 for Mr. Fernandez, $251,969 for Mr. Myers and $236,542 for Mr. Thompson. The value of the Performance RSUs granted under our long-term incentive program in 2017 and 2018 that would vest at target regardless of performance is $1,535,261 for Mr. Zijderveld, $328,492 for Mr. Wilson, $369,564 for Mr. Fernandez, $251,969 for Mr. Myers and $236,542 for Mr. Thompson. The Performance RSUs would be settled on the original settlement date, which is three years following the grant date.

Ms. McCoy is entitled to continued coverage under our applicable group health plan(s) and applicable group life and accident plan(s), in each case for the three-year period following a double trigger change in control, the value of which is $55,720 and $334, respectively. For purposes of awards under our stock incentive plan, we have assumed for the purposes of this column that unvested awards have been assumed or otherwise replaced by the acquirer or surviving entity upon a change in control so that they would vest and be payable upon involuntary or constructive termination of employment that occurs within two years following a change in control. The value of Service-based RSUs that would immediately vest is $201,600 for Ms. McCoy, $3,864,012 for Mr. Scully, $1,314,094 for Mr. Acosta, $822,140 for Mr. Higson and $786,608 for Mr. Benjamin. The cash payout, which was part of the previously disclosedone-time 2015 performance-based retention award granted to Ms. McCoy, would immediately vest in an amount of $107,453. The value of the Performance RSUs granted under our long-term incentive program in 2015 and 2016 that would vest at target regardless of performance is $4,371,738 for Ms. McCoy, $1,037,502 for Mr. Scully, $785,096 for Mr. Acosta, $493,643 for Mr. Higson and $469,955 for Mr. Benjamin. The Performance RSUs would be settled on the original settlement date, which is three years following the grant date (March 2018 and March 2019 for Performance RSUs granted in March 2015 and March 2016, respectively).

 

7

For Mr. Higson,Messrs. Zijderveld, Wilson, Fernandez Myers and Thompson, in calculating the dollar equivalent for amounts that would be delivered in Euros,GBP, amounts have been converted to U.S. Dollarsdollars based on the December 31, 20162018 currency exchange rate.

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  6569


8

Given that Ms. McCoy’s employment ended prior to December 31, 2018, there would be no incremental payments or benefits that would be payable to her with respect to the listed events as of that date. As described in “Departure of Former CEO” above, we entered into a letter agreement with Ms. McCoy in August 2017 pursuant to which Ms. McCoy would depart on March 31, 2018, and that her departure would constitute an involuntary separation other than for cause for purposes of the Company’s compensation and benefit plans and programs and that she is retirement-eligible for purposes of vesting and for stock option exercise under the terms of our incentive plans and outstanding awards.


CEO PAY RATIO

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of RegulationEQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATIONS-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Mr. Zijderveld, CEO for 2018:

For 2018, our last completed fiscal year:

 

Plan Category 

  Number of Securities  

  to be Issued Upon  

  Exercise of  

  Outstanding Options,  

  Warrants and Rights  

 

  Weighted-Average  

  Exercise Price of  

  Outstanding Options,  

  Warrants and Rights1  

 

  Number of Securities  

  Remaining Available for  

  future Issuance Under  

  Equity Compensation Plans  

  (Excluding Securities  

  Reflected in Column (a))2  

  (a) (b) (c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 25,097,5173  $20.09  40,868,138 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 366,3974  N/A  

Total

 25,463,9145  $20.09  40,868,138 

 

the annual total compensation of the employee identified at median of our company (other than our CEO), was $23,554; and

 

1This reflects the weighted-average exercise price of stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016. Outstanding Service-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and Performance RSUs are not included as such awards do not have an exercise price. Outstanding stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) are not included as such awards settle in cash only.

the annual total compensation of the CEO was $6,206,339.

2Amounts reflect the shares available for future issuance under the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), determined as follows: (i) grants of stock options or SARs reduce the total shares available by each share subject to such an award and (ii) grants of any award of restricted stock, stock units and other stock-based awards (other than stock options and SARs) reduce the total shares available by 2.4 multiplied by each share subject to such an award.

Based on this information, for 2018 the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Zijderveld, our current CEO, to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees is estimated to be 263 to 1.

3These include outstanding awards under the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, Amended and Restated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, and 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Amounts include shares underlying stock option awards, Service-based RSU awards and Performance RSU awards. The amounts included for Performance RSUs are based on target performance for 2014, 2015 and 2016 and may be awarded only upon satisfaction of performance measures. Amounts exclude 68,578 SARs and 602,550 Service-based RSUs and Performance RSUs, which will settle only in cash in accordance with local law requirements

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios. Therefore, the estimated pay ratio reported above may not be comparable to the pay ratios reported by other companies and should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.

4Includes 40,000 outstanding Service-based RSUs granted to our Chief Executive Officer in April 2012 as anoutside-the-plan employment inducement award, which will not be settled under the Plan or the predecessor plan. Also includes 326,397 outstanding Service-based RSUs and 121,951 outstanding Performance RSUs granted to our then Chief Financial Officer in March of 2015 as anoutside-the-plan employment inducement award, which will not be settled under the Plan or the predecessor plan.

5As of December 31, 2016, the Company had the following equity awards outstanding: 14,824,000 options outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $20.09 and a weighted average remaining term of 4.8 years, 5,607,663 Service-based RSUs, and 5,100,829 Performance RSUs.
As noted previously in this Proxy Statement, 2018 was a year of CEO transition for us, as Mr. Zijderfeld commenced service and Ms. McCoy departed. Pursuant to Instruction 10 of Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, we have calculated the annual total compensation of the CEO by looking to Mr. Zijderveld’s compensation. The annual total compensation for the CEO equals the CEO’s compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table plus an additional amount that reflects the annualization of his base salary,non-equity incentive plan compensation and annual long-term equity award for 2018. To identify the “median employee,” the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments, and estimates that we used were as follows: We determined that, as of October 1, 2018, our employee population consisted of approximately 24,200 individuals globally. We selected October 1, 2018, which is within the last three months of 2018, as the date upon which we would identify the “median employee”. To identify the “median employee” from our employee population, we used base salary paid during the12-month period ending December 31, 2018. In making the determination, however, this resulted in approximately 699 associates with the same base salary, so we then took the median of annual total compensation for this group of employees to determine the “median employee” for the purposes of the CEO pay ratio disclosure. For purposes of this disclosure, amounts were converted from local currency to U.S. dollars using the rate of exchange in effect on December 31, 2018.

 

6670AVON 2019 Proxy Statement  


PROPOSAL 2—ANNUAL ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We are asking shareholders to approve our annual advisory resolution on the compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”) as described in the Executive Compensation section of this Proxy Statement. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis, beginning on page 32,33, describes our executive compensation programs and decisions made by the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) in detail. In 2017, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) determined that the Company will hold advisory votes to approve executive compensation on an annual basis. It is expected that the next such advisory vote will occur at our 2020 annual meeting of shareholders.

2016In our shareholder outreach efforts, the feedback provided to us was an important year for Avon as it markedfocused on the 130thanniversary of our iconic beauty company. It was also a year of significant change as Avon embarked on its first year of a three-year transformation plan (the “Transformation Plan”). Following a strategic reviewcontinued improvement of the business and certain issues in 2015 undertakenexecutive compensation that we addressed. Overall 2018 operating results were disappointing and reinforced the urgent need to identify alternativesexecute Avon’s new strategic direction. In 2018 we made critical progress in addressing key concerns of leadership and strategic direction. Throughout the year we continued to strengthen Avon’s leadership team, further recruiting seasoned and skilled senior executives. The process of putting in place a leadership team to accelerate change and to increase sustainable profit continued with the recruitment by the Board of a new Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Jan Zijderveld, who joined Avon in February 2018. In addition, we made critical senior leadership appointments in key markets, and we are confident that Avon has an energized, highly motivated leadership team in place with the skillset required to deliver our new Open Up Strategy and the experience needed to restore Avon to growth in key emerging and developing markets.

Avon is operating in a dramatically changing and competitive environment, where business as usual is not an option for improving shareholder value, we finalizedAvon. A year ago the Board gave Mr. Zijderveld a clear mandate to lead a deep and comprehensive strategic partnership with Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. (collectively with its affiliates, “Cerberus”) in March 2016. The partnership with Cerberus has put Avon on a solidand operating review of all facets of the business and evaluate ways to significantly accelerate Avon’s path to profitabilityprofitable growth. This review led to the development and growth by providinglaunch of Avon’s new Open Up Strategy, which was communicated to shareholders in September 2018. Our Open Up Strategy is simple and clear, and we made important progress during Q3 and Q4 of 2018.

The Committee reviewed the Company’s compensation programs during 2018 and affirmed their alignment with shareholders, through many factors, including:

Our CEO’s target annual compensation opportunity is below the median of our peer group, which is consistent with our performance and our share usage. We redefined our peer group in 2017 to better reflect our smaller revenue scope

Our CEO’s annual and long-term incentive opportunity is entirely performance-based andat-risk

Our NEOs have, on average, approximately 75% of their total compensation tied to performance andat-risk

None of our executives earned a solutioncash annual incentive award for the North America business2018 as well as the capital, focus, and resources to support growth of Avon Products, Inc. through the executiona result of the Transformation Plan. The steps we have takenCompany not meeting our performance goals (other than an employment inducement award to our new CEO of aone-time minimum 2018 annual incentive of 50% of target)

66% of the performance-based restricted stock units awards granted in 2016 have laid the foundation for further progressthat were eligible to vest in improving and growing the business.early 2019 based on our relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) performance were forfeited due to underperformance.

The following factors support our recommendation to approve the compensation of our NEOs:

 

 · 

Our programs are designed to support anddrive shortshort- and long-term, externally communicated business transformation objectives. Further, an analysis of our programs demonstrates astrong and direct link between realizable pay and performance.

 

 · 

Ourprogram design incorporates shareholder feedback received during recent outreach campaigns.

 

 · 

Our long-term incentive plan design isaligned with shareholder value, requiring significant stock price appreciation before target awards are realized. As a result, we have delivered long-term incentive compensation targets for our NEOs well below those delivered in the prior year.target.

 

 · 

We have also maintained a focus onlimiting shareholder dilution.

 

 · 

We benchmark our executives’ pay against apeer group that better reflects Avon’s business following the separation of our North America business.business.

Key features of our 2016 compensation programs that demonstrate the further improved alignment of executive compensation with the interests of our shareholders and transformation goals including the following:

·Annual incentive plan: We directly link pay with performance by choosing metrics aligned with financial goals and our Transformation Plan. All metrics, including our strategic objectives, have threshold, target and maximum attainment levels and are quantitatively derived. For 2016, bonus payouts for all NEOs are tied only to these quantitative results.

·Long-term incentive plan: Changes to our long-term incentive plan for 2016 were thoughtfully made in order to better align compensation with shareholders’ interests, minimize dilution and reflect the investment made by Cerberus. As a result, significant stock price improvement is required in order for senior officers to realize target long-term compensation. For 2016, the following are the key features of our long-term incentive plan:

·Use of stock price divisor of $5.00, a price consistent with the Cerberus investment, rather than the actual, lower stock price on the grant date ($4.22), to determine the number of shares granted to senior officers. This methodology resulted in a reduction in the delivered grant date fair value and also reduced shareholder dilution.

·Incorporated premium-priced stock options with a significantly higher exercise price than the actual stock price at grant, to be exercisable and vest ratably over three years. Shares were converted to premium-priced stock options using a 2.5 to 1 ratio rather than the accounting fair value ratio in order to further reduce shareholder dilution.

·Included performance-based restricted stock units (“Performance RSUs”) tied to relative Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”), with above median performance required before target payouts are achieved.

·Restored the performance period for Performance RSUs to three years based on relative TSR goals.

·Pay for Performance:We believe that our programs deliver compensation to our executives reflecting performance over time. The 2016 annual incentive plan paid out at approximately 53% of target, and the realized value of the 2014-2016 Performance RSUs was approximately 31% of the targeted award value. The actions above resulted in a 31% reduction in our CEO’s delivered long-term incentive compensation fair value for 2016 compared to the prior year.

For 2017, we are committed to maintainingensuring that Avon’s pay framework, particularly our incentive programs, are aligned with and reflect the strong alignmentmost important task of our executive pay programs withteam – returning our shareholders’ interests, while ensuringbusiness to profitable growth. For 2019, we can attractcontinue our commitment to improved financial and retain key talent inoperating performance and tying executive compensation opportunity to the organization. As such, we believeachievement of our goals. The Committee believes that many elements of the 2016 design remainscurrent incentive program remain appropriate, as it has strong performance elements that support our three-year Transformation Planexternally communicated business goals and requires significant stock price appreciation for executives to realize target compensation. Ascompensation, with a result,few adjustments to further strengthen their alignment with Avon’s strategic direction and focus on delivering the details of our compensation programs for 2017 are not significantly different from 2016.

turnaround strategy with urgency.

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  6771


In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Board recommends a vote in favor of the following advisory resolution:

RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission under Item 402 of RegulationS-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the executive compensation tables and related narrative discussion.

This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the principles, policies, and practices described in this Proxy Statement. Although the vote isnon-binding, the Committee will review and consider the voting results in connection with evaluating and structuring our executive compensation program.

 

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS

that you vote FOR approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

 

72AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL 3—APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) Has Adopted and Recommends a Vote “FOR” Approval of the

Avon Products, Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated as of May 16, 2019)

 

68

Executive Summary of Proposal and Selected Plan Information

Introduction:

On March 13, 2019, upon the recommendation of the Compensation and Management Development Committee, the Board approved the Avon Products, Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, amended and restated as of May 16, 2019 (prior to such restatement, the “2016 Plan”, and as amended and restated, the “Amended and Restated 2016 Plan”), subject to shareholder approval at the 2019 Annual Meeting. The 2016 Plan was originally approved by shareholders on May 26, 2016 (the “Original Effective Date”). The 2016 Plan is the only plan under which equity-based compensation may currently be awarded to our key employees andnon-employee directors.

We believe that the adoption of the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan is necessary in order to allow Avon to continue to utilize equity awards, including performance awards, to attract, retain and motivate key employees and to further align the interests of our employees with those of Avon’s shareholders.

If approved by our shareholders, the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan will become effective on May 16, 2019 (the “Restatement Effective Date”). If our shareholders do not approve the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan, the 2016 Plan will remain in effect in its current form.

The primary changes effectuated by this amendment and restatement are:

   Establishing a new share reserve of 20,451,976 shares of common stock as of the Restatement Effective Date, which includes a request for 5,000,000 additional shares and 15,451,976 unused shares under the 2016 Plan as of March 15, 2019, with a new fungible ratio pursuant to which each option and stock appreciation right (SAR) will count as one (1) share and each full-value award (i.e., an award other than an option or SAR) will count as 1.35 shares;

   The expansion of theone-year minimum vesting provision to apply to all awards under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan (not solely to stock options and SARs); and

   The prohibition of payment of dividends and dividend equivalents prior to full vesting of the underlying award.

The incremental share request of 5,000,000 shares is conservative because the aggregate reserve under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan is projected to enable us to make equity awards only for one year. However, it reflects a deliberate and conscious decision by the Compensation and Management Development Committee to (i) structure and deliver equity awards in a manner that incentivizes and rewards performance, while mitigating shareholder dilution and (ii) enable shareholders another opportunity tore-assess the size of the reserve at the 2020 Annual Meeting, pending Avon’s transformation under the Open Up strategy and future stock price performance. Accordingly, the conservative incremental share request reinforces the alignment of the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan with our shareholders’ interests.

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement73


Proposed Share Reserve as of the Restatement Effective Date:

If the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan is approved by shareholders then, as of the Restatement Effective Date, the total number of shares of common stock that may be made subject to awards under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan is 20,451,976 shares of common stock, which includes a request for 5,000,000 additional shares and 15,451,976 unused shares under the 2016 Plan as of March 15, 2019,less one (1) share for every one (1) share that is subject to an option or SAR granted after March 15, 2019 and 1.35 shares for every one (1) share that is subject to a full-value award granted after March 15, 2019.

The proposed share reserve is subject to adjustment for certain events as more fully described below.

Impact on Dilution and Expected Duration:

Our Board recognizes the impact of dilution on our shareholders and has evaluated this share request very carefully in the context of the need to motivate, retain and ensure our leadership team is focused on our strategic and long-term growth priorities. Equity is an important component of a compensation program that aligns with our strategy of achieving long-term, sustainable growth. The total potential voting power dilution, assuming that the entire share reserve is granted in the form of stock options or SARs, would be 11.1%, and the total potential voting power dilution assuming the share reserve is granted in the form of only full-value awards would be 10.1%.1 The Company’s historical practice, which is not currently expected to change, has been to grant a combination of stock options and full-value awards, resulting in potential dilution between these two levels. Our Board believes that the increase in shares of common stock available for issuance represents a reasonable amount of potential equity dilution given our strategic and long-term growth priorities.

Based on our historical share usage, we currently expect the proposed share reserve will enable us to make equity awards for one year. Expectations regarding future share usage could be impacted by a number of factors such as award type mix; hiring and promotion activity at the executive level; the rate at which shares are returned to the Plan’s reserve under permitted addbacks; the future performance of our stock price; the consequences of acquiring other companies; and other factors. While we believe that the assumptions we used are reasonable, future share usage may differ from current expectations.

Governance Highlights of the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan:

The Amended and Restated 2016 Plan incorporates certain compensation governance provisions that reflect best and prevalent practices. These include:

   Minimum vesting period of one year from the date of grant for all awards under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan, subject to certain limited exceptions;

   Minimum 100% fair market value exercise price for options and SARs;

   No repricing of options or SARs and no cash buyout of underwater options and SARs without shareholder approval;

   No “liberal” share recycling for any options or stock appreciation rights under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan;

   No dividends or dividend equivalents paid out currently on unearned awards;

   No dividend equivalents on options or SARs;

   No evergreen provision;

   No “liberal” change in control definition;

   “Double-trigger” vesting for change in control benefits;

74AVON 2019 Proxy Statement  


   No excise taxgross-up on change in control benefits; and

   Clawback provisions.

Date of Plan Expiration:

The Amended and Restated 2016 Plan will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the Restatement Effective Date (i.e., on May 16, 2029), unless terminated earlier by the Board, but awards granted prior to such date may extend beyond that date.

PROPOSAL 3—FREQUENCY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ADVISORY VOTE

In accordance

(1)

As shown in the table below under “Dilution”, total potential voting power dilution is calculated as (equity awards outstanding + shares available for grant) / (common stock outstanding + equity awards outstanding + shares available for grant), each calculated as of March 15, 2019.

Burn Rate

The following table sets forth information regarding awards granted, the burn rate for each of the last three fiscal years and the average burn rate over the last three years under the 2016 Plan, the 2013 Plan and the 2010 Plan. The burn rate has been calculated as the quotient of (i) the sum of (x) all stock options/SARs granted in such year and (y) service-based restricted stock units (“Service-based RSUs”) granted, and the number of performance-based restricted stock units (“Performance RSUs”) earned in such year, divided by (ii) the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding at the end of such year. The Service-based RSUs and Performance RSUs are adjusted using a multiplier of 1.5 options per share, based on the methodology used by Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) and the Company’s3-year average volatility.

 

BURN RATE

(Shares in thousands)

 
   

 

Year Ended December 31,

     
   2018         2017         2016           

Options/SARs granted

   5,952,000      6,785,000      6,059,000     

Service-based RSUs granted

   3,033,000      2,813,000      2,150,000     

Performance RSUs earned (1)

   1,046,648      1,490,501      2,244,047      3-Year     

Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding

   441,948,665      439,700,000      437,000,000      

 

Average    

 

 

 

Burn rate(2)

   2.73%      3.01%      2.89%      2.88%   

(1)

With respect to Performance RSUs in the table above, we calculate the burn rate based on the applicable number of sharesearnedeach year. For reference, the Performance RSUsgranted during the foregoing3-year period were as follows: 1,501,000 shares in 2018, 1,869,000 shares in 2017 and 1,578,000 shares in 2016.

(2)

Burn rate is calculated as (options granted + restricted stock/RSUs granted + Performance RSUs earned) / weighted average shares outstanding. All restricted stock/RSUs granted and Performance RSUs earned are adjusted using a multiplier of 1.5 options per share (based on the ISS methodology and the Company’s3-year average volatility of December 31, 2018).

Dilution

As of March 15, 2019, our capital structure consists of 441.6 million weighted average shares of common stock outstanding and 435,000 shares of Series C preferred stock. The table below represents our potential voting power dilution levels based on our common stock outstanding and shares that may be made subject to awards pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan as of March 15, 2019. Our Board believes that the requested shares of common stock under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan represents a reasonable amount of potential equity dilution, which will allow us to continue awarding equity incentives, an important component of our overall compensation program.

This conclusion is based, in part, on advice received from Pay Governance based on an analysis of the equity grant practices of companies within our industry classification and with a market capitalization that is similar to ours.

Potential Voting Power Dilution Assuming 20,451,976 Shares Available as of March 15,
2019:
Potential Voting
Power Dilution

Equity awards outstanding as of March 15, 2019 (1)

34,444,249  

Shares available for grant under the 2016 Plan as of March 15, 2019

15,451,976  

Proposed additional shares under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan, subject to shareholder approval

        5,000,000  

Total Potential Voting Power Dilution

54,896,22511.1% (2)

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement75


(1)

The amounts included for Performance RSU awards are based on target performance for 2017, 2018, and 2019 awards that are payable only upon the satisfaction of performance measures. Amounts exclude 442,780 SARs and 225,568 Service-based RSUs and Performance RSUs, which will settle only in cash in accordance with local law requirements. Includes 683,400 outstanding stock options, 600,000 outstanding Service-based RSUs and 1,010,00 outstanding performance-based RSUs granted to our Chief Executive Officer in February and March 2018 asoutside-the-plan employment inducement awards, which will not be settled under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan or the predecessor plan.

(2)

Total potential voting power dilution is calculated as (equity awards outstanding + shares available for grant) / (common stock outstanding + equity awards outstanding + shares available for grant) as of March 15, 2019.

Overhang Data as of March 15, 2019

The following table sets forth certain information as of March 15, 2019 with respect to the Company’s existing equity compensation plans:

  Stock Options/Stock-Settled SARs Outstanding

20,153,838

  Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Stock Options/SARs

$6.69

  Weighted-Average Remaining Term of Outstanding Stock Options/SARs

7.94

  Total Stock-Settled Full-Value Awards Outstanding

14,290,411

  Basic common shares outstanding as of the record date (3/27/2019)

442,504,364

Summary of the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan

The following is a summary of certain material features of the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan, which is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete terms of the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan attached as Appendix A. The closing price of a share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) on March 27, 2019 was $2.98. If the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan is approved by shareholders then, as of the Restatement Effective Date, the total number of shares of common stock that may be made subject to awards under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan is 20,451,976 shares of common stock, lessone (1) share for every one (1) share that is subject to an option or SAR granted after March 15, 2019 and 1.35 shares for every one (1) share that is subject to a full-value award granted after March 15, 2019. The Amended and Restated 2016 Plan provides for the grant of options intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 14A422 of the Code, nonqualified stock options, SARs, restricted share awards, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance awards and other stock-based awards. The terms and conditions of each award, as determined by the Committee, will be set forth in a written award agreement.

Purpose

The purpose of the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan is to:

Encourage share ownership and align compensation with performance results and shareholder interests;

Promote decision-making that is consistent with long-term Company and shareholder goals; and

Provide competitive incentive compensation sufficient to attract, retain and motivate key employees and directors of the Company.

Although the use of equity is an important part of our compensation program, we are mindful of our responsibility to our shareholders in granting equity awards.

Eligible Participants

Key employees andnon-employee directors are eligible participants (the “Participants”). A key employee is any person, including an officer, employed by us or any of our subsidiaries who is or is expected to be responsible for the management, growth or protection of some aspect of the business or who makes, or is expected to make, a contribution to the Company or its subsidiaries. Currently, the 10non-employee directors and approximately 352 key employees would potentially be eligible to receive awards under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan. The Committee may grant one or more awards to any Participant designated by it to receive an award.

Plan Administration

The Amended and Restated 2016 Plan will be administered by the Compensation and Management Development Committee or such other committee appointed by the Board to administer the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan, (i) each member of which must be “independent” under the rules of the NYSE, (ii) to the extent relevant, at least two members of which must satisfy the criteria for being an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and (iii) at least two members of which must satisfy the criteria for being a“non-employee director” for purposes of Rule16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended we(the “Exchange Act”); however, the Board or the Nominating and Corporate

76AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


Governance Committee of the Board will administer the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan with respect to awards tonon-employee directors (the applicable committee is referred to herein as the “Committee”). The Committee will have full and complete authority, in its sole and absolute discretion, to (i) exercise all of the powers granted to it under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan, (ii) construe, interpret and implement the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan and any related document, (iii) prescribe, amend and rescind rules relating to the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan, (iv) make all determinations necessary or advisable in administering the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan, and (v) correct any defect, supply any omission and reconcile any inconsistency in the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan. The Committee may delegate the approval of certain transactions to subcommittees consisting solely of members of the Committee who are seeking“outside directors” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code or“non-employee directors” for purposes of Rule16b-3 under the Exchange Act.

With respect to key employees (other than certain senior officers), the Committee may delegate authority to a member of the Board (or committee thereof) or an executive officer to select Participants and make grants, subject to terms and conditions determined by the Committee. For example, the Committee typically establishes the aggregate number of shares that may be subject to annual andnon-binding,off-cycle advisory voteequity grants and the terms and conditions of such awards, and has delegated to the Chief Executive Officer, as director, the authority to determine the Participants and the number of shares subject to each award.

Available Shares as of the Restatement Effective Date

Subject to certain adjustments set forth in the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan, as of the Restatement Effective Date, the total number of shares of common stock that may be made subject to awards under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan is 20,451,976 shares of common stock,less one (1) share for every one (1) share that is subject to an option or SAR granted after March 15, 2019 and 1.35 shares for every one (1) share that is subject to a full-value award granted after March 15, 2019. In addition, the maximum number of shares under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan that may be made subject to Incentive Stock Options is 20,451,976.

After March 15, 2019, if (i) any shares of stock subject to an award are forfeited, an award expires or an award is settled for cash (in whole or in part), or (ii) any shares of stock subject to an award under any Prior Plan are forfeited, an award under any Prior Plan expires or is settled for cash (in whole or in part), then in each such case the shares of stock subject to such award or an award under any Prior Plan shall, to the extent of such forfeiture, expiration or cash settlement, be added to the shares available for awards under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan. After March 15, 2019, in the event that withholding tax liabilities arising from our shareholders (the“Say-on-Frequency Vote”) on how oftena full-value award or a full-value award under any Prior Plan are satisfied by the tendering of shares of common stock (either actually or by attestation) or by the withholding of shares of common stock by the Company, should holdthe shares so tendered or withheld shall be added to the shares available for awards under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan. (References to a “Prior Plan” means the Company’s Amended and Restated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan and the Company’s 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.)

Any shares of stock that again become available for awards under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan shall be added as (i) one (1) share for every one (1) share subject to options or SARs, and (ii) as 1.35 shares for every one (1) share subject to awards other than options or SARs.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the following shares shall not be added to the shares authorized for grant under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan: (i) shares tendered by the Participant or withheld by the Company in payment of the purchase price of an option or an option under any Prior Plan, (ii) shares tendered by the Participant or withheld by the Company to satisfy any tax withholding obligation with respect to an option or SAR under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan or under any Prior Plan, (iii) shares subject to a SAR or a SAR under any Prior Plan that are not issued in connection with its stock settlement on exercise thereof, and (iv) shares reacquired by the Company on the open market or otherwise using cash proceeds from the exercise of options or options under any Prior Plan. Awards that will be mandatorily settled in cash shall not count against the authorized share limit.

In the event that the Company or its subsidiaries makes an acquisition or is a party to a merger or consolidation and the Company assumes the options or other awards consistent with the purpose of the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan of the entity acquired, merged or consolidated which are administered pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan, shares of stock subject to the assumed options or other awards shall not count as part of the total number of shares of stock that may be made subject to awards under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan.

Equitable Adjustments

In the event any change in or affecting our outstanding shares of common stock occurs by reason of a stock dividend, spinoff or split, merger or consolidation, recapitalization, reorganization, combination or exchange of shares or other similar corporate changes or any extraordinary dividend in cash, securities or other property, the Board will make appropriate adjustments to the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan and/or to outstanding awards, which may include changes in the number of remaining shares under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan, the number of remaining shares (or other property) subject to outstanding awards, and the maximum number of shares that may be granted or delivered to any single Participant. Such equitable adjustments as they relate to outstanding awards will be required to ensure that the intrinsic value of each outstanding award immediately after any of the aforementioned changes in, or affecting the shares of common stock, is equal to the intrinsic value of each outstanding award immediately prior to any of the aforementioned changes.

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement77


Participant Limits

Subject to certain adjustments set forth in the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan, the following limits will apply to awards of the specified type granted to any one Participant in any single fiscal year:

Appreciation Awards—Options and SARs: 2,500,000 shares;

Full Value Awards—Restricted Stock, Stock Units, Performance Awards and/or Other Stock-Based Awards that are denominated in shares of common stock: 2,500,000 shares; and

Cash Awards—Performance Awards that are denominated in cash: $10,000,000.

In applying the foregoing limits, (a) all awards of the specified type granted to the same Participant in the same fiscal year will be aggregated and made subject to one limit; (b) the limits applicable to options and SARs refer to the number of shares of stock subject to those awards; (c) the share limit on full-value awards refers to the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be delivered assuming a maximum payout; and (d) the dollar limit on cash awards refers to the maximum dollar amount payable under an award or awards assuming a maximum payout.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the maximum number of shares of common stock subject to awards granted during a single fiscal year to anynon-employee director shall not exceed $500,000 in total value (calculating the value of any such awards based on the grant date fair value of such Awards for financial reporting purposes).

Minimum Vesting Requirement

Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, awards granted under the Plan (other than cash-based awards) shall vest no earlier than the first anniversary of the date on which the award is granted; provided, that the following awards shall not be subject to the foregoing minimum vesting requirement: any (i) substitute awards granted in connection with awards that are assumed, converted or substituted pursuant to a merger, acquisition or similar transaction entered into by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, (ii) shares of common stock delivered in lieu of fully vested cash awards, (iii) awards tonon-employee directors that vest on earlier of theone-year anniversary of the date of grant and the next annual meeting of shareholders which is at least 50 weeks after the immediately preceding year’s annual meeting, and (iv) any additional awards the Committee may grant, up to a maximum of five percent (5%) of the available share reserve authorized for issuance under the Plan. The foregoing restriction does not apply to the Committee’s discretion to provide for accelerated exercisability or vesting of any award, including in cases of retirement, death, disability or a change in control.

Awards

The Amended and Restated 2016 Plan authorizes grants of a variety of awards described below. The Committee, or the Board or the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board with respect tonon-employee directors, determines the terms and conditions of each award at the time of grant, including whether payment of awards may be subject to the achievement of performance goals, consistent with the provisions of the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan.

Stock Units

A stock unit entitles a Participant to receive, at a specified future advisory votesdate, shares of common stock or an amount equal to the fair market value of a specified number of shares of common stock.

Stock units may be subject to service or performance conditions.

Payments in respect of stock units may be made in shares, cash or a combination of both, in the Committee’s discretion.

A Participant may be credited with dividend equivalents, i.e., an amount equal to the cash or stock dividends or other distributions that would be paid on compensation for our NEOs similarshares covered by an award if such shares were issued and outstanding on the dividend record date.

Any dividend equivalents with respect to Proposal 2. ThisSay-on-Frequency Votean award of stock units will be subject to the same restrictions as such award and, if the Committee determines that dividend equivalents will be credited with respect to an unvested award, such dividend equivalents will be accumulated and paid once, and to the extent that, the underlying award vests and any performance goals (if applicable) are attained.

Stock Options/SARs

A stock option entitles a Participant to purchase a specified number of shares of common stock at a specified exercise price, subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine.

Stock options may be subject to service or performance conditions.

78AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


A SAR entitles a Participant to receive a payment measured by the excess of the fair market value of a specified number of shares of common stock on the date on which the Participant exercises the SAR over a specified grant price, subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine.

The applicable exercise or grant price may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant, unless granted through the assumption or substitution of awards previously granted to individuals who become employees of the Company through a corporate transaction.

Stock options and SARs generally terminate after ten years from the date of grant.

At the time of exercise, the option price must be submittedpaid in full in cash or, if the award agreement or award program provides, by delivery of shares or in a cashless exercise through a broker or similar arrangement, depending on the terms of the award.

Incentive stock options are subject to additional limitations set forth in the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan and the Code.

Restricted Stock

Restricted stock awards are shares of common stock that are issued to a Participant subject to transfer and other restrictions as the Committee may determine, such as the continued employment of the Participant and, in some instances, performance conditions, and in each case may be forfeited if the prescribed conditions are not met.

During the restricted period, shares of restricted stock arenon-transferable but have all the attributes of outstanding shares of common stock. However, dividends and any other distributions on the shares will be accumulated, with or without interest, or reinvested in additional shares during the restricted period, depending on the terms of the award, but in any event will be held subject to the same restrictions to which the underlying shares of restricted stock are subject (and will vest or be forfeited at the same time that the underlying shares of restricted stock vest or are forfeited, as applicable).

Once shares of restricted stock are no longer subject to forfeiture, the shares and any withheld dividends will be delivered to the Participant.

Performance Awards

The Amended and Restated 2016 Plan also provides for the grant of cash and equity-based performance awards.

Performance awards may be settled in shares of common stock (including shares of restricted stock) or cash or a combination thereof.

The award agreement relating to a performance award will provide, in the manner determined by the Committee, for the vesting of such performance award if the specified performance measures are satisfied or met during the specified performance period and for the forfeiture of such award if the specified performance measures are not satisfied or met during the specified performance period.

Any dividends or dividend equivalents with respect to a performance award will be subject to the same restrictions as such performance award and, if the Committee determines that dividends or dividend equivalents will be credited with respect to an unvested performance award, such dividends or dividend equivalents will be accumulated and paid once, and to the extent that, the underlying performance award vests and any performance goals are attained.

Dividend Equivalents

May be granted in tandem with another award or as a separate award, but may not be granted in connection with stock options/SARs.

Dividend equivalents shall be withheld until the lapsing of any restrictions thereon or until the vesting, exercise, payment, settlement or other lapse of restrictions on the award to which the dividend equivalents relate.

Other Stock-Based Awards

Other types of stock-based awards may also be granted so long as they are consistent with the purpose of the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan.

Special terms may apply for awards to Participants who are foreign nationals, or who are employed outside of the United States, as the Committee considers necessary or appropriate to accommodate differences in local law, tax policy, or custom.

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement79


Performance Measures

The Committee may grant awards that will be paid solely on the attainment of certain performance goals established by the Committee based on the performance criteria set forth in the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan.

The performance measures may include (without limitation) one or more of the following criteria on a consolidated basis, on the basis of a subsidiary, business unit or geographically based unit or relative to one or more peer group companies or indices, which can be expressed either in terms of specified levels of, rates of change or relative changes in, one or more of the following measures: (a) share price; (b) earnings per share, diluted or basic; (c) return to shareholders (including dividends); (d) revenues; (e) sales by category or brand; (f) active representatives; (g) sales representatives; (h) ending representatives; (i) units sold; (j) customers; (k) sales representative productivity; (l) earnings before or after deduction for all or any portion of interest, taxes, depreciation, or amortization, whether or not on a continuing operations or an aggregate or per share basis; (m) operating income or operating profit; (n) net income; (o) gross margin; (p) operating margin; (q) economic profit; (r) cash flows from operations, free cash flow, cash flow return on capital, working capital; (s) market share; (t) inventory levels; (u) inventory days outstanding; (v) order fill rate; (w) size of line in total or by category or type; (x) advertising, brand and product innovation; (y) research and development; (z) costs; (aa) capital expenditures; (bb) working capital; (cc) accounts receivable; (dd) days sales outstanding; (ee) period overhead; (ff) sales representative satisfaction; (gg) return on investment, assets, equity or capital (total or invested); or (hh) any other objective or subjective criteria specified by the Committee.

The preceding criteria shall be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles to the extent applicable or be subject to adjustments as may be specified by the Committee including (without limitation) for (a) discontinued operations; (b) acquisitions and mergers; (c) divestitures, including exits of markets and/or categories; (d) cumulative effect of changes in accounting rules and methods and tax laws; (e) impairment or disposal losses; (f) restructuring costs; (g) pension expense or contribution in excess of operating budget; (h) business losses from economic, political and legal changes; (i) retained and uninsured losses from natural disaster or catastrophe; (j) currency fluctuations or devaluations; (k) significant litigation or claim judgments or settlements; (l) debt refinancing costs or gains, including related bank and legal fees and costs to unwind existing structure; (m) other extraordinary, unusual, infrequently occurring and/or nonrecurring events; (n) an event either not directly related to the operations of the Company, subsidiary, division, business segment or business unit or not within the reasonable control of management; (o) a change in the fiscal year of the Company; or (p) any other adjustments specified by the Committee.

Clawback

Awards and shares of stock issued pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan are subject to forfeiture in the event that a Participant engages in misconduct, including (i) a serious violation of our Code of Conduct or (ii) a violation of law within the scope of employment with the Company. The Board of Directors has adopted an additional clawback policy that applies to incentive awards made to certain Participants, including our named executive officers. Under the policy, in the event of a financial restatement, material incorrect calculations of performance metrics or misconduct, the Committee is authorized to recover awards.

In addition, in the event a Participant violates noncompetition, nonsolicitation, or nondisclosure obligations specified in an award agreement, all awards and shares issued to the Participant will be forfeited.

Repricings Prohibited

Repricings of stock options and SARs are not permitted without shareholder approval. A “repricing” means reducing the exercise price or grant price, canceling the award and granting replacement awards at least once every six years.

Shareholders may cast their vote on their preferred voting frequency by choosinga time when the option or SAR price is equal to or more than the market value of every one year,the underlying stock, or repurchasing the award for cash at a time when the exercise price or grant price is equal to or more than the fair market value of the underlying stock, in each case other than in the context of an equitable adjustment or a change in control.

Change in Control

In the event of a change in control, the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan provides for unvested awards that are assumed or otherwise replaced in the change in control to become fully vested and payable upon a “double trigger,” i.e., upon certain terminations of employment without “cause” or for “good reason” within two years or three years, or they may abstain from voting on this proposal. The frequencyafter a change in control. “Change in control” is defined generally as an event that receives the highest number of votes cast by shareholders at the Annual Meeting willwould be considered thenon-binding, advisory vote of our shareholders.

We last held an advisory vote on the frequencya change in control under Section 409A of the executive compensation advisoryCode and the 409A regulations and which includes:

the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of more than 50% of the outstanding stock of the Company, measured by vote during our 2011 Annual Meetingor value;

the acquisition by a person or group that acquires, within a12-month period, 30% or more of Shareholders. During this meeting, the Board recommended, and total voting power of the outstanding stock of the Company;

a majority of shareholders votedour Board of Directors is replaced during any12-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board of Directors before the date of the appointment or election; or

80AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


a sale of a substantial portion of the Company’s assets (40% or more of the total gross fair market value) within a12-month period, unless the recipient of the assets is (i) a subsidiary 50% or more of the total value or voting power of which is owned by the Company, (ii) Company shareholder(s) owning 50% or more of the total value or voting power of the Company, or (iii) an entity of which at least 50% of the total value or voting power is owned by such Company shareholder(s) described in (ii); provided that the assets are not distributed to a Company shareholder in exchange for common stock.

In addition, the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan provides that unvested awards that are not assumed or otherwise replaced in the change in control become fully vested and paid upon a change in control. In such case, awards subject to the achievement of performance goals will be fully vested and paid as if the performance goals had been achieved at target.

Amendments and Termination

The Board may at any time amend, suspend or terminate the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan. However, it may not, unless otherwise provided under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan, without the approval of shareholders:

Increase the number of shares available for awards under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan;

Change the class of eligible Participants;

Reduce the basis upon which the minimum stock option exercise price or SAR grant price is determined;

Extend the period within which awards may be granted beyond the tenth anniversary of the date of shareholder approval;

Provide for a frequencystock option or SAR to be exercisable more than ten years from the date of one year. As a result,grant;

Amend the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan to eliminate the prohibition on repricing; or

Amend the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan without shareholder approval if shareholder approval is required by applicable law.

Under these provisions, shareholder approval would not necessarily be required for all possible amendments that might increase the past six years,costs of the Board has determined to hold an annual advisory vote on executive compensation.

After careful considerationAmended and continuous dialogue with shareholders, the Board maintains its recommendation that you vote to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation every year. We continue to believe that an annual vote will facilitate frequent input and discussions with shareholders on executive compensation and corporate governance matters and is consistent with our policy of reviewing our compensation program annually.

Although this advisory vote isnon-binding, the Board and Compensation and Management Development Committee value the opinion of our shareholders and will consider carefully the results of this vote in making a determination about the frequency of future executive compensation advisory votes. Notwithstanding the Board’s present recommendation and the voting results,Restated 2016 Plan. In addition, the Board may not, without the consent of the person affected, make any amendments that would impair the rights of a Participant other than as provided in the terms of an award, except to the extent provided in the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan or in the award agreement or award program.

Term of Plan

No awards may be made under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan after the tenth anniversary of the Restatement Effective Date.

New Plan Benefits

The benefits and amounts that will be received by or allocated to participants under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan are not yet determinable because the types and amounts of awards and selection of participants are subject to the Committee’s future decide to conduct advisory votes ondetermination.

Tax Matters

The following is a different frequency basisbrief summary of the principal United States federal income tax consequences of awards under the Amended and may vary its practiceRestated 2016 Plan. This summary is based on future discussionsthe law as in effect on March 27, 2019. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive and does not describe state, local or foreign tax laws.

Stock Awards. The tax consequences of stock awards under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan are generally as follows: (i) a recipient of a restricted stock award generally must recognize as ordinary income the value of any shares at the time the restrictions lapse plus the amount of dividends to which the Participant then becomes entitled; although the holder of a restricted stock award may make a “Section 83(b) election” if permitted by the Company, in which case the value of shares would be taxable at grant at ordinary income tax rates; (ii) a recipient of a stock unit award will generally recognize ordinary income at the time of payment equal to the value of the underlying shares or cash paid; and (iii) a recipient of an unrestricted stock award generally must recognize as ordinary income the value of the shares at the time of grant. In each of the foregoing cases, the Company will generally be entitled to a corresponding federal income tax deduction at the same time the Participant recognized ordinary income, subject to the limitations of Section 162(m). If the Participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally would be subject to withholding and employment taxes.

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement81


Non-Qualified Stock Options. The grant of anon-qualified stock option (i.e., a stock option that is not an incentive stock option) will not result in any immediate tax consequences to the Company or the Participant. Upon the exercise of anon-qualified stock option, the Participant will recognize ordinary income, and we will be entitled to a deduction, equal to the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the shares of common stock acquired at the time of exercise, subject to the limitations of Section 162(m). If thenon-qualified stock option were granted in connection with shareholders and/employment, this taxable income would also constitute “wages” subject to withholding and employment taxes. The foregoing summary assumes that any shares acquired upon exercise of anon-qualified option are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. Any gain or changesloss upon a subsequent sale or exchange of the shares will be capital gain or loss, long-term or short-term, depending on how long the shares have been held.

Incentive Stock Options. The grant of an incentive stock option will not result in any immediate tax consequences to the Company or the Participant. In addition, a Participant will not recognize ordinary income, and we will not be entitled to any deduction, upon the exercise of an incentive stock option while the Participant is an employee or within three months following termination of employment (longer, in the case of disability or death). In such event, the excess of the fair market value of the shares acquired over the exercise price will be includible only in the Participant’s alternative minimum taxable income for the year of exercise for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. If the Participant does not dispose of the shares acquired within one year after their receipt (and within two years after the option was granted), gain or loss recognized on the subsequent disposition of the shares will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss. Capital losses of individuals are deductible only against capital gains and a limited amount of taxable ordinary income. In the event of an earlier disposition, the Participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price; or (ii) if the disposition is a taxable sale or exchange, the amount of any gain realized. Any additional gain to the Participant will be treated as capital gain, long-term or short-term, depending on how long the shares have been held. Upon such a disqualifying disposition, we will be entitled to a deduction in the same amount and at the same time as the Participant recognizes such ordinary income, subject to the limitations of Section 162(m). A Participant’s stock options otherwise qualifying as incentive stock options would be treated for tax purposes asnon-qualified options to the extent that, in the aggregate, they first become exercisable in any calendar year for stock having a fair market value (determined as of the date of grant) in excess of $100,000.

Stock Appreciation Rights. The grant of either a tandem SAR or a freestanding SAR will not result in any immediate tax consequences to the Company or the grantee. Upon the exercise of either a tandem SAR or a freestanding SAR, any cash received and the fair market value on the exercise date of any shares received will constitute taxable ordinary income to the grantee. We will be entitled to a deduction in the same amount and at the same time, subject to the limitations of Section 162(m). If the SAR were granted in connection with employment, this taxable income would also constitute “wages” subject to withholding and employment taxes.

Dividend Equivalents. Dividend equivalents generally will be taxed at ordinary income rates when paid. In most instances, they will be treated as additional compensation that the Company may be able to deduct at that time, subject to the limitations of Section 162(m).

Withholding. Applicable taxes required by law will be withheld from all amounts paid in satisfaction of an award. Under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan, the amount of withholding to be paid in respect ofnon-qualified options exercised through the cashless method in which all shares are sold immediately after exercise will be determined by reference to the price at which the shares are sold.

Section 162(m).Section 162(m) generally limits the deductible amount of annual compensation paid by a public company to a “covered employee” (i.e., the CEO, the CFO and any of the three other most highly paid executive officers) to no more than $1 million. For taxable years beginning prior to December 31, 2017, amounts payable upon exercise of stock options and SARs, which were granted at an exercise price of not less than fair market value at their date of grant, as well as amounts payable solely upon satisfaction of performance objectives pursuant to a Section 162(m) compliant plan, were generally exempt from the $1 million deduction limitation. However, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “TCJA”) repealed the Section 162(m) performance-based compensation exception effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. The TCJA provides transition relief for certain arrangements in effect on November 2, 2017 that are not modified in any material respect on or after that date, and thus, compensation paid to our executivecovered employees in excess of $1 million generally will not be deductible unless it qualifies for the transition relief. It is possible that performance-based compensation practicesthat was intended to be exempt from the deduction limitation may not meet the requirements to qualify for such exemption.

Section 409A. Section 409A of the Code imposes restrictions on nonqualified deferred compensation. Failure to satisfy these rules results in accelerated taxation, an additional tax to the holder of the amount equal to 20% of the deferred amount and programs.a possible interest charge. Stock options and SARs granted on shares of common stock with an exercise price that is not less than the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant will not give rise to “deferred compensation” for this purpose unless they involve additional deferral features. Stock options and SARs that would be awarded under the Amended and Restated 2016 Plan are intended to be eligible for this exception.

 

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS

that you vote forFOR the option of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation EVERY YEAR.Amended and Restated 2016 Plan.

 

82AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

Plan Category  

Number of Securities

to be Issued Upon

Exercise of

Outstanding Options,

Warrants and Rights

  

Weighted-Average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options,

Warrants and Rights1

   

Number of Securities

Remaining Available for

future Issuance Under

Equity Compensation Plans

(Excluding Securities

Reflected in Column (a))2

 
   (a)  (b)   (c) 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

   24,470,2053   $14.05    31,827,092 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

   2,293,4004    N/A    0 

Total

   26,763,605  $14.05    31,827,092 

1

This reflects the weighted-average exercise price of stock options outstanding at December 31, 2018. Outstanding Service-based RSUsand Performance RSUs are not included as such awards do not have an exercise price. Outstanding stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) are not included as such awards settle in cash only.

2

Amounts reflect the shares available for future issuance under the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”), determined as follows: (i) grants of stock options or SARs reduce the total shares available by each share subject to such an award and (ii) grants of any award of restricted stock, stock units and other stock-based awards (other than stock options and SARs) reduce the total shares available by 2.4 multiplied by each share subject to such an award.

3

These include outstanding awards under the Company’s 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, Amended and Restated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, and 2016 Plan. Amounts include shares underlying stock option awards, Service-based RSU awards and Performance RSU awards. The amounts included for Performance RSUs are based on target performance for 2016, 2017 and 2018 and may be awarded only upon satisfaction of performance measures. Amounts exclude 442,780 SARs and 225,568 Service-based RSUs and Performance RSUs, which will settle only in cash in accordance with local law requirements.

4

Includes 600,000 outstanding Service-based RSUs, 1,010,000 outstanding Performance RSUs, and 683,400 outstanding Stock Options granted to our Chief Executive Officer in February and March of 2018 as anoutside-the-plan employment inducement award, which will not be settled under the 2016 Plan or the predecessor plan.

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  6983


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee (“Committee”(the “Committee”) is composed ofthreenon-employee directors directors and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors and last amended on October 6, 2016. The charter is available on Avon’s website atwww.avoninvestor.com. The investor.avonworldwide.com.The Committee reviews the charter and calendar annually and, together with the Board, amends the charter as appropriate to reflect the evolving role of the Committee. The Committee fulfilled its duties and responsibilities for 2016,2018, as outlined in the charter, which include:

 

reviewing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm major issues regarding accounting principles and financial statement presentations;

 

reviewing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the Company’s annual audited and quarterly consolidated financial statements and earnings press releases;

 

the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm;

 

approving all audit services and allpermittednon-audit services services of the independent registered public accounting firm;

 

reviewing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting;

 

reviewing, evaluating, and, as appropriate, approving or ratifying related person transactions as defined under the applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules;

 

oversight of the performance of the internal audit function;

 

oversight of compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including reports to the Committee regarding the receipt, retention, and treatment of financial reporting and other compliance matters; and

 

oversight of risk management practices.

As set forth under “Information Concerning the Board of Directors—Board Committee”Committees” on page 16,17, the Board has determined that all of the Committee membersMessrs. McMaster and Cornwell are “audit committee financial experts” under the rules of the SEC and that all of the Committee members are independent and financially literate under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).

Management has responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures. Management is also responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), is responsible for auditing the annual financial statements prepared by management and providing their opinions, based on their audit, as to whether the financial statements fairly present, in all material respects, the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and as to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. In addition, PwC’s responsibility is to design and perform their audit to provide reasonable assurance that the Company’s financial statements are free of material misstatements and whetherthat effective internal control over financial reporting waswere maintained in all material respects. It is not the duty of the Committee, or of any of its members, to conduct separate auditing or accounting reviews or provide independent assurance of the Company’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

In this context, the Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and PwC the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and PwC’s opinion regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Committee has also discussed with management and PwC the matters required to be discussed by the rules of the NYSE, the SEC and the charter of the Committee, including the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301 (Communications with Audit Committees) issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). The Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from PwC required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding PwC’s communications with the Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with PwC its independence, including any relationships that may impact their objectivity and independence.

The Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining the independence of PwC. Consistent with its charter, the Committee has evaluated PwC’s qualifications, performance, and independence, including that of the lead audit partner. As part of the auditor engagement process, the Committee also considers whether to rotate the independent registered public accounting firm and leads the selection of the engagement audit partner, working with PwC, with input from management as more fully described in “Proposal 4—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” on page 72.86. The Committee has established a policy pursuant to which all services, auditandnon-audit, provided provided by PwC mustbepre-approved by the Committee or one or more of its members.

 

7084AVON 2019 Proxy Statement  


This policy prohibits PwC from providingcertainnon-audit services services such as bookkeeping or financial systems design and implementation. TheCompany’spre-approval policy policy is more fully described in Proposal 4 on page 72.86. The Committee has concluded that the provision ofthenon-audit services services described in that section was compatible with maintaining the independence of PwC. In addition, the Committee discussed with PwC the overall scope and plans for their audit and reviewed the terms of PwC’s engagement letter. The Committee also reviewed the Company’s internal audit plan. The Committee meets periodically and reviews with the internal auditor and PwC, with and without members of management present, the results of their respective examinations, evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

Based upon the review and discussions described in this report, the members of the Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20162018 be included in the Company’s Annual Report onForm10-K for for 20162018 filed with the SEC.

 

Audit Committee

Charles H. Noski,

Andrew G. McMaster, Jr., Chair

Jose Armario

W. Don Cornwell

Cathy D. Ross

March 16, 201712, 2019

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  7185


PROPOSAL 4—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, UnitedKingdom(“PwC-UK”) to to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019.PwC-UK has audited our accounts since 2017. This is a change from thePrior to that, its U.S. affiliate, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, UnitedStates(“PwC-US”), that began auditingaudited our accounts insince 1989. If the appointmentofPwC-UK as as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year 20172019 is not ratified by shareholders, the Audit Committee will reconsider its appointment.

The reports ofPwC-US on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 did not contain any adverse opinions or disclaimers of opinion, nor was either report qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 and in the subsequent interim period through the date hereof, (i) there were no disagreements withPwC-US on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved toPwC-US’s satisfaction, would have causedPwC-US to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with this report, and (ii) there were no reportable events of the type described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of RegulationS-K.

A member of PwCPwC-UK will be present at the Annual Meeting to answer appropriate questions and to make a statement if he or she desires. In determining whether to appointreappoint PwC-UK as as our independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee took into consideration a number of factors, including including:

the breadth of experience and length oftimePwC-US PwC-UK had(and before that,PwC-US) has been engaged, engaged;

historical and recent performance on the Company’s audit, audit;

familiarity with our global operations and businesses, businesses;

the advisability and potential impact of selecting an entirely different and unaffiliated independent registered public accounting firm,firm;

PwC-UK’s independence independence, and internal quality controls;

the appropriateness of PwC’s fees for its professional services; and

an assessment of the professional qualifications and past performance of the lead audit partner and auditing teamofPwC-US. PwC-UK.

Following this evaluation, the Audit Committee concluded that the selectionofPwC-UK as as the independent registered public accounting firm for 20172019 is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.

A new lead audit partner is designated at least every five years. In line with this, a new lead audit partner was designated for 2015. Because of the change toPwC-UK fromPwC-US, a new lead audit partner has beenlast designated for 2017. The new lead audit partner, a partner inPwC-US with extensive US-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing experience, will be on secondment withPwC-UK. The process for selection of the Company’s new lead audit partner involved meetings between the candidate and the Chair of the Audit Committee and Avon financial management, as well as discussion by the full Audit Committee and with management.

Audit andNon-Audit ServicesPre-Approval Policy

The Audit Committee has established a policy forthepre-approval of of all auditandnon-audit services services by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and its worldwide affiliates (“PwC”), and the corresponding fees, which (i) strictly disallows any service that would be a prohibited service; (ii) allows audit, audit-related, and tax services only if the particular type of service is on the list of types of services that havebeenpre-approved by by the Audit Committee, specific procedures are followed to ensure appropriate management assessment of such service, the proposed fee is within the overall limit set by the Audit Committee for that category of service, and the Audit Committee is informed on a timely basis of each such service; and (iii) allows other services not within any of the foregoing categories only if each such service and the corresponding fee is approved in advance by the Audit Committee or by one or more members of the Audit Committee with subsequent approval by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has reviewed and approved all services provided by PwC, and the amount of fees paid to PwC for audit, audit-related, tax and othersuch services and concluded that the provision of services by PwC is compatible with the maintenance of their independence.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for professional services rendered for us by PwC, as of and for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and December 31, 2015.2017.

 

  

 

2016

 

   

 

2015

 

   

 

2018

  

 

2017                     

 
  

 

(in millions)

 

  (in millions)                                   
Audit Fees  $                        10.5           $               7.4             $            9.5  $            8.5                 
Audit-Related Fees    0.0            0.1                           0.0                 0.0                 
Tax Fees   0.0            0.0                           0.0                 0.0                 
All Other Fees   0.0            0.0                           0.0                 0.1                 
Total  $10.5           $7.5             $            9.5  $            8.6                 

86AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


Audit Fees.These amounts represent the aggregate fees for professional services rendered by PwC for the audit of our annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and December 31, 2015,2017, the review of the financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports onForm10-Q for for those years, and services related to statutory and regulatory filings and engagements for such years. For 2016 and 2015, these amounts include $2.5 million and $0.4 respectively, for which we were reimbursed by New Avon LLC for costs incurred in connection with an audit of the North America business that was separated from the Company in March 2016.

72


Audit-Related Fees. These amounts represent the aggregate fees for assurance and related services performed by PwC that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements. For 20162018 and 2015, these amounts represent fees for audits of pension plans and other consultations regarding statutory reporting standards. For 2016 and 2015,2017, audit-related fees were less than $50,000.de minimis.

Tax Fees. There were no such amounts for tax services rendered by PwC in each of the last two years.

All Other Fees. These amounts represent the aggregate fees for other services rendered by PwC not included in any of the foregoing categories. For 2016 and 2015,2018, all other fees were less than $50,000.de minimis. For 2017, the amount primarily represents fees for strategic consulting services provided by PwC.

 

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS

that you vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, United Kingdom, as independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.2019.

 

 

  LOGOAVON 2019 Proxy Statement  7387


SOLICITING MATERIAL

The Compensation and Management Development Committee Report and the Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 thereof. In addition, they shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any statement that incorporates this Proxy Statement by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference.

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

We are making this solicitation of proxies on behalf of our Board of Directors and will pay the solicitation costs. Our directors, officers and other employees may, without additional compensation except reimbursement for actual expenses, solicit proxies by mail, in person or by telecommunication. In addition, we have retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated at a fee estimated to be approximately $20,000, plus reasonableout-of-pocket expenses, to assist in the solicitation of proxies. We will reimburse brokers, fiduciaries, custodians, and other nominees forout-of-pocket expenses incurred in sending our proxy materials to, and obtaining instructions relating to such materials from, beneficial owners.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 20182020 ANNUAL MEETING

If you are a shareholder and you wish to bring an item of business before the 20182020 Annual Meeting pursuant to ourBy-Laws(other than the nomination of a proxy access nomination,Director candidate to the Board, which is described below), you must notify our Corporate Secretary in writing, at the address set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, after January 9, 201817, 2020 and on or before February 8, 2018.16, 2020. If you wish to have a proposal included in our Proxy Statement and proxy card for the 20182020 Annual Meeting pursuant to the SEC’s Rule14a-8, your proposal must be received by our Corporate Secretary on or before November 30, 2017.December 5, 2019. Your notice must pertain to a proper matter for shareholder action and must comply with ourBy-Laws and with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder.

In order to be properly brought before the 20182020 Annual Meeting, a shareholder’s notice of nomination of one or more director candidates to be included in our Proxy Statement and proxy card pursuant to Section 14(b) of Article 3 of ourBy-Laws (a “proxy access nomination”) must be received by our Corporate Secretary in writing, at the address set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, no earlier than October 31, 2017November 5, 2019 and no later than the close of business on November 30, 2017December 5, 2019 (i.e., no earlier than the close of business on the 150th day and no later than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date our definitive Proxy Statement was first released to shareholders in connection with the preceding year’s annual meeting of shareholders). If the date of the 20182020 Annual Meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to the 20182020 Annual Meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 20182020 Annual Meeting is first made by the Company. To be in proper form, a shareholder’s notice for a proxy access nomination must include the information about the nominee or nominees specified in, and must otherwise comply with, ourBy-Laws. Please also see Section 14(a) of Article 3 of ourBy-Laws for details regarding the nomination of a Director candidate through the Advance Notice Process which is separate from a proxy access nomination.

A copy of theBy-Law procedures is available upon written request to our Corporate Secretary.

INFORMATION REQUESTS

If you make a written request to the Investor Relations Department at Avon Products, Inc., 601 Midland Avenue, Rye,1 Avon Place Suffern, NY 1058010901 by mail or telephone number203-682-8200,212-282-5320, we will provide you without charge, a copy of our Annual Report on Form10-K for 2016,2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our Annual Report on Form10-K for 20162018 is also available without charge on our investor website (www.avoninvestor.com)(investor.avonworldwide.com).

If you have any questions about giving your proxy or require assistance, please contact our proxy solicitor at:

INNISFREE M&A INCORPORATED

501 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor

New York, NY 10022

Shareholders call toll-free:(888) 750-5834

Banks and brokers call collect:(212) 750-5833

 

74


LOGO88AVON 2019 Proxy Statement  


APPENDIX A

AVON PRODUCTS, INC.

2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

(Amended and Restated Effective May 16, 2019)

Section 1.  Purpose.

The purpose of the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan is to: (i) encourage share ownership and align compensation with performance results and shareholder interests, (ii) promote decision-making that is consistent with the long-term goals of the Corporation and its shareholders and (iii) provide competitive incentive compensation sufficient to attract, motivate and retain Key Employees andnon-employee directors of the Corporation.

Section 2.  Definitions.

As used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the respective meanings specified below.

a.    “Award” means an award granted pursuant to Section 4.

b.    “Award Agreement” means a document described in Section 6, setting forth the terms and conditions applicable to an Award granted to the applicable Participant.

c.    “Award Program”means a written program established by the Board of Directors, pursuant to which Awards are awarded under the Plan tonon-employee directors under terms, conditions and restrictions set forth in such written program.

d.    “Board of Directors” or “Board”means the Board of Directors of the Corporation, as it may be comprised from time to time.

e.    “Cause” means, unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, the Participant’s:

(i)       continued failure to perform substantially his or her duties with the Corporation (other than any such failure resulting from a documented disability as defined by applicable law);

(ii)      willful failure to perform substantially his or her duties with the Corporation, or other willful conduct that is materially injurious to the Corporation, monetarily or otherwise;

(iii)     personal dishonesty in the performance of his or her duties;

(iv)     breach of fiduciary duty involving personal profit;

(v)      commission or conviction of a felony or a misdemeanor, or the entering of a plea of guilty ornolo contendere with respect to a felony or a misdemeanor (unless the Corporation determines that considering such circumstances is prohibited by applicable law);

(vi)     willful or significant violation of any Corporation rule or procedure, including without limitation, absenteeism, violation of safety rules or insubordination; or

(vii)    violation of the Corporation’s Code of Conduct;

provided, however, that if a Participant is party to an employment agreement with the Corporation that includes a definition of “Cause”, “Cause” shall have the meaning set forth in such agreement, unless otherwise provided therein. All determinations of whether any of the events above have occurred and/or whether “Cause” shall have occurred will be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

f.    “Change in Control” means any of the following:

(i)    any one person or more than one person acting as a group acquires ownership of shares of the Corporation that, together with the shares of the Corporation held by such person or group, constitutes more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of the shares of the Corporation; provided, however, that if any one person or more than one person acting as a group is considered to own more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of the shares of the Corporation, the acquisition of additional shares by the same person or persons shall not constitute a

LOGO
  AVON 2019 Proxy StatementA-1


Change in Control under this clause (i) or clause (ii) of this definition. An increase in the percentage of shares of the Corporation owned by any one person or persons acting as a group as a result of a transaction in which the Corporation acquires its own shares in exchange for property will be treated as an acquisition of shares of the Corporation by such person or persons for purposes of this clause (i);

(ii)    any one person or more than one person acting as a group acquires, or has acquired during the12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons, ownership of shares of the Corporation having 30% or more of the total voting power of the shares of the Corporation; provided, however, that if any one person or more than one person acting as a group so acquires 30% or more of the total voting power of the shares of the Corporation, the acquisition of additional control of the Corporation by the same person or persons shall not constitute a Change in Control under clause (i) or (ii) of this definition;

(iii)   a majority of the members of the Board of Directors is replaced during any12-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the Board of Directors prior to the date of such appointment or election; or

(iv)   any one person or more than one person acting as a group acquires, or has acquired during the12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons, assets from the Corporation that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than 40% of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets of the Corporation immediately prior to such acquisition or acquisitions; provided, however, that a transfer of assets by the Corporation shall not be treated as a Change in Control if the assets are transferred to (A) a shareholder of the Corporation immediately before the asset transfer in exchange for or with respect to shares of the Corporation, (B) an entity, 50% or more of the total value or voting power of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Corporation, (C) a person or more than one person acting as a group that owns, directly or indirectly, shares of the Corporation having 50% or more of the total value or total voting power of all outstanding shares of the Corporation or (D) an entity, at least 50% of the total value or voting power of which is owned by a person or persons described in clause (C) above; and provided, further, that for purposes of clauses (A), (B), (C) and (D) above, a person’s status is determined immediately after the transfer of the assets. For purposes of this clause (iv), gross fair market value means the value of the assets of the Corporation, or the value of the assets being disposed of, determined without regard to any liabilities associated with such assets.

Solely with respect to any Award that constitutes “deferred compensation” subject to Code Section 409A and that is payable on account of a Change in Control (including any installments or stream of payments that are accelerated on account of a Change in Control), a Change in Control shall occur only if such event also constitutes a “change in the ownership”, “change in effective control”, and/or a “change in the ownership of a substantial portion of assets” of the Corporation as those terms are defined under Treasury Regulation§1.409A-3(i)(5), but only to the extent necessary to establish a time or form of payment that complies with Code Section 409A, without altering the definition of Change in Control for purposes of determining whether a Participant’s rights to such Award become vested or otherwise unconditional upon the Change in Control.

g.    “Change in Control Good Reason” means, unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, employment agreement or a severance policy applicable to the relevant Participant, any of the following:

(i)     a material diminution in the Participant’s base compensation; or

(ii)    a material change in the geographic location at which the Participant must perform services.

For purposes of this definition, a Participant shall not be deemed to have incurred a termination of employment for a Change in Control Good Reason unless:

(i)     the condition constituting a Change in Control Good Reason occurs during the period commencing with the date of the Change in Control and ending on the second anniversary of the date of the Change in Control; and

(ii)    the Participant provides written notice to the Corporation of the existence of the condition constituting a Change in Control Good Reason within ninety (90) days of the initial existence of the condition constituting a Change in Control Good Reason and the Corporation or one of its affiliates is given thirty (30) days to cure such condition.

h.    “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

i.     “Committee”means the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board or such other committee appointed by the Board to administer the Plan, (i) each member of which must be “independent” under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, (ii) to the extent applicable, at least two members of which must satisfy the criteria for being an “outside director” for purposes of Code Section 162(m) and (iii) at least two members of which must satisfy the criteria for being a“non-employee director” for purposes of Rule16b-3 under the Exchange Act; provided that, with respect to Awards tonon-employee directors under an Award Program, “Committee” means the Board or the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board.

 

Electronic Voting Instructions

A-2AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


j.    “Corporation”means Avon Products, Inc. and any successor thereto.

k.   “Covered Employee”means a covered employee within the meaning of Code Section 162(m)(3).

l.    “Disability”has the same meaning as provided in the long-term disability plan or policy maintained or, if applicable, most recently maintained, by the Corporation or, if applicable, any Subsidiary for the Participant. If no long-term disability plan or policy was ever maintained on behalf of the Participant or, if the determination of Disability relates to an Incentive Stock Option, “Disability” shall mean that condition described in Code Section 22(e)(3), as amended from time to time. In the event of a dispute, the determination of a Disability shall be made by the Committee and shall be supported by advice of a physician competent in the area to which such Disability relates. Subject to the approval of the Committee, a different definition of Disability may be applicable to a Participant employed outside of the United States of America who is subject to local disability laws and programs.

m.  “Eligible Person”means any Key Employee and anynon-employee director of the Corporation.

n.  “Exchange Act”means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and any successor statute, as it may be amended from time to time.

o.  “Fair Market Value”means the closing price of a share of Stock on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. composite tape (or if the Stock is not then traded on the New York Stock Exchange, on the stock exchanges orover-the- counter market on which the Stock is principally trading) on the date of measurement and if there were no trades on the measurement date, on the day on which a trade occurred next preceding such measurement date; provided, however, that if the measurement date is a Sunday and the following Monday is a day on which trades occur, the closing price of a share of Stock on such Monday shall be used.

p.  “Incentive Stock Option”means an Option (or an option to purchase Stock granted pursuant to any other plan of the Corporation or a Subsidiary) intended to comply with Code Section 422.

q.  “Key Employee”means any person, including an officer, in the employment of the Corporation or a Subsidiary who, in the opinion of the Committee, is or is expected to be responsible for the management, growth or protection of some part or aspect of the business of the Corporation and its Subsidiaries or who makes, or is expected to make, a contribution to the Corporation and its Subsidiaries.

r.   “Non-Qualified Stock Option”means an Option that is not an Incentive Stock Option.

s.   “Option”means an option to purchase Stock granted pursuant to Section 4a.

t.   “Original Effective Date” has the meaning specified in Section 10n.

u.  “Over 10% Owner”means an individual who at the time an Incentive Stock Option is granted owns Stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries, determined by applying the attribution rules of Code Section 424(d).

v.   “Participant”means any Eligible Person who has been granted an Award.

w.  “Performance Award” means any Award of Performance Cash, Performance Shares or Performance Units granted pursuant to Section 4e.

x.   “Performance Cash” shall mean any cash incentive payment, granted pursuant to Section 4e payable to the applicable Participant upon the achievement of such performance goals as the Committee shall establish.

y.   “Performance Measures” means the criteria established by the Committee, on a consolidated basis, on the basis of a Subsidiary, business unit or geographically based unit or relative to one or more peer group companies or indices, which can be expressed either in terms of specified levels of, rates of change or relative changes in, one or more performance measures, including, without limitation: (a) share price; (b) earnings per share, diluted or basic; (c) return to shareholders (including dividends); (d) revenues; (e) sales by category or brand; (f) active representatives; (g) sales representatives; (h) ending representatives; (i) units sold; (j) customers; (k) sales representative productivity; (l) earnings before or after deduction for all or any portion of interest, taxes, depreciation, or amortization, whether or not on a continuing operations or an aggregate or per share basis ; (m) operating income or operating profit; (n) net income; (o) gross margin; (p) operating margin; (q) economic profit; (r) cash flows from operations, free cash flow, cash flow return on capital, working capital; (s) market share; (t) inventory levels; (u) inventory days outstanding; (v) order fill rate; (w) size of line in total or by category or type; (x) advertising, brand and product innovation; (y) research and development; (z) costs; (aa) capital expenditures; (bb) working capital; (cc) accounts receivable; (dd) days sales outstanding; (ee) period overhead; (ff) sales representative satisfaction; (gg) return on investment, assets, equity or capital (total or invested); or (hh) any other objective or subjective criteria specified by the Committee.

  

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!AVON 2019 Proxy Statement

A-3


The preceding criteria shall be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles to the extent applicable or be subject to adjustments as may be specified by the Committee, including, without limitation, for (a) discontinued operations; (b) acquisitions and mergers; (c) divestitures, including exits of markets and/or categories; (d) cumulative effect of changes in accounting rules and methods and tax laws; (e) impairment or disposal losses; (f) restructuring costs; (g) pension expense or contribution in excess of operating budget; (h) business losses from economic, political and legal changes; (i) retained and uninsured losses from natural disaster or catastrophe; (j) currency fluctuations or devaluations; (k) significant litigation or claim judgments or settlements; (l) debt refinancing costs or gains, including related bank and legal fees and costs to unwind existing structure; (m) other extraordinary, unusual, infrequently occurring and/or nonrecurring events; (n) an event either not directly related to the operations of the Corporation, Subsidiary, division, business segment or business unit or not within the reasonable control of management; (o) a change in the fiscal year of the Corporation; or (p) any other adjustments specified by the Committee (the “Performance Measure Adjustments”).

To the extent an Award is determined by the Committee to be subject to Section 4h, the Committee shall, within the first ninety (90) days of a Performance Period (or, within any other maximum period allowed under Code Section 162(m)), define in an objective fashion the manner of calculating the Performance Measures it selects to use for such Performance Period, including any adjustments which shall be applied in accordance with the preceding paragraph.

z.     “Performance Period” shall mean the period established by the Committee during which any performance goals specified by the Committee with respect to a Performance Award are to be measured.

aa.    “Performance Share” shall mean any grant pursuant to Section 4e of a share of Stock or unit valued by reference to a designated number of shares of Stock, which may be issued or paid to the applicable Participant upon achievement of such performance goals as the Committee shall establish.

bb.    “Performance Unit” shall mean any grant pursuant to Section 4e of a unit valued by reference to a designated amount of cash or property other than shares of Stock, which value may be paid to the applicable Participant upon achievement of such performance goals as the Committee shall establish.

cc.    “Plan”means this 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan as adopted by the Corporation, as amended from time to time.

dd.    “Prior Plan” means the Corporation’s 2013 Stock Incentive Plan and 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, in each case, as amended from time to time.

ee.    “Restricted Stock”means an Award granted pursuant to Section 4c.

ff.     “Restatement Effective Date” has the meaning specified in Section 10n.

gg.    “Retirement”means a Participant’s Separation from Service with the Corporation or a Subsidiary on or after (i) the Participant’s attainment of his 55th birthday and completion of ten years of service with the Corporation or a Subsidiary; (ii) the Participant’s attainment of his 60th birthday and the completion of five years of service with the Corporation or Subsidiary; (iii) the Participant’s 65th birthday; or (iv) the date the Participant is eligible for early or normal retirement under any retirement plan of the Corporation or a Subsidiary that applies to such Participant. Subject to the approval of the Committee, a different definition of Retirement may be applicable to a Participant employed outside of the United States of America who is subject to local retirement laws and programs.

hh.    “SAR”means a stock appreciation right granted pursuant to Section 4b.

ii.      “Separation from Service” has the meaning set forth in Code Section 409A.

jj.      “Stock”means shares of common stock, par value $.25 per share, of the Corporation or any security of the Corporation issued in substitution, exchange or lieu thereof.

kk.    "Stock Units”means an Award granted pursuant to Section 4d.

ll.      “Subsidiary” means (i) any corporation or other entity in which the Corporation, directly or indirectly, controls 50% or more of the total combined voting power of such corporation or other entity; and (ii) any corporation or other entity in which the Corporation has a significant equity interest and which the Committee has determined to be considered a Subsidiary for purposes of the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to an Award that is subject to the rules of Code Section 409A, for purposes of determining whether an Eligible Person has had a Separation from Service under Section 10f, a Subsidiary means any corporation or other entity in which the Corporation, directly or indirectly, controls 50% or more of the total combined voting power of such corporation or other entity.

Section 3.    Eligibility.

The Committee may grant one or more Awards to any Eligible Person designated by it to receive an Award.

 

A-4AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


Section 4.Awards.

The Committee may grant any one or more of the following types of Awards, and any such Award may be granted singly, in combination or in tandem:

a.    Options. An Option is an option to purchase a specific number of shares of Stock exercisable at such time or times and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine, including any performance measures that must be satisfied as a condition to vesting or payment, consistent with the provisions of the Plan, including the following:

(i)    The exercise price of an Option shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the date the Option is granted, unless the Option was granted through the assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted to individuals who become employees of the Corporation as a result of a merger, consolidation, acquisition or other corporate transaction involving the Corporation. No Option may be exercisable more than 10 years after the date the Option is granted. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that on the last business day of the term of an Option (other than an Incentive Stock Option) the exercise of the Option is prohibited by applicable law, the term of the Option shall be extended for a period of thirty (30) days following the end of the legal prohibition.

(ii)   The exercise price of an Option shall be paid in full upon exercise in any form or manner authorized by the Committee in an Award Agreement or Award Program, including, but not limited to, cash or, if the Award Agreement or Award Program provides, (A) by delivery to the Corporation of shares of Stock held by the Participant (which may include an attestation of ownership of such shares of Stock); or (B) in a cashless exercise through a broker, by withholding shares of Stock for which the Option is exercisable valued at the Fair Market Value on the date of exercise or similar arrangement. Any Stock accepted in payment of the exercise price of an Option shall be valued at its Fair Market Value on the date of exercise.

(iii)   No fractional shares of Stock will be issued or accepted. The Committee may impose such other conditions, restrictions and contingencies with respect to shares of Stock delivered pursuant to the exercise of an Option as it deems desirable.

(iv)  Incentive Stock Options shall be subject to the following additional provisions:

A.    No grant of Incentive Stock Options to any one Eligible Person shall cover a number of shares of Stock whose aggregate Fair Market Value (determined on the date the Option is granted), together with the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined on the respective date of grant of any Incentive Stock Option) of the shares of Stock covered by any Incentive Stock Options which have been previously granted under the Plan or any other plan of the Corporation or any Subsidiary and which are exercisable for the first time during the same calendar year, exceeds $100,000 (or such other amount as may be fixed as the maximum amount permitted by Code Section 422(d));provided, however,that if the limitation is exceeded, the Incentive Stock Options in excess of such limitation shall be treated asNon-Qualified Stock Options.

B.    No Incentive Stock Option may be granted to an Eligible Person who on the date of grant is not an employee of the Corporation or a corporation that is a subsidiary of the Corporation within the meaning of Code Section 424(f).

C.    Incentive Stock Options granted to an Eligible Person who is an Over 10% Owner shall have an exercise price that is at least 110% of the Fair Market Value on the date the Option is granted and shall not be exercisable more than 5 years after the date the Incentive Stock Options are granted.

(v)   Subject to Sections 6 and 9, unless otherwise determined by the Committee or provided for in the Award Agreement or Award Program, upon a Participant’s Separation from Service with the Corporation or a Subsidiary for any reason, all unvested Options and SARs shall be forfeited by the Participant.

b.    Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs).A SAR is the right to receive a payment measured by the excess of the Fair Market Value of a specified number of shares of Stock on the date on which the Participant exercises the SAR over the grant price of the SAR determined by the Committee. The grant price of a SAR shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the date the SAR is granted, unless the SAR was granted through the assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted to individuals who become employees of the Corporation as a result of a merger, consolidation, acquisition or other corporate transaction involving the Corporation. SARs may be (i) freestanding SARs or (ii) tandem SARs granted in conjunction with an Option, either at the time of grant of the Option or at a later date, and exercisable at the Participant’s election instead of all or any part of the related Option. To the extent an Option is exercised in whole or in part, any tandem SAR granted in conjunction with such Option (or part thereof) shall terminate and cease to be exercisable. To the extent a tandem SAR is exercised in whole or in part, the Option (or part thereof) in conjunction with which such tandem SAR was granted shall terminate and cease to be exercisable. The payment to which the Participant is entitled on exercise of a SAR may be in cash, in Stock valued at Fair Market Value on the date of exercise or partly in cash and partly in Stock, as provided in the Award Agreement or Award Program or, in the absence of such provision, as the Committee may determine. No SAR may be exercisable more than 10 years after the date the SAR is granted. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that on the last business day of the term of a

  Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.AVON 2019 Proxy StatementA-5


SAR the exercise of the SAR is prohibited by applicable law, the term shall be extended for a period of thirty (30) days following the end of the legal prohibition. At the time of the grant, the Committee shall determine, consistent with the provisions of the Plan, the factors which will govern the SARs, including, at the discretion of the Committee, any performance measures that must be satisfied as a condition of vesting or payment.

c.    Restricted Stock.

(i)    Restricted Stock is an Award of Stock that is issued to a Participant subject to restrictions on transfer (including forfeiture) and such other restrictions on incidents of ownership as the Committee may determine. At the time of the grant, the Committee shall determine, consistent with the provisions of the Plan, the factors which will govern the Restricted Stock, including, at the discretion of the Committee, any performance measures that must be satisfied as a condition to vesting or payment. Subject to the specified restrictions, the Participant as owner of those shares of Restricted Stock shall have the rights of the holder thereof. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, any dividends or other distributions paid with respect to that Stock while subject to those restrictions shall be accumulated, with or without interest, or reinvested in Stock, as specified by the Committee at the time of grant, and in any event, such dividends or other distributions shall be held subject to the same restrictions as the Restricted Stock and such other terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine (and will vest or be forfeited at the same time that the underlying shares of Restricted Stock vest or are forfeited, as applicable). Shares of Restricted Stock shall be registered in the name of the Participant and, at the Corporation’s sole discretion, shall be held in book entry form subject to the Corporation’s instructions or shall be evidenced by a certificate, which shall bear an appropriate restrictive legend, shall be subject to appropriate stop-transfer orders and shall be held in custody by the Corporation until the restrictions on those shares of Restricted Stock lapse.

(ii)   Subject to Sections 6 and 9, unless otherwise determined by the Committee or provided for in an Award Agreement or Award Program, upon a Participant’s Separation from Service with the Corporation or a Subsidiary for any reason during the applicable restriction period, all unvested shares of Restricted Stock shall be forfeited by the Participant.

d.    Stock Units.

(i)    A Stock Unit is an Award that entitles the Participant to receive at a specified future date, payment of an amount equal to all or a portion of the Fair Market Value of a specified number of shares of stock at the end of a specified period. Stock Units containing performance measures or other restrictions, including but not limited to the continued employment or service of the Participant with the Corporation or a Subsidiary during a restricted period set forth in an Award Agreement, may be designated as Restricted Stock Units.

(ii)    Payment in respect of Stock Units may be made by the Corporation in cash, in Stock valued at Fair Market Value on the date of settlement or partly in cash and partly in Stock, as provided in the applicable Award Agreement or Award Program, or, in the absence of such provision, as the Committee may determine.

(iii)    Subject to Sections 6 and 9, unless otherwise determined by the Committee or provided for in an Award Agreement or Award Program, upon a Participant’s Separation from Service with the Corporation or a Subsidiary for any reason during the applicable restriction period, all unvested Restricted Stock Units shall be forfeited by the Participant.

e.    Performance Awards.

(i)    Performance Awards in the form of Performance Cash, Performance Shares or Performance Units, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, may be granted hereunder to Participants. The performance goals to be achieved for each Performance Period shall be conclusively determined by the Committee and may be based upon the performance measures or such other criteria as determined by the Committee in its discretion and set forth in an Award Agreement.

(ii)    The performance criteria to be achieved during any Performance Period and the length of the Performance Period shall be determined by the Committee upon the grant of each Performance Award. Performance Awards may be paid in cash, shares of Stock, other property, or any combination thereof, in the sole discretion of the Committee. The amount of the Award to be distributed shall be conclusively determined by the Committee.

(iii)  Subject to Sections 6 and 9, unless otherwise determined by the Committee or provided for in an Award Agreement or Award Program, upon a Participant’s Separation from Service with the Corporation or a Subsidiary for any reason during the applicable performance period, all unvested Performance Awards shall be forfeited by the Participant.

f.    Other Stock-Based Awards.The Committee may grant other Awards under the Plan pursuant to which shares of Stock are or may in the future be acquired. Such other Awards may be granted alone, in addition to or in tandem with any Award of any type granted under the Plan and must be consistent with the purpose of the Plan. At the time of the grant, the Committee shall determine the factors which will govern the Other Stock-Based Awards, including, at the discretion of the Committee, any performance measures that must be satisfied as a condition to payment.

A-6AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


g.    Dividend Equivalents.Any Awards (other than Awards of Options, SARs or Restricted Stock) under the Plan may, in the discretion of the Committee, earn dividend equivalents. In respect of any such Award which is outstanding on a dividend record date for Stock, the Participant may be credited with an amount equal to the cash or stock dividends or other distributions that would have been paid on the shares of Stock covered by such Award had such covered shares been issued and outstanding on such dividend record date. The Committee shall establish such rules and procedures governing the crediting of dividend equivalents, including the timing, form of payment and payment contingencies of such dividend equivalents, as it deems are appropriate or necessary. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, to the extent the Committee determines that dividend equivalents will be credited with respect to an unvested Award, no dividend equivalents shall be paid on any such Award prior to vesting, but shall be accumulated and paid once (and to the extent that) the underlying Award vests and any performance goals, if applicable, are attained.

h.      Code Section 162(m) Provisions.

(i)    Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, if the Committee determines, at the time a Restricted Stock Award, a Stock Unit Award, a Performance Award or an Other Stock-Based Award is granted to a Participant, that such Participant is or may be, in respect of the tax year in which the Corporation would claim a tax deduction in connection with such Award, a Covered Employee, then the Committee may, but need not, provide that this Section 4h is applicable to such Award;provided that the limits under Section 4(h)(iii) below shall be applicable to all Participants with respect to each fiscal year (whether or not a Covered Employee with respect to the applicable tax year).

(ii)    Any Award (other than Options and SARs) to which this Section 4h applies shall be earned only upon the attainment of a specified level of one or more Performance Measures established by the Committee within the time limits described in the last paragraph of the definition of “Performance Measures.”

(iii)    Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 9, the following limits will apply to Awards of the specified type granted to any one Participant in any single fiscal year:

(x)Appreciation Awards —Options and SARs: 2,500,000 shares;

(y)Full Value Awards —Restricted Stock, Stock Units, Performance Awards and/or Other Stock-Based Awards that are denominated in shares of Stock: 2,500,000 shares; and

(z)Cash Awards —Performance Awards that are denominated in cash: $10,000,000.

In applying the foregoing limits, (a) all Awards of the specified type granted to the same Participant in the same fiscal year will be aggregated and made subject to the applicable limit; (b) the limits applicable to Options and Share Appreciation Rights refer to the number of shares of Stock subject to those Awards; (c) the share limit under clause (y) refers to the maximum number of shares of Stock that may be delivered under an Award or Awards of the type specified in clause (y) assuming a maximum payout; and (d) the dollar limit under clause (z) refers to the maximum dollar amount payable under an Award or Awards of the type specified in clause (z) assuming a maximum payout.

(iii)   Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan, with respect to any Award that is subject to this Section 4h, (i) the Committee may adjust downwards, but not upwards, the amount payable pursuant to the Award on account of the attainment of the applicable Performance Measures, (ii) the Committee may not waive the achievement of the applicable Performance Measures except in the case of the death or disability of the Participant or as otherwise determined by the Committee in special circumstances, and (iii) the Committee must certify, in writing, the level of the attainment of the applicable Performance Measures before payment in respect of the Award is made.

(iv)   The Committee shall have the power to impose such other restrictions on Awards subject to this Section 4h as it may deem necessary or appropriate to ensure that such Awards satisfy all requirements for “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m).

(v)    Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, (i) if the Committee determines that a Participant who has been granted an Award designated as subject to this Section 4h is not (or is no longer) a Covered Employee, the terms and conditions of such Award may be modified without regard to any restrictions or limitations set forth in this Section 4h (but subject otherwise to the provisions of Section 7 of the Plan), and (ii) the Committee may, in its sole discretion, make such post-grant adjustments to Awards originally designated as subject to this Section 4h in a manner which could or would cause such Awards to cease to satisfy all requirements for “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m);provided that no such adjustment may increase the amount of compensation payable that would otherwise be due upon the attainment of the applicable Performance Measure.

i.    Treatment of Awards upon Separation from Service.Subject to Sections 6 and 9, any Award held by a Participant who has incurred a Separation from Service with the Corporation or a Subsidiary may be cancelled, accelerated, paid or continued, as provided in the Plan or the applicable Award Agreement or Award Program, or, in the absence of such provision, as the Committee may determine. The portion of any Award exercisable in the event of continuation or the amount of any payment due under a continued Award may be adjusted by the Committee to reflect the Participant’s period of service from the date of grant

  AVON 2019 Proxy StatementA-7


through the date of the Participant’s Separation from Service or such other factors as the Committee determines are relevant to its decision to continue the Award.

j.    Clawback/Forfeiture of Shares.Notwithstanding any vesting schedule set forth in any Award Agreement or Award Program, in the event that the Committee determines that a Participant violated a noncompetition, nondisclosure or nonsolicitation agreement as set forth in the Award Agreement or Award Program, all Awards and shares of Stock issued to the Participant pursuant to the Plan shall be forfeited. In addition, Awards and shares of Stock issued pursuant to the Plan are also subject to forfeiture and/or recoupment in the event that a Participant has engaged in misconduct, including (i) a serious violation of the Corporation’s Code of Conduct or (ii) a violation of law within the scope of employment with the Corporation.    In all of the above circumstances, the Committee may require the cancellation of outstanding Awards and/or reimbursement of any gains realized on the exercise, settlement, vesting or sale of equity awards held by a Participant,provided, however,that the Corporation shall return to the Participant the lesser of any consideration paid by the Participant in exchange for Stock issued to the Participant pursuant to the Plan or the then Fair Market Value of the Stock forfeited hereunder; andprovided, further, that if the Participant no longer holds shares of Stock issued to such Participant pursuant to the Plan, the Participant shall pay to the Corporation the excess of the Fair Market Value of any such shares of Stock on the date such shares of Stock were issued to the Participant pursuant to the Plan over any consideration paid by the Participant in exchange for such shares of Stock. For those Participants who are subject to the Corporation’s Compensation Recoupment Policy, Awards and shares of Stock issued to such Participants pursuant to the Plan are also subject to the Compensation Recoupment Policy.

k.   Repricings.Repricing of Options and SARs shall not be permitted without shareholder approval. For this purpose, a “repricing” means any of the following (or any other action that has the same effect as any of the following): (A) changing the terms of an Option or SAR to lower its exercise price or grant price; (B) any other action that is treated as a “repricing” under generally accepted accounting principles; (C) canceling an Option or SAR at a time when its exercise price or grant price is equal to or more than the fair market value of the underlying stock in exchange for another Option, SAR, Restricted Stock or other equity award; and (D) repurchasing for cash an Option or SAR at a time when its exercise price or grant price is equal to or more than the fair market value of the underlying stock, unless the change, other action or cancellation, exchange or repurchase occurs in connection with an event set forth in Section 9. Such cancellation and exchange would be considered a “repricing” regardless of whether it is treated as a “repricing” under generally accepted accounting principles and regardless of whether it is voluntary on the part of the Participant.

l.    Minimum Vesting Requirement. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, Awards granted under the Plan (other than cash-based Awards) shall vest no earlier than the first anniversary of the date on which the Award is granted;provided, that the following Awards shall not be subject to the foregoing minimum vesting requirement: any (i) substitute Awards granted in connection with awards that are assumed, converted or substituted pursuant to a merger, acquisition or similar transaction entered into by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, (ii) shares of Stock delivered in lieu of fully vested cash Awards, (iii) Awards to non-employee directors that vest on earlier of theone-year anniversary of the date of grant and the next annual meeting of shareholders which is at least 50 weeks after the immediately preceding year’s annual meeting, and (iv) any additional Awards the Committee may grant, up to a maximum of five percent (5%) of the available share reserve authorized for issuance under the Plan pursuant to Section 5 (subject to adjustment under Section 9);provided, further, that the foregoing restriction does not apply to the Committee’s discretion to provide for accelerated exercisability or vesting of any Award, including in cases of retirement, death, Disability or a Change in Control, in the terms of the Award Agreement or otherwise.

Section 5.  Stock Available under Plan.

a.    Subject to the adjustment provisions of Section 9, as of the Restatement Effective Date, the total number of shares of Stock that may be made subject to Awards under the Plan is 20,451,976 shares, less one (1) share for every one (1) share of Stock that was subject to an Option or SAR granted after March 15, 2019 and 1.35 shares for every one (1) share of Stock that was subject to an Awardother than an Option or SAR granted after March 15, 2019. In addition, as of the Restatement Effective Date, the maximum number of shares under the Plan that may be made subject to Incentive Stock Options is 20,451,976. After the Original Effective Date of the Plan, no awards may be granted under any Prior Plan, but awards outstanding thereunder as of such effective date shall remain outstanding in accordance with their existing terms.

b.    After March 15, 2019, if (i) any shares of Stock subject to an Award are forfeited, an Award expires or an Award is settled for cash (in whole or in part), or (ii) any shares of Stock subject to an award under any Prior Plan are forfeited, an award under any Prior Plan expires or is settled for cash (in whole or in part), then in each such case the shares of Stock subject to such Award or award under any Prior Plan shall, to the extent of such forfeiture, expiration or cash settlement, be added to the shares available for Awards under the Plan, in accordance with Section 5d below. After March 15, 2019, in the event that withholding tax liabilities arising from an Awardother than an Option or SAR or an awardother than an option or stock appreciation right under any Prior Plan are satisfied by the tendering of shares of Stock (either actually or by attestation) or by the withholding of shares of Stock by the Corporation, the shares so tendered or withheld shall be added to the shares available for Awards under the Plan in accordance with Section 5d below. Awards that will be mandatorily settled solely in cash shall not reduce the shares authorized for grant under Section 5a.

c.    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the following shares shall not be added to the shares authorized for grant under Section 5a: (i) shares tendered by the Participant or withheld by the Corporation in payment of the purchase price of an Option or an option under any Prior Plan, (ii) shares tendered by the Participant or withheld by the

 

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

A-8AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


Corporation to satisfy any tax withholding obligation with respect to any Award under the Plan or any award under any Prior Plan, (iii) shares subject to a SAR or a stock appreciation right under any Prior Plan that are not issued in connection with its stock settlement on exercise thereof, and (iv) shares reacquired by the Corporation on the open market or otherwise using cash proceeds from the exercise of Options or options under any Prior Plan.

d.    Any shares of Stock that after March 15, 2019 again become available for Awards under the Plan pursuant to this Section shall be added as (i) one (1) share for every one (1) share subject to Options or SARs granted under the Plan or options or stock appreciation rights granted under any Prior Plan, and (ii) as 1.35 shares for every one (1) share subject to Awards other than Options or SARs granted under the Plan or awards other than options or stock appreciation rights granted under any Prior Plan.

e.    In the event that the Corporation or its Subsidiaries makes an acquisition or is a party to a merger or consolidation and the Corporation assumes the options or other awards consistent with the purpose of the Plan of the entity acquired, merged or consolidated which are administered pursuant to the Plan, shares of Stock subject to the assumed options or other awards shall not count as part of the total number of shares of Stock that may be made subject to Awards under the Plan. Additionally, in the event that an entity acquired by the Corporation or any Subsidiary or with which the Corporation or any Subsidiary combines has shares available under apre-existing plan approved by stockholders and not adopted in contemplation of such acquisition or combination, the shares available for grant pursuant to the terms of suchpre-existing plan (as adjusted, to the extent appropriate, using the exchange ratio or other adjustment or valuation ratio or formula used in such acquisition or combination to determine the consideration payable to the holders of common stock of the entities party to such acquisition or combination) may be used for Awards under the Plan and shall not reduce the shares of Stock authorized for grant under the Plan (and shares subject to such Awards shall not be added to the shares available for Awards under the Plan); provided that Awards using such available shares shall not be made after the date awards or grants could have been made under the terms of thepre-existing plan, absent the acquisition or combination, and shall only be made to individuals who were not employees or directors of the Corporation and its Subsidiaries prior to such acquisition or combination.

f.      Any shares of Stock issued hereunder may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued shares, treasury shares or shares purchased in the open market or otherwise.

g.    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the maximum number of shares of Stock subject to Awards granted during a single fiscal year to anynon-employee director, shall not exceed $500,000 in total value (calculating the value of any such Awards based on the grant date fair value of such Awards for financial reporting purposes).

Section 6.Award Agreements and Award Programs.

Each Award under the Plan shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement (and/or any related administrative guidelines) or Award Program. Each Award Agreement or Award Program shall set forth the terms and conditions applicable to the Award, including but not limited to provisions for (i) the time at which the Award becomes exercisable or otherwise becomes nonforfeitable; (ii) the treatment of the Award in the event of the termination of a Participant’s status as an Eligible Person; and (iii) any special provisions applicable in the event of an occurrence of a Change in Control, as determined by the Committee consistent with the provisions of the Plan.

Section 7.Amendment and Termination.

a.    The Board of Directors shall have the power to amend the Plan, including the power to change the amount of the aggregate Fair Market Value of the shares of Stock subject to Incentive Stock Options first exercisable in any calendar year under Section 4a(iv)(A) to the extent provided in Code Section 422, or any successor provision. It shall not, however, except as otherwise provided in the Plan, without approval of the shareholders of the Corporation, increase the maximum number of shares of Stock available for Awards under the Plan, nor change the class of Eligible Persons, nor reduce the basis upon which the minimum Option exercise price or SAR grant price is determined, nor amend Section 4k, nor extend the period within which Awards under the Plan may be granted, nor provide for an Option or SAR that is exercisable more than ten years from the date it is granted, nor otherwise amend the Plan without shareholder approval if shareholder approval is required by applicable law. The Board of Directors shall have no power to change the terms of any Award theretofore granted under the Plan so as to materially impair the rights of a Participant without the consent of the Participant whose rights would be affected by such change except to the extent, if any, provided in the Plan or in the Award Agreement or Award Program.

b.    The Board of Directors may suspend or terminate the Plan at any time. No such suspension or termination shall affect Awards then in effect.

Section 8.Administration.

a.    The Plan and all Awards shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall have full and complete authority, in its sole and absolute discretion, (i) to exercise all of the powers granted to it under the Plan, (ii) to construe, interpret and implement the Plan and any related document, (iii) to prescribe, amend and rescind rules relating to the Plan, (iv) to make all determinations necessary or advisable in administering the Plan, and (v) to correct any defect, supply any omission and reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan. The actions and determinations of the Committee on all matters relating to the Plan and any Awards will be final and conclusive. The Committee’s determinations under the Plan need not be uniform and may be made by it selectively

  AVON 2019 Proxy StatementA-9


among Eligible Persons who receive, or who are eligible to receive, Awards under the Plan, whether or not such persons are similarly situated. The Committee may delegate the approval of certain transactions to subcommittees consisting solely of members of the Committee who are (i) to the extent applicable, “outside directors” for purposes of Code Section 162(m) or (ii)“non-employee directors” for purposes of Rule16b-3 under the Exchange Act.

b.    The Committee and others to whom the Committee has delegated such duties shall keep a record of all their proceedings and actions and shall maintain all such books of account, records and other data as shall be necessary for the proper administration of the Plan.

c.    The Corporation shall pay all reasonable expenses of administering the Plan, including but not limited to the payment of professional fees.

d.    It is the intent of the Corporation that the Plan and Awards hereunder satisfy, and be interpreted in a manner that satisfy, in the case of Participants who are or may be officers or directors of the Corporation subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, the applicable requirements of Rule16b-3 under the Exchange Act, so that such persons will be entitled to the benefits of Rule16b-3, or other exemptive rules under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, and will not be subjected to avoidable liability under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act. If any provision of the Plan, any Award Agreement or any Award Program would otherwise frustrate or conflict with the intent expressed in this Section 8d, that provision to the extent possible shall be interpreted and deemed amended so as to avoid such conflict. To the extent of any remaining irreconcilable conflict with such intent, such provision shall be deemed void as to such officers, directors or Covered Employees, as applicable.

e.    The Committee may appoint such accountants, counsel, and other experts as it deems necessary or desirable in connection with the administration of the Plan.

f.      The Committee may delegate to a director (or committee thereof) or an executive officer of the Corporation the right to designate Key Employees (other than the delegate, Covered Employees and directors and officers of the Corporation subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act) to be granted Awards and the number of shares of Stock or other amount subject to Awards granted to each such Key Employee, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and such other terms and conditions that may be determined by the Committee.

Section 9.Adjustment Provisions.

a.    In the event of any change in or affecting the outstanding shares of Stock by reason of a stock dividend or split, spinoff, merger or consolidation (whether or not the Corporation is a surviving corporation), recapitalization, reorganization, combination or exchange of shares or other similar corporate changes or an extraordinary dividend in cash, securities or other property, the Board of Directors shall make such amendments to the Plan, outstanding Awards, Award Agreements and Award Programs and make such equitable adjustments and take actions thereunder as applicable under the circumstances. Such equitable adjustments as they relate to outstanding Awards shall be required to ensure that the intrinsic value of each outstanding award immediately after any of the aforementioned changes in, or affecting the shares of Stock, is equal to the intrinsic value of each outstanding Award immediately prior to any of the aforementioned changes. Such amendments, adjustments and actions shall include, as applicable, (i) changes in the number of shares of Stock (or amount of other property) then remaining subject to the Plan, (ii) the number of shares of Stock then remaining subject to Awards of Stock and Stock Units (including Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units and Performance Awards) or subject to Awards of Options and SARs under the Plan and the Option or SAR exercise price per share of Stock (or other property), (iii) the maximum number of shares that may be granted or delivered to any single Participant pursuant to the Plan, including those that are then covered by outstanding Awards, and (iv) the terms of any outstanding Award, including, without limitation, any applicable performance measures.

b.    The existence of the Plan and the Awards granted hereunder shall not affect or restrict in any way the right or power of the Board of Directors or the shareholders of the Corporation to make or authorize any adjustment, recapitalization, reorganization or other change in its capital or business structure, any merger or consolidation of the Corporation, any issue of bonds, debentures, preferred or prior preference stock ahead of or affecting the Stock or the rights thereof, the dissolution or liquidation of the Corporation or any sale or transfer of all or any part of its assets or business, or any other corporate act or proceeding.

c.    In the event of a Change in Control, upon an agreement or agreements approved by the Board of Directors with the prospective new owner of the Corporation, or the surviving entity of any merger or other business combination, the new owner or surviving entity, as the case may be, shall adopt and assume the Plan and maintain it with respect to all outstanding Awards, adopt outstanding Award Agreements and Award Programs, and continue in effect their respective terms. The adoption and assumption may provide for the substitution of shares of the new owner or surviving entity or its parent company for Stock underlying the Awards; provided, however, that equitable adjustments shall be made to reflect the relative value of the Stock prior to and following the Change in Control. The new owner of the Corporation or the surviving entity of any merger or other business combination or its parent company shall comply with any agreement or agreements to grant new stock-based awards in substitution for unexercised Awards granted by the Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, each such assumed or substituted award under this Section 9c shall (i) have a value not less than the value as of the time of the Change in Control of the Awards that they are replacing and (ii) provide rights and entitlements substantially equivalent to or more favorable than the rights, terms and conditions applicable under such Award, including, but not limited to, an identical or better exercise or vesting schedule.

 

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 A.M. New York Time, on May 9, 2017.

A-10AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


d.    Except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s employment agreement with the Corporation or in an Award Agreement or Award Program, if (i) a Change in Control occurs and (ii) all Awards that are outstanding continue to be exercisable for, or payable in, Stock (or cash, in the case of any outstanding cash-denominated Awards) or have been assumed or substituted with comparable awards by the new owner or surviving entity of the Corporation or its parent company, and (iii) within two years of such Change in Control a Participant incurs a Separation from Service as provided in Code Section 409A due to (A) death or Disability, (B) the Participant incurring a Change in Control Good Reason, or (C) involuntary Separation from Service by the Corporation other than for Cause, then (w) any Options and SARs, and assumed or substituted awards of options and stock appreciation rights, will become vested and exercisable, (x) all restrictions on Restricted Stock and any assumed or substituted awards of restricted stock will lapse, (y) all Stock Units and Other Stock-Based awards (and assumed or substituted stock unit and other stock-based awards) will become fully vested and shall (unless otherwise provided by the Committee to avoid tax penalties under Section 409A or similar legal penalty) be paid out on the payment date set forth in the terms thereof, and (z) all Performance Awards and assumed or substituted performance awards will become fully vested and shall (unless otherwise provided by the Committee to avoid tax penalties under Section 409A or similar legal penalty) be paid out on the payment date set forth in the terms thereof, but the payout shall be calculated as if the applicable performance measures had been achieved at target.

e.    Except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s employment agreement with the Corporation or in an Award Agreement or Award Program, if (i) a Change in Control occurs and (ii) Awards that are outstanding have not been assumed or substituted with comparable awards by the new owner or surviving entity of the Corporation or its parent company and Stock is not available into which the Awards may be exercised or for delivery in satisfaction of the Awards, then awards shall be fully vested and paid on the basis of the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the effective date of the Change in Control (the “Cash-out Price”) as follows: (A) for Options, the spread, if any, between theCash-out Price and the exercise price of the Option multiplied by the number of shares of Stock payable in respect of such Awards, (B) for SARs, the spread, if any between theCash-out Price and the grant price of the SAR, (C) for Stock Units and Other Stock-Based Awards, theCash-out Price to be paid within 60 days after the Change in Control, (D) for Stock-denominated Performance Awards, theCash-out Price to be paid within 60 days after the Change in Control (unless otherwise provided by the Committee to avoid tax penalties under Section 409A or similar legal penalty), multiplied by a number of shares of Stock payable in respect of such Awards, which number of shares of Stock shall be calculated as if the applicable performance measures had been achieved at target, and (E) for cash-denominated Performance Awards, the cash amount to be paid within 60 days after the Change in Control (unless otherwise provided by the Committee to avoid tax penalties under Section 409A or similar legal penalty), with the value calculated as if the applicable performance measures had been achieved at target. Any outstanding Options or SARs with an exercise price that is less than the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the effective date of the Change in Control shall be cancelled.

f.    To the extent that any Award is subject to Code Section 409A and is payable upon a Separation from Service, then, notwithstanding any other provision in the Plan to the contrary, the Award will not be paid to the Participant during thesix-month period immediately following the Participant’s Separation from Service if the Participant is then deemed to be a “specified employee” (as that term is defined in Code Section 409A and determined pursuant to procedures and elections made by the Corporation). The Award shall instead be paid, unless another payment date is provided pursuant to other provisions of the Plan, on the first day of the seventh month following such Separation from Service. This Section 9f will cease to be applicable in the event of and following the Participant’s death.

Section 10.Miscellaneous.

a.    Transferability. No Award shall be transferable or assignable except (i) by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or (ii) with respect toNon-Qualified Stock Options, pursuant to a domestic relations order or by gift to a family member of the Participant to the extent permitted in the applicable Award Agreement or Award Program; provided, however, that under no circumstances shall an Award be transferable or assignable for value or consideration to the Participant. During the lifetime of the Participant, an Option shall be exercisable only by the Participant unless it has been transferred pursuant to a domestic relations order or by gift to a family member of the Participant, in which case it shall be exercisable only by such transferee and in accordance with the applicable Award Agreement. For the purpose of this provision, a “family member” shall have the meaning set forth in the General Instructions to FormS-8 Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

b.    Other Payments or Awards.Nothing contained in the Plan shall be deemed in any way to limit or restrict the Corporation or a Subsidiary from making any award or payment to any person under any other plan, arrangement or understanding, whether now existing or hereafter in effect.

c.    Payments to Other Persons.If payments are legally required to be made to any person other than the person to whom any amount is made available under the Plan, payments shall be made accordingly. Any such payment shall be a complete discharge of the liability of the Corporation and its Subsidiaries hereunder.

d.    Unfunded Plan.The Plan shall be unfunded. No provision of the Plan, any Award Agreement or any Award Program shall require the Corporation or a Subsidiary, for the purpose of satisfying any obligations under the Plan, to purchase assets or place any assets in a trust or other entity to which contributions are made or otherwise to segregate any assets, nor shall the Corporation or a Subsidiary maintain separate bank accounts, books, records or other evidence of the existence of a segregated or separately maintained or administered fund for such purposes. Participants shall have no rights under the Plan other than as unsecured general creditors of the Corporation or a Subsidiary.

  

  LOGO

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement
  A-11


e.    Limits of Liability.Any liability of the Corporation or a Subsidiary to any Participant with respect to an Award shall be based solely upon contractual obligations created by the Plan and the Award Agreement or Award Program applicable to such Award. Neither the Corporation or its Subsidiaries, nor any member of the Board of Directors or of the Committee, nor any other person participating in any determination of any question under the Plan, or in the interpretation, administration or application of the Plan, shall have any liability to any party for any action taken, or not taken, in good faith under the Plan.

f.    Rights of Eligible Persons.Status as an Eligible Person shall not be construed as a commitment that any Award shall be made under the Plan to such Eligible Person or to Eligible Persons generally. Nothing contained in the Plan, in any Award Agreement or in any Award Program shall confer upon any Eligible Person or Participant any right to continue in the employ or other service of the Corporation or a Subsidiary or constitute any contract or limit in any way the right of the Corporation or a Subsidiary to change such person’s compensation or other benefits or to terminate the employment or other service of such person with or without Cause. A transfer of an Eligible Person from the Corporation to a Subsidiary, or vice versa, or from one Subsidiary to another, duly authorized by the Corporation, shall not be deemed a Separation from Service or other termination of employment or other service.

g.    No Limitation on Corporate Actions. Nothing contained in the Plan shall be construed to prevent the Corporation or any Affiliate from taking any corporate action which is deemed by it to be appropriate or in its best interest, whether or not such action would have an adverse effect on the Plan or any awards made under the Plan. Such actions may include, without limitation, suspension of the vesting or payment relating to any outstanding Awards pending the outcome of an internal or external investigation involving a Participant or any cancellation or recoupment of an Award or shares of Stock pursuant to Section 4j above. No employee, Participant or other person shall have any claim against the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries or Affiliates as a result of any such action.

h.    Rights as a Shareholder.A Participant shall have no rights as a shareholder with respect to any Stock covered by an Award until the date the Participant becomes the holder of record thereof. Except as provided in Section 4g or 9, no adjustment to an Award shall be made for dividends or other rights, unless the Award Agreement or the Award Program specifically requires such adjustment.

i.    Withholding.The Corporation shall deduct from all cash distributions under the Plan any taxes required to be withheld by federal, state, local or foreign governments. Whenever the Corporation proposes or is required to issue or transfer shares of Stock under the Plan or upon the vesting or payment of any Award of Stock, the Corporation shall have the right to require the recipient to remit to the Corporation an amount sufficient to satisfy any United States federal, state, local or foreign withholding tax requirements prior to the delivery of any certificate or certificates for such shares or the vesting or payment of such Award of Stock. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, a Participant may pay the withholding tax in cash, or may elect to have the number of shares of Stock such Participant is to receive reduced by the nearest number of whole shares of Stock which, when multiplied by the Fair Market Value of the shares of Stock determined as of the exercise or delivery date, is sufficient to satisfy the applicable United States federal, state, local or foreign withholding taxes arising from the exercise or payment of an Award (such withholding to be at a rate as will not cause adverse accounting consequences for the Corporation and is permitted under applicable withholding rules of the relevant taxing authority).

j.    Foreign Participants.In order to facilitate the making of any Award under the Plan, the Committee may provide for such special terms for Awards to Participants who are nationals and/or tax residents of a jurisdiction other than the United States of America, or who are employed outside of the United States of America, as the Committee may consider necessary or appropriate to accommodate differences in local law, tax policy or custom of a jurisdiction outside of the United States of America.

k.    Invalidity.If any term or provision contained herein, in any Award Agreement or in any Award Program shall to any extent be invalid or unenforceable, such term or provision will be reformed so that it is valid, and such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision or part thereof.

l.    Applicable Law.The Plan, the Award Agreements, the Award Programs and all actions taken hereunder or thereunder shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York without regard to the conflict of law principles thereof.

m.    Compliance with Laws.Notwithstanding anything contained herein, in any Award Agreement or in any Award Program to the contrary, the Corporation shall not be required to sell, issue or deliver shares of Stock hereunder or thereunder if the sale, issuance or delivery thereof would constitute a violation by the Participant or the Corporation of any provisions of any law or regulation of any governmental authority or any national securities exchange; and as a condition of any sale or issuance the Corporation may require such agreements or undertakings, if any, as the Corporation may deem necessary or advisable to assure compliance with any such law or regulation, including but not limited to Code Section 409A. To the extent that any Award under this Plan is intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m) or is subject to Code Section 409A, any provision, application or interpretation of the Plan shall be in a manner that complies with Code Section 162(m) or Code Section 409A, as applicable, as determined by the Board in its sole discretion.

n.    Effective Date and Term.The Plan was originally adopted by the Board of Directors on April 5, 2016 and became effective on May 26, 2016 (the “Original Effective Date”), which is the date the Plan was originally approved by the shareholders of the Corporation. The Plan as amended and restated was adopted by the Board of Directors on March 13, 2019, and shall become

 

Vote by Internet

A-12AVON 2019 Proxy Statement


effective on May 16, 2019 (the “Restatement Effective Date”), which is the date the Plan is approved by the shareholders of the Corporation, subject to such approval. No Award may be awarded under the Plan after the tenth anniversary of the Restatement Effective Date; provided, however, that such expiration shall not affect Awards then outstanding, and the terms and conditions of the Plan shall continue to apply to such Awards. If the Plan, as amended and restated hereby, is not approved by shareholders, the originally adopted Plan shall continue to remain in effect in accordance with its terms until the tenth anniversary of the Original Effective Date; provided, however, that such expiration shall not affect Awards then outstanding, and the terms and conditions of the Plan shall continue to apply to such Awards.

  

• Go towww.envisionreports.com/avp

AVON 2019 Proxy Statement  

• Or scan the QR code with your smartphone.

A-13


    LOGO

• Follow the steps outlined on the secure website.

 

Vote by telephone

Within the USA, US territories & Canada, call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE
(8683) on a touch tone telephone.  There is NO CHARGE to you for the call.

• Outside the USA, US territories & Canada, call 1-781-575-2300 on a touch tone telephone. Standard rates will apply.

• Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message.

Using ablack ininkkpen, mark your votes with an X as shown in

this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.

   LOGO     

Your vote matters – here’s how to vote!

You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing this card.

LOGO

Votes submitted electronically must be

received by 1:00 A.M. New York Time,

on May 16, 2019.

Online

Go towww.envisionreports.com/avp or scan the QR code – login details are located in the shaded bar below.

LOGO

Phone

Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada

LOGO

Save paper, time and money!

Sign up for electronic delivery at

www.envisionreports.com/avp

 

LOGO

  LOGO

q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q

 

 A 

 Proposals
The Board of Directors recommendsrecommend a voteFOR the all eight nominees listed nominees.andFOR Proposals 2 – 4.
1.Election of Directors:  

LOGO
01 - Jose Armario

  

02 - W. Don Cornwell

  

03 - Nancy Killefer

      

04 - Susan J. Kropf

LOGO
  05 - Helen McCluskey  06 - Sheri McCoyAndrew G. McMaster, Jr.
      07 - James A. Mitarotonda  0708 - Charles H. NoskiJan Zijderveld  

08 - Cathy D. Ross

 

  

 

 

Mark here to voteFOR all nominees

 

 

  Mark here toWITHHOLD vote from all nominees
  01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 
   

For AllEXCEPT- To withhold a vote for one or more nominees, mark the box to the left and the corresponding numbered box(es) to the right.

         

 

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposals 2 and 4 and for every 1 YEAR for Proposal 3. 
    For Against Abstain     1 Year 2 Years 3 Years Abstain   For  Against Abstain     For Against Abstain
2. Non-binding, advisory vote to approve compensation of our named executive officers.       3. Non-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of the executive compensation advisory vote.      Non-binding, advisory vote to approve compensation of our named executive officers.      3. Approval of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive    
   For  Against Abstain       
4. Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, United Kingdom, as our independent registered public accounting firm, for 2017.              Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, United Kingdom, as our independent registered public accounting firm, for 2019.           

 

 B  Authorized Signatures This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Datecount. Please date and Sign Belowsign below.

This proxy revokes all prior dated proxies. The signer hereby acknowledges receipt of Avon’s 20172019 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement and the Annual Report.

NOTE: Please sign exactly as namename(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or guardian,custodian, please give full title as such.title.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Please print date below.

 

 

Signature 1  Please keep signature within the box.

   Signature 2  Please keep signature within the box.
           //     

IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOUMUST SIGN ABOVE.

 

LOGO

LOGO


2019 Annual Meeting Admission Ticket

(If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, bring this Admission Ticket with you)

Avon Products, Inc. Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Tuesday,Thursday, May 9, 201716, 2019 at 9:00 A.M.

The Ritz-CarltonConvene, 810 Seventh Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, Westchester

3 Renaissance Square

White Plains, NY 10601

Salon IIINew York 10019

 

 

For transportation directions, please go to:

http://www.avoncompany.com/investor/annualmeeting/directions.pdfinvestor.avonworldwide.com/annualmeeting-directions

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR

THE 20172019 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 9, 2017.16, 2019.

Our Proxy Statement for the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the Annual Report to

Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162018 are available at

www.edocumentview.com/avp

Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The material is available at: www.envisionreports.com/avp

LOGO

q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q

 

 

LOGO

Proxy — Avon Products, Inc.

LOGO
 

 

Proxy Card Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors and

Voting Instruction Card to

Great-West Trust Company, LLC, Trustee

 

The undersigned hereby appoints Jeff BenjaminGinny Edwards and Ginny Edwards,Meridith Krell, and each of them, proxies, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to vote and act with respect to all shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Shares”) owned of record by the undersigned and which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 9, 2017,16, 2019, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, as instructed on the reverse side of this card, and to vote in accordance with their discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting.

 

The undersigned also provides instructions to Great-West Trust Company, LLC, Trustee, to vote Shares allocated, respectively, to accounts the undersigned may have under the Avon Personal Savings Account Plan which are entitled to be voted at the aforesaid Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, as instructed on the reverse side of this card. Unless your card is received by May 5, 2017,10, 2019, and unless you have specified your instructions, your Shares cannot be voted by the Trustee.

 

IF NO INSTRUCTIONS ARE SPECIFIED ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS CARD:

      

All Shares owned of record by the undersigned will be voted FOR the election of the eight nominees proposed for election as directors (Proposal 1), FOR the advisory vote to approve compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal 2), forFOR the optionapproval of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation every ONE YEARthe amended and restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (Proposal 3) and FOR the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, United Kingdom, as our independent registered public accounting firm, for 20172019 (Proposal 4).

  

Shares allocated under the Avon Personal Savings Account Plan WILL NOT BE VOTED.

 

 C   Non-Voting Items     

Change of Address Please print new address below.

  Meeting Attendance 
    

Mark box to the right if

you plan to attend the

Annual Meeting.

 

 

    LOGO  

LOGO

IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOUMUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.

LOGOLOGO